Commentary

In this module, we discuss the following topics.

I. The Evolution of Information
II. Introduction to the Research Process
III. Selecting a Topic
IV. The Thesis Statement
V. Selecting Search Terms

VI. The Research Log
VII. Search Basics
VIII. Searching the Internet and Relevancy Ranking
IX. Search Statement

I. The Evolution of Information

Information involves creating and sharing knowledge, something humans have done for millennia. It evolved from paintings on cave walls, the creation of paper and the printing press, to today's digital information revolution.

Information today is created and shared using sophisticated technologies, but the basic premise remains the same: information is created in the form of ideas, facts, or data, transmitted to others, stored and then accessed, and used to generate new information.

The types of information available are as varied as are the creators of information. Here are a few types of information creation:

All of these types of information are created and made accessible to others to create new knowledge.

It is often said that we live in an Information Age. As technology has enabled more people to create and distribute information, more information is being created than ever before. It has been estimated that between 1750 and 1900 humankind's knowledge doubled, then doubled again from 1900–1950, and then again from 1960–1965, and at least once again every five years since 1965 (Brevik, 1998, p. 1).

To be a good researcher, you must be able to locate, organize, evaluate, and communicate information. Learning to navigate and effectively use this ever expanding universe of information is a challenge for everyone, whether a college student, businessperson, or informed citizen.

Libraries help make the universe of knowledge more manageable by collecting, organizing, and providing access to information. Libraries traditionally functioned as storage facilities for print resources such as books and manuscripts. With advances in the technology for storing and retrieving information, libraries now manage information in many formats, including print, microfilm, videos, compact disks, digital files, and the World Wide Web. Today libraries not only store information created in the past, they also provide access to new information.

Libraries are a primary resource for conducting academic research. Learning how to effectively use them and their resources is important to understanding the research process. To become adept at locating and using information for research, you must know about the many different resources available to you. Libraries provide access to information through print materials, electronic databases and catalogs, and Internet resources. Understanding how to select and use the appropriate resources for specific information needs is the key to successful research.

II. Introduction to the Research Process

Bolner and Poirier recommend that you follow these eight steps of the research process.

  1. Select a topic.
  2. Formulate a thesis.
  3. Prepare an outline.
  4. Prepare a search strategy and gather information.
  5. Evaluate resources.
  6. Take notes.
  7. Write the text of your paper.
  8. Document your sources

By following these steps, you should be able successfully to gather information for a research paper. In this course, you will practice steps 1, 2, 4, 5, and 8, and your final product will be a journal of your research process—a research log—rather than a research paper. Although you will not write a paper in this course, you can use these steps when you do need to prepare such a paper.

As mentioned previously, in this course we will discuss only those steps that involve gathering, evaluating, and documenting sources. In this module, we will address the first two steps. We will discuss steps 4, 5 and 8 in subsequent modules.

III. Selecting a Topic

The first step in the research process is selecting a topic. For this course, and for the purposes of developing your research log, we have provided three topics for you to select from for developing the research log. You will select from the three topics in Step 1 of the research log. The research log form you will use for this course is available from the WebTycho Class Menu.

Although Bolner and Poirier recommend that you do a preliminary library search before making a final selection of a topic for a research paper, we have not yet introduced you to the tools (library catalogs, periodical indexes, and so on) you will need to use. Therefore, we will not require you to do a preliminary search. However, we encourage you to try a preliminary search using resources you may already be comfortable with from previous experience.

IV. The Thesis Statement

Once you have chosen one of the three topics provided in the research log, you need to formulate a thesis statement. After you conduct your research, you may find you need to clarify or refine your initial thesis. Bolner and Poirier recommend that you write your initial thesis statement in the form of a question to begin the process of formulating your research question. The resulting research should answer that question. You can then search for information on your research question and refine it into a final thesis statement.

Learning Activity 2 asks you to formulate a thesis statement and select keywords to search. After trying a search with your chosen keywords, you will be ready to finalize your thesis statement for your research log.

The following are two factors to consider in formulating a thesis.

  1. Who is your audience?
  2. What is the scope of your topic?

Determining your audience will help determine the level of research and the types of materials you select. For example, if you select a topic such as diabetes, your audience could be people who suffer from diabetes. Therefore, the types of resources you find and plan to use should be written for laypeople and not in medical jargon that only a physician would understand. Remember, all the resources you select should support your thesis statement.

Developing a thesis statement also requires you to determine the scope of your topic. For example, if you are selecting a broad topic, such as the history of a particular country, you may want to narrow it in your thesis statement to a particular aspect of this history such as the founding of the country or the cultural history of a particular segment of the population. It is acceptable to broaden or narrow the scope of your original topic as you do the research. In fact, the best thesis statements are those that are refined after an initial search or two. To help you refine your statement, you may want to ask yourself the following questions.

The search process will indicate how widely and deeply your topic is covered and whether it will be a manageable topic for this course and the research log assignment.

V. Selecting Search Terms

Once you have chosen one of the three topics provided in the research log and devised a thesis statement, it is time to select search terms for use in UMUC's library databases via MdUSA (which is the University System of Maryland's access point for library databases), the Internet, and library catalogs.

Here are the steps to take in selecting search terms.

  1. Referring to your thesis statement, write down a list of words and phrases that best describe your topic. These are keywords that you can use to search effectively for your topic. See Bolner and Poirier for more information.
  1. Write down the dates that are relevant to your topic. How far back do you need to go? Is the topic very current?
  2. What about geographic location? Do you need to consider any special geographic locations in your search on your topic? If so, write those down also to help you select your search terms.
  3. Think about synonyms and antonyms. What search terms are similar to your topic? For example, for the topic global warming, you might also use the term climate change as a related keyword search term. As for antonyms, what terms are the opposites of global warming? Might you also search the term global cooling?
  4. Consider different forms of the word such as book or books or woman or women. What forms of the word might help you in your search?

Here is a sample table illustrating how to plan the selection of your search terms.

Steps

Example

Write down your topic.

Marketing and the Internet

Write down your thesis statement.

Web advertising is an effective marketing tool for small businesses.

List words or phrases that best describe your topic.

marketing, Internet, small business(es), sales, Web

You could decide to refine your topic in different ways, such as

  • effect of the Internet on marketing for small businesses
  • negative effect of the Internet on small businesses
  • advantages to small businesses of marketing on the Internet

Determine dates relevant to your topic.

1992 to the present

Determine geographic location relevant to your thesis statement (if any).

United States or worldwide issue

Write down relevant synonyms or antonyms of the words you listed or both (if any).

Web, Internet, World Wide Web, small business, marketing, sales

Write down different forms of the words or phrases you listed (if any).

small business (small businesses), market (markets, marketing, marketed)

VI. The Research Log

Having created a thesis statement and selected search terms based on it, it's a good idea to begin to track your research activities by preparing a plan or blueprint. If you carefully track your research, you will likely find more relevant information and spend less time searching. Doing so will help you

A research log is an effective tool for mapping out your research activities and helping you keep track of the research you've done. It can be in whatever format you prefer—print, electronic, or note cards. What the log looks like is much less important than ensuring it works well for you. Therefore, take some time to think about how you would keep a research log and what format would work best for your needs.

We have developed a template for your research log for this course that you will use to make entries as you go through the steps of formulating a thesis statement, finding materials, evaluating them, and citing them properly. To begin, review the Creating Your Research Log section in Thiroux (1999, chapter 2), which you will find in the Reserve Reading section of this course.

Once you have reviewed the Thiroux materials, think about how you would create a research log of your own for this course and for courses throughout your academic career. Then, review the research log assignment description, the completed sample log, and the log form you will use for this course. You may also want to print a copy of the blank log to use as a reference. Once you have reviewed the Thiroux materials, the completed sample log, and the log assignment instructions, you will be better prepared for the steps involved in creating a research log of your own for this course and for courses throughout your academic career.

Here are the steps to follow when you develop a research log.

VII. Search Basics

To search the contents of a database, construct a search statement using various commands to connect the keywords you have selected. These commands should include one or more of the following:

We explain each of these commands in more depth later in this section. The types of commands available vary from one database to the next, and databases use different symbols and words to represent these commands. We will provide examples of these variations in the following discussion.

