Analogues of Capsaicin with Agonist Activity as Novel Analgesic Agents: Structure-Activity Studies. 4. Potent, Orally Active Analgesics
Abstract:
Structural features of three regions of the capsaicin molecule necessary for agonist properties were delineated by a previously reported modular approach. These in vitro agonist effects were shown to correlate with analgesic potency in rodent models. Combination of optimal structural features from each of these regions of the capsaicin molecule have led to highly potent agonists (e.g., 1b). Evaluation in vivo established that 1b had analgesic properties but poor oral activity, short duration of action, and excitatory side effects which precluded further development of this compound. Preliminary metabolism studies had shown that the phenol moiety of 1b was rapidly glucuronidated in vivo, providing a possible explanation for the poor pharmacokinetic profile. Subsequent specific modification of the phenol group led to compounds 2a-j, which retained in vitro potency. The in vivo profiles of two representatives of this series, 2a,h, were much improved over the "parent" phenol series, and they are candidates for development as analgesic agents.
Earlier papers in this series have described the
potential use of capsaicin-like agonists as analgesic
agents.1-3
This work has formed the basis of a molecular approach toward more potent capsaicin agonists which are anticipated to be useful as novel analgesic agents. In parallel with our studies, workers at Procter and Gamble Co. have explored structural modifications of the capsaicin molecule. Based on antinociceptive studies, a series of aliphatic vanillylamides were described5 culminating in the identification of Olvanil (NE 19950, oleyl vanillylamide) as a putative analgesic. The structure-activity relationship (SAR) conclusions from both groups are broadly in concert. More recently Park et al.6 have described capsaicin-like agonists in the patent literature.
![]() | Chart 1 |
Specifically, from our earlier studies, it was established that the natural substitution pattern was optimal in the A region, that a thiourea moiety conferred high potency when incorporated in the B region, and that a hydrophobic unit of limited size, e.g., a substituted aralkyl or aralkenyl substituent, was necessary in the C region. The present paper describes the combination of these individual potency-enhancing features in the same molecule with the aim of making compounds with increased in vitro potency which might therefore be expected to have enhanced analgesic properties in vivo. Realization of this goal and the subsequent refine- ments of the target structures based on in vivo data are described below and have led to compounds with therapeutic potential.
The synthetic approaches to the target molecules are
unexceptional and not discussed here in detail. The
skeletal assembly, involving the coupling of an amine
component with an isothiocyanate component, is shown
in outline in Scheme 1, and the resulting target structures are listed in Table 1. The protecting
group
strategies (described by X in Scheme 1 and Table
1)
varied from compound to compound and are described
in detail in the Experimental Section. For the
"parent"
phenol series 1a-i, the phenolic group was
either left
unprotected or carried through the isothiocyanate coupling step as the ethoxyethyl acetal which was subsequently removed using dilute acid. For the 2-aminoethyl phenolic ether series 2a-j, the primary
amino group
was protected as the phthalimide in the coupling step
and then removed using hydrazine under standard
conditions.
![]() | Scheme 1 |
The (Z)-ethenyl compound 1d was made by photochemical isomerization of the E compound 1c. The (methylamino)ethyl side chain of 4 was protected as the FMoc derivative for the coupling step. The protecting group was subsequently removed using piperidine under standard conditions. The (dimethylamino)ethyl phenol ether 5 was prepared from the aminoethyl compound 2a by treatment with paraformaldehyde and subsequent reduction with sodium cyanoborohydride. The acylated compounds 8-10 were made from 2a using acetyl chloride, ethyl chloroformate, and di-tert-butyl dicarbonate, respectively.
Combination of the optimal features of each of the
three regions of the capsaicin molecule has led to the
aralkyl and aralkenyl thioureas 1a-i. As
anticipated,
evaluation of these compounds in the
45Ca2+ influx assay
has established that 1a-i are capsaicin-like
agonists
with potencies, in some cases, greater than that of
capsaicin itself (see Table 1). Indeed, with the
exception
of the complex natural product resiniferatoxin and its
analogues,7-9
The C region substituents (R2), exemplified in
1a-i,
fall within the molecular size limit (Mr 55)
for the
"hydrophobic substituent of limited size" compatible
with high potency which had been proposed earlier.3
The
significant difference in activity between the isomers
1c,d is interesting and may reflect a further
manifestation of the shape and size limitation in this region.
Further consideration of the SAR establishes the importance of substitution of the aromatic ring
(i.e., the
unsubstituted analogue 1g is less potent), but
further
attempts to rationalize the nature or pattern of substitution seem pointless from these data given the similar
activities of these analogues.
The p-chlorophenethyl thiourea 1b was selected for in vivo evaluation to assess its potential as an analgesic agent. The potent (E)-ethenyl compound 1d was precluded from consideration because of its limited chemical stability.
From the data shown in Table 2 the analgesic
properties of 1b support the principle established
earlier,1-3
namely, that potent capsaicin-like agonism correlates
with analgesic effects in rodent models. This
molecule
was however precluded from further development as a
therapeutic agent because of several unwanted properties. Although 1b was effective in several
rodent
analgesia models given subcutaneously (ED50 = 11.8
±
3.6
mol/kg, 4.0 ± 1.2 mg/kg), oral activity was poor
(ED50 = 370 ± 54
mol/kg, 113 ± 16 mg/kg) and
the
duration of the response was short (total
loss of activity
at 2 h after an ED50 dose sc). The spectrum of
excitatory
side effects of 1b was similar to that of
capsaicin.10 In
particular, bronchoconstrictive effects of 1b
(threshold
dose 0.025 ± 0.005
mol/kg, 8.9 ± 1.8
g/kg, iv,
guinea
pig), which are a characteristic property of
capsaicin,11
were observed at similar doses to the latter. The
excitatory properties of 1b were also manifest in
its
pungency and irritant properties which were akin to
those of capsaicin itself. Olvanil (oleyl
vanillylamide),
while clearly less pungent than capsaicin,5b suffers
from
some of the same defects as 1b, particularly, poor
oral
activity.
The medicinal chemistry goal to develop a therapeutic entity therefore was focused to address these issues, namely, the improvement of the bioavailability and the reduction of the excitatory properties of 1b. Preliminary metabolism studies on phenol 1b established that the molecule was rapidly metabolized to the O-glucuronide, which was the only detectable component in plasma at all time points after oral dosing in rats and dogs.12 This marked glucuronidation and thereby probable inactivation of the parent molecule 1b would explain the low oral bioavailability and the relatively short duration of action of this compound.
It had been established from our earlier studies1 that, in general, blocking of the phenolic OH group with a variety of substituents removed or drastically reduced agonist activity in capsaicin analogues; however, substitution with the 2-aminoethyl group led to the series of compounds 2a-j in which agonist potency in vitro was substantially maintained. Comparison of structural pairs (e.g., 1b and 2a, 1e and 2c, 1f and 2d, and 1g and 2b) showed relatively lower potency in the O-substituted analogues over the parent phenols with one clear exception (1i and 2h). Contemporaneously the Procter and Gamble group claimed that this same substituent attached to the phenolic moiety of their aliphatic vanillylamides improved the water solubility, reduced the irritant effects, and retained the antinociceptive properties of these compounds.13 A representative of this chemical class is the compound oleyl 4-O-(aminoethyl)vanillylamide (NE 21610).
