The difference between a "pure moral philosophy" and an "anthropology of morals" is their basis for evaluation. The former is based on logic and theory, devoid of all things empiracle. The latter is entirely empiracle, based on things of experience or measurement. This distintion is necesary in order to determine whether any action is morally good. That cannot be determined when there is empiracle influence present "because morals themselves remain exposed to corruption of all sorts as long as this guided thread is lacking, this ultimate norm for moral judgement." (vii) Kant believed that the only the thing that could be considered good without qualification was a good will. "For if any action is to be morally good, it is not enough that it should conform to the moral law - it must be done for the sake of the moral law."(viii) In this he was saying that sometime an action may conform to what is good(I may let someone go ahead of me in the breakfast line) but have bad motivations(I want to be late getting to class.) In order to be truly good I have to do good only for the sake of doing good(I saw that the person behind me looked hungry and allowed their hunger to be satisfied before mine out of the goodness of my heart.) He later explains this quite clearly, "A good will is not good because of what it effects of accomplishes-because of its fitness for attaining some proposed end: it is good through its willing alone-that is, good in itself." (3) Also, actions that we have an inclination for do not have the moral worth that actions that we do purely out of duty have because we would be doing them whether or not they were good. In the example of a grocery store owner, he would clearly not overcharge an inexperiences shopper. He could do it out of the inclination to treat all people equally. He could also do it out of the moral duty to be honest. But, in this case he does it purely out of the self interest of not losing profit due to bad business practices. Back to Philosophy page Ryan's Writings main page |
| Interpretation of Preface and Chapter 1 of Immanuel Kant's Moral Law by Ryan Cofrancesco |