Keywords

In many instances, you will use keywords to search for information in databases or on the Internet. Bolner and Poirier provide some guidelines indicating when to use a keyword search and describe what keywords are. It is important to understand that keyword searching allows for greater flexibility, but at the same time, it is likely to retrieve less relevant information than would a search with subject terms or thesaurus terms, for example.

Sometimes, if you depend on keywords, you may not understand why you retrieve certain items. But you will find the keyword search a good place to begin when looking for information on a topic if you are aware of its limitations.

Truncation

Bolner and Poirier discuss truncation, which is the ability to search alternate endings or spellings to a keyword search term by using a symbol such as an asterisk, a question mark, or a dollar sign within the word or at the end of the search term, for example

colleg?
communit*

Bolner and Poirier discuss how you can add truncation symbols to your keywords to retrieve multiple forms of a word in a database search.

Many electronic databases perform some type of automatic truncation. For example, the database may automatically search for the singular and plural form of a keyword. You will need to read the help screens of databases to determine if truncation is automatic or if you need to use a symbol to truncate keywords.

Note that the truncation symbols vary from one database to the next. For example, some databases use the exclamation point (!) as a truncation symbol, whereas other databases use the question mark (?) or asterisk (*). Again, be sure to read the help screens the databases provide to learn about these symbols.

Wildcards

If there are alternate spellings of a word, you can use a wildcard symbol to search for different spellings at the same time. A wildcard symbol is used to represent only one character and can be used in the middle or at the end of a keyword.

For example, if you would like to retrieve both the American and British spellings of the word authorization/authorisation, you would use the wildcard symbol * to indicate the alternate letter:

authori*ation

Note that not all databases offer the wildcard option.

Limiting

Bolner and Poirier refer to limiting a search. Limiting can be helpful when you retrieve too many documents or if you want to limit the retrieval to a specific search field in a database. In many databases, including MdUSA, it is possible to limit your search by using a chosen field (e.g., author, title, publication title, or subject heading).

When you limit your retrieval to a particular field, your search will be focused, and you will likely retrieve fewer records as a result. So, for instance, if you wanted to find all the articles written by Michael Porter, it would make sense to enter the name, michael porter and then limit the search to only those records where michael porter appears as the author. Or, if you wanted to see only articles from the Harvard Business Review, it makes sense to limit the search by the publication title and enter the name Harvard Business Review as part of your search.

Limiting is a powerful tool that is often misunderstood or overlooked. We recommend you try limiting your search and see if it doesn't help you do a better search that is more focused on your needs.

Boolean Operators

Most databases allow you to use a set of connectors called Boolean operators in your search statements. These connectors or operators are

We will now explain their functions.

AND is used to connect the different keywords in your search. This connector narrows your search by requiring that the records the search retrieves contain both keywords. For example, the search statement

internet AND marketing

would retrieve only records that have both the word internet and the word marketing. This criterion forces the search mechanism to exclude those records that include only one keyword. Note that some databases use alternate symbols in place of the AND connector, such as the plus sign (+).

Click on the yellow arrow below to see this concept illustrated.

Search statement: internet AND marketing

The animation illustrates that the search statement internet AND marketing retrieves only those records that contain both keywords.

OR is used to connect synonyms or related keywords. It broadens your search by providing alternate keywords to be searched. For example, the search statement

internet OR web

would retrieve records that contained either of these keywords. Note that some databases use alternate symbols such as the pipe sign ( | ) in place of the OR connector.

Click on the yellow arrow below to see this concept illustrated.

Search statement: internet OR web

The animation illustrates that the search statement internet OR web retrieves all records that contain either the keyword internet or the keyword web. Some of the records may actually contain both words.

NOT is used to eliminate records that contain certain keywords. It narrows your search by ignoring any record containing the keyword indicated. For example, the search statement

internet NOT web

would retrieve only the records that have the word internet but not the word web. Note that some databases use alternate symbols or words in place of the NOT connector, such as AND NOT or the minus sign (–).

Click on the yellow arrow below to see this concept illustrated.

Search statement: internet NOT web

The animation illustrates that no records that contained the keyword web were included, even if they contained the keyword internet. We recommend that you use the NOT connector sparingly, because using it may cause you to leave out relevant records.

Test your understanding of these Boolean operators by trying Learning Activity 1, which gives you practice using the Boolean operators AND, OR, and NOT.

Positional Operators

Bolner and Poirier discuss another type of connector, positional operators. Examples of positional operators, sometimes referred to as proximity operators, are

Use positional operators in place of the AND connector in search statements to

  1. indicate the order in which keywords must appear in a record
  2. indicate how close together the keywords must be for the record to be retrieved

Positional operators are especially useful when you are searching a full-text database because requiring that your keywords appear closer together physically in the full text of a document usually means that they are closer together conceptually.

For example, if you search a full-text database using the search statement

internet AND marketing

the two keywords may be in completely different sections of the article and have no relation to each other. If, instead, you search the database using the search statement

internet ADJ5 marketing

you are requiring the database to retrieve only those records that contain the keyword internet within five words of the keyword marketing. In other words, there can be up to five intervening words between your keywords. This search statement would retrieve articles that contain the following phrases:

We recommend that if you try searching a database using the AND connector between two keywords and you retrieve a large number of records that do not seem relevant, try using positional operators in your search statement.

For example, if you search a database using the search statement

internet AND marketing

you will probably retrieve hundreds of records. If you search a database using the search statement

internet ADJ5 marketing

you will retrieve much fewer records, perhaps fewer than 100.

Stopwords

Stopwords are words that should not be used in a search statement because the database does not index them. See Bolner and Poirier for more information. Examples of stopwords are

Different databases have different stopwords, so be sure to read the help screens provided.

Nesting

Once you have selected the keywords to use in your search and the Boolean or positional operators with which to connect them, you may consider using nesting to construct your search. Essentially, nesting involves putting parentheses around groups of synonyms so the search statement will be interpreted correctly. Without the parentheses, the computer combines terms from left to right without considering meaning. Parentheses are usually used with keywords connected by OR.

For example, suppose you wanted to find information on Web marketing. You can use Internet as a synonym for Web. You will want all records retrieved to contain the keyword marketing. These records should also contain either of the keywords web or internet (or both).

Suppose we did not use parentheses in our search statement, as follows:

marketing AND web OR internet

The database would first process marketing AND web, indicated by the colored area in the figure below:

Then, it would process the results obtained with the connector OR and the keyword internet. The colored area in the figure below represents all the records retrieved:

As you can see, the search statement marketing AND web OR internet retrieved records that contained both the keywords marketing and web plus any records that contained the keyword internet. This result is not what we wanted.

Nesting can drastically alter your search results. Suppose we use parentheses, as follows:

marketing AND (web OR internet)

The database would first process web OR internet (parentheses are processed first), indicated by the colored area:

and then process marketing with the results above to get the colored area in the figure below:

Only the Web and Internet records that also had the keyword marketing would be retrieved.

In summary,

Correct: marketing AND (web OR internet)

The synonyms web and internet are set off by parentheses.
Incorrect: marketing AND web OR internet

The computer would combine marketing with web into a set and then add all records containing the word internet, regardless of whether the articles mentioned marketing.

VIII. Searching the Internet and Relevancy Ranking

The Internet is fast becoming the first stop in searching. Although the information available on the "free" Web may not be of as high quality as that found in journal databases, such as UMUC's library databases, the popularity of searching on the Web cannot be disputed. Bolner and Poirier discuss the steps for successful searching on the Internet.

You may already be searching using an Internet search engine. If you are, you may be amazed to discover that you can actually influence what you retrieve and improve your retrieval by understanding how search engines find documents on the Internet.

In this section, we will review the ways in which search engines find documents to help you better understand how to search and successfully retrieve information from the Internet. To understand the search engine(s) you use, you must understand relevancy ranking and its effect on your search in a Web-based search engine such as Lycos, AltaVista, Yahoo!, Google, or Hotbot.

Bolner and Poirier provide a good descriptive table giving the basic search commands to use with the more popular search engines. Please refer to it to improve your retrieval and to become more efficient in searching with these tools.

