Aufklänge (Resonances)

 

            Hausegger’s last symphonic work, Aufklänge, is a set of variations on the once-familiar nursery song “Sleep, Baby Sleep”. He thought of the work as a complement to Die Natursymphonie, the one bringing man into a cosmic relation with Nature, the other establishing man within his own subjective experience. The text is:

 

Schlaf’, Kindchen schlaf                              Sleep, baby sleep

Der Vater hüt’t die Schaf                              While father guards the sheep

Die Mutter schüttelt’s Bäumelein                  And mama rocks her baby’s bough

Da fällt herab die Träumelein                       Till tiny dreams fall o’er thee now

Schlaf,’ Kindchen schlaf                              Sleep, baby sleep

 

            Aufklänge reflects the “dream-like optimistic and deeply reverie-like feelings of a father beside his child’s cradle.” (The work is dedicated to his son, Friedrich.) The general layout of the piece is a theme and eight variations, followed by an elaborate scherzo-like section Hausegger describes as “the roaring song of a visionary view of life”. The music concludes with a return to the musing of its beginning.

            He finished the work in Sept. 1917, at Obergrainau. Premiered in 1919 at the Tonkunstlerfest der Allgemein Deutscher Musikverein in Berlin, it was published the same year. Aufklänge lasts ca. 30 minutes and is scored as follows:

 

3 flutes (piccolo), 2 oboes, English horn, D clarinet, 2 Bb clarinets, bass clarinet (Bb #2

            when the D clarinet’s playing), 3 bassoons (contrabassoon)

6 horns, 4 C trumpets

2 tympanists, 2 percussion- crash cymbals, triangle, glockenspiel (If the percussionists

            aren’t territorial and union regs allow it, 3 players overall will suffice.)

celeste, harp (2 or 3 if possible), 62 strings (32/12/10/8)

 

            Aufklänge begins with calm string harmonies, which both serve as a slow introduction and to establish the fundamental F major tonality of the work. After this, we hear the lullaby itself.

 

Ex. 1

The first variation is so short as to be hardly more than a transition to the second. Supported by string arpeggios, the horns sound the theme, harmonized with, appropriately, horn fifths. The second variation is a faster 6/8 in the manner of a barcarolle.  Its predominant colors are the high woodwinds and celeste, enriched with a handsome violin countermelody.

 

Ex. 2

The third variation is more tender, with an especially attractive violin and clarinet duet

 

Ex. 3

 

This variation mingles in the first two bars of the lullaby, building to a climax, then a decrescendo, where the horns play a couple a couple of - very oblique - bars’ transition into the fourth variation in D major, where for the first time the work strays from its basic F major tonality.

            Over the theme in the celli, the upper strings and woodwinds play an eloquent countertheme with crossing voices in the strings creating the harmonic inner parts. The B minor of the theme itself versus the D major of the countermelodies and the pedal D creates a bimodal tension between the major key and its relative minor (Ex. 4).

 

 

Ex. 4

 

Eventually, with the lullaby on the horns, the music segues into B minor. The fifth variation begins with an overlapping dialogue, or as Hausegger wrote “the bassoons clumsily stumble behind one another” (Ex. 5)

 

Ex. 5

The orchestra then snatches up the theme “with arrogant menace”

 

Ex. 6

building to a powerful tutti segment which suddenly breaks off to resume the introductory dialogue, this time adding clarinets to the discussion. The somewhat grotesque nature of the music prepares us for the sixth variation, “a spooky, extended scherzo” which begins with the theme on the celeste, accompanied by harp syncopations and rustling string figures.

 

Ex. 7

A center scherzando section, highlighting the woodwinds, uses the first two and the last four beats of the lullaby in retrograde.

 

Ex. 8

As momentum gathers, a new agitated chromatic theme joins in on the strings and higher woodwinds.

 

Ex. 9

 

Its relation to Ex. 8 is plain. The stormy pace continues, climaxing on an A flat seventh chord, to have its momentum undercut by a D natural in the bass instruments and tympani. After this, there’s a short reprise of shadowy opening bars of the introduction to the section.