With the identification of the 2-aminoethyl substituent as an acceptable replacement for the metabolically labile parent phenolic hydrogen, it was considered important to explore the SAR of this substituent. The results of this structural investigation are shown in Table 1 from the series of analogues of 2a. It is clear from the in vitro data presented in Table 1 that all modifications of the 2-aminoethyl substituent are deleterious. Thus lengthening of the methylene bridge (in 3) and alkylation (in 4-6) and acylation (in 7-10) of the amino group all lead to less active compounds than the unsubstituted compound 2a. The lack of activity of the quaternary ammonium compound 6 is particularly noteworthy, possibly implying the existence of an access barrier, e.g., membrane penetration, to such a compound. Further investigation of this hypothesis is in progress.
On the basis of the in vitro data compounds 2a,h were evaluated in vivo in analgesia models in comparison with morphine as a representative established analgesic agent and oleyl 4-O-(aminoethyl)vanillylamide (NE 21610), another capsaicin agonist. These data are shown in Table 2.
The modification of the phenol group described above was undertaken to improve the pharmacokinetic properties of these molecules. It can be seen from the data in Table 2 that this improvement has been achieved. While the potency of the phenol 1b is comparable with that of 2a by the subcutaneous route, the oral potency of the latter is much improved. In contrast the same improvement is not observed with oleyl 4-O-(aminoethyl)vanillylamide, where, from the tail-flick latency data (see Table 2), it appears that this molecule has only poor oral activity. We have no explanation for this difference which clearly lies elsewhere than in vitro potency as oleyl 4-O-(aminoethyl)vanillylamide is comparable in the Ca2+ influx assay to 2h. The potency of 2h is significantly increased by both routes of administration over that of 2a, perhaps reflecting the greater in vitro activity of the former; moreover 2h is more potent than the reference molecule morphine. Another improvement is illustrated by the increased duration of action of both compounds, 2a,h, over the "parent" phenol 1b.
Fortuitously this structural change, which has improved the analgesic profile of analogues such as 2a,h, also reduced the excitatory properties of these compounds in comparison to the phenolic compounds. In contrast to 1b, a clear separation of bronchoconstrictive effects from analgesia was achieved with 2a and (to a lesser extent) with the more potent compound 2h. These compounds are also virtually nonpungent in comparison to capsaicin and 1b. A possible explanation for the reduced excitatory properties of O-substituted compounds such as 2h over the phenol series, e.g., 1b, appears to lie in their rate of excitation of the sensory neuron.14
On the basis of the combination of its antinociceptive properties and its reduced excitatory effects compared with other capsaicin agonists, 2h has been selected as a clinical development candidate with a novel mode of analgesic action. Mechanistic studies are ongoing to elaborate a molecular explanation for the improved properties of 2h and congeners which involves the rate of membrane penetration, and this will be reported in due course.
General Information. Melting points were
determined
using a Reichert hot-stage microscope and are uncorrected.
Routine NMR spectra were recorded using
Hitachi-Perkin
Elmer R12B and Varian Gemini 200 machines. High-field
spectra were recorded using Varian VX400 400 MHz (University College London Chemistry Department) and Bruker
AM360 360 MHz (Sandoz, Basle) instruments. All
spectra
were recorded using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal
standard, and chemical shifts are reported in parts per
million
() downfield from TMS. Coupling constants are reported
in
hertz. A Perkin-Elmer 781 machine was used to record
IR
spectra. Elemental analyses were performed by the
Analytical
Department of University College London and were within
0.4% of theory unless otherwise indicated. Mass spectra
were
recorded by the Mass Spectrometry Department of University
College London, using a VG 7070F/H spectrometer, and FAB
spectra were recorded in Sandoz, Basle, using a VG 70-SE
spectrometer. Accurate mass determinations were made
by
M. Cocksedge and Dr. D. Carter, London School of Pharmacy,
using a VG ZAB SE mass spectrometer and FAB ionization.
TLC was performed using Merck Kieselgel 60 F254
silica
plates or Merck aluminum oxide 60 F254 plates, and
components were visualized using UV light and iodine vapor.
HPLC
was performed using a Waters 600 system (-Bondapak C-18
column (RP18), using CH3CN/0.1% aqueous
TFA gradients of
compositions stated in the text. Compounds were purified
by
flash column chromatography15 using Merck Kieselgel
60
(230-400 mesh) unless otherwise indicated. Solvents
were
HLPC grade and used without further purification.
Solvents
were dried according to the standard procedures.16
Test
compounds were homogenous by TLC or HPLC unless otherwise stated. Chemical yields were not optimized.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Vanillyl Thioureas. The thioureas described herein were prepared either by coupling vanillylamine (or a 4-alkyloxy derivative) with the relevant isothiocyanate (method A) or by coupling vanillyl isothiocyanate (or a 4-alkyloxy derivative) with the relevant amine (method B). Both are exemplified below.
Method A:
C; TLC (silica,
CH2Cl2/MeOH, 5:1)
Rf 0.59; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz)
3.74 (3H, s,
ArOCH3), 4.56 (2H,
br m, ArCH2NH), 4.70 (2H, br m,
ArCH2NH), 6.72 (2H, m,
benzyl ArH5,6), 6.91 (1H, s, vanillyl
ArH2), 7.35 (4H, m,
ArH),
7.92 (2H, br m, thiourea NHs), 8.92 (1H, s,
ArOH); MS m/e
336 (M+). Anal.
(C16H17N2O2SCl)
C, H, N.
Method B:
C; TLC
(silica,
cyclohexane/EtOAc, 1:1) Rf 0.24;
1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 60
MHz)
2.85 (2H, m, ArCH2CH2N),
3.65 (2H, m, ArCH2CH2N),
3.75
(3H, s, ArOCH3), 4.55 (2H, d, J =
6.0 Hz, ArCH2N), 6.7-7.0
(3H, m, ArH), 7.1-7.35 (4H, m, ArH), 7.50 (1H,
br m, CH2NH),
7.80 (1H, br m, ArCH2NH); MS
m/e 334 (M+). Anal.
(C17H19N2O2SF) C,H,N.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Isothiocyanates. Unless commercially available, or otherwise indicated, all isothiocyanates mentioned herein were synthesized by the method illustrated by the synthesis of 4-tert-butylbenzyl isothiocyanate described below.
4-
C;
TLC
(silica, CH2Cl2/MeOH, 5:1)
Rf 0.69; 1H-NMR
(DMSO-d6, 400
MHz)
2.82 (2H, t, J = 7.16 Hz,
ArCH2CH2), 3.65 (2H, br
m,
ArCH2CH2N), 3.76 (3H, s,
ArOCH3), 4.52 (2H, br m,
ArCH2N),
6.73 (2H, m, ArH), 6.9 (1H, s, ArH), 7.31 (4H, m, ArH),
7.40
(1H, br m, thiourea NH), 7.75 (1H, br m, thiourea NH),
8.90
(1H, s, ArOH); MS m/e 350
(M+). Anal.
(C17H19N2O2SCl)
C,H,N.
4-Chlorobenzoyl Nitrile. This compound was prepared from 4-chlorobenzoyl chloride, according to the method of Burger and Hornbaker.17
2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxyethylamine. Lithium aluminum hydride (50 g) was suspended in dry diethyl ether (500 mL) and stirred on a salt/ice bath. A solution of 4-chlorobenzoyl nitrile (115.0 g, 0.695 mol) in diethyl ether (500 mL) was added dropwise over 30 min. The mixture was stirred under N2 at room temperature for 18 h and then refluxed for 6 h. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and then on ice, and wet diethyl ether (500 mL) was added to deactivate the LiAlH4 followed by the slow addition of 5 N NaOHaq. The mixture was filtered, the solution was dried over Na2SO4 and then filtered, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography (silica, CH2Cl2/MeOH, 10:1) to give 39.0 g of a white crystalline solid (33% yield): TLC (CH2Cl2/MeOH/AcOH, 120:90:5) Rf 0.45.
