|
|
|
The space-time theory of the
Relativity--- The fallacy from the experiment perjuries
§1 The examination and verification
principle of “Space-time twisting” experiment of the Relativity.
1. A serious mistake on the principle of
space-time experiment of the Relativity.
According to the Theory of Relativity,
the light propagates in the vacuum linearly, and the gravitation of matter acts
on the space-time and makes it twisted, in turn, the twisting of the space-time
causes the light to be bend. However, the experiment use the same bundle of
light that were ‘twisted correspondingly with the space-time’ as the benchmark.
This is the basic error of the experiment principle.
Scientists who supported the Relativity
declared that the space-time twisting had been proved accurately by the
experiments that found the light twisting on the surface of the sun coincided
exactly with the theoretical data of Relativity.
In order to describe my opinion exactly
and concretely, I once put forward a simulation experiment to prove that the
statement above is a definite mistake on experiment principles.
Get a blank sheet of paper or a flat
piece of thin rubber, and set one point as an "observation station ";
Mark some points of “stars” according to star chart as remote galaxies, and
mark the "pulsar". Connect the observation station and the pulsar
with a line.
If there is a prism on the line between
the observe eyepiece and the "pulsar", the light would be bent. We
must adjust the position and angle of the eyepiece to get the light pass
through the prism and enter the eyepiece to find this pulsar. This is the
condition in which the space-time system physical interaction causes the light
deviated, and also are the testing methods what we speak.
When we get the thin flat rubber twisted
by forces, we would find that the line between the eyepiece and " pulsar " is twisted accordingly. But we do not
need to adjust the positions and angles of the straight eyepiece. The light
originating from the pulsar still could enters the eyepiece
accurately. This is just because the space-time twisted in concert with the
light as a whole.
Conclusion: What the experiment can observed was the twisting caused by the factors in the same
space-time context. There is fundamental principle mistake to prove the
distortion of space-time by matter gravitation using the observation of the
light twisting over the surface of the sun.
2. . The refract of light over the sun surface
caused by surface gaseous state material of the sun has been neglected.
I hope sincerely to get the answer of
following question from serious physics scholar :
The academia has already made the
discussion or the conclusion (not at all as far as I know), that it’s
reasonable to eliminate the refraction caused by the surface atmosphere of the
sun (include ion). We need document, calculate, quote data, calculation principle,
result, etc. relevantly.
We all know in the morning, the sky is
bright before the sun rises. This light distortion is so enormous that is far
beyond second-counting. Although because the material density on the sun
surface is quite different from the atmosphere of the earth, the distortion of
the light on the sun surface is much smaller than the one on the earth, we
cannot simply neglect it. This kind of idea is subjective and not serious. What
we need is theoretical analysis and experiment examination. As we know, the
materials on the sun surface have the enormous average kinetic energy and under
the extremely high temperature, these are the factors that increase the
refraction rate. So it is reasonable to propose: "
Theory of Relativity space-time experiment is suspected of piecing
together the data ".
We notice, the modern experiments
revised the deviation of the light that caused by the corona, but they do not
determine the experiment under the context of the whole atmosphere of the sun.
Some relevant experiments (such as sun
covers the experiment of the radio source (high frequency)) find that the
distortion precision that observed vary with the different light frequencies. This simply the physical characteristics of solar atmosphere deflection
and chromatic dispersion. And it further proves the importance of
analyzing the solar atmosphere deflection.
The qualitative experiment result is at
the same level as the Theory of Relativity within certain radius under lower
frequency. But as the radius and the frequency increases, the refraction effect
rapidly reduces。
The experimental result directly
produces the conclusion as below: with lower frequency and within certain
radius, the experiment result is at same level as the Theory of Relativity
effect… This fully proves that "the deflection is correlated with the
frequency closely"; Proved the solar atmosphere has the deflection basic
reason,
And it also revealed that the scholars
of the Theory of Relativity put pieces of the empirical datum together. This is
the absurd behavior.
C. The solar gravitational pull action
to the moving mass of light quantum also are supposed
to be the important attribute which the proof must consider.
In fact, Einstein discussed in his
initial papers that the deflection is halfly caused by the sun's
In all the space-time theoretical
calculations of the Relativity completely neglect this important factor ( the deflection is halfly caused by the sun's
3. : negative deviation
The experiment of negative deviation
shows that sun's rotation influences significantly to the light that propagates
through the surface atmosphere of the sun; It shows that the deviation
phenomena of the light through the surface of the sun is produces by some usual
physical factors. So-called "the precise confirmation" is only the
good expectation of "some scholars” who hope that the space-time theory of
Relativity to be true.