            A brief transition leads to the seventh variation a rather pensive adagio in D flat major. First the horns, then the violins, play a longing transformation of the lullaby.

 

Ex. 10

 

Adding a note of anguish, the music builds to a crescendo over the bass instruments playing a version of the original theme’s ninth and tenth bars. Eventually, it dies away, returning to the D flat tonality via this cadence:

 

Ex. 11

The eighth variation, in A major, combines the first bars of the theme with a countermelody on the flute (part of the lullaby in retrograde):

 

Ex. 12

These form an ostinato accompanying “an intimate melody” on the violin.

 

Ex. 13

 

The general light coloration of this variation contrasts with the emotional depth of its predecessor. The vision of the child’s song fades away, the music via a deceptive cadence, returning to F major. An expectant stillness overcomes the music, vanishing in a diminished seventh chord. As an introduction to the elaborate final section of the work, we hear (Mahlerian) bird calls on the flutes, based on the first notes of the lullaby.

 

Ex. 14

 

The woodwind choir, then the entire orchestra joins in till the violas begin a fugato passage, its subject based on the second bird call.

 

Ex. 15

Its development reaches a climax in C major, then, after a diminuendo, a “love song” appears on the solo violin, then the celli (Ex.16).

 

 

Ex. 16

 

            Another fugal segment, based on the second bar of Ex. 15 ensues, with the bird-calls chiming in. The music gets increasingly energetic, not to say bumptious, including a sweeping variant of Ex. 16 for divisi violins and violas, till abruptly, “the child’s laughter vanishes”. A violin theme reminiscent of Ex. 16 introduces a second episode.

 

Ex. 17

 

A compressed reappearance of the fugato passage resumes, the entries every 2, rather than 4, bars. Its momentum is tautened by hemiola rhythms, climaxing in a vaulting melody on the strings and woodwinds, combined with brass fanfares derived from the bird-calls. Underpinning all this is the fugal subject, Ex. 15. Aufklänge is Hausegger’s most diatonic orchestral work. E. g., in all this contrapuntal activity, there’s scarcely an accidental; “serene child-like innocence subdues the world!”  (Ex. 18)

 

Ex. 18

After a short reprise of the fugue theme, the music again broadens out over this melody in the strings

 

Ex. 19

The waves of sound subside, leading to the coda, using the first bars of the lullaby in extended asymmetric phrases, to lead to this elegiac violin theme:

 

Ex. 20

 

Reminiscences of the bird-calls reappear. Over an F pedal, a further violin melody unfolds, along with muted reminiscences of the last phrase of the lullaby (recall the words are “Sleep, baby sleep”) on the harp and horns.

 

Ex. 21

            We could consider Aufklänge as a counterpart to Strauss’ Domestic Symphony, minus the literal details of the yowling baby, the lovemaking parents or the cooing relatives. Like the Strauss work, it centers on the child, but in a more sublimated form. We also hear Mahler’s influence. Although it could simply be the composer desiring a lighter texture at key moments, the absence of the lower brass inevitably recalls Mahler’s Fourth (Hausegger was at its premier). The critical role of the bird-calls in the final segment, especially in their rubato phrasing, also pays homage to a Mahler trait.

            After Aufklänge, von Hausegger wrote nothing further for orchestra. Partly this was due to his increasingly successful career as a conductor, which, as his son noted, took up more and more of his time. Nontheless, I’m inclined to think it’s also a case of the times being out of joint. We see a similar drying up in contemporary composers as different as  Sibelius and von Schillings.

            To someone of Hausegger’s idealistic, otherworldly bent, with his veneration of the musical art, the paths being taken by, say Krenek or Weill must have seemed like a sacrilege. Alternately, that of Schönberg and his 12-tone technique would probably have struck him as denying the very notion of inspiration. Neither was a direction he could take, thus he sought refuge in the classics, devoting his life to their interpretation and the education of a new generation. One does one’s best and hopes for a vindication from future explorations - like this one.