Search engines use algorithms to sort the results and rank them according to relevancy. Bolner and Poirier refer to this process as "natural language search" in their discussion. When you search the Internet, you expect the most relevant sites to appear at the top of the list. But, is that actually the case?

Let's examine how a search engine finds documents to determine what we actually retrieve when we search the Internet. How does the computer decide which sites are "relevant"? Most search tools do not reveal their ranking formulas—they consider them proprietary information, "a secret formula." They do, however, share some elements of the criteria they use to rank the results. Their process is known as relevancy ranking

Relevancy Ranking

Some elements considered in ranking the results are:

  1. Number of terms matched
  2. Web pages containing all of the search terms will be ranked higher than Web pages with only some of the search terms.

  3. Proximity of terms to each other
  4. Web pages where the terms appear closer to each other—that is, in the same section, paragraph, or sentence—will be ranked higher than Web pages with the terms separated.

  5. Location of terms within the document
Web documents are usually formatted by HTML coding, which uses tags to identify where information should appear in the document. Some search tools give higher ranking to Web pages where the search terms appear in the following tags
  1. Frequency of terms in the document
If a term is used frequently in the Web page, the page may have a higher ranking. However, most major search engines recognize Web designer attempts to improve ranking by deliberately adding terms and either lower the ranking of the site or ignore it entirely.
  1. Number of links to the page
This ranking strategy is based on the premise that a page to which many others have linked is probably well regarded on the Internet. Google and Excite rank their results using this technique. As a result, sometimes you may retrieve documents that are not what you wanted and not as relevant to your needs as you would have expected.

Take a look at the review of relevancy ranking provided by the Search Engine Report at searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/rank.html. There, you will find more interesting tidbits about how Internet documents are ranked and how the ranking process affects your results.

Keyword Search

Unlike journal databases, Internet search engines do not typically have thesaurus terms or subject headings you can use to help focus your search. Therefore, you will have to do a keyword search—a search without the help of subject headings or thesaurus terms.

So, how do you do a keyword search? Here are a few tips to help you search the Internet more effectively.

  1. Make sure you are informed about the ranking policy at your search engine of choice.
  2. Use the advanced search features of the tool (look for choices like "more options" or "advanced search").
  3. Use Boolean operators and plus or minus signs to narrow your retrieval and focus your results.

With a little knowledge about your search engine, you can lessen the number of irrelevant items retrieved and improve your search results dramatically.

In later modules, we will review in more detail the specifics of Web searching, and you will be able to try different techniques for searching the Internet effectively. For now, a basic understanding of relevancy ranking is important.

IX. Search Statement

Now that you understand the commands, symbols, and other search techniques, let's discuss how you will put them together in a search strategy. For example, our sample thesis statement might be the following:

Has the use of the Web for marketing increased sales for companies in the retail industry?

The keywords from this thesis statement are:

marketing
web
sales

Retail might be another keyword, but you should usually try to limit your search to a maximum of three keywords at a time. Use additional keywords only if you need to further narrow your search because you don't want to limit your search too much in the beginning. If you use four keywords in your search, you might end up with no results.

The next step is to think of synonyms or related terms for these keywords. Here are the related terms for our sample search.

Keywords:

marketing

web

sales

Related terms:

advertising

internet

income

Try to think of at least one alternate term for each of your keywords. Once you have this list of keywords and synonyms, think about how you will combine them. Then you are ready to start searching for information on your topic. As you search each database, be sure to look for additional terms that can help you in your search.

Learning activity 2 will give you an opportunity to develop a list of keywords and related terms for your search and combine them in a search statement.

In module 2, we will discuss electronic resources, including UMUC's subscription databases. As you learn more about specific databases, we will introduce additional search strategies.

References

Bolner, M., & Poirier, G. (1997). The research process: Books and beyond.
Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

Brevik, P. (1998). Student learning in the Information Age.
Phoenix: The Oryx Press.

Return to top of page

Learning More

The Search Engine Features Chart has a section that summarizes key areas of how crawler-based search engines rank web pages. The Search Engine Design Tips page also summarizes key tips that will help you improve the relevancy of your pages with crawler-based search engines.

Search Engine Watch members have access to the How Search Engines Work section. This section provides detailed information about how each major search engine gathers its listings and an additional tips on enhancing your position in their results. Learn more about becoming a Search Engine Watch member and the many benefits members receive by visiting the Membership page.

 

Description of Research Log Assignment

The research log provides a systematic means to do research. In creating a research log, you detail the processes you follow to

This log provides an important record of the steps you took to do your research and the end result of your efforts. In this course, you will create a research log in systematic parts, comprising the following sections.

  1. Topic selection—For this course, three topics are available for your research statement. You will select one of them to research.
  2. Thesis statement formulation—Once you have decided which topic you want to use for the log, you can formulate your thesis statement. Refer to page 31 of the Thiroux text to learn more about how to do so. You may also find the information on page 32 of the Bolner text helpful in conceiving a thesis statement. Once you have developed this statement, you are ready to think about how to search for materials on your topic.
  3. Search statements—For this project, you need to search at least one search tool on the Web, one UMUC library subscription database, and one library catalog. Provide the search statements you intend to use to search in the research resources of your choice. List the keywords you selected and include any search commands you used, such as truncation, nesting, or adjacency.
  4. Evaluation of the materials you find when you conduct your searches—It is important to evaluate the sources you find on the Web, in the library subscription databases, and in the library catalog. For this section of the log, evaluate one Web resource, one journal article from the library subscription databases, and one book, answering the questions posed in the research log regarding the authority, comprehensiveness, reliability, and currency of each resource.
  5. Citations and annotations—Once you have evaluated the three resources for your log, provide a complete citation for each item following the appropriate formats in Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 5th edition. Note: You will not be able to indent or italicize your citations using the log form template. To receive full credit on Step 5 of the log, all of the elements of a citation need to be present in the correct order and format appropriate to the resource (e.g. Web document or journal article) according to the APA citation guidelines. You should also provide in your own words an annotation for each resource that summarizes the content of the item and explains how the resource relates to your thesis.

 

HOW TO CITE SOURCES: APA STYLE


Books | Periodicals | Electronic Resources | Dissertations, Theses, & Practicums | Government Reports | ERIC ED Documents | Proceedings | Other Resources

Why cite?

The purpose of citing sources is to give credit to the author for any ideas or quotations that you use, and to enable your reader to locate the sources.

How to cite?

The best time to document sources is when you are actually using them. It can be very difficult to go back at a later date to relocate your sources.

Step 1. Decide what type of resource you are using - a book? a web site? a magazine? an interview?

Step 2. Find the example in this brochure, or look it up in the APA manual.

Step 3. Write your citation, following the appropriate examples. Use the proper punctuation, but remember,your source might not have all of the parts listed in the guidelines and examples.

Important Note

Due to space constraints, the citations in this handout are not double-spaced; however, APA style requires that the text of the paper and the references list must be double-spaced.

APA Manual

The most common types of sources are listed in this brochure, but for explanations and examples of other types of sources, please ask your instructor, or refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.) (Ref BF76.7 .P83 2001).

Books [top]

General notes about books:

· Names are listed last name, then initials, if name(s) is the first element of the citation.

Book by a single author
Author's name. (Year). Title of book. Place of publication: Publisher.

Chitty, D. (1996). Do lemmings commit suicide? Beautiful hypotheses and ugly facts. New York: Oxford University Press.

Book by two or more authors
Author's names. (Year). Title of book. Place of publication: Publisher.

Rosellini, G., & Worden, M. (1997). Of course you're angry: A guide to dealing with the emotions of substance abuse (Rev. ed.). Center City, MN: Hazelden.

Book by a corporate author
Corporate author. (Year). Title of book. Place of publication: Publisher.

Children's Express. (1993). Voices from the future: Our children tell us about violence in America. New York: Crown.

Book by an unknown author
Title of book. (Year). Place of publication: Publisher.

The Koran. (1974). New York: Crescent Books.

Book with editors
Editor's name. (Ed.). (Year). Title of book. Place of publication: Publisher.

