Investment Views (January 31st 2000) |
As I have pointed out long time ago, the e-retailers have shown themselves
to be unable
to make a profit. The amazons of this world have no pricing power.
But there are still
strong techs out there: the B2B internet stocks, the software and net
infra-structure stocks.
Although no one is making money on the internet, it is still paramount
for all companies to
present themselves on the net, if only to defend their brand image.
So we should see continued
investment by companies of all sizes on e-commerce software, and internet
infra-structures. And
companies will have to get ready for the next wireless phone internet
presence. Therefore
we wouldn't sell off all tech stocks indiscriminately.
The Dax corrected along with Wall Street. Since Wall Street did
not fall seriously until
after the Dax was closed, we expect the Dax to catch up on Monday.
The next
level to watch is 6800. We are still quite optimistic on the
Dax, if the Dow
manages to avoid a crash.
The CAC followed the amazingly strong Asian markets on Friday.
It was almost the
only major European market that closed positively. The French
growth has been
stronger than expected. We remain positive on the CAC.
The Swiss market broke out of its trading range last week. 6950
offers strong support,
so unless the Dow falls below 10500, this level should hold.
On the other hand,
the Swiss market has been relatively weak all last year. The
major stocks are still
reasonably valued. So maybe the foreign investors will finally
recognize this and
start nibbling.
|
Ericsson reported much better earnings than expected. The company
is also optimistic about the prospects of this year. The shares
exploded
to the upside. We remain committed to this stock and recommend
adding to the position on weakness.
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter has revised its target for Nokia to $180.
The
market hurried to cover shorts and thus make the prognosis of MSDW
likely to become true. We think that Nokia is undervalued compared
to
Qualcomm. Qualcomm will benefit from the next generation of CDMA
wireless standard. But Nokia will probably be equally profitable.
We therefore
don't see why Qualcomm should be valued at a PE of more than 500 while
Nokia has a PE of 78. Since we don't believe Qualcomm will correct
in a
hurry, we expect the PE multiples of Nokia to expand. Even if
Nokia's
stock prices were to double from the current level, it will still be
cheaper than
Qualcomm. We therefore see no reason why Nokia shouldn't reach
$300.
The Samsung challange should, however, be taken seriously. Therefore
we would revise the target downwards to $240. Also we would
buy more
Ericsson on weakness. If CDMA were to become the next wireless
communication
standard, then Ericsson should profit for the same amount as Qualcomm.
As far as I
can recall, Ericsson and Qualcomm's patent settlement calls for cross
licensing across
the board for the two companies.
But as long as the aversion of risk remains, we think the US markets
will
remain "overvalued". The US dollar will not slip into crisis.
Because the US
remains a safe haven. But what happens when the Japanese and the emerging
markets heat up again? Then the safe haven will no
longer look so safe
anymore. And international investors would want to repatriate
their funds.
Therefore we would watch out for signs of recovery and growth in Japan
and
other Asian economies intensively. Because once this trend
starts, the
Fed will not be in a position to save the stock market.
The internet will transform our world in a massive way. I think
it is time to
begin and do some thinking on what kind of change it will bring and
see if
we can draw some conclusions that are relevant to our investment decisions.
First, as we have opined in this column we do not believe many of the
today
sky high internet stocks will eventually make a lot of money.
The internet
is such a competitive forum. The pricing pressure is so great
so that only
providers with brand name recognition and meaningful contents will
be able
to have some pricing power. We must remember what the internet
eventually
will bring is absolute international competition. Price competition
will be fierce.
Middle men will be eliminated. Therefore we see many service
sector jobs
will be eliminated. For example, we see this trend in the financial
sector already.
More and more people are trading stocks on line. With internet
brokerage
charging less than $10 per trade, we should see brokers and financial
advisors
being eliminated at major brokerages in a big way soon. The same
should
happen in other tradable items. For example, there will be less
need for
retail stores for items that one can buy easily on the internet.
Of course
there will be branches of the economy that will profit. For example:
the telecoms, the Federal Expresses, and the computer software industries.
But the question is: Will the general economy really profit or will
the general
deflationary trend continue and become worse and worse? Without
pricing
power and with lots of jobs being eliminated and salaries on hold,
we see
the world economies trending toward deflation, even if it continues
to grow.
That means real estates and gold will become even less appealing.
If we
believe our argumentation, we would not invest in the "internet" stocks
themselves but in the companies that do have contents and pricing power
as well as companies that will offer services to the internet providers
and users: ie. companies such as Sony, Time Warner, Dow Jones,
Federal Express and UPS. We would also recommend the stocks of Corsair
(CAIR),
Qualcomm, Ericsson, Nokia, the equipment and software provider for
the CDMA,
the next wireless telephony standard as well as stocks of telephone
companies
like Sonera, ATT, Worldcom-MCI, Colt Communications, and Swisscom.
We also
see internet companies needing ever more sophisticated software.
Therefore
we're quite optimistic about the long term future of the likes of IBM,
Oracle,
SAP, Cap Gemini,Broadvision and i2 technologies.
*The stock prices are provided for informational purposes only and not intended for trading purposes. The opinions expressed in these pages are what they are: opinions! |