2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-chloroethylamine Hydrochloride. 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxyethylamine (38.2 g,
0.223
mol) was dissolved in chloroform (500 mL). Thionyl
chloride
(55 mL, 0.765 mol) in chloroform (100 mL) was added slowly
with stirring, and a dense beige precipitate formed.
The
mixture was stirred and refluxed for 3 h and then cooled,
and
the solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was
sonicated
in MeOH, filtered, washed with diethyl ether, and then
dried
to give 25.9 g of an off-white crystalline solid (51% yield):
TLC
(silica, CH2Cl2/MeOH, 5:1)
Rf 0.6; 1H-NMR
(CD3OD, 60 MHz)
3.55 (2H, d, J = 7.2 Hz,
CHClCH2NH2), 5.4 (1H, t,
J = 7.2
Hz, ArCHClCH2), 7.6 (4H, s, ArH); FABMS
m/e 190 (MH+).
2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-chloroethyl Isothiocyanate.
2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-chloroethylamine hydrochloride (25.9 g,
0.114
mol) was suspended in water (300 mL), with a few crystals
of
phenolphthalein. Thiophosgene (9.2 mL, 0.120 mol) was
added
in CH2Cl2 (200 mL) with stirring followed
by the gradual
addition of 2 M NaOHaq until the aqueous layer retained
a
permanent purple coloration. After stirring for 30 min,
the
layers were partitioned using a separating funnel. The
organic
phase was washed with saturated NaClaq, dried over
Na2SO4,
and then filtered and the solvent removed in vacuo.
The
residue was purified by flash column chromatography
(silica,
cyclohexane/EtOAc, 50:1) to give 22.3 g of a yellow
crystalline
solid (84% yield): TLC (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 50:1)
Rf
0.25; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 60 MHz) 3.95 (2H, d,
J = 7.0 Hz,
CHCH2NCS), 5.0 (1H, t, J = 7.0
Hz, ArCHClCH2), 7.4 (4H,
m, ArH); IR
2090 cm-1 (NCS stretch).
(C;
triethylamine (4.5 g, 0.045 mol) was added, and the
reaction
mixture was stirred for 18 h, at which point a further 4.5 g
of
triethylamine was added. The reaction mixture was
stirred
at 100
C for another 18 h. The reaction mixture was
cooled
to room temperature and filtered, and the solvent was
removed
in vacuo. The residue was partially purified by flash
column
chromatography (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 50:1); the
mixture
of cis and trans isomers was then recrystallized from
n-hexane
to give 1.55 g of the pure trans isomer, a white crystalline
solid
(20% yield): TLC (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 50:1)
Rf 0.45; 1H-NMR (acetone-d6, 200 MHz)
6.84 (1H, d,
J = 14.13 Hz,
ArCH=CHNCS), 7.05 (1H, d, J = 13.96 Hz,
ArCH=CHNCS),
7.33 (4H, m, ArH).
C; TLC (silica,
CH2Cl2/MeOH, 25:1)
Rf 0.32; 1H-NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz)
3.8 (3H, s,
ArOCH3), 4.7 (2H,
d, J = 5 Hz, ArCH2NH), 6.1
(1H, d, J = 14.6 Hz, ArCH=
CHNH), 6.7-7.4 (7H, m, ArH), 7.6 (2H, br m,
ArCH2NH +
ArOH), 8.1 (1H, m, ArCH=CHNH), 9.3 (1H, br d,
ArCH=
CHNH); MS m/e 348 (M+).
Anal.
(C17H17N2O2SCl)
C,H,N.
C; TLC (silica,
cyclohexane/EtOAc,
1:1) Rf 0.28; 1H-NMR
(acetone-d6, 400 MHz)
3.82 (3H,
s,
ArOCH3), 4.70 (2H, br s,
ArCH2N), 5.61 (1H, d, J = 9.6
Hz,
ArCH=CHNH), 6.75-6.85 (2H, m, ArH), 7.01 (1H, d,
J = 1.6
Hz, ArH), 7.33 (4H, m, ArH), 7.55 (1H, m, ArCH=CHNH),
7.58
(1H, s, ArOH), 7.85 (1H, br m, thiourea NH), 8.85 (1H, br
m,
CH=CHNH); MS m/e 348
(M+). Anal.
(C17H17N2O2SCl)
C,H,N.
4-(1-Ethoxyethoxy)-3-methoxybenzyl isothiocyanate: from 4-(1-ethoxyethoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine,12 to give a brown oil, used without further purification after workup, crude yield 100%; TLC (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 1:1) Rf 0.46.
2-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)ethyl isothiocyanate: synthesized from 2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)ethylamine, to give a brown oil, which was used without further purification after workup, crude yield 98%; TLC (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 1:1) Rf 0.7.
C; TLC (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 1:1)
Rf 0.28; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 60 MHz)
2.95 (2H, m,
NHCH2CH2Ar), 3.65
(2H, m, NHCH2CH2Ar), 3.75
(3H, s, ArOCH3), 4.55 (2H, d,
J
= 6.0 Hz, ArCH2NH), 6.75-7.0 (3H, m,
ArH), 7.1-7.9 (5H, m,
3 × ArH + 2 × NH), 8.85 (1H, s, ArH); MS
m/e 384 (M+).
Anal.
(C17H18N2O2SCl)
C,H,N.
2-Phenylethyl isothiocyanate: synthesized from 2-phenylethylamine, to give an orange oil, which was used without further purification after workup, crude yield 97%.
C; 1H-NMR
(DMSO-d6, 60 MHz)
2.80 (2H, t, J = 7
Hz, ArCH2CH2), 3.70 (2H,
m,
ArCH2CH2N), 3.75 (3H, s,
ArOCH3), 4.55 (2H, d, J = 6 Hz,
ArCH2N), 6.75-6.95 (3H, m, ArH), 7.2-7.4
(5H, m, ArH), 7.40
(1H, br t, thiourea NH), 7.75 (1H, br t, thiourea NH), 8.80
(1H,
s, ArOH); MS m/e 316
(M+). Anal.
(C17H20N2O2S)
C,H,N.
3-(4-Chlorophenyl)propyl Methyloxime.
Methoxylamine
hydrochloride (4.8 g, 0.0575 mol) and sodium acetate (4.80
g,
0.0575 mol) were suspended in MeOH (40 mL) and added to a
solution of 3-(4-chlorophenyl)propanal (3.0 g, 0.0178 mol)
in
MeOH (30 mL). The reaction mixture was refluxed for 90
min
and cooled and the solvent removed in vacuo. The
residue was
partitioned between CH2Cl2 and water; the
organic phase was
washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and filtered and
the
solvent removed in vacuo. The residue was purified by
flash
column chromatography (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 30:1) to
give 1.50 g of a colorless oil (43% yield): TLC (silica,
cyclohexane/EtOAc, 1:1) Rf 0.60; 1H-NMR
(CDCl3, 60 MHz) 2.80
(4H, m, ArCH2CH2CH),
3.80 (3H, s, NOCH3), 6.70 (1H, m,
CH2CH=NOCH3), 7.20 (4H, m, ArH);
MS m/e 197 (M+).