Moen, P., Elder, G., & Luscher, K. (Eds.). (1995). Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Introduction, preface, foreword, or afterword
Author of section being cited. (Year). Name of section. In author of book [initials last name], Title of book (pp. page numbers). Place of publication: Publisher.

Jeffrey, I. (1988). Introduction. In B. Savelev, Secret city: Photographs from the USSR (pp. 8-12). New York: Thames and Hudson.

Edition other than the first
Author's name. (Year). Title of book (Number of edition). Place of publication: Publisher.

Hoff, R. (1992). I can see you naked : A new revised edition of the national bestseller on making fearless presentations (New rev. ed.). Kansas City, MO: Andrews and McMeel.

Pasachoff, J. (1992). Field guide to the stars and planets (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Work in an anthology
Author's name. (Year). Title of selection. In Editor's name (Ed.), Title of anthology (Vol. volume number if appropriate, pp. page numbers of selection). Place of publication: Publisher.

Updike, J. (1996). A & P. In M. Meyer (Ed.), The Bedford introduction to literature: Reading, thinking and writing (pp. 487-491). Boston: St. Martin's Press.

Encyclopedia or dictionary entry
Author's name. (Year). Entry heading or title. In Title of anthology (Vol. volume number if appropriate, pp. [page numbers of selection]). Place of publication: Publisher.

Tavris, C. (1989). Queen bee syndrome. In Women's studies encyclopedia (Vol. 1, p. 307). New York: Greenwood Press.

Eschatology. (1982). In Webster's new world dictionary of the American language (2nd ed.). New York: Simon and Schuster.

Multivolume work
Author's name. (Year). Title of multivolume work (Vol. volume number/s). Place of publication: Publisher.

Schlager, N. (Ed.). (1994-1999). How products are made: An illustrated guide to product manufacturing (Vols. 1-4). Detroit, MI: Gale Research.

Mills, L. (1996). Architecture of the Old South (Vols. 1-2). Savannah, GA: Beehive Foundation.

Periodicals [top]

General notes about periodicals:

Article in a journal or magazine with volume number and continuous pagination

Author's name. (Year). Title of article. Title of journal or journal, volume number, page numbers.
[Note: The issue number is not included if all the issues in the volume have continuous pagination that continue through all the issues of the volume.]

Watson, J. D., & Crick, F. H. (1953). A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 171, 737-738.

Jasper, W. F. (1997). Good cop, bad cop: Alarming expansion and bad police work define today's FBI. The New American, 13, 234-239.

Article in a journal or magazine paginated by issue
Author's name. (Year). Title of article. Title of journal, volume number(issue number-only if issue starts with page 1 rather than continuously paginated through all issues), page numbers.

Jones, H. M. (1997). The attractions of stupidity. The St. Croix Review, 30(2), 6-10.

Gerry, R.. (1997, April-June). Tempo training for freestyle. Swimming Technique, 34(1), 40-42.

Article in a daily newspaper
Author's name. (Year, Month Day). Title of article. Title of newspaper, pp. [pages].

Munsey, C., & Shuey, P. J. (1997, May 8). Bomb threats to become felony. The Capital, p. A1.

Editorial in a newspaper
Author's name. (Year, Month Day). Title of article [Editorial]. Title of newspaper, pp. [pages].

Krauthammer, C. (2002, April 25). Why feed a mortal enemy? [Editorial]. The Washington Post, p. A27.

Unsigned article in a newspaper or magazine
Title of article. (Year, Month Day). Title of newspaper or magazine, pp. [pages].

Student health insurance policy. (2002, May 23). Anne Arundel College Campus Crier, p. 1.

Review of a book or film.
Reviewer's name. (Year). Title of Review [Review of the book/film Title of book or movie]. Title of magazine, volume number(issue number - if paginated by issue), pages.

Wrathall, J. (1997). [Review of the film That thing you do!]. Sight and Sound, 7, 57.

Reviewer's name. (Year, Month Day). Title of review [Review of the book/film Title of book or movie]. Title of newspaper, pp. [pages].

Maslin, J. (2001, December 11). Shakespeare saw a therapist? [Review of the movie Shakespeare in love]. The New York Times, p. E16.

Electronic Resources [top]

Aggregated databases
(Cite as you would a printed source, followed by) Retrieved date of access (month day, year, prefaced with "Retrieved" and ending with "from") from name of the database (ending with "database")

Cookson, C., Hargreaves, D., & Parker, G. (1999, March 21). Mad cow disease linked to humans. Financial Times, 1. Retrieved April 17, 2002, from Health Reference Center Academic database.

"We were just happy freaks, man:" Garcia in his own words. (2000). Rolling Stone, 16, 52-57. Retrieved May 16, 2001, from Expanded Academic ASAP database.

Newspaper
Mattel sues publisher over Barbie essays. (1999, December 6). New York Times national ed., C18. Retrieved January 5, 2002, from Contemporary Women's Issues database.

Boudette, N. (1999, October 20). In Europe: Surfing a Web of red tape. Wall Street Journal, p. B1. Retrieved October 29, 2000, from ABI/Inform database.

Dzau, V. J., & Creager, M. A. (1999). Chapter 247: Diseases of the aorta. Harrison's principles of internal medicine. Retrieved January 7, 2000, from Harrison's Online database.

E-mail. Mailing lists (listservs). Usenet news & forums

APA does not recommend including personal communications including private email messages because of the difficulty of recovering them at a later time. If you need to use a personal electronic communication and your professor requires that it be cited in your reference list, consult Electronic Styles: A Handbook for Citing Electronic Information (Li & Crane, Ref PN.171 .F56 L5 1996) for guidance.

Message posted to a newsgroup, only author's screen name available
Author or screen name. (Year, Month day). Subject line of message [Any identifier]. Message posted to (address of newsgroup)

Aquawoman. (2002, April 3). Problems accessing information [Msg 21]. Message posted to news://sci.psychology.hynosis

Message posted to online forum or discussion group
Author or screen name. (Year, Month day). Subject line of message [Any identifier]. Message posted to (address of URL)

Jones, D. O. (2002, March, 3). Geneology help [Msg 232]. Message posted to http://groups.yahoo. com/group/ geneology/message/232

Message posted to an electronic mailing list
Author or screen name. (Year, Month day). Subject line of message [Any identifier]. Message posted to (address of URL)

Clarke, F. (2002, April 13). Hyponsis [Msg 334]. Message posted to STUMPERS electronic mailing list, archived at http://www.umich.orgmail-archive/stumper-l/msg000334.htm

Web site - web document similar to a print document
(Cite as you would a printed source, followed by) Retrieved date of access (month day, year, prefaced with "Retrieved" and ending with "from") from URL of the document

Adams, R. G. (1937). Librarians as enemies of books. In D. Seaman (Ed.), The electronic text center. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia, 1998. Retrieved January 7, 2000, from http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/modeng/modengA.html

Freud, S. (1899/1911). The interpretation of dreams (3rd ed.). (A. A. Brill, Trans.). Retrieved January 21, 2000, from http://psychwww.com/books/interp/toc.htm

Cher (Cherilyn LaPiere Sarkisian). (2001). Cher. Biography.com. Retrieved January 2, 2002, from http://search.biography.com/print_record.pl?id=23190

Web site - web document without a print document counterpart
Author's name (if any) (last name, initials). (Date of electronic publication or update). Title of the document (if there is no title, provide a [Description of content, in brackets]. Retrieved date of access (month day, year, prefaced with "Retrieved" and ending with "from") from URL of the document

Tanner Computer Services. (1999, July 7). The world famous hot dog page. Retrieved January 7, 2002, from http://www.xroads.com/~tcs/hotdog/hotdog.html

Kuo, H. (2001, October 14). [Home page]. Retrieved January 14, 2002, from http://www.tc.umn.edu/nlhome/g012/kuox0019/

Web site - magazine, journal or newspaper article
(Cite as you would a printed source, followed by) Retrieved date of access (month day, year, prefaced with "Retrieved" and ending with "from") from URL of the article

Reed, M. L. (1997). Algebraic structure of genetic inheritance. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 34, 107-130. Retrieved January 8, 2002, from http://www.ams.org/bull/1997-34-02