We can’t believe that the so called
great achievement – Relativity, was proved by the forged experimental evidence.
But it is definitely true.
§2.The Fizeau （Armand
Fizeau） experiment is a definite contra-evidence to the
Theory of Relativity
In the theoretical calculation of this
experiment to verify the theory of relativity，they used
still water instead of flowing water，so they ignored
the eddy in the flowing water and the difference of speed from central and
wall-side of the tube and many other factors to influence refractive indexes.
And they asserted that the Theory of Relativity was precisely with this
experiment.. Actually, it is one of the confirmed contra-evidence of the Theory
of Relativity.
As with the experiment mentioned above,the surprising "great achievements" was born one
by one.
To this experimental physics question.
We think, the precision of experiment involved is a
percentage value of the velocity of flow. But use of the refraction rate in the
still water instead of of the one in the flowing water produces the smaller
ratio, but it involves the change of the value of velocity of light in
different states and it could influence the precision of experiment and could
not be neglected. We must simulate the corresponding swirl produces in quiet
water pipe (Certainly we should test velocity of flow and the intensity of
swirl), Measure the refraction rate of the water staying no flowing but in the
whirlpool, substitute the so- called accurate calculating type of entering
Theory of Relativity with this. We also must consider that the difference of
speeds from in center and closing the face of tube at the same time. Provide
accurate value of the experiment, fight for the inaccurate ones.
§3.Review the principle of the
Relativity’s experiment: Mercury orbit processional motion of radius vector
First, let’s discuss inertia system K
and K' in the “lorentz transformation”. In the K, the origin of K’ moves from
x1 to x2, takes time of t, if I say, the observed values in K is not x1,x2, t,
but the Lorentz-transformed x1’, x2’and t’, everyone should say that “You do
not understand the Theory of Relativity”.
In the inertia system K, let’s imagine a
ball is rotating around the origin O with equally angular speed of w, If I say
that the angular speed is not w but the w’ that transformed by “lorentz
transformation”, everyone should say: You do not understand the Theory of
Relativity.
The astronomer observed that Mercury
orbit processional motion of radius vector is 43” every 100 years, it matches
with the Theory of Relativity calculation precisely.
I say I’m not wrong. The astronomer
should move the instrument on Mercury and aim the sun, and then if they could
derive the conclusion above, they could say there is a precise matching. The
experiment above has made the same mistake in the verification principle, it treated the space-time of moving system as
that of the static system. Similarly, using the principle of equivalence to
draw out the general theory of relativity also follows the same track.
§4.The data putting together in the
latest Doppler Effect Experiment of Relativity theory
There are some experiments related to
special relativity: The atom experiment examining; the Inspection to the fine
structure of hydrogen atomic (Stem from the pure Theory of Relativity quantum
mechanics effect); superfine structure (stem from the quantum field-effect
considering the relativity); the testing to the anomalous magnetic moment of
electron (assert that match until the 11th digits after the decimal point) and
the latest Doppler Effect Experiment of Relativity theory (declare that the
precision is up to 8 effective figures) and so on.
The latest Doppler Effect Experiment of
Relativity theory was made in 1994 by R. Grieser,etc.
The experiment principle is similar to Ives-Stillwell test; the speed of the
particle is 0.064c.
The frequency of laser resonance
vibration that the experiment examined is 512 667 592.4 (3.1) MHz.
The frequency of resonance vibration
according to the Theory of Relativity prophecy is 512 667 588.3(0.8) MHz.
The frequency of resonance vibration
according to the classical theory is 514 776 111.3(0.8) MHz.
(See the attachment in experiment
principle.)
The crucial problem of this experiment
and the ones that made people feel regretful are that the speed of Li ion was
accelerated to high speed status of 0.064C, but the related verification
calculation used the value of energy level and distribution that obtained prior
to the acceleration.
As we know, the system energy (include
the inner energy and the kinetic energy) of Li ion should increase by a wide
margin when accelerated up to high speed of 0.064C and the deference energy of
system determines deference distribution of energy level. We agree that when
the energy of system changes not so much, the energy level distribution can
treated with system "translation" approximately. Unfortunately, the experiment
used the value of energy frequency distribution that before the system was
accelerated up to high speed, and they used this calculation to declare that
the precision is up to 8 effective digits……
The quantum mechanics system is not a
rigidity framework, and the lithium ion is the system with much protons.