3-(4-Chlorophenyl)propylamine. 3-(4-Chlorophenyl)propyl methyloxime (1.71 g, 0.0087 mol) was dissolved in dry THF (10 mL) and stirred under Ar on ice; 1 M borane-THF complex in THF (4.5 mL) was added slowly to the oxime solution, and the reaction mixture was refluxed for 24 h. Another 4.5 mL of 1 M borane-THF solution was added and the reaction mixture refluxed for a further 4 h and then cooled on ice. MeOH (60 mL) and 5 M NaOHaq (14 mL) were slowly added, and the reaction mixture was refluxed for 2 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was partitioned between water and EtOAc. The organic phase was dried over MgSO4 and filtered, and the solvent was removed in vacuo to give 1.45 g (98%) of a pale brown oil, which was used without purification/characterization: TLC (silica, CH2Cl2/MeOH/AcOH, 120:90:5) Rf 0.45 (ninhydrin positive).
Vanillyl Isothiocyanate. Vanillylamine hydrochloride (1.89 g, 0.010 mol) was dissolved in water (20 mL) with CH2Cl2 (20 mL) and calcium carbonate (3.0 g, 0.030 mol) and stirred. Thiophosgene (0.9 mL, 0.012 mol) was added slowly in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) over 90 min. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h and then filtered, and the organic phase was purified by flash column chromatography (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 4:1) to give 1.1 g of a dark brown oil (56% yield): TLC (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 4:1) Rf 0.43.
C; TLC (silica, CH2Cl2/MeOH, 25:1)
Rf 0.45; 1H-NMR
(CDCl3,
400 MHz)
2.60 (2H, t, J = 7.58 Hz,
ArCH2CH2), 3.43 (2H,
br
m, CH2CH2NH), 3.88 (3H, s,
ArOCH3), 4.47 (2H, br m,
ArCH2N), 5.63 (1H, s, ArOH), 5.73
(1H, br m, thiourea NH),
6.00 (1H, br m, thiourea NH), 6.80 (3H, m, vanillyl ArH),
7.15
(4H, m, ArH): MS m/e 364 (M+).
Anal.
(C18H21N2O2SCl)
C,H,N.
C; TLC (silica,
cyclohexane/EtOAc, 1:1) Rf 0.30; 1H-NMR
(CDCl3, 200 MHz)
1.30 (9H, s,
tert-butyl), 3.84 (3H, s, ArOCH3),
4.51 (2H, d, J = 5.12 Hz,
ArCH2NH), 4.58 (2H, d, J =
4.76 Hz, ArCH2NH), 5.61 (1H,
s,
ArOH), 6.02 (2H, br m, thiourea NHs), 6.73-6.86 (3H,
m,
vanillyl ArH), 7.26 (4H, m, ArH); MS m/e 358
(M+). Anal.
(C20H26N2O2S)
C,H,N.
Boc-vanillylamine. Vanillylamine hydrochloride (18.0 g, 0.095 mol) and triethylamine (10.6 g, 0.11 mol) were dissolved in water (250 mL). Di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (20.5 g, 0.095 mol) in dioxane (200 mL) was added with stirring over a period of 15 min and the resulting mixture stirred overnight at room temperature. The dioxane was removed in vacuo and the aqueous residue extracted with CHCl3 (3 × 150 mL). The combined extracts were dried over MgSO4 and filtered and the solvent removed in vacuo to leave a brown oil which was purified by flash column chromatography (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 5:2) to give 21.5 g of a colorless oil (89% yield) which crystallized on standing: TLC (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 1:1) Rf 0.5.
Boc-4-(2-bromoethoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine.
Boc-vanillylamine (21.0 g, 0.083 mol), 1,2-dibromoethane (250
mL),
40% aqueous KOH (66 mL), and 40% aqueous tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (6.6 mL) were combined and heated at 50
C for 3 h with rapid stirring. The mixture was cooled,
diluted
with CH2Cl2 (200 mL), and washed with
water (3 × 200 mL),
and the combined aqueous washings were extracted once with
CH2Cl2 (600 mL). The combined organic
layers were washed
with brine, dried over MgSO4, and filtered, and the
solvent
was removed in vacuo to leave 23.0 g of a white solid
(77%
yield) which was used without further purification: TLC
(silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 1:1) Rf
0.6.
Boc-4-(2-phthalimidoethoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine. Boc-4-(2-bromoethoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine
(23.0
g, 0.064 mol) and potassium phthalimide (11.8 g, 0.064
mol)
were suspended in dry DMF (500 mL). The resulting
suspension was heated at 50 C for 2 h with rapid stirring (after
30
min the mixture became homogeneous). The mixture was
then
cooled and the DMF removed under high vacuum. The
resulting solid residue was purified by flash column
chromatography (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 1:1) to give 26.5 g of
a
white solid (97% yield): TLC (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc,
1:1)
Rf 0.45.
(4-(2-Phthalimidoethoxy)-3-methoxybenzyl)ammonium Trifluoroacetate.
Boc-4-(2-phthalimidoethoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine (26.5 g, 0.062 mol) was dissolved in
CH2Cl2 (200 mL), and trifluoroacetic acid
(15 mL) was added
dropwise with stirring. On completion of the addition,
the
mixture was stirred for a further 2 h at room temperature
until
the reaction was complete by TLC (silica,
cyclohexane/EtOAc,
1:1). The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the
resulting
colorless oil solidified on standing to give 24.5 g of a
white
crystalline solid (90% yield): 1H-NMR
(DMSO-d6, 200 MHz)
3.63 (3H, s, ArOCH3), 3.95 (4H, m,
OCH2CH2N +
ArCH2N),
4.23 (2H, t, J = 5.9 Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 6.95-7.10 (3H, m,
ArH),
7.89 (4H, m, ArH).
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Aminoethoxy Analogues. All deprotections of phthalimidoethoxy compounds to give the desired aminoethoxy compounds were carried out by the method exemplified by the synthesis of compound 2a.
C, until
the
solution became homogeneous. Hydrazine monohydrate
(0.95
mL, 980 mg, 0.0195 mol) was added and the mixture heated
for 90 min. After 15 min, a white precipitate was formed,
and
a small amount of ethanol was added to keep the mixture
mobile. The reaction mixture was cooled and transferred to
a
separating funnel, and methyl tert-butyl ether (50 mL)
and
0.5 M NaOHaq (50 mL) were added. The organic layer
was
extracted, washed with brine, dried over
Na2SO4, and filtered
and the solvent removed in vacuo. The residue was
purified
by flash column chromatography (silica,
CH2Cl2/MeOH, 10:1,
changing to MeOH). The product fractions were
evaporated
and dried in vacuo to give 1.35 g of a glassy solid (90%
yield).
The hydrochloride salt was prepared by dissolving 2a in
boiling
1 M HClaq, cooling to room temperature, and filtering.
The
filtrate was recrystallized from EtOH/water and dried in
vacuo
over P2O5 to give 1.40 g of a colorless
crystalline solid (78%
overall yield): mp 83-84
C; TLC (silica,
CHCl3/Et3N/MeOH,
93:2:5) Rf 0.3, (silica,
nBuOH/AcOH/H2O, 4:1:1) Rf 0.3;
1H-NMR
(DMSO-d6, 400 MHz)
2.80 (2H, t, J
= 6.8 Hz,
ArCH2CH2N),
3.00 (2H, t, J = 5.2 Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 3.62 (2H, m,
ArCH2CH2N),
3.80 (3H, s, ArOCH3), 4.00 (2H, t, J
= 5.2 Hz,
OCH2CH2N),
4.57 (2H, br s, ArCH2N), 6.78-6.95 (3H, m,
ArH), 7.30 (4H,
m, ArH), 7.67 (1H, br s, NH), 7.98 (1H, br s, NH); FABMS
m/e
394 (MH+). Anal.