No page numbers for online article
Rosenberg, S. (1999, June 2). What is to be done about Microsoft? Salon. Retrieved January 10, 2002, from
http://www.salon.com/tech/col/rose/1999/06/02/microsoft_breakup/index.html

Medical marijuana proponent is jailed pending bail hearing. (2000, January 4). Los Angeles Times. Retrieved January 7, 2001, from http://www.latimes.com/news/state.html

Document available on university program or department Web site, no date
Author. (Year or n.d. if no date). Title of Web document. Retrieved date of access from name of institution, program or department Web site: URL

Colman, W. C. (n.d.). Comparisons of grade point averages between men who join fraternities and men who do not join fraternities at Shady Rock University. Retrieved April 14, 2002, from Nova Southeastern University, Programs for Higher Education Web site: http://www.nova.edu/phe/phe_resources/online_documents.html

Dissertations, Theses, & Practicums [top]

Doctoral dissertation abstracted in Dissertation Abstracts International (DAI) and obtained from UMI via the Digital Dissertations database
Author (last name, first initial). (Year). Title of dissertation. Dissertation Abstracts International, volume number (issue number), page number series letter (A or B). Retrieved date retrieved from Digital Dissertations database.

Jitpraphai, S. (2001). Financial variables and merger premiums: Evidence from bank mergers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62 (9), 3134A. (UMI No. AAT 3025476) Retrieved June 22, 2002, from Digital Dissertations database.

Doctoral dissertation abstracted in Dissertation Abstracts International (DAI) and obtained from UMI in print
Author. (Year). Title of publication. Dissertation Abstracts International, volume number (issue number), page number [followed immediately by] series number [A or B]. (UMI No. xxxxxxxx)

Doctoral dissertation abstracted in Dissertation Abstracts International (DAI) and obtained in print from Nova Southeastern University
Author. (Year). Title of dissertation (Doctoral dissertation, name of institution, year of the dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International, volume number (issue number), page number series number (A or B).

Bi, W. (2001). Knowledge discovery by attribute-oriented approach under directed acyclic concept graph (DACG) (Doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62 (11), 5195B.

Doctoral dissertation abstracted in Dissertation Abstracts International (DAI) and obtained at that university
See format in previous example.

Johnson, D. (2001). Designing bibliographic instruction online and face to face (Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Ohio, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62 (8), 4672A.

Unpublished doctoral dissertation
Author. (Year). Title of dissertation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, institution, location.

Bernardi, R. A. (1990). Accounting pronouncements, firm size, and firm industry: Their effect on Altman's bankruptcy prediction model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova University, Fort Lauderdale, FL.

[Note that dissertations before 1994 are from Nova University rather than Nova Southeastern University.]

Patterson, G. W. (2000). A comparison of multi-year instructional programs (looping) and regular education program utilizing scale scores in reading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

Unpublished doctoral practicum indexed in ERIC and retrieved online
See previous example. Include retrieval statement.

Sanford, C. A. (1997). Working from within the classroom: Improving the delivery of speech-language services to kindergarten at-risk students. Unpublished doctoral practicum, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED420967) Retrieved December 21, 2001, from ERIC E-Subscribe database.

Unpublished doctoral applied dissertation available on university program or department Web site, no date:
Author. (n.d. if no date, otherwise Year). Title of dissertation. Unpublished doctoral name of document type, institution, city, state unless city name is also in name of institution. Retrieved date of access, from institution, department or program Web site: URL

Matlak, K. L. (n.d.). Outcomes evaluation of the Techology Property Initiative at Collin County Community College. Unpublished doctoral applied dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL. Retrieved May 11, 2002, from Nova Southeastern University, Programs for Higher Education Web site: http://www.nova.edu/phe/ phe_resources/ online_documents.htm

Unpublished doctoral MARP
Author. (Year). Title of document. Unpublished doctoral name of document, name of institution, place.

Digby, K. E. (1985). A comparison of the characteristics of successful and non-successful associate degree nursing students. Unpublished doctoral major applied research project, Nova University, Fort Lauderdale, FL.

[Note: If this is indexed in ERIC, you also need the ERIC ED number. If you obtain it full text online, you also need the retrieval statement.]

Unpublished master's research project indexed in ERIC and retrieved online
Author. (Year). Title of project. Unpublished master's type of document, name of institution, place. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ednumber) Retrieved date of access, from Name of Database followed by the word "database".

Brown, M. (2001). Increasing participation of female students in physical science class. Unpublished master's action research project, St. Xavier
University, Smithtown, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED455121) Retrieved December 24, 2001, from ERIC E-Subscribe database.

Government Reports [top]

Government publications
Treat the government department, office, agency, or institute that produced the report as the author. If the organization that produced the report is not well known, precede with the higher organization. (Year). Title of publication (Report number). Place of publication: Publisher.

U.S. Department of Justice. (1995). Correctional populations of the United States, 1992. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Report available from the Government Printing Office (GPO) with a government institute as group author
Author. (Year). Title of report (Report number). Location: Publisher or agency.

Shafer, L. (1999). Data sources on lifelong learning available from the National Center for Education Statistics (GPO No: ED 1.310/2/:431892). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Note that it is DC without periods like state abbreviations, but U.S. has the periods

Report available from the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)
Author. (Year). Title of publication (Report number). Place of publication: Publisher. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EDnumber)

Schafer, L. L. (1999). Data sources on lifelong learning available from the National Center for Education Statistics. Work paper series (NCES-WP-1999-11). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED431892)

[Note: This record was located in ERIC. The previous citation was for the very same resource but the information was located in the GPO database. Note the similarity in the ED and GPO numbers.]

Government report not available from the Government Printing Office (GPO) or a document depository like ERIC or NTIS
Author (or treat the government department, office, agency, or institute that produced the report as corporate author. If the organization that produced the report is not well known, precede with the higher organization). (Year). Title of publication (Report number). Place of publication: Publisher.

Health, Services, and Human Services Division, General Accounting Office. (1998). Suicide prevention: Efforts to increase research and education in palliative care. Report to congressional requesters (GAO/HEHS-98-128). Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED420832)

Electronic version of U.S. government report available from GPO Access database on the Web (aggregated database)
See format in previous citation. Retrieved date of access, from name of agency via name of database: URL

Lewis, L., & Farris, E. (1996). Remedial education at higher education institutions in fall 1995 (GPO No: ED 1.328/5:R 28). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education. Retrieved June 20, 2002, from General Accounting Office Reports online via GPO Access: http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs /aces/aces160.shtml?/gao/index.html

U.S. government report available on government agency Web site
Name of agency. (Year). Title of document (Report number). Retrieved date of access, from URL.

National Center for Higher Education. (2002). Statistical analysis report: Higher education (NCES 97-584). Retrieved June 22, 2002, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs/97584.html

ERIC ED Documents [top]

General notes about ERIC ED documents:

ERIC digest retrieved full text in ERIC
Author. (Year). Title of document. Place of publication: Publisher. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EDnumber) Retrieved date of access from Name of Database and ending with the word "database".

McKay, K., & Sorenson, B. (1999). How to use ERIC to search your special education topic: Update 1999. ERIC Digest E573. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 434456) Retrieved December 12, 2001, from the ERIC database.

Unpublished conference paper indexed in ERIC and retrieved from a Web site.
(Cite as you would a printed conference paper that was not published, followed by) Retrieved date of access (Month day, year) Name of Database and ending with the word "database".

Clay, D. (1998, April). WWW.2CHEAT.COM. Paper contributed to the Teaching in the Community Colleges Online Conference (3rd), Honolulu,
HI. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED450824) Retrieved December 23, 2001, from
http://leahi.kcc.hawaii.edu/org/tcom98/rooks.html

Unpublished conference paper indexed in ERIC.
(Cite as you would a printed conference paper that was not published and that was indexed in ERIC.)

