Dear All,

Who sue and win or loss?
Who care? I do not care, for sure.

What I mean is:
If we called the historical, the inventor of the TR(transistor) working at the BELL LAB.
Tri Big Star in the nobel prize, i know it, Mou know more than i do.

And who know Bartee win second nobel prize, in what area? see the answer in the bottom of this email?>

Ha! Ha! Ha!



Subject: Re: Selling CISCO stocks    ---- old news
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:19:58 -0800 (PST)

One more piece of information. Marvell sued Hwa Wei and won. Now, some  of
Hwa wei's gears are banned in US, Europe and other countries.  However, China allows Hwa Wei to sell in China.

  When I said "wrong" in my last email, I meaned KJ's information was
wrong. Cisco had sued Hwa Wei long time ago and won, not just now.  However, Hwa Wei survived because China wanted it that way.

The point is that "when a super big corporation is
sueing a rather small emerging company, it means that
the former is feeling challenge from the latte   r."    If
a large company hires lawers instead of engineers,
then you, as an investor, should watch out.

Kuo-Jay Chi
===========
--- Peng Howard  wrote:

> Dear Mou,
>
> "Cisco (and other US comapnies) had sued Hwa-Wei
> long time ago."
>
> You know it. I know it.
>
> You say "Wrong",
> I say "I don't know it's Wrong or possible illegal,
> or what ever clever law
> terminology"
> God know(or Tien Know.
>
> I tell all the story, I think it the same law sue
> against the A, B, C com
> of the USA companies.
> In the mercury News paper, every Thursday business
> section, there are many
> case.
> One thing I think it is very important for me, and
> if any of classmates can
> give the comment.
> Thank one hundred times.
>
> "Sony pay the such money to MIT media lab, for the
   >   patent", I think it was
> 200n year.
> And The Sony has lay out 1000 workers and some of
> them moved to San Diego.
> I have some job hunting friends telled me that.
> And I see it, Sony American is located very close to
> Cadence where is my
> last party(last dance)
> Cisco is also is down business, I think.  Only if
> Cisco can make another
> Tower of Babel(borrow Abe's
> words).
>
> My point is Cisco is very expensive comparing those
> small company.
> Because Hua-Wei is China supported star company,
> Cisco has no need to sue
> further.
> This is so called by the American companies
> Win-Win(acturally is
> globalization police)
> As I know Cadence want to set up a software company,
> but my little brain
> think it is fail.
> Cicso is firware companies, cadence is software
> company. In the US, the
> workers lo   oking   for
> better money, so that why there are so many startup,
> IPO, and then,
> .....endless of invovation.
> My coworker in 3Com, moved to Cisco, but now they
> are 4n+, can they work
> for Cisco forever?
> I hope I understand Kuo Jay's point. - too expensive
> and not reliable.
>
> Yes, that cyber text news is obso(I am lazy to look
> up the dictionay.
> Time is money in the USA high tech industry.
> Take care, time to go home?
>
> Best Regards,
> little monk, wuhow
> 2006 2/21 16:28 PST > >Subject: Re: Selling CISCO stocks
> >Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:44:05 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >
>
思科直到最近才开始关注华为，并表示正考虑对华为侵犯知识产权的行为诉诸法律
> ，Wrong, Cisco (and other US coma   pnies)   had sued
> Hwa-Wei long time ago.
> >
> >   Mou
> >
> >Kuo-Jay Chi  wrote:
> 思科直到最近才开始关注华为，并表
>
示正考虑对华为侵犯知识产权的行为诉诸法律，华尔街一名分析师曾表示“这是我所
知