(C19H24N3O2SCl·HCl·2.5H2O)
C,H,N,O,S,Cl.
2.86 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz,
ArCH2CH2N), 3.08 (2H, t,
J =
5.0 Hz, OCH2CH2N), 3.16 (2H, br m,
NH2), 3.71 (2H, t, J =
7.0 Hz, ArCH2CH2N), 3.77 (3H, s,
ArOCH3), 4.00 (2H, t, J
=
5.0 Hz, OCH2CH2N), 4.44 (2H, d,
J = 4.2 Hz, ArCH2N),
6.09
(1H, br m, NH), 6.43 (1H, br m, NH), 6.68-6.79 (3H, m,
ArH),
7.11-7.31 (5H, m, ArH); HRMS
(C21H29N3O2ClS)
calcd 422.1669,
found 422.1662.
2.53 (2H, br m, NH2), 2.99 (2H, t, J
= 7.2 Hz, ArCH2CH2N), 3.11 (2H, t, J = 5.2 Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 3.75 (2H, br
m,
ArCH2CH2N), 3.84 (3H, s,
ArOCH3), 4.03 (2H, t, J = 5.2
Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 4.45 (2H, br m,
ArCH2N), 5.82 (1H, br m, NH),
6.18 (1H, br m, NH), 6.82, 7.17, 7.35 (7H, m, ArH); HRMS
(C19H25N3O2FS)
calcd 378.1652, found 378.1650.
1.54 (2H, br m,
NH2), 2.84 (2H,
t, J = 7.2 Hz,
ArCH2CH2N), 3.10 (2H, t,
J = 5.4 Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 3.72 (2H, br m,
ArCH2CH2N), 3.83 (3H,
s,
ArOCH3), 4.02 (2H, t, J = 5.4 Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 4.42 (2H,
br
m, NH), 5.72 (1H, br m, NH), 6.20 (1H, br m, NH),
6.32-7.13
(6H, m, ArH); HRMS
(C19H24N3O2Cl2S)
calcd 428.0966, found
428.0962.
4-(2-Phthalimidoethoxy)-3-methoxybenzyl isothiocyanate: prepared by the reaction of 4-(2-phthalimidoethoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine trifluoroacetate (5.0 g, 0.011 mol) with thiophosgene, as described for 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-chloroethyl isothiocyanate, and purified by flash column chromatography (silica, cyclohexane/ethyl acetate, 50:1) to give 2.8 g of a yellow oil (67% yield) which was used immediately.
3.54 (3H, s, ArOCH3), 3.93 (2H, t, J
= 6 Hz, OCH2CH2N),
4.17
(2H, t, J = 6 Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 4.50-4.67 (4H, br
d, 2 × CH2Ar), 6.70-6.96 (3H, m, ArH), 7.07 (2H, d, J = 9 Hz,
I-ArH),
7.67 (2H, d, J = 9 Hz, I-ArH), 7.80-7.98 (5H, br s,
ArH).
3.15 (2H, t, J = 6 Hz,
OCH2CH2NH2), 3.81
(3H, s, ArOCH3),
4.10 (2H, t, J = 6 Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 4.77 and 4.80 (4H, 2
× br
s, 2 × CH2Ar), 6.79-7.02 (3H, m, ArH),
7.05 (2H, d, J = 9 Hz,
I-ArH), 7.63 (2H, d, J = 9 Hz, I-ArH); HRMS
(C18H23N3O2IS)
calcd 472.0556, found 472.0550.
4-(Trimethylsilyl)toluene. 4-Chlorotoluene (4.0 g,
0.032
mol), trimethylsilyl chloride (84 mL), and Mg dust (840
mg,
0.045 mol) were suspended in anhydrous THF, and the
resultant mixture was refluxed for 18 h, after which time
all
the magnesium had been consumed. The solution was
cooled
to room temperature and poured into water (150 mL), and
the
product was extracted into diethyl ether. The organic
layer
was dried over MgSO4 and filtered, and the solvent
was
removed in vacuo. The product was purified by
vacuum
distillation (0.1 mmHg, bp 28 C) to give 2.9 g of a
colorless
oil (55% yield).
4-(Trimethylsilyl)benzyl Bromide.
4-(Trimethylsilyl)toluene (2.0 g, 0.012 mol), N-bromosuccinimide (2.2 g,
0.012
mol), and a catalytic amount of dibenzoyl peroxide were
combined in 60 mL of dry carbon tetrachloride and stirred
under nitrogen. The mixture was refluxed for 6 h,
until
conversion was complete by 1H-NMR, and then poured
into
water. The organic phase was dried over MgSO4 and
filtered,
and the solvent was removed in vacuo. Purification by
flash
column chromatography (silica, cyclohexane) gave 1.6 g of
a
pale yellow oil (55% yield): TLC (silica,
cyclohexane/EtOAc,
1:1) Rf 0.8; 1H-NMR
(CDCl3, 200 MHz) 0.28 (9H, s, ArSi(CH3)3), 4.50 (2H, s,
ArCH2Br), 7.35-7.55 (4H, m, ArH).
(4-(Trimethylsilyl)benzyl)phthalimide:
synthesized from
4-(trimethylsilyl)benzyl bromide, as described for
Boc-4-(2-phthalimidoethoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine; purification by
flash column chromatography (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 10:1) gave a white crystalline solid (77% yield); TLC
(silica,
cyclohexane/EtOAc, 10:1) Rf 0.22;
1H-NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz)
0.24 (9H, s, ArSi(CH3)3),
4.85 (2H, s, ArCH2N), 7.47 (4H, s,
ArH), 7.70 (2H, m, ArH), 7.85 (2H, m, ArH).
4-(Trimethylsilyl)benzylamine: synthesized from
(4-(trimethylsilyl)benzyl)phthalimide, as described for
2a; purification by flash column chromatography (silica,
CH2Cl2/MeOH, 10:1) gave a white solid (77% yield); TLC (silica,
CH2Cl2/MeOH, 10:1)
Rf 0.2; 1H-NMR (CDCl3,
200 MHz) 0.24
(9H, s, ArSi(CH3)3), 3.80 (2H,
br s, ArCH2NH2), 3.90 (2H,
s,
ArCH2NH2), 7.37 (2H, m, ArH),
7.52 (2H, m, ArH).
0.26 (9H, s,
Si(CH3)3), 3.67 (3H, s,
ArOCH3), 4.06 (2H, t, J = 6
Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 4.24 (2H, t, J
= 6 Hz, OCH2CH2N), 4.54 and
4.66
(2 × 2H, d, J = 7 Hz, 2 ×
ArCH2NH), 6.26 (2H, br m, 2
×
NH), 6.69-6.88 (3H, m, ArH), 7.27 (2H, d, J = 8 Hz,
ArH),
7.50 (2H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 7.70-7.90 (4H, m,
ArH).
0.26 (9H, s,
Si(CH3)3), 3.08 (2H,
t,
J = 6 Hz, OCH2CH2N),
3.80 (3H, s, ArOCH3), 4.00 (2H, t, J
=
6 Hz, OCH2CH2N), 4.56 and 4.66
(2 × 2H, 2 × br d, J = 7 Hz,
2 × ArCH2NH), 4.80 (~2H, br s,
NH2), 6.43 (2H, br s, 2 × NH),
6.72-6.83 (3H, m, ArH), 7.25 (2H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH),
7.50
(2H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH); HRMS
(C21H32N3O2SSi)
calcd 418.1985,
found 418.1980.
