Site
Departments:
Commentary
Observations
Research
A Midwest
Phototour
Your own question, opinion? E-mail
me..
Of Interest
Scattering Fork Outdoor Center
Worstell Design
Simmons' Stables Restorations Fund
Google News
|
Feb 20, 2004
More than the
simplistic Dems versus GOP, this is more culture differences and
lifestyle choices. There is an ongoing war, but it isn't fought in the
Press or with modern weapons. It does elect our policians,
though. Why should you be concerned with this?
|
Presidents are elected by cultures, not by press or advertising or money or political ties.
People still rule their own roost. The cultural differences are
underlying the current animosities between the parties. A recent study
of the Civil War brought this home to me in a different light. We
seem to be involved in constant skirmishes and tactical engagements
these days, more than we are commonly aware of.
This study is fascinating as it struck home to me just as I was
returning to the rural Midwest after a long sojourn (23+ years) living
in metropolitan areas, mostly in Los Angeles - downtown Hollywood. The
2000 Presidential race was more illustrative of the nation's cultures
and fixed ideas than it was about political whatevers.
Bush and Gore wound up with essentially the same party platforms.
Both had the same planks, the same issues. They ran on their
principal characters and virtues rather than any real ideological
differences. We might not see that same action again. Both
parties were centrist, both trying to run on a campaign to get the big
bulk middle rather than the extremes of each end.
What we saw then, were two characters who were rich and had rich
backers. Both had gone to fancy colleges and gotten degrees from
what were known
as some of the best schools in the US. Both had ample funds
supporting
them to do so. Both were seasoned politicians and knew how to get
people to support them.
One was an intimate of a President involved in personal scandals. This
person was known to stretch, if not fabricate the truth, much as his
mentor did.
The other candidate was a plain-spoken Texan, with deep-seated beliefs
in God. This candidate was not polished in public speaking and wasn't a
lawyer, but a CEO. His father had been president and failed in a
re-election attempt.
But their following showed more about the US than anyone had thought
possible. A tightly contested race showed that there were far
more differences within the US itself, which measured the character of
the candidate more closely than the press or government ever would.
The USA Today newsmagazine came out with the original red/blue state
and county maps of the US, which showed the supporters of the Blue
party were not just a handful of disparate states, but actually just
the metropolises of those states. Red party counties showed that
they controlled around 90 percent of the land mass of this country,
being responsible for all the food supply and a great deal of the
manufacturing in this country. Blue parties had the principle
media centers and governmental areas.
This is a far larger story than can be told in a short web-page/blog.
The research is still ongoing to examine the whereby's and whatfor's of
this But the consensus of all those who have reported on this issue
points to a real cultural divide which exists in this country.
This won't reach the height of the insanities which preceded the Civil
War. But it does speek tomes about the same arrogance and ignorance in
the attitudes of extremists on both sides of our current cultural
divide, just as there were then. We do not have "slavery" to act as a
lightning rod as was the situation then. But there are strong
undercurrents which are causing sweeping changes in the politics of
this country, as well as the economy.
Confronted and dealt with, we can predict certain changes in this
country and this world, all positive and survival-oriented.
Certain people won't confront these changes and this is one key factor
which will affect the outcome.
As I finish this research, I'll report on it through these pages.
But the results have been surprising, nothing that the news media
(read: blue-oriented) have reported. That is a subject and study
in itself. The long and short of it is that people are turning more red
and not because of anything that people are talking about. Hint: try
property ownership, something mundane and usual as home and land
ownership.
As always, let me know what
you think. There is certainly room for more research input along this line.
Robert C. Worstell.
Back to top
|