. |
Job analysis is just that analyzing the tasks you need done in
order to complete a job. It doesn't have to be difficult or complicated. Job analysis is
the process of looking at exactly what a job entails in order to determine the necessary
job qualifications.
Whatever methodology is used, the job analysis should be based on observable behaviors or work
products. By recording behavior and work products in the job analysis, the analysis
concentrates on those aspects of the job which are empirically verifiable.
Through the job analysis, a job's skills,
knowledge and ability (KSA)
can be defined in operational terms. This is essential if the job
analysis data are to have any utility whatever. For example, if KSA's are to be used in
performance assessment, they must be operationally defined.
- Knowledge is knowing how to perform the work but not having
performed it.
- Skill is having performed the work.
- Ability is having the physical, emotional, intellectual, and
psychological ability to perform the work but neither having done the work nor having been
trained to do the work.
Once jobs have been scored for KSA level and
those scores have been entered into a computer, it is possible to have the computer sort
the jobs by skill level.
The relative ranking of one
job to another may then be supported by KSA's. Jobs with lesser KSA's
tend to be lower in the organization than jobs with greater KSA's; this may be relevant in
the determination of pay levels within the organization.
|
. |
A job analysis should focus on work
behavior(s) and the tasks associated with them. If work behavior(s) are not observable,
the job analysis should identify and analyze those aspects of the behavior(s) that can be
observed and the observed work products.
In order to ensure content
validity, the job analysis must be a record of observable behaviors or work products. The
job analysis should not record thought processes, attitudes, traits, or other such
constructs.
Employee input:
The work of jobs is done by people
and people do not generally behave in random fashion. In general, people are reasonable
and systematic. Furthermore, when asked,
people are able to talk about their jobs in a very organized, systematic manner. Hence, it
should be possible to do a job analysis by talking to job incumbents.
Accommodating changing jobs:
The job analysis process must be able to
accommodate and adjust to organizational change. Many jobs undergo constant change, and
job analysis systems must address this fact of change. If the job analysis data are not
valid and do not reflect job changes, employment decisions based on that data may be
irrelevant. To avoid being invalid, job analysis data should be periodically reviewed by
employers.
|
. |
|
Positives aspects of site observation...
pinpoint precise details about
timing, frequency, complexity, work flow, production efficiencies, work conditions,
materials, and equipment
minimizes likelihood of incumbents
biasing the data
Negative aspects of site observation...
can only be used on jobs that are easily
discernible or measurable
|
I. SITE
OBSERVATIONEmployee
observation:
Observing employees is one of the most
commonly used job analysis techniques. Observation can also serve as a complement
to an interview, to ensure that nothing has been left out or to verify the data
provided by the job incumbent.
Drawbacks:
The job analysis will generally analyze
the employee performing the job through a complete job cycle. It is important
that, when observing an employee, the person doing the analysis not let opinions about the
employee get in the way of observing the job. Don't analyze the employee (this is not a
performance assessment) analyze the job. Employee observation is usually easier in
a manufacturing or production environment. Because the jobs and tasks of a management
employee may vary so widely from day to day, site observation of this job may not be as
easy or appropriate.
|
. |
II. WORK SAMPLING:JOB ANALYST randomly samples the
content of a job rather than the entire job
USEFUL FOR HIGHLY REPETITIVE JOBS |
Care
must be taken that the sample is indeed representative of the ENTIRE job
|
.. |
III. THE JOB ANALYSIS INTERVIEW
1. |
interview job incumbents and/or job
supervisor |
2. |
ask similar questions - gives interview
structure and enhances reliability |
3. |
interviews allow analyst greater
"depth" than observation (can ask probing questions/clarify areas of confusion) |
4. |
interview used primarily for designing job
standards, identifying training needs and determining job worth |
|
.. |
Interviews:
Initial job analysis data
collection is generally achieved through interviews with one or more job
incumbents. These incumbents are likely to be the most knowledgeable people about
the duties and responsibilities of the job.
In general, for most jobs,
employees can identify several hundred tasks per job. Using a relative scale, employees
can rank hundreds of tasks in terms of relative frequency and relative difficulty;
this provides an excellent method for defining the critical aspects of a job.
The interview process:
The job analysis interview starts with the
interviewer asking the job incumbents to talk about what they do. Interviews permit the
interviewer to attain considerable richness of detail; if the interviewer is unclear about
what the incumbent is talking about, clarification may be asked for.
Once the initial interview has been
completed, the data should be entered into a computer.
Management review of data:
Management should review the data from the
initial interview to determine if the data reflect the work being done by the employees,
and if the employees are doing what they should be doing?
Verification of the information:
A computer print-out of the initial
interview data can then be distributed to everyone in the job, so they can revise the data
according to their perception and experience with the job.
Job analysis detail (critical job behaviors):
Given the hundreds of specific tasks that
might be identified for any job, one task of the analysis is to determine the
level of detail necessary for a good job analysis? To this end, the incumbents
should be asked to score each of the tasks for relative frequency and relative
difficulty. One way to do this would be to score each task for frequency and
difficulty with a number from 0 to 7. Once the employees have scored the list of tasks for
frequency and difficulty, it is a simple matter to establish which tasks are critical.
|
..QUESTIONNAIRE...
...MOST EFFICIENT METHOD:
fast
standardized
if data is inadequate, follow-up interviews may be
scheduled
|
IV. JOB ANALYSIS: USE OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE
Written questionnaires:
A questionnaire is a written series of
questions that relate to the specific duties of the job. This questionnaire is completed
by a job incumbent. The questionnaire seeks to determine the tasks the employee does most,
and the skills the employee will need to do the job.
Questionnaires can vary in style. For
example, the questions can be highly structured or open ended. Open-ended questions allow
the interviewee to give a narrativeanswer, such as an essay question. Open-ended questions
are also especially effective for positions that cover a wide range of responsibilities.
Remember, the main objective is to find out
what is done. The job analysis process can help an employer crystallize her/his thoughts
into a clear picture of what is needed to do a job, and which skills a prospective
employee must have to do it.
|
. |
|
. |
|