1.26 (9H, s,
tert-butyl), 3.70 (3H, s, ArOCH3),
4.08 (2H, t, J = 5.6 Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 4.25 (2H, t, J
= 5.6 Hz, OCH2CH2N), 4.75
(2H,
d, J = 5.3 Hz, ArCH2NH), 6.17
(1H, br t, NH), 6.80 (3H, m,
ArH), 7.24 (4H, m, ArH), 7.76 (4H, m, ArH).
1.30 (9H, s, tert-butyl), 2.32 (2H, br m, NH2), 3.12 (2H, m,
OCH2CH2N), 3.85
(3H, s, ArOCH3), 4.03 (2H, t, J =
5.5 Hz, OCH2CH2), 4.82
(2H,
d, J = 5.5 Hz, ArCH2NH), 6.31
(1H, br t, NH), 6.86 (3H, m,
ArH), 7.30 (4H, m, ArH), 7.85 (1H, br m, NH); HRMS
(C21H30N3O2S) calcd
388.2059, found 388.2055.
1.26 (9H, s,
tert-butyl),
3.62 (3H, s, ArOCH3), 4.03 (2H, t, J
= 5.6 Hz, OCH2CH2N),
4.19 (2H, t, J = 5.6 Hz,
OCH2CH2), 4.50 and 4.57 (2 ×
2H, 2
× br d, J
5 Hz, 2 ×
ArCH2NH), 6.19 (2H, br s, 2NH),
6.64-6.85 (3H, m, ArH), 7.12-7.34 (4H, m, ArH), 7.65-7.87
(4H,
m, ArH).
C for 48
h,
to give a colorless crystalline solid (46% overall yield):
TLC
(silica, MeOH) Rf 0.2; mp 125-130
C;
1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400
MHz)
1.30 (9H, s, tert-butyl), 1.54 (2H, br s,
NH2), 3.08 (2H,
t, J = 5 Hz, OCH2CH2N),
3.80 (2H, s, ArOCH3), 4.00 (2H, t,
J
= 5 Hz, OCH2CH2N), 4.54 (2H,
br s, ArCH2N), 4.59 (2H, br s,
ArCH2N), 6.25 (2H, br s, 2 × NH), 6.76 (3H, m,
ArH), 7.26
(4H, m, ArH); MS m/e 401 (M+).
Anal.
(C22H31N3O2S·HCl·H2O) C,H,N,O,S,Cl.
3,5-Di-
3,5-Di- 1.31 (18H, s, 2 × tBu), 4.65 (2H,
br
s, ArCH2OH), 7.22 (2H, m, ArH), 7.38 (1H,
m, ArH).
3,5-Di- 1.38 (18H, s, 2 × tBu), 7.72 (3H,
s,
ArH), 10.00 (1H, s, ArCHO).
3,5-Di- 1.31 (18H,
s, 2 × tBu),
3.95 (3H, s, NOCH3), 7.41 (3H, m, ArH), 8.06
(1H, s, ArCH=N).
3,5-Di-
1.31 (18H, s, 2 ×
tBu), 1.75 (2H, br s, NH2), 3.85 (2H, s,
ArCH2N), 7.20 (3H, m,
ArH).
1.28 (18H, s, 2 × tBu), 3.65 (3H, s,
ArOCH3), 4.15 (4H,
m, OCH2CH2N), 4.55 (4H,
br s, 2 × ArCH2N), 6.10 (2H, 2
×
br s, 2 × NH), 6.75 (3H, m, ArH), 7.10 (2H, m, ArH), 7.35
(1H,
m, ArH), 7.75 (4H, m, ArH).
1.28
(18H, s, 2 × tBu), 2.62 (2H, br, NH2), 3.04
(2H, t, J = 5 Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 3.72 (3H, s,
ArOCH3), 3.95 (2H, t, J = 5
Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 4.55 (4H, br s, 2
× ArCH2N), 6.35 (2H, 2 × br s,
2 × NH), 6.75 (3H, m, ArH), 7.10 (2H, m, ArH), 7.30 (1H,
m,
ArH): HRMS
(C26H40N3O2S) calcd
458.2841, found 458.2847.
2-(4-
1.30
(9H, s, tert-butyl), 2.84 (2H, t, J = 7 Hz,
ArCH2CH2N), 3.07
(2H, br m, OCH2CH2N), 3.70 (2H, br
m, ArCH2CH2N), 3.82
(3H, s, ArOCH3), 4.00 (2H, t, J = 5
Hz, OCH2CH2N), 4.48
(2H,
br m, ArCH2NH), 5.90 (1H, br m, NH), 6.15
(1H, br m, NH),
6.70-6.85 (3H, m, ArH), 7.12-7.34 (4H, m, ArH); HRMS
(C23H34N3O2S) calcd
416.2372, found 416.2378.
Boc-4-(3-bromopropoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine:
prepared as described for Boc-4-(2-bromoethoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine from Boc-vanillylamine (2.0 g, 0.008 mol) and 1,3-dibromopropane (50 mL) to give a colorless oil, yield 2.91
g
(97%); TLC (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 1:1) Rf
0.63; 1H-NMR
(CDCl3, 60 MHz) 1.46 (9H, s, tert-butyl),
2.35 (2H, m,
OCH2CH2CH2Br),
3.65 (2H, m,
OCH2CH2CH2Br),
3.85 (3H, s,
ArOCH3), 4.05-4.30 (4H, m,
ArCH2N,
OCH2CH2CH2Br),
4.82
(1H, br m, NH), 6.85 (3H, s, ArH).
Boc-4-(3-phthalimidopropoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine: prepared as described for Boc-4-(2-phthalimidoethoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine from Boc-4-(3-bromopropoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine (2.80 g, 0.0075 mol); purified by flash column chromatography (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 2:1) to give 2.80 g of a white solid (85% yield); TLC (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 1:1) Rf 0.44.
(4-(3-Phthalimidopropoxy)-3-methoxybenzyl)ammonium trifluoroacetate: prepared as described for (4-(3-phthalimidoethoxy)-3-methoxybenzyl)ammonium trifluoroacetate, from Boc-4-(3-phthalimidopropoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine; used without purification or characterization.
1.76 (2H, m,
OCH2CH2CH2N),
2.67
(2H, t, J = 6.63 Hz,
OCH2CH2CH2N), 2.82
(2H, t, J = 7.30
Hz, ArCH2CH2N), 3.62 (2H, br m,
ArCH2CH2N), 3.72 (3H,
s,
ArOCH3), 3.98 (2H, t, J = 6.35 Hz,
OCH2CH2CH2N),
4.54 (2H,
br m, ArCH2N), 6.78 (1H, m, ArH), 6.90 (2H, m,
ArH), 7.30
(4H, m, ArH), 7.63 (1H, br m, NH), 7.98 (1H, br m, NH);
HRMS
(C20H27N3O2SCl)
calcd 408.1513, found 408.1520.
1.45
(9H, s, tBu), 2.80 (3H, s, NCH3), 3.35 (2H, m,
CH2CH2NCH3),
3.90 (3H, s, ArOCH3), 4.1-4.4 (4H, m,
ArCH2N,
OCH2CH2),
6.45 (3H, m, ArH).