Protons and electrons in the same system are under the different motion state,
when the system is accelerated by a wide margin interaction of the strong
electric field, while the kinetic energy increases; the internal energy of the
system increases too. On the other hand, the mass of the proton and the
electron is not at the same quantity grade, so system energy and interval
energy will change when total energy state changes with a large margin.
Attachment
Hereby I introduce the principle of this
experiment briefly.
The transmission system used with this
experiment is the lithium ion moving at high-speed. The experiment has used
three energy levels of the lithium ion. There is no harm in being called level
1(In fact it is the superfine level of J=1, F=3/2 under the 2^3S energy level),
level 2(2^3S，J=1, F=5/2), and level 3(2^3P, J=2,
F=5/2). Level 1 is the lowest level among the all of three, level 3 is the
highest one, and level 2 is a little higher than level 1. Its picture of energy
level looks like the Greek alphabet lambda, so I called it lambda system.
Let’s consider the static situation
first. Generally, the lithium ion exists on level 1 mainly. When we impact the
lithium ion with a bunch of laser, when the frequency of the laser is just
equal to the difference between level 3 and level 1, the lithium ion will be
activated to jump to the level 3. But level 3 is volatile,
lithium ion will jump back to level 1 or to level 2 again. As such, the result
of impacting is that the number of the lithium ion under energy level 2 increase significantly. If the lithium ion is impacted by
another bunch of laser again at this moment, and the frequency of this bunch of
laser is adjustable. When the frequency of the laser transfers to the
difference of energy 3 and energy 2, the laser will be absorbed greatly, and
the fluorescence emerges. The frequencies of the two spectrum lines involved
have been determined accurately. Set them as f1(1->3)
and f2(3->2).
Now let’s consider the situation below.
There is a bunch of lithium ions with high-speed. The speed of the ion varies,
it have certain distribution, (certainly being
distributed is not very widely). Transmit laser behind the ion with frequency
higher than the difference of level 3 and level 1 slightly. Because of the
Doppler Effect, the frequency of laser that the lithium ion receives will be
reduced a bit, how much it is reduced depends on the speed of the ion.
Only the lithium ions with specific
speed can receive the frequency of laser that corresponding to the difference
of level 3 and level 1 exactly, so that only this part of lithium ions would be
activated and jumped into the level 2.
Penetrate the adjustable laser from the
front of this bunch of lithium ion now. Also because of the Doppler Effect, the
laser frequency that the lithium ion receives will be a little bit higher.
Because only the lithium ions at that speed that chosen by the first bunch of
laser can gether in level 2 largely,only when the second bunch of laser’s
frequency changed by the Doppler Effect under that speed to the difference of
level 3 and level 2, the laser would be absorbed largely. The frequency of
second bunch of laser is the so-called resonance frequency. Through intensity of
fluorescence sent by the measuring system,we can
determine whether the second laser resonance with the system.
The frequency of the first bunch of
laser is fa, the frequency of the second bunch of laser is fb, the chosen speed of the lithium ion is v. According to the
principle above, The relations between four pieces of
frequency meet with the following mathematical relations:
f1 = fa * f(v)
f2 = fb * g(v)
Two functions of f(v)
and g(v) are that Doppler formulae of backside direction and opposite direction
separately. Different theories derive different function forms.
As to Special Relativity
f1 = fa * k * (1 - v/c)
f2 = fb * k * (1 + v/c)
Do multiplying, we get:
f1 * f2 = fa * fb （1）
So the resonance laser frequency of the
special relativity prophecy should be
fb = f1 * f2 / fa
As to classical theory
f1 = fa * (1 - v/c)
f2 = fb * (1 + v/c)
Do multiplying, we get:
f1 * f2 = fa * fb * (1 - vv/cc) （2）
So the resonance laser frequency of the
classical theory prophecy should be
fb = f1 * f2 / fa / (1 - vv/cc)
The purpose of the experiment is to
examine whether the resonance frequency that derived from the Theory of
Relativity is match with the measured value. The result of experiment was given
yesterday and we make some supplemented a little more here.
The frequency of the first bunch of
laser is fa = 582 490 603.370(0.130) MHz
The frequency of the second bunch of
laser is fb = 512 667 592.4(3.1) MHz
The frequency of two lines is respectively
under the static reference system:
[This was measured independently by an
experiment scientist of another group，published in
Physical Review A 49, 20 (1994) finally。The two values
below were found by me from this document. I have not found the data which
Grieser used，So the value of Theory of Relativity
prophesy with below this group of data will be slightly different with what
provided yesterday, but the tolerance is within the range of error.]
f1 = 546 474 963.42 (0.4) MHz
f2 = 546 455 145.74 (0.4) MHz