Index
Market in General
Stocks
Currencies
Last Week's Views
Investment Views (August
10th 1998) |
Instead of writing my clients
individually I thought I might as well
do a weekly summary of my views
on the markets, the currencies,
the economy, the world, and
life in general.
Markets in General
What a week! On Monday it looked as if the European markets were
finally stablizing.
Then came the 300 points decline on the Dow Tuesday after Ralph Acampora,
a well known
market guru at Prudential, turned bearish. Although the market
recovered a bit in New York
on Wednesday, when other well known market gurus such as Abby Cohen,
Mary Farrell,
Ron Hill all reiterated their buy on the dip recommendations. The Europeans
remain jittery and the
European markets played catch up in falling. Thursday didn't
see any recovery . On Friday
the European markets finally closed on the upside, but the nervousness
is still palpable. The French
market showed the greatest relative strength. Although the German
and Swiss markets both
recovered over 1%, the volume was thin. The markets still do
not have conviction.
In this situation it is important to recall that the markets are driven
by liquidity. There is still no
lack of that in the US and Europe. The German and the French
markets have both reached
important support levels. Therefore next week should see these
markets recover a bit, as
long as New York holds up. The Swiss market is more difficult to read. The more important
support level 7400-7600 hasn't been reached yet. Therefore we expect further volatility.
The question is therefore: have the investors in the US changed
their strategy of buying on
the dip to selling into the rising markets? Mass psychology is
notoriously difficult to predict.
We have to see how the next week develops. The New York market
has reached an
important support level: the 8400-8500 area. Although we tend
to think that we shall
see recovery next week, but only time will tell.
Go to Index
Stocks
Our favorite stocks remains SAP, Nokia, Raisio
Group, Ericcson, Cable and Wireless
Baan and Bachem.* Raisio Group's
stocks spit 1:10.
High of the Year |
Low of the Year |
Stock |
Last Week's
Close |
Daily high |
Daily low |
This Week's Close |
HFl. 108.70 |
62.60 |
Baan |
75.60 |
81.30 |
79.10 |
81.30 |
SFr. 1495 |
1351 |
Bachem |
1835 |
1850 |
1741 |
1800 |
Gbp 8.13 |
4.67 |
C&W |
7.97 |
7.37 |
7.21 |
7.29 |
SFr. 44 |
25 |
Ericsson |
42.60 |
40.75 |
39.50 |
40.50 |
FIM 378 |
182 |
Nokia |
471 |
458 |
442 |
454 |
Gbp 8 |
2.40 |
Orange |
7.17 |
7.54 |
7.15 |
7.51 |
FIM 1080 |
640 |
Raisio Group |
86 |
83.90 |
80 |
83 |
SFr. 785 |
419 |
SAP |
975 |
895 |
878 |
890 |
SFr. 440 |
385 |
Straumann |
367 |
359 |
350 |
359 |
|
We recommend buying Orange shares whenever these shares correct.
Orange is the English cellular telephone
arm of the Hong Kong tycoon Li Ka-Shing. They have shown that
they can compete in the very competitive
cellular market in England. Now they're expanding into Switzerland.
We especially like the stock's performance
last week. While other stocks sank like stones. Orange
barely budged.
Straumann will report earnings next week. We're optimistic that
it will come through with good earnings.
But the market is still doubtful, ever since the German health insurances
took dental implants off from
their dental insurance coverage.
SAP's listing on New York big board has brought the stock a lot of media
attention, but no additional
price rise. Indeed we will probably see much greater volatility.
Go to Index
Currencies
Soros and other hedge funds including Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs,
Merrill Lynch and Salomon
are at it again: mounting a huge assault on the Hong Kong dollar
and its stock market. The situation is
grotesque. The Hong Kong government had been a paragon of budgetary
discipline. And Hong Kong
does not really have a trade deficit. Yet when the speculators
attack its currency, its people and economy
have to suffer the consequence: high interest rates even though the
economy is slowing down rapidly.
We're convinced that there is a systemic weakness in the so called
open world economic order. An open
system will only work, if all players are more or less equal. But what
we have now is a situation where
sometimes one hedge fund has more funds available to attack any small
currency of their choice
than the smaller countries have funds to defend it, especially considering
the fact that the hedge funds can
leverage their funds in all sorts of ways, whereas central banks normally
do not have that possibility.
The speculators have finally realized that one does not need any reason
to attack a currency.
All economies are based on credit and confidence. Once the confidence
in a country's
currency is shaken, the credit system will automatically crumble.
The European countries have recognized this problem and have started
the common currency euro
in the hope that there will be more safety in size. But will
it really? We have to wait a few more
years, before we know. But we're not convinced that the euro
will be immune from speculative
attacks in the future. The speculants have grown bolder as they
grow wealthier.
What the world need to ask is: is the cost of this lopsided "open"
system worth it? The
instability of the currency market is for the moment still contained
within one region of
the world economy: Asia. But what if the Asian contagion starts
to spread to
all the regions of the world? Will the IMF have enough funds
to save the world?
Why not set up some rules about shorting currencies and raise the margin
requirements
to 100% ? That at least will put the central banks on a more
equal footing with
the speculators.
Go to Index
*The stock prices are provided
for informational puruposes only and not intended for trading
purposes. The opinions expressed in these pages are what they are:
opinions! |