Gulf War Syndrome
- The Burlington Free Press, 06/15/2002:
Sanders to
address British Parliament
Gulf War Syndrome
- The report to Congress 11/07/97
[contents]:
Union Calendar
No. 228
Back To:
Primal Scream:
Beyond the Box
Essays: Gulf
War Syndrome
and The News
Links:
GulfWeb.org
GulfLink.mil
Pages 134 - 136 of the printed version are shown at right. A com-plete copy of this report is available from your Congress-ional Represent-ative, or from:
U.S. Printing
Office
A pdf version is available from the Federal Government at:
Library of
Congress
|
ADDITIONAL VIEWS OF HON. BERNARD SANDERS
I would like to express my appreciation for the time and energy which
Congressman Shays, Ranking Member Towns and the committee staff have put into this
investigation and this Report. I would also like to express my concurrence with the
conclusions and recommendations in this report. As it happens, it is my opinion that this
report represents the most comprehensive and accurate assessment of the complexities
surrounding Gulf War illnesses. I am delighted that the Government Reform and Oversight
Committee approved this report and I believe we should promptly begin working on
implementing its recommendations in a timely manner. After 6 years of virtually no
progress in this area, we have no time to lose. The U.S. Congress, along with the
scientific and medical community, the Veterans organizations and other concerned bodies,
must begin focussing on this issue in a way that has not yet occurred. Our goal must be,
as soon as possible, to discover the causes of Gulf War illnesses and the most effective
treatments available.
Chairman Shays and his subcommittee have lead the effort during the last
19 months to unravel the complexities surrounding Gulf War illnesses. We have heard
compelling testimony from dozens of sick veterans - at times this testimony was not only
difficult for them to give, but was also painful for the Members and the public to hear.
The subcommittee heard testimony from high level representatives from the Department of
Defense, the Veterans Administration, doctors and scientists from around the world, the
General Accounting Office and many others. I would like to stress that the conclusions
contained in this report were not made lightly. They were drawn by gathering of
information from 11 subcommittee hearings and thousands of pages of documents. Many many
people testified at these hearings and I would like to thank all of them for the
tremendous help they gave this committee.
The bottom line is this. After an exhaustive gathering of the evidence,
and careful analysis of the information which was put before this subcommittee, it is my
own conclusion that the Department of Defense and the VA have failed miserably in solving
the problems of Gulf War illnesses and in developing effective treatments for the tens of
thousands of veterans who are hurting -including hundreds in my own State of Vermont.
It is clear to almost everyone that, from the very beginning of this
situation, the DOD and the VA have downplayed the whole issue of Gulf War illness. In the
very beginning they actually denied that there was any problem whatsoever. And then, after
finally acknowledging that there was a problem, they concluded that the problem was in the
heads of our soldiers - of psychological origin. For 5 years, the Pentagon denied that our
soldiers had been exposed to any chemical warfare agents. Finally, after being forced to
admit that there were exposures, they suggested that the exposures were ``limited''. The
DOD's first estimates were 400 troops exposed, then 20,000 troops. In July of this year,
the DOD and CIA gave us their best estimate - that as many as 98,910 American troops could
have been exposed to chemical warfare agents due to destruction of ``the Pit'' in
Khamisiyah, an Iraqi munitions facility. I would not be surprised if this estimate is
revised upward in the not too distant future, as more information is gathered regarding
other incidents of chemical warfare exposure. And on and on it goes. Getting information
has been like pulling teeth.
If I were in pain and for 6 years I went to a doctor who was unable to
effectively diagnose my problem or treat me, I would say to that doctor, ``Thank you very
much for your efforts, but I am going elsewhere.'' And that is the situation facing some
70,000 veterans of Gulf War illness. The evidence is overwhelming that, for whatever
reason, the DOD and the VA have not been able to come up with a cause for Gulf War
illnesses or an effective treatment. It may simply be nothing more complicated than the
fact that the VA and the DOD simply lack the expertise in environmental toxicology that is
at the root of the problem. I am not casting aspersions on the sincerity of the leadership
of the VA and the DOD and their desire to do the right thing and help our veterans. I am
simply saying that they have failed, that we must acknowledge their failure, and for the
sake of the 70,000 veterans who continue to hurt, we must go outside of the DOD and VA if
we are to come up with the cause of this problem and find effective treatments.
