:: CLICK HERE Before Reading Any Post ::
CATEGORY: HISTORIC PATTERNS
BABYLON THEN AND BABYLON THE GREAT WHORE
Babylon is one of the oldest kingdoms, that is, the Babylon built by Nimrod. The flood had taken place and the wicked, spawn by the Fallen Angels Sons of God, and they also, perished. You would think that would deal with the fallen angels and they would learn not to incarnate in flesh, especially that God violently dealt with the first perpetrators (Jude 1:6). However, just as early as the great Grandson of Noah, we see them popping up again. Where and Who? Nimrod. Of old all the men of might were fallen angels in flesh. In the Genesis Chronology it listed then stop at Nimrod and said, "he began to be a mighty one in the earth" (Gen 10:8). Again, men began to be mighty in the earth, which is less than realized, compare to his exploits. Other times men where mighty in the earth was before the flood by the fallen angels Son of God as men, wherewith the scripture could have said, "There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown" (Genesis 6:4). So after the flood Nimrod was the first to be categorize thus, the first known fallen angel as man. Easton Bible Dictionary states, "firm, a descendant of Cush, the son of Ham. He was the first who claimed to be a 'mighty one in the earth.' Babel was the beginning of his kingdom, which he gradually enlarged (Gen 10:8-10)." But what was different with Nimrod was that he seems to be favorable towards God, in the verse, "He was a mighty hunter before the LORD: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD." What really separates him was the tower of Babel, which he was behind the operations thereof. The tower of Babel is not understood in its intension, for the scripture says, "Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven" (Gen 11:4). The fallen ones are not stupid, they know they cannot build a physical building that would reach heaven. So it obviously means something else. My deduction is that he was sincerely or otherwise attempting something prophesized before or after the flood or known of. That is, being a fallen angel, someway back to heaven. This is not a wild guess, as will be seen later. To prevent this from taking place, if be, before its time, God confused the language. God loves unity and oneness so confusion of literal language wasn't the intent but a by-product of what really took place; confusion in the spirit. For even if the language were confused fallen ones know themselves and could continue build that same tower, even by the said humans, by virtue of their ability. Let's get some definitions:
BABYLON, the Greek form of BABEL; Semitic form Babilu, meaning "The Gate of God." In the Assyrian tablets it means "The city of the dispersion of the tribes" (Easton Bible Dictionary).
Many think the name means "confusion," but that was applied to it after the confusion of language incident and the oldest culture there, Semites, has the true meaning in their culture preserved. So the name of the tower of Babel give some proof that they were more than building a building to the clouds. They were somehow attempting "The Gate of God." I don't know what was that, like some star gate or something. I doubt it would be like a Star Gate, but aspect of something foreseen or prophesied surrounding a possible re-entry into heaven or redemption.
So Nimrod and his friends,
fallen ones tried to build a tower to heaven, of course employing people, as
the Egyptians did of the Jews to build their mysterious pyramids - so though
the confounding of language would mostly apply to humans it would affect the
cause and even affect them if language creation begun there. When the fallen
ones became men they were "men of renown." After the flood, the first
man of renown was "Nimrod," the grandson of Noah. So it seems fallen
ones again enfleshed themselves. He did something that was daring, began to
build a superpower or cities - The land of Shinar which includes Babylon and
Accad. But more importantly, the Tower of Babylon.
I also mentioned the tower because...Why a tower, probably because it might have been in a herald of their redemption or they foreseeing it and at that early stage attempts on their own to get back to heaven. They being fallen ones, knew where heaven is and know that an earthly tower cannot be built to a literal heaven, so they were really trying to get back in heaven. Even further, the original meaning of the word Babylon (or Babel in Greek), means The Gate of God, which makes the attempt obvious. How it correlates to getting there, they themselves might not have known exactly, or probably was closed seeing that God confounded them - probably saying it's not time. They alone would know if a prophetic herald was given to them prior to their falling or after.
The second thing is a city
in the land of Shinar Nimrod built called Accad. The whole Shinar or Babylonia
was inhabited and built by black people, especially the Accadians. Here was
a library and they were advance in literacy:
"The Accadians who came from the "mountains of the east," where the ark rested, attained to a high degree of civilization. In the Babylonian inscriptions they are called "the black heads" and "the black faces," They invented the form of writing in pictorial hieroglyphics, and also the cuneiform system, in which they wrote many books partly on papyrus and partly on clay."
