Print Page | Add To Favorites | Close Window | Send To A Friend | Save This Page

FAQ # 150

QUESTION  150 :  Was God manifested in the flesh speaking of God the Father or God the Son?

One person said,

1 Tim.3:16 “God was manifested in the flesh” (appeared in) 1 Jn.4:2; 2 Jn. 7 “came in the flesh.” 1 Jn.1:2: For “the life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and shew unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us.”

1 Tim.3:16 says it was God come in the flesh, a person, not just eternal life that was manifested. Where does it say the Father was manifested in the flesh? It does not ever say this. The only time a specific person is mentioned as God being manifested is found in 1 John 3:8, “For this purpose the Son of God was manifested.” Whereas Oneness claims that the Father was manifested the Bible makes it clear that specifically the person of God is the Son, He was the God who was revealed and made known. This should clarify the issue that if the eternal life that was manifested was with the Father (1 Jn.1:2) is not a person, then the Son of God is not a person either. This means the person of God was not literally manifested in the flesh but something lesser than his actual nature or identity. If we go back to verse we find this. V.5 “And you know that HE was manifested to take away our sins.” Here John is identifying the deity was made known. Who is the “He”?

Jn.1:2 “He was in the beginning with God all things were made through him... In him was life... From this we see this life is in a he, which is a person. This he was with another person and this other made everything through him. Again in vs.10 “He was in the world, and the world was made through him. This is the same he and him that is previously established to be with God, the same he in vs.1 who was with the Father…The Son was incarnated (Letusreason.org).

Here we see an age-old flaw with the Trinity coming to front again, it obvious letusreason.org don't know of it. That is, the ancient successors of the trinity found a great flaw in the Trinity and made a mending doctrine to it called Perichoresis - "The mutual indwelling of the three persons" (Dr. Boyd). That is, the doctrine of the trinity was flawed because if a pre-existent son indwelt the human son, then apart of God (allege trinity) was only in Christ; as against Colossian 2:9, "For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily." Thus the doctrine of Perichoresis was needed to be formulated to solve this and guard against obvious tritheism. In other words, after seeing another flaw of the trinity theory, instead of throwing it out altogether, they form another peripheral doctrine to cover up the error. However, one of the greatest fallacies of Perichoresis is that three spirits reside in one human body, never said in the scriptures and even admitted by letusreason.org. This can only be the case of demonic possession and we know Christ was not demon possessed. So letusreason.org has only two positions to take:

1)       Say a pre-existent son indwelt Christ and be guilty of tritheism - belief in three gods. Or,

2)       Change this argument like their predecessor and hold a to an unbiblical notion that three spirits was in Christ. It's either of the two, which are both wrong.

The best thing for them and all Trinitarians to do is, finally come to the fact that there is no Trinity but one single solitary God, who is spirit (John 4:24), who incarnate in flesh as Jesus Christ (1 Tim 3:16).

"That is the Bibles final answer!"

Answer Notes: 1. A stupid back fire to this would be that if all of God was in Christ as we proclaim, then there would be none anywhere else, so we are wrong. We didn't proclaim that, the bible did in Colossian 2:9. The mystery of God is that even in that state he is omni presently in control. For instance, I can be in a jacket and fill it, but my hands protrude to handle other stuff, so does my head and feet (Jer 23:24). As against the trinitarian concept that one of the members of the unit God was in the jacket, while the other two was in heaven - unbiblical to Col 2:9. Even worse, they came with the Perichoresis peripheral doctrine to say, three men were in a jacket.

Tell a friend about this page!
Their Name:
Their Email:
Your Name:
Your Email:

Go to top of Page | Get the Book | Buy it here or here or here or here | More FAQ's