![]() |
|
![]()
Taxpayers, are you aware that… A Newark Star Ledger report verified that Robbinsville (Washington) Township taxes have almost doubled in 7 years. The newspaper further reported that the township had the highest average percentage tax increase for 2007. Two-thirds of those increases have been for the tax levies to support Robbinsville Schools since 60% of your taxes are for the school district.
Your recent tax bill probably shows a 10% increase this year. Last spring, the school board accepted a 13% increase in the school budget. The Town Council cut 3% from the municipal budget. Thus the difference is the school budget.
At the December Board of Education meeting, Board President Mr. Setaro announced that the 20% funding increase granted by the state only amounts to $480,000. This is a paltry amount considering all of the state's fanfare about this being the highest percentage that a district could receive. What appeared to be a significant financial boost to the district, isn't.
Mr. Setaro also announced that the
federal law suit was dismissed. The federal court told the district
they must exhaust state remedies first before bringing a suit into the
federal court system. The chances of their succeeding is nil.
Hammonton, Egg Harbor and Galloway Township already tried in 2003 and
lost. The state court ruled that the "petitioners cannot prevail on
their claim that respondents are required to increase their CEIFA aid."
(For clarification, respondents refers to the state and CEIFA is the law
that provides the formula for funding.)
At the October BOE Meeting, the auditor stated that previous audit recommendations were not acted upon by former Business Administrators. This was one of the major reasons for the district’s financial problems over the past two years. Problems cited by the auditor included this partial list:
- All purchase orders be complete and supporting documentation be available for inspection and review. - Bills be paid in a timely manner to avoid the charging of penalties and interest. - The district must follow The Uniform Minimum Chart of Accounts for New Jersey. (This is fundamental for all accounting in New Jersey schools.) - That approved budgetary line accounts NOT (my emphasis) be overcommittedand/or over-expended. - That Commissioner approval be obtained for all transfers that on a cumulative basis exceed10% of the amount included in the budget certified for taxes. (This is the law but the district was obviously not following it.) - That any expenditures which exceed the bid or quote threshold be made in accordance with the requirement of the Public School Contracts Law (N.J. 18: 18A et seq) (Again the district was not following legal guidelines.) - That Business Registration Certificates be obtained from all vendors when purchases exceed in the aggregate the quote threshold as per c. 57, P.L. 2004. - Due to Grantor balances must be returned immediately with the submission of the final grant expenditure report. (This and the next to last item refer to last years grant scandal.)
The recent audit of the school district’s accounts turned up a $259,040 surplus. According to the law, it must be used for pay down debts. This is good but where did the surplus come from in light of the financial problems over the last two years?
The statistics on this site came primarily from New Jersey State Department of Education Records. They were given to the State by the local districts, such as Robbinsville Township, as part of mandated reporting requirements.
|