The word Academics could come from the word Accadians; which predates the Egyptians.
Easton Bible Dictionary
went on,
"It was a double city, and received the common name Sepharvaim, i.e., "the two Sipparas," or 'the two booktowns.' The Sippara on the east bank of the Euphrates is now called Abu-Habba; that on the other bank was Accad, the old capital of Sargon I., where he established a great library... [the two sipparas or sepharvaim possible referential to HotHot..."The most famous of the early kings of Babylonia were Sargon of Accad (B.C.3800) and his son, Naram-Sin, who conquered a large part of Western Asia, establishing their power in Palestine, and even carrying their arms to the Sinaitic peninsula. A great Babylonian library was founded in the reign of Sargon" (Easton Bible Dictionary).
So Nimrod, fallen one, through a black descendant established a tower and a great library. Another thing is, "Sargon of Accad, founder of the first Semitic empire, as well as of one of the most famous libraries of Chaldea." Interesting is that Sargon "In the inscriptions, 'Sarra-yukin' [the god] has appointed the king; also 'Sarru-kinu,' the legitimate king."
So it seems that from then they know of the dealings, so to speak, and knew that of such would be a Black King, the correct King appointed by God or legitimate. Probably not exactly, but if from this early it means that they expected such a deliverance to the point Nimrod made a tower and egg whites or traces of such are found around it, it means that they were probably told of such a deliverance from heaven. For satan himself know of it by the Muslim suckery attempt. How else could they have known except it was told them and they went ahead and dive into that line? Like satan knowing of Christ from Adam and dive into that line for the similitude and attempted things around it; probably even Moses childhood assassination attempt.
With this outline you see
that other ancient Kingdoms attempted this, most obvious is Egypt, their towers
are world famous and they choose to wear the black coat or black skinned. They
making Sargon, a black person the first King of the first World Empire and the
Egyptians making a black King, Osiris, helps me understand that the towers aren't
mystical in nature; as a star gate that is. For nothing is particularly divine
in that a liberator or king skin is black, but that they foresee in part and
know tid bits surrounding their own possible re-entry and go at it; God sometimes
allowing such, like making the people go to Egypt and grow there, but old Pharaoh.
Then he made them go to Babylon, the first "Gate of God," but again.
Notice how they try to get everything right, down to the skin:
"But Nineveh is of old like a pool of water: yet they shall flee away. Stand, stand, shall they cry; but none shall look back. Take ye the spoil of silver, take the spoil of gold: for there is none end of the store and glory out of all the pleasant furniture. She is empty, and void, and waste: and the heart melteth, and the knees smite together, and much pain is in all loins, and the faces of them all gather blackness. Where is the dwelling of the lions, and the feedingplace of the young lions, where the lion, even the old lion, walked, and the lion's whelp, and none made them afraid?" (Nahum 2:8-11)
Nineveh was that city of non-Jewish heathen Jonah was sent to preach to but refused because they were heathens and God reprimanded him; but he didn't know they were fallen angels in flesh. Nineveh, which was also built by Nimrod in building an empire and tower of what he had seen. Nineveh, Assyrian capital, of Babylon and hence, attempted Gate of God. Here God said it is of old, that is, their intent of what they are doing in trying to achieve what was either spoken to them or seeing of a possible re-entry. But here, Assyria fell, they failed again. So they tried through Babylon under Nebuchadnezzar, who God called his servant, this time God allowed his people to mix with them and even Daniel became head of all the Magicians and sorcerers (which could be just fallen angels being angels, their nature), but it didn't work either. Rightly so, as with the tower of Babel, it was not time as yet; especially that the stout lion or Jesus Christ (Yahoshua) hadn't come as yet, much more the old lion, which would possible pertain to them. Notice the Nahum prophecy that when Nineveh fell they cried for the lion, the young lions, even the old lions; they wanting to be the lion's whelps and none made them afraid; this is seen in the Egyptian sphinxes, where Oxford describe it as, "figure of a recumbent lion with head of man or animal." That place is what they were building, a republic they had foreseen where they as