Parks, W., & Odom, S. L. (2000, June-July). Reflections on community-based inclusive preschools. Paper presented at the Head Start National Research Conference, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED450938)

ERIC document with limited circulation information.
Author. (Year of publication.) If no author, title of document first [Medium info if appropriate]. (Year of publication if no author.) (Name and mailing address where can obtain publication. A Web address can be used in place of or in addition to address. ) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EDnumber)

Enhancing education through technology: New tools to close the achievement gap. Satellite town meeting #79: May 15, 2001. [Videotape]. (2001). (Available from ED Pubs, P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD, 20794-1398) (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED435672)

Education Development Center. (2001). Districts on the move: Unified student service in Boston public schools: Building a continuum of services through standards-based reform. (National Institute for Urban School Improvement, Education Development Center, Inc., 55 Chapel Street, Newton, MA, 02458.) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED455329)

CD-ROM indexed in ERIC
Author. (Year). Title of CD-ROM [Medium]. (Availability information) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EDnumber)

Pacific Resources for Education and Learning. (2001). Art of the Pacific Islands [CD-ROM]. (Available from Pacific Resources for Education and Learning,
1099 Alakea Street, 25th floor, Honolulu, HI 96813-4513) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED422222)

Government report indexed in ERIC
Author. (Year). Title of report (Report number). Place of publication: Publisher or agency of publication. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EDnumber) Include retrieval statement if the full text of the document was retrieved online.

Hoffman, L. M. (2001). Key statistics on public elementary and secondary schools and agencies: School year 1997-98. Survey report (NCES-2001-304R). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED452279) Retrieved December 23, 2001, from ERIC E-Subscribe database.

Data file, available from ERIC Clearinghouse Web site
Name of clearinghouse. (Year). Title of document [Data file]. Available from place to obtain cited material Web site: URL

ERIC Clearinghouse for Assessment and Evaluation. (2002). Data coordination/standard work groups status reports [Data file]. Available from National Center for Research Web site: http://cresst96.cse.ucla.edu/

Proceedings [top]

Published conference paper in conference proceedings
Author. (Year,). Title of paper. In Editor (first initial, last name) (Ed.) Title of conference proceedings (page numbers). Place of publication: Publisher.

Gibson, C. C. (1995). Impact of the larger social context on the distance learner. International Council for Distance Education: One world many voices: Quality in open and distance learning (pp. 279-282). Chicago: Milton Keynes.

Conference paper published in a journal
Format like journal article retrieved at online Web site.

Campbell, C. (1998, August). Quality assessment in distance education. Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, 507-510. Retrieved March 22, 2002, from http://www.CDTL.org/index/disted/12333.htm

Unpublished conference paper
Author. (Year, month). Title of paper. Paper presented at name of conference, city, state.

Martins, J. R. (1999, April). Working with the terminally ill: An integrated theoretical model. Paper presented at the American Counseling Association World Conference, San Diego, CA.

Unpublished conference paper indexed in ERIC and retrieved in a full-text online database
Author. (Year, month). Title of paper. Paper presented at (name of conference), city, state. [Include ERIC ED number if indexed in ERIC and retrieval statement if retrieved online.]

Kelly, J. (1997, March). Effects of traditional and professional development school preservice training models on teacher attrition after three years. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED408256) Retrieved June 22, 2002, from ERIC E-Subscribe database.

Conference paper presented at a virtual conference
Author. (Year). Title of conference paper. Paper presented at the Name of conference. Retrieved date of access, from URL [There is no geographic location, page numbers, or month with year of publication.]

Steinbrecker, D. (2002). The care and feeding of an online instructional site. Paper presented at the Distance Education virtual conference. Retrieved July 14, 2002, from http://www.umuc.au/ conference/ disted/care.html

Other Resources [top]

Interview - conducted by the researcher
Interviews are personal communications, which are only cited in the text of the paper, not in the reference list.

APA does not recommend including personal communications because of the difficulty of recovering them at a later time.

Film or video recording
Name of the producer (Producer), & Name of the director (Director). (Year of release). Title [Medium]. Distributor.

Jarre, K., Carr, P. (Producers), & Sommers, S. (Director). (1999). The mummy [Videotape]. MCA Universal Home Video.

Television program - broadcast
Producer's name (Producer). (Broadcast date). Title of the program [Television program]. Station or viewing location: name of the station or network.

Garwood, S. (Producer). (1998, December 31). EastEnders [Television program]. Clarksville, MD: BBC America.

Manuscript in progress or submitted for publication but not yet accepted.
Author. (Year). Title of document. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Lucio, L, & Tuñón, J. T. (2001). Designing library instruction for international online students. Manuscript submitted for publication.

For additional web site examples, consult the APA web site: http://www.apa.org/journals/webref.html

l

1420 Maryland Ave. | Baltimore, MD 21201 | (410) 837-4260 | langsdale.ubalt.edu

Last updated: 12/16/2002 17:02:11

 

index.htmlHandouts and Linksindex.htmlThe Writing Center

from Handouts & Links >Developing Drafts > Thesis

More Writing Center handouts

Tips on printing out this handout.

Constructing Thesis Statements

What this handout is about …

Your history professor just handed back your essay on the Civil War. Next to your introductory paragraph, she's written in red ink, "What is your argument??" Sound familiar?
Your English T. A. seems to be obsessed with something called a "thesis" and the lack of one in your papers. Confused?
Welcome to the world of college academic expectations! Gone are the days when a well-written summary of a novel or an accurate description of a historical event earned a favorable evaluation from your teachers. Now they expect more from you. The hallmark of a college education is the ability to think critically, and the proof of this ability lies in your successful construction of argumentative essays that stake out and support a position persuasively. Fine--but what does that mean, exactly? How do you "stake out" a position? What is a "thesis statement?"

What is it, and why do I need it?

A thesis statement tells a reader how you will interpret the significance of the subject matter under discussion. Such a statement is also called an "argument," a "main idea," or a "controlling idea." Note that a thesis is an interpretation of a subject, not the subject itself. The subject, or topic, of an essay might be World War II or Moby Dick; a thesis must then offer a way to understand the war or the novel that others might dispute. A single sentence somewhere in your first paragraph should present your thesis to the reader. The body of the essay gathers and organizes evidence that will persuade the reader of the logic of your interpretation. Your thesis statement gives the reader a preview of the essay's purpose and goal.

"But," you object, "I don't want to give everything away right at the beginning. Can't I have an argumentative essay without announcing my position in the first paragraph?" Yes, you can, but the resulting essay is likely to lack focus. Keep in mind that an academic essay is not a mystery novel. Your reader does not want to figure out the plot, search for clues, or guess "whodunit." The point of an essay assignment is to demonstrate your thinking skills and your ability to keep a reader on the tracks of your train of thought. A strong thesis not only grabs the interest of your reader, who now wants to see you support your unique interpretation, it also provides a focus for your argument, one to which every part of your paper refers in the development of your position. A thesis keeps the writer centered on the matter at hand and reduces the risk of intellectual wandering. Likewise, a thesis provides the reader with a "road map," clearly laying out the intellectual route ahead. The best essays will begin with strong thesis statements.

"That's not fair!" you protest; "I've never done that before!" Yes, you have, but probably in a less formal context. Everyday life abounds with argument and persuasion. Remember when you wanted to convince your parents to let you have your own car? "Having my own car will give me more freedom to explore life, but it will also provide discipline through the expansion of my household responsibilities." You then granted that you would drive to friends' houses and to the beach, but you also pointed out how you could be relied upon to fetch Junior from soccer practice or to pick up dinner on the way home from school. First argument, then persuasion. The first thing out of your mouth was probably not "It's really important for me to have a car," or "I could take road trips!" The first is too vague, and the second is clearly not sensibly reasoned when you consider the parental audience. They are examples of weak thesis statements: if you used one of them as your argument, you probably spent a lot of time walking.

Always assume that your instructors expect you to write an essay that argues a position that you set out in a thesis statement, even if the question does not explicitly ask you to do so. Instructors often see this as a given, since the point of most assignments is to stimulate critical thinking. Occasionally, you will be asked to write a summary of a reading passage, or to jot down what you see in a painting, without providing any kind of interpretation. Such assignments are fairly rare, however. When in doubt, ask your instructor if a thesis statement is required; 99 times out of 100, it is. Whenever an assignment asks you to analyze, to interpret, to compare and contrast, to demonstrate cause and effect, or to take a stand on an issue, you are being asked to develop a thesis and to support it persuasively. (Check out our handout, How to Read an Assignment, for more information!)