Boc-4-(2-(L, 470 mg, 0.0047 mol), and the
solution
was stirred at room temperature for 6 h. The solvents
were
removed in vacuo, and the residue was partitioned
between
EtOAc and water. The organic phase was washed with
brine
and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The
mixture was filtered
and the solvent removed in vacuo. The product was
purified
by flash column chromatography (silica, CHCl3) to give 2.1
g
of a colorless oil (93% yield): TLC (silica,
cyclohexane/EtOAc,
1:1) Rf 0.37; 1H-NMR
(CDCl3, 60 MHz)
1.45 (9H, s, tBu),
3.05 (3H, s, NCH3), 3.70 (2H, m,
CH2CH2NCH3), 3.80
(3H, s,
ArOCH3), 4.1-4.6 (6H, m,
fluorenylCH2CH,
ArCH2N,
OCH2CH2), 4.85 (1H, m, CH), 6.80 (3H, m, ArH),
7.2-7.9 (8H, m,
fluoreneArH).
(4-(2-( 2.95 (3H, s, NCH3), 3.20-4.60 (12H, m, 4
× CH2, ArOCH3,
CH), 6.70-7.9 (11H, m, ArH).
2.62
(3H, s, NCH3), 2.80 (2H,
t, J = 7.33 Hz,
ArCH2CH2NH), 3.26 (2H, br
m, OCH2CH2NH),
3.60 (2H, br m, ArCH2CH2NH),
3.76 (3H, s, ArOCH3), 4.21 (2H,
t, J = 5.1 Hz,
OCH2CH2NH), 4.60 (2H, br
m, ArCH2NH), 6.80
(1H, m, ArH), 7.00 (2H, m, ArH), 7.30 (4H, m, ArH), 7.80
(1H,
t, J = 5.2 Hz, NH), 8.07 (1H, t, J = 5.6 Hz,
NH); HRMS
(C20H27N3O2SCl)
calcd 408.1513, found 408.1508.
2.23 (6H, s,
N(CH3)2), 2.62 (2H, t, J
=
5.97 Hz, OCH2CH2N), 2.82 (2H, t,
J = 7.18 Hz,
ArCH2CH2N),
3.63 (2H, br m, ArCH2CH2N), 3.75
(3H, s, ArOCH3), 4.02 (2H,
t, J = 5.93 Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 4.57 (2H, br m,
ArCH2N), 6.78
(1H, m, ArH), 6.92 (2H, m, ArH), 7.30 (4H, m, ArH), 7.44
(1H,
br m, NH), 7.80 (1H, br m, NH); HRMS
(C21H29N3O2SCl)
calcd
422.1669, found 422.1662.
Boc-4-(2-(trimethylammonio)ethoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine Bromide. Boc-4-(2-bromoethoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine (1.0 g, 0.0027 mol) was dissolved in a saturated solution of trimethylamine in MeOH, and the solution was refluxed under a positive pressure of N2 for 18 h, until the reaction was complete by TLC. Solvent was removed in vacuo to give 1.15 g of a colorless oil (100% yield); this was used without purification: TLC (silica, CH2Cl2/MeOH/AcOH, 120:90:5) Rf 0.30.
(4-(2-(Trimethylammonio)ethoxy)-3-methoxybenzyl)ammonium ditrifluoroacetate: prepared as described for (4-(3-phthalimidoethoxy)-3-methoxybenzyl)ammonium trifluoroacetate, from Boc-4-(2-(trimethylammonio)ethoxy)-3-methoxybenzylamine bromide; used without purification or characterization.
2.80 (2H, t, J = 7.30 Hz,
ArCH2CH2N), 3.20 (9H,
s,
N(CH3)2), 3.60 (2H, br m,
ArCH2CH2N), 3.75 (3H, s,
ArOCH3),
3.78 (2H, t, J = 4.81 Hz,
ArOCH2CH2N), 4.39 (2H, br
m,
ArOCH2CH2N(CH3)2),
4.59 (2H, br m, ArCH2N), 6.82 (1H,
m,
ArH), 7.02 (2H, m, ArH), 7.30 (4H, m, ArH), 8.13 (1H, br
m,
NH), 8.38 (1H, br m, NH); MS m/e 436
(M+). Anal.
(C20H30N3O2SCl·CF3CO2H·H2O)
C,H,N,O,F.
C; TLC
(silica,
cyclohexane/EtOAc, 1:2) Rf 0.4;
1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz)
2.84 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz,
ArCH2CH2N), 3.62 (5H, m,
ArCH2CH2N,
ArOCH3), 4.11 (2H, t, J = 5.7 Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 4.27 (2H, t,
J
= 5.7 Hz, OCH2CH2N), 4.39 (2H, d,
J = 5.5 Hz, ArCH2N),
5.62
(1H, br s, NH), 6.03 (1H, br s, NH), 6.70-6.85 (3H, m,
ArH),
7.15 (4H, m, ArH), 7.80 (4H, m, ArH): MS m/e 523
(M+). Anal.
(C27H26N3O4SCl)
C,H,N.
C; TLC (silica,
CH2Cl2/MeOH, 10:1) Rf 0.30;
1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz)
1.82
(3H, s, CH3), 2.80 (2H, t, J = 7.2 Hz,
ArCH2CH2NH), 3.33
(2H,
br m, OCH2CH2NH), 3.62 (2H, br
m, ArCH2CH2NH), 3.72
(3H,
s, ArOCH3), 3.93 (2H, t, J = 5.9
Hz, OCH2CH2NH), 4.55
(2H,
br m, ArCH2NH), 6.75 (1H, m, ArH), 6.92
(2H, m, ArH), 7.30
(4H, m, ArH), 7.45 (1H, br m, NH), 7.80 (1H, br m, NH),
8.10
(1H, br m, NH); FABMS m/e 436
(MH+). Anal.
(C21H26N3O3SCl) C,H,N.
C; TLC (silica,
CH2Cl2/MeOH, 20:1) Rf 0.46;
1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz)
1.23
(3H, t, J = 7.1 Hz,
CH2CH3), 2.86 (2H, t, J
= 7.08 Hz, ArCH2CH2NH), 3.46 (2H, t, J = 5.55 Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 3.72 (2H, br
m, ArCH2CH2NH), 3.83 (3H, s,
ArOCH3), 4.02 (2H, t, J =
5.55
Hz, OCH2CH2), 4.08 (2H, q,
J = 6.9 Hz,
OC(=O)CH2CH3)),
4.58
(2H, br m, ArCH2NH), 6.80-7.00 (3H, m,
ArH), 7.20 (4H, m,
ArH); FABMS m/e 466 (MH+).
Anal.
(C22H28N3O4SCl)
C,H,N.
C; TLC (silica, cyclohexane/EtOAc, 1:1)
Rf 0.21; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz)
1.42 (9H, s,
tert-butyl), 2.86 (2H,
t, J = 7.14 Hz,
ArCH2CH2N), 3.41 (2H, t,
J = 5.55 Hz,
OCH2CH2N), 3.70 (2H, br m,
ArCH2CH2N), 3.83 (3H,
s,
ArOCH3), 4.00 (2H, t, J = 5.57 Hz,
OCH2CH2), 4.58 (2H,
br
m, ArCH2NH), 6.79-6.96 (3H, m, ArH), 7.20
(4H, m, ArH);
FABMS m/e 494 (MH+). Anal.
(C24H32N3O4SCl)
C,H,N.
Biology. The in vitro assay (45Ca2+ influx into neonatal rat DRG neurons) and the mouse tail-flick in vivo antinociceptive assay have been described in part 1 of this series.1
Mouse Writhing Antinociceptive Assay. Female mice (CD-1, Charles River, weight 20g) were maintained in a controlled lighting environment (12 h on/12 h off) and fasted overnight prior to testing. Animals received an intraperitoneal injection of 0.3 mL of an acetic acid solution (200 mM), and 5 min later the number of abdominal constrictions was counted in the subsequent 5 min period. Animals received drug or vehicle (10 animals/group) subcutaneously or orally 55 min prior to administration of acetic acid. Compounds were considered to have interesting antinociceptive properties if they produced a significant increase in threshold (p < 0.05).
