THE RELATIVITY
¾
CLASSICAL TRUTH OR A FALSE THEORY?
Based on sufficient and irrefutable evidence of
physics this paper is announcing that the relativistic concept about space-time
has a serious error in the domain of modern physics. Examples are given bellow.
3.1 Carelessness and omissions in calculations of major relativistic experiments
The infraction caused by the ionic molecules or plasma gas surrounding
the sun has been ignored in experimental calculations for verifying that light
deflects in gravitational field surrounding the sun. On the basis of this
experiment the relativists have asserted that the gravitational field acts on
space and time and bends their axes. Stranger still is that the result of the
deflection value is twice that of the theoretical value from relativity, also
twice that of the gravitational deflection value. Even Einstein thought that the
half value was caused by the gravitational effect. But all research related to
relativity has always ignored this half value from its observation.
3.2 All experiments of relativity are actual contra-evidence in thinking of the existence of dark matter.
In astrophysics it has been proved that the universal
vacuum actually is filled with a kind of gravitational substance so called the
“dark matter”. Its total mass is about 95% of the universal mass. Physicists
have found that “dark matter”
is composed of “some-rino”, its level of mass order is similar or smaller
than the neutrino. This greatest discovery reveals all experiments of relativity
to be contra-evidence in itself. For example, in the movement of Mercury in a
100 years period the resistance caused by “dark matter” has been ignored in
all theoretical calculations.
3.3 Physical phenomena of moving particles in dark matter
Of course scientists in that era did not have enough
knowledge about “dark matter” so had to assert that light is pure energy and
propagates in the space of the universe without any carrier or medium. With our
current knowledge of “dark matter” and hydromechanics we can state that when
an object or a particle moves in “dark matter” its mass, its lifetime and
its frequency should vary with its velocity. To
understand this easily and clearly you can see from the common phenomenon that
the speed of a falling rain drop is faster and this quickly increases the
raindrops mass...Almost no other experiment can really prove that relativity is
conclusive.
3.4 A converse observation results in “relativistic clock effect” to predict the value of relativity
We can all accept that all results ratiocinated from premises of relativity only
relate to the relative movement between two inertial systems. However the
results of those experiments on the relativistic clock effect relate to the
practical movement between the two inertial systems. The two results are
converse to each other in the experiment of the clock effect. From this
essential difference a debate in academic circles about the relativistic paradox
was raised and unexpectedly disposed of this matter carelessly. Further more the
frequency of the atomic clock
should be determined by composite force, so that the correct result of these
calculations prove that there are no effects of relativity at all in the so
called experiments of relativistic clock effect.
3.5
The “250 miles difficulty” in experiments of relativity
The major concepts of relativity about space- time,
which have been confirmed by
academics as a classical truth, surely can not
be accepted when based on those rough verifications of experiments and
having no reliability and no strict math-physical logic. Actually relativists
know clearly that there is a lot of contra-evidence of relativistic theory, for
example the 250 miles difficulty that the Canadian physicist Radir posed, i.e.
the results of all experiments with velocity v = 250 mile/sec disagree with all
their theoretical calculations of relativity.
3.6 The great achievements of relativity and its
false experiments
At that time Einstein lived, it was impossible to know that light matter
existed in universal space; How would light be propagated in universal space?
Was there any medium or carrier for light? As a scientific explorer he assumed
something to explain some light phenomena and believed that light propagates in
a vacuum without any medium or carrier and that light is pure energy and so on.
But he finally doubted that his theory might be wrong just before dying, showed
his great personality and attitude towards seeking the truth from facts.
It
can be understood why people were greatly excited by the theory of relativity,
because of the idea by which time and the space could be bent by the action of
mass. So there existed the starting point of time, the starting point of space
and the time stopped area; 1.5x1010 years ago. All of
time and space, as well as the mass-energy of the Universe were
concentrated on a projectile-like small region. According to Einstein’s theory
it may be possible to go back in time or travel into the future. However to
confirm something as truth it should be on the basis of reliable evidence,
experiments and strict logic and not depend on the beautiful ideas that it may
be possible to move in time and space.
3.7 Starting the research on the nature of light,
matter and fields.
Of course physics at present requires us to research
the nature of light; to learn how light propagates in the form of
wave particle duality i.e. its mechanism of light propagation. As a
matter of fact we have taken a long time to research this and found at last that
there exists really a original particle of light matter but it isn’t the photon
quantum hn. I call it WG as mentioned below. The light
matter WG puts forward possesses gravitational character. Its level of mass
order is 3.6 x 10-42 g. which fills up all space in the universe and
permeates in the micro world between elementary particles. So there must exist
the macro pressure effect of light matter. The calculated results perfectly
agree with the strength and the short-range character of the strong interaction.
After further researching the character of the light matter in free space, we
find that the photon quantum is a phenomenon of wave-particle interference in
space filled with the light matter WG. It's a kind of standing wave in
mathematical form. Certainly it has been confirmed by the discovery of “dark
matter”. The nature of the photon quantum hn
(n can get the value from 0 to infinite) has
been found as a certain quantity of WG that the object system emits or absorbs
when the system is stimulated. The character of WG determines the value of h and
the value of n,
which is determined by the relations of “Schrödinger” equation of the
object system.
Obviously the matter character and the mechanism of light propagation
were real puzzles to the scholars in Einstein’s era. They assumed that light
is pure energy to amend the basic concepts about the mass and the energy of
previous physics so as to fit the mathematical form of relativity. Relativists
assert that the mass and the energy are exchangeable with each other. The mass
can disappear and that corresponding pure energy could be created immediately;
or that certain energy could also be transform to the corresponding mass. Any
physicist knows that light possesses some major characteristics that some normal
objects possess such as light pressure and impulse. In spite of these facts
relativists still insist on the concept that light is pure energy...
Certainly, they have their right to believe in relativity or any other
theory as being a classical truth.
But surely we must insist on the basic physical principles. We must check if the
facts and the evidence of this great theory are proved, trustworthy and
realistic. However most of the relativists have usually shown the attitude of
trusting and not that of scholars who
should have questioned and examined the evidence when
learning and commenting on
theories. This would have given me more confidence to know the scientists in the
domain of physics were
looking to find the nature of light matter and the mechanism of light
propagation and find the nature of various field matters and the essential
mechanisms of those interactions.
3.8
Brief introduction about the WG theory
This paper presents the completed research of WG
theory as follows. Perhaps some of my results in this very important physical
domain are important and will catch the attention of relevant academia.