"But I'm no expert!" you continue to protest. "Sure, I can argue with my parents over a car, but I don't know anything special about Huckleberry Finn or the Civil War! How am I supposed to come up with an interpretation that will impress my professor? She knows everything!" Hold on now; don't put so much pressure on yourself! Sure, it's unlikely that you will amaze your instructor with a radically new interpretation of a topic (although you never know!), but this isn't what you are being asked to do. You are being evaluated on the quality of critical thinking you demonstrate in the essay. Have you taken account of the evidence? Do you forge relationships between facts that broaden their significance? Do you persuade the reader of the logic of your argument instead of merely assuming it's obvious? Accomplishing these tasks in your essay is what will impress your instructor. (Still confused? Our handout, Effective Academic Writing: The Argument, might help!)

"OK," you sigh, "so I need a thesis. How do I get one?" Ah, I thought you'd never ask…

How do I get a thesis?

You can't just pluck a thesis out of thin air. Even if you have a terrific insight concerning a topic, it won't be worth much unless you can logically and persuasively support it in the body of your essay. A thesis is the evolutionary result of a thinking process, not a miraculous creation. Formulating a thesis is not the first thing you do after reading an essay assignment. Let me repeat that: deciding on a thesis does not come first. Before you can come up with an argument on any topic, you have to collect and organize evidence, look for possible relationships between known facts (such as surprising contrasts or similarities), and think about the beneath-the-surface significance of these relationships. After this initial exploration of the question at hand, you can formulate a "working thesis," an argument that you think will make sense of the evidence but that may need adjustment along the way.

"You've got to be kidding," you say. "You mean I should start writing my essay with a thesis I might have to change? Won't that be a huge waste of time?" Hold on--a well-written essay is not the product of smoke and mirrors. You are involved in a thinking process, remember? That takes time. Writing is an act of thinking that's not predictable; you follow your best insights, guided by your working thesis but not constrained by it. If you suddenly see a new relationship while writing that hadn't occurred to you before and that really begins to make sense, what should you do? Include it, but leave the now faulty thesis as is and hope the reader doesn't notice? Exclude it, keep the old thesis, and carry your wonderful insight with you to the grave? Neither of these is a wise choice. You want your instructor to see your best work as a critical thinker, and that requires time for reassessment and revision.

Writers use all kinds of techniques to stimulate their thinking and to help them clarify relationships or comprehend the broader significance of a topic. For example, freewriting gives you the license to write nonstop for 15 minutes about anything that pops into your head about a topic. Once the 15 minutes are up, you go back over what you've written to see what kind of insights unexpectedly leap out at you. This often gets the creative juices flowing. If you are comparing and contrasting two events, you might make two columns on a piece of paper and write down everything you know about each event in the columns. Then, look back and forth between the two columns and see if anything unusual or unexpected or just plain interesting catches your attention. Formulate a working thesis, and see where it takes you. Reassess and revise your thesis. Reassess and revise your essay. Repeat as necessary.

How about some examples?

Why not? Since history and literature classes are notorious for demanding persuasive argumentative essays, let's look at some possible essay questions in these fields. For each question, I'll give you examples of a weak thesis, a useful working thesis, and a strong final thesis. Suppose you are taking a course on 19th-century America, and the instructor hands out the following essay assignment:

Compare and contrast the reasons why the North and South fought the Civil War.

You turn on the computer and type out the following:

The North and South fought the Civil War for many reasons, some of which were the same and some different.

No kidding! So what? This weak thesis basically restates the question without providing any additional information. It is your job to do this right away. Sure, you will expand on this new information in the body of the essay, but it is important that the reader know where you are heading. Remember--you are not writing a mystery novel.

So, what kind of new information should you provide? The reader of this weak thesis probably thinks to herself, "What reasons? How are they the same? How are they different?" Ask yourself these same questions. Try to characterize the reasons ("I think slavery was the main reason Americans fought the Civil War," you might say to yourself). Begin to compare Northern and Southern attitudes ("The South believed slavery was right, and the North thought slavery was wrong"). Now, push your comparison toward an interpretation--why did one side think slavery was right and the other think it was wrong? You look again at the evidence and you decide the North believed slavery was immoral while the South believed it upheld their way of life. At the computer, you write:

While both sides fought the Civil War over the issue of slavery, the North fought for moral reasons while the South fought to preserve its own institutions.

Now you have a working thesis! Included in this working thesis is a reason for the war and some idea of how the two sides disagreed over this reason. As you write the essay, you will probably begin to characterize these differences more precisely. Suddenly your working thesis seems inexact or more vague than you had originally thought. Maybe you decide that, actually, both sides fought for moral reasons, they just saw morality in different contexts. You end up revising the working thesis into a final thesis that really captures the argument in your paper:

While both Northerners and Southerners believed they fought against tyranny and oppression, Northerners focused on the oppression of slaves while Southerners defended their own rights to property and self-government.

Compare this to the original weak thesis. See the difference? This final thesis presents a way of interpreting evidence that illuminates the significance of the issues raised by the question. If the essay supplies evidence and logical reasoning in support of this thesis, your instructor will be suitably impressed. Keep in mind that this is one of many possible interpretations of the Civil War--it is not the one and only right answer to the question. There isn't a right answer: there are only strong and weak thesis statements and strong and weak uses of evidence.

*

Let's look at another example. Suppose your literature professor hands out the following assignment in a class on the American novel:

Write an analysis of some aspect of Mark Twain's novel Huckleberry Finn.

"This will be easy," you think. "I loved Huckleberry Finn!" You grab a pad of paper and write:

Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn is a great American novel.

Why is this a weak thesis? Think about what the reader would expect from the essay that follows: you will most likely provide a general, appreciative summary of Twain's novel. But the question did not ask you to summarize, it asked you to analyze. Your professor is not interested in your opinion of the novel, which she probably shares, or in your ability to retell its story, which she knows; instead, she wants you to think about why it's such a great novel--what do Huck's adventures tell us about life, about America, about coming of age, about race relations, etc.? First, the question asks you to pick an aspect of the novel that you think is important to its structure or meaning--for example, the role of storytelling, the contrasting scenes between the shore and the river, the relationships between adults and children, etc. Now you write:

In Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain develops a contrast between life on the river and life on the shore.

Here's a working thesis with potential: you have highlighted an important aspect of the novel for investigation. It's still not clear what your analysis will reveal. What meaning does this contrast convey to the reader? Your reader is intrigued, but is still thinking, "So what? What's the point of this contrast? What does it signify?" You do not want the reader to have to figure out the answers to these questions herself. But perhaps you are not sure yet, either. That's fine--begin to work on comparing scenes from the book and see what you discover. Freewrite, make lists, jot down Huck's actions and reactions, etc. Eventually, you will be able to clarify for yourself, and then for the reader, why this contrast matters. After examining the evidence and considering your own insights, you confidently write:

Through its contrasting river and shore scenes, Twain's Huckleberry Finn suggests that to find the true expression of American democratic ideals, one must leave "civilized" society and go back to nature.

This final thesis statement presents an interpretation of a literary work based on an analysis of its content. Of course, for the essay itself to be successful, you must now present evidence from the novel that will convince the reader of your interpretation.

*

Finally, let's look at a slightly different example. Sometimes an essay question asks you to take a stand on an issue. Maybe your history professor wants fives pages on the following:

Was the New Deal of the 1930s a liberal plan to create a welfare state in America, or was it a conservative defense of American capitalism?

Questions like this one often elicit quick responses from writers based on gut feelings. Another example of this type of question is, "Was the US justified in dropping atomic bombs on Japan in World War II?" Students may feel quite strongly one way or the other, but they must remember that passion about a topic must be supported with critical thinking in an academic essay. To return to our example, a student might turn on the computer after reading this question and write:

The New Deal was a conservative defense of American capitalism.