The percentage analgesic effect was calculated as (mean number of writhes (drug))/(mean number of writhes (vehicle)) × 100. A logistic function (ORIGIN software) was fitted to these data, and an ED50 value was calculated, with standard error, as the dose required to produce a 50% reduction in the number of writhes.
Bronchoconstriction. Capsaicin is known to cause
an
acute bronchoconstrictor response when administered as an
intravenous injection in anesthetized guinea pigs.10
Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (400-450 g, n = 4
animals/treatment
group) were anesthetized with urethane (2 g/kg of body
weight)
and placed on a heated blanket to maintain body
temperature
at 37 C. The carotid artery was cannulated for blood
pressure
measurements and a jugular cannula inserted for
administration of drugs. The trachea was cannulated and the
animal
artifically ventilated at a frequency of 60 strokes/min and
a
tidal volume of 10 mL/kg of body weight. Airway
opening
pressure (Pao) was measured with a differential
pressure
transducer (Farnell Electronics), attached to a side arm of
the
tracheal cannula, as an index of changes in
tracheobronchial
resistance to airflow. The threshold dose required to
induce
an increase in Pao was determined following iv
administration.
We thank Derek Reid for technical assistance.
Analytical HPLC elution solvent gradient (1 page). Ordering information is given on any current masthead page.
* In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.
Abstract published in Advance ACS
Abstracts, November 1, 1996.
1. Walpole, C. S. J.; Wrigglesworth, R.; Bevan, S. J.; Campbell,
E.
A.; Dray, A.; James, I. F.; Perkins, M. N.; Reid, D. J.; Winter,
J.
Analogues of Capsaicin as Novel Analgesic Agents:
Structure-Activity Studies. Part 1. The Aromatic 'A' Region.
J. Med.
Chem. 1993, 36,
2362-2372.
2. Walpole, C. S. J.; Wrigglesworth, R.; Bevan, S. J.; Campbell,
E.
A.; Dray, A.; James, I. F.; Perkins, M. N.; Masdin, K. J.;
Winter,
J. Analogues of Capsaicin as Novel Analgesic Agents:
Structure-Activity Studies. Part 2. The Amide-Bond 'B' Region.
J. Med.
Chem. 1993, 36,
2373-2380.
3. Walpole, C. S. J.; Wrigglesworth, R.; Bevan, S. J.; Campbell,
E.
A.; Dray, A.; James, I. F.; Perkins, M. N.; Masdin, K. J.;
Winter,
J. Analogues of Capsaicin as Novel Analgesic Agents:
Structure-Activity Studies. Part 3. The Hydrophobic Side-Chain
'C'
region. J. Med. Chem.
1993, 36, 2380-2389.
4. Wood, J. N.; Winter, J.; James, I. F.; Rang, H. P.; Yeats,
J.;
Bevan, S. Capsaicin-induced ion fluxes in dorsal root
ganglion
cells in culture. J. Neurosci.
1988, 8, 3208-3220.
5. (a) Brand, L.; Berman, E.; Schwen, R.; Loomans, M.;
Janusz,
J.; Bohne, R.; Maddin, C.; Gardner, J.; Lahann, T.; Farmer,
R.;
Jones, L.; Chiabrando, C.; Fanelli, R. NE-19550: A Novel,
Orally
Active Anti-inflammatory Analgesic. Drug.
Exp. Clin. Res.
1987,
13, 259-265.
6. Park, N. S.; Ha, D. C.; Chol, J. K.; Hong, M. S.; Lim, H. J.; Lee, K. S. Novel Phenylacetamide Derivatives and Processes for the Preparation Thereof. Eur. Pat. Appl. 0525360 A2, 1992.
7. Szallasi, A.; Blumberg, P. M. Resiniferatoxin, A
Phorbol-Related
Diterpene, Acts as an Ultrapotent Analog of Capsaicin.
The
Irritant Constituent in Red Pepper. Neuroscience
1989, 30,
515-520.
8. Winter, J.; Dray, A.; Wood, J. N.; Yeats, J. C.; Bevan, S.
Cellular
Mechanism of Action of Resiniferatoxin: a Potent Sensory
Neuron Excitotoxin. Brain Res. 1990,
520, 131-140.
9. Walpole, C. S. J.; Bevan, S. J.; Bloomfield, G.; Breckenridge,
R.;
James, I. F.; Ritchie, T. J.; Szallasi, A.; Winter, J.;
Wrigglesworth, R. Similarities and Differences in the Structure
Activity
Relationships of Capsaicin and Resiniferatoxin. J.
Med. Chem.
1996, 39, 2939-2952.
10. Campbell, E.; Bevan, S.; Dray, A. Clinical Applications of Capsaicin and its Analogues. In Capsaicin in the Study of Pain; Wood, J., Ed.; Academic Press: London, 1993; pp 255-272.
11. Molnar, J.; Makara, G.; Gyorgy, L.; Unyi, G. The
Bronchoconstrictor Action of Capsaicin in the Guinea Pig. Acta
Physiol.
Acad. Sci. Hung. 1969,
36, 413-420.
12. P. Donatsch, Sandoz, Basle, private communication.
13. Gardner, J. H.; Kasting, G. B.; Cupps, T. L.; Echler, R. S.; Gibson, T. W. EP 0282127 A2, 1988.
14. Bevan, S.; Docherty, R. J.; Rang, H. P.; Urban, L.
Membrane
Actions of SDZ 249-482, an Analgesic Capsaicin Analogue
with
Reduced Excitatory Actions. Am. Pain Soc.
Abstr. 1995, A-33.
15. Still, W. C.; Kahn, M.; Mitra, A. Rapid Chromatographic
Technique for Preparative Separations with Moderate
Resolution. J. Org. Chem.
1978, 43, 2923-2925.
16. Perrin, D. D.; Armarego, W. L. F.; Perrin, D. R. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals; Pergamon Press: New York, 1980.
17. Burger, A.; Hornbaker, E. D. Reduction of Acyl cyanides
with
Lithium Aluminium Hydride. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1952, 74,
5514.
|
tail-flick latency |
||||||
ED50 ( |
writhing ED50 ( |
|||||
compound |
sc |
po |
duration of action (h)a |
sc |
po |
bronchoconstriction
threshold doseb ( |
capsaicin |
10.3 ± 2.9 |
962 ± 272 |
|
5.72 ± 0.63 |
|
0.018 ± 0.003 |
1b |
11.8 ± 3.6 |
370 ± 54 |
<2 |
10.13 ± 1.16 |
|
0.025 ± 0.005 |
oleyl vanillylamide |
11.3 ± 1.6 |
>400 |
|
2.10 ± 0.59 |
|
>0.100 |
2a |
4.8 ± 1.2 |
22.87 ± 3.18 |
5 |
3.32 ± 0.36 |
11.45 ± 2.81 |
0.137 ± 0.037 |
2h |
0.40 ± 0.09 |
1.45 ± 0.55 |
>6 |
0.49 ± 0.04 |
2.55 ± 0.50 |
0.062 ± 0.012 |
oleyl 4-O-(aminoethyl)vanillylamide |
6.3 ± 1.0 |
184 ± 45 |
|
3.06 ± 0.57 |
|
>0.100 |
morphine |
21.61 ± 2.98 |
|
|
4.27 ± 0.16 |
|
|
a At ED50 dose.b Threshold dose required to induce an increase in Pao.