As part of this effort, I am happy to report that the Labor-HHS
appropriations bill, which is currently in conference, contains language, that I
introduced, which asks the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences to study
how chemical exposures in the Persian Gulf relate to Gulf War illnesses. Additionally
through this program, the NIEHS is to investigate treatment protocols which are being
developed in the private sector around the country. Whether or not the NIEHS should be the
agency given full responsibility for heading up the broader independent investigation
which this report calls for, I can't answer right now. But that is an issue that needs to
be pursued vigorously and in the very near future.
As we learned through our subcommittee hearings, the military theater in
the Persian Gulf was a chemical cesspool. Our troops were exposed to chemical warfare
agents, leaded petroleum, widespread use of pesticides, depleted uranium and burning oil
wells. In addition, they were given a myriad of pharmaceuticals as vaccines. Further, and
perhaps most importantly, as a result of waiver from the FDA, hundreds of thousands of
troops were given pyridostigmine bromide. Pyridostigmine bromide, which was being used as
an anti-nerve gas agent, had never been used in this capacity before. In the midst of all
of this, our troops were living in a hot and unpleasant climate and were under very great
stress.
Through our subcommittee hearings we have also learned that an increasing
number of scientists now believe that the synergistic effect of chemical exposures, plus
the experimental vaccine pyridostigmine bromide, may well be a major cause of the health
problems affecting our soldiers. Additionally, we learned of scientific studies which
suggest that stressful conditions in combination with taking pyridostigmine bromide can
lead to neurological problems. Moreover, this subcommittee heard from scientists who
conclude that exposures to low levels of chemical weapons, such as those experienced near
Khamisiyah, can lead to long-term health problems - contrary to what the DOD and VA
continue to maintain.
One of the most important, yet disturbing facets of this problem is that
health effects from chemical exposures may surface years after the initial exposure - and
these health effects can be very serious, including kidney damage, liver damage,
neurological damage, reproductive problems, respitory problems and cancer. Our government
needs to own up to the fact that many of the chemical exposures in the Gulf can very well
lead to long-term and serious health problems for our veterans. And because of this we
have a responsibility to provide health care, treatment and compensation for the health
problems which stem from service in the Gulf.
I very much agree with the recommendation in this report that Congress
enact a law which sets up the presumption that Gulf War veterans were exposed to hazardous
materials known to have been present in the Gulf War theater. As we have learned in our
hearings, to this point the burden has been on the veteran to prove that they were exposed
to harmful chemicals and that their illnesses stem from that exposure. Because of the lack
of military records as to administration of pyridostigmine bromide, missing logs on
chemical and biological weapons alarms, and missing data as to which individuals were
exposed to chemical weapons, it has been impossible for thousands of veterans to prove
that chemical exposure has caused their illnesses. This has resulted in unending
frustration for thousands of sick veterans_causing many to seek medical attention from the
private sector and devote significant financial resources to treating their illnesses.
This is simply unacceptable.
In having passed this committee report, we should not think that our work
is done. On the contrary, we have really just begun. It is my belief that serious and
focused scientific work can give us an understanding of why tens of thousands of our
soldiers are suffering a myriad of illnesses, and some excellent scientific work - already
completed - is paving the way for us. It is also my belief that we can come up with
effective treatments. And it very likely that there are physicians throughout the country
who have already developed treatments that are helpful.
It seems to me that our committee must remain involved in this issue,
must, along with our colleagues in both bodies, help find the appropriate agency to direct
the research, must make certain that adequate money is made available, and must exercise
oversight over that agency to ensure that its mandate is carried out. I thank Chairman
Shays and Ranking Member Towns for their hard work on this issue, and I look forward to
working with my committee colleagues in the near future, to implement its recommendations.
Hon. Bernard Sanders.
|
|