What makes this a weak thesis? Well, the author's position is certainly clear, but why does she hold it? Keep in mind that an assertion is not an argument! This weak thesis just repeats part of the question; it adds nothing to our understanding of the issues involved in making this judgment. A better, working thesis would include a reason for holding this position: "The New Deal was a conservative defense of American capitalism because it _____________."

Perhaps you realize that questions like this one rarely have all-or-nothing answers, and your investigation of the evidence finds support for both positions. In this case, you might write the following:

The New Deal both defended capitalist economic principles and offered government assistance to needy Americans, making it conservative and liberal at the same time.

What makes this a weak thesis? After all, it takes account of the evidence and makes an argument, doesn't it? Yes, it does, but it's wishy-washy--it does not stake out a position. A critical thinker assesses the evidence supporting both sides of a question but must ultimately decide which way the balance of evidence tilts. A strong thesis presents the final statement of this act of critical interpretation. For example:

Despite its work relief elements, the New Deal is best understood as a defense of American capitalism because its main programs attempted to create a stable environment for private enterprise.

It's all there: position, argument, and attention to conflicting evidence. Again, this is not the "right answer," but if the essay that follows supports this statement with the logical use of pertinent evidence, it will be a persuasive answer and a successful essay.

How do I know if my thesis is any good?

Perhaps you face an essay question that isn't really similar to any of these examples. How do you know whether you have formulated an effective thesis statement? If there's time, the best strategy is to run it by your instructor or to make an appointment at the Writing Center to get some feedback. Remember, you must have some sense of how you will develop your thesis persuasively before anyone can give you a preliminary evaluation: always be ready to discuss supporting evidence and your reasoning when asking for feedback on a working thesis.

Even if you do not have time to get advice elsewhere, you can do some thesis evaluation of your own. When critiquing your first draft and its working thesis, ask yourself the following:

  • "Do I answer the question?" This might seem obvious, but it's worth asking. No matter how intriguing or dazzling, a thesis that doesn't answer the question is not a good thesis! If you are being asked to "take a stand," do you? If you are being asked "what's the most important event of the 20th century," do you just state why your selection is important, or do you state why you think it's the most important when compared to other important events? Re-reading the question prompt after constructing a working thesis can help you fix an argument that misses the focus of the question.
  • "Have I taken a position that others might challenge or oppose?" If not, then you probably do not have a strong argument. Theses that are too vague often have this problem. If your thesis contains vague words like "good" or "successful," see if you could be more specific: why is something "good"; what makes something "successful"?
  • "Does my thesis pass the 'So What?' test?" Also known as the "What's the Big Deal?" test, the "So What?" test asks whether your thesis presents a position or an interpretation worth pursuing. If a reader's first response is, "So what?" then you need to clarify, to forge a relationship, or to connect to a larger issue. Once a reader says, "Gee, this argument has the potential to broaden my understanding of the significance of this topic," then you have successfully passed this test.
  • "Does my essay support my thesis specifically and without wandering?" Just as a thesis that doesn't answer the question ultimately fails, so does a thesis that isn't properly supported with evidence and reasoning. If your thesis and the body of your essay do not seem to go together, one of them has to change. Generally, this means revising your thesis to capture more precisely the argument in your paper. Remember, always reassess and revise your writing as necessary.

If you'd like more advice on making an argument or on writing in specific disciplines, please check out our other handouts on the Web, or call us for an appointment with a writing consultant.

Bibliography

Anson, Chris M. and Robert A. Schwegler. The Longman Handbook for Writers. 2nd ed. New York: Longman, 2000.

Hairston, Maxine and John J. Ruszkiewicz. The Scott, Foresman Handbook for Writers. 4th ed. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers, 1996.

Lunsford, Andrea and Robert Connors. The St. Martin's Handbook. 3rd ed. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1995.

Rosen, Leonard J. and Laurence Behrens. The Allyn & Bacon Handbook. 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1997.

© Copyright 1998, UNC-CH Writing Center | URL: http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | URL: http://www.unc.edu/
Site Email:
writing_center@unc.edu | Last updated: October 17, 2000

 

Home | FAQs | News | Courses & Writing Centres | Advice | Books | For Faculty

Using Thesis Statements


When you are asked to write an essay that creates an argument, your reader will probably expect a clear statement of your position. Typically, this summary statement comes in the first paragraph of the essay, though there is no rigid rule about position. Here are some characteristics of good thesis statements, with samples of good and poor ones. Note that the better examples substitute specific argumentative points for sweeping general statements; they indicate a theoretical basis and promise substantial support. (See Some Myths About Thesis Statements, below, for a discussion of times not to use a thesis statement. See also the file General Advice on Essay Writing. )
  1. It makes a definite and limited assertion that needs to be explained and supported by further discussion:
  2. trite, irrelevant

    Shakespeare was the world's greatest playwright.

    intriguing

    The success of the last scene in Midsummer Night's Dream comes from subtle linguistic and theatrical references to Elizabeth's position as queen.

  3. It shows the emphasis and indicates the methodology of your argument:
  4. emotional, vague

    This essay will show that the North American Free Trade agreement was a disaster for the Canadian furniture industry.

    worth attention

    Neither neo-protectionism nor post-industrial theory explains the steep reversal of fortune for the Canadian furniture industry in the period 1988-1994. Data on productivity, profits, and employment, however, can be closely correlated with provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement that took effect in the same period.

  5. It shows awareness of difficulties and disagreements:

sweeping, vague

Having an official policy on euthanasia just causes problems, as the Dutch example shows.

suitably complex

Dutch laws on euthanasia have been rightly praised for their attention to the principles of self-determination. Recent cases, however, show that they have not been able to deal adequately with issues involving technological intervention of unconscious patients. Hamarckian strategies can solve at least the question of assignation of rights.

Some Myths about Thesis Statements

Written by Dr. Margaret Procter, Coordinator, Writing Support, University of Toronto.
Copyright 2001. All rights reserved.


index.htmlU. of T. Writing Homeindex.html

Site Administered by Dr. Margaret Procter

Coordinator, Writing Support, University of Toronto

Site Credits

Last modified September 7, 2001

Home | FAQs | News | Courses & Writing Centres
Advice | Books | For Faculty

 

Political Science Writing Center
Smith 220B
(206) 616-3895

Guide to Writing Thesis Statements

Back to Helpful Handouts o Writing Center Home Page

 

Your thesis statement is the central argument of your essay. It must be concise and well-written.


The key difference between an opinion statement and thesis statement is that a thesis conveys to the reader that the claim being offered has been thoroughly explored and is defendable by evidence. It answers the "what" question (what is the argument?) and it gives the reader a clue as to the "why" question (why is this argument the most persuasive?).

Examples of good thesis statements:



1. Thesis statements must make a claim or argument. They are not statements of fact.

Statement of fact: "A candidates ability to afford television advertising can have an impact on the outcome of Congressional elections." This is essentially an indisputable point and therefore, not a thesis statement.

Similarly, the claim "The United Nations was established to promote diplomacy between major powers." is not likely to inspire much debate.

2. Thesis statements are not merely opinion statements.

Statement of opinion:"Congressional elections are simply the result of who has the most money." This statement does make a claim, but in this format it is too much of an opinion and not enough of an argument.

Similarly, "The United Nations is incapable of preventing war" is closer to a thesis statement than the factual statement above because it raises a point that is debatable. But in this format, it doesn't offer the reader much information; it sounds like the author is simply stating a viewpoint that may or may not be substantiated by evidence.

In conclusion, your thesis should make clear what your argument is; it should also provide the reader with some indication of why your argument is persuasive.

For example: In the congressional elections example, why is money important (and whose money? The candidates'? Corporations'? Special interests'?), are other factors irrelevant (the candidates' views on the issues?) and for which types of elections is this true (is your argument equally true for Senatorial elections and elections for the House of Representatives? Why or why not?)?

In the other example, you will need to think about why the United Nations is not capable of preventing war. Your thesis should indicate that you have an understanding of the relevant historical circumstances and that you are aware of alternative explanations.

Of course, one can re-work a thesis statement indefinitely and one can almost always find something at fault with it. The point is that you must be sure that your thesis statement is indicating to your reader that you have an argument to make.



Back to handouts