lions would be a strong nation against the yellowrites, where they lie down experiencing the refreshing and none troubling them. So they saw the tower, they saw the republic and they also saw Sargon, or a black King or mediator of them. Notice how meticulous they tried to make that latter part correct, "She [WOMEN] is empty, and void, and waste: and the heart melteth, and the knees smite together, and much pain is in all loins [PREGNANT WOMBS], and the faces of them all gather blackness [THAT IS BROUGH FORTH]." After the fall thereof and they trying again, they started over, this time making sure the babies or civilization thereof were black. To get an idea of why after this non-Jewish heathen nation fell they cried for the lions, young lions, the lion and the old lion, re-read this from other writings:
Isaiah 41:4 jumped out at me because the Lord himself was dealing with me concerning my purpose and shockingly enough that reference of he being the first wasn't a reference of being God or exaltation of that divine attributes, but the first dispensational savior of the Tribe of Judah, that is, Christ of Nazareth; Moses was the only one before him that issued in a new era of God's grace, but he was not of Judah. From Isa 41:1, he is not the last either, that's why he said he is "with the last;" the last liberator from Judah. The liberators and Kings were to come from Judah, as Jacob prophesied. This first began to happen with Othniel, the first Judge of Israel, then David first King of Israel of Judah and God's real first choice of Kings, then the Kings thereafter to Christ, who is King of Kings. Yet, he is not the last, though the greatest and epitome or reason for the Lions of Judah; Othniel being the first, young Lion and the Last Lion being the Old Lion (Gen 49:9, Isa 30:6), of course, Christ is THE Lion, the middle or the Lion in his prime or prime age. He is the first Lion of Judah to usher in a new dispensation, grace as against Law, Moses being the first dispensational liberator but not of Judah. But there might be a last dispensational liberator and Lion of Judah. Jacob prophecy says, "Judah is a lion's whelp," a whelp means children or offsprings. So Judah will breed or furnish Israel with Lions. As said, this first began to happen with Othniel first Judge of Israel down to David then to Christ. Jacob continued, "he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up." That is, "he stooped down" means the young Lions; "he couched as a Lion" means The Lion Christ Jesus (Yahoshua). "As an old Lion" means a last Lion to come after Christ. Let's go to another book. The book of Job tells us, "The roaring of the lion, and the voice of the fierce lion, and the teeth of the young lions, are broken. The old lion perisheth for lack of prey, and the stout lion's whelps are scattered abroad" (Job 4:10-11). The "teeth of the young lions" speak of all the Lions before Christ. The "stout Lion" speaks of Christ, stout meaning the Lion in his prime - heavy, solid. But it mentions something else, "the stout lion's whelps are scattered abroad," meaning this stout lion, Christ, has many young Lions that are Scattered abroad in the Earth; of course, these are the Christians where the scriptures says this stout Lion "hast made us unto our God kings and priests" (Rev 5:10). But at last it also said, "The old lion," meaning an Old Lion of all the Lions scattered abroad - many lions, but you have THE Lions; and because of the stout lion's whelps, which the old is of, the old Lion is overshadow, "or perisheth for lack of prey" because the others are eating them up - speaking in analogy, because it means by the zeal of all the lions all the prey (strong holds, devils, works of God) is being defeated greatly and the old Lion wouldn't seem as great by his works because of the many great works of the stout Lion's whelps, he would be more like a goldsmith putting on the beautifying finishing touches after Christ the carpenter laid the foundation, structure and entire building. However, Jacob said, "as an old lion; who shall rouse him up" (Gen 49:9)? This old Lion mentioning because he would be the last Lion or last "new era liberator" which Isa 41:4 alludes to: Or, the last Lion to breed more Lions or have whelps. Judah bred the Lions leading up to Christ, "Judah is a lion's whelp," then Christ bred the Lions leading up the Old Lion, "the stout lion's whelps are scattered abroad," and so a last Lion would be another King Lion who spawn another set of whelps. Notice the word whelps, could easily read helps in analogy; though meaning young or cubs. For Christ whelps were his helps to his cause and so the whelps before him to the cause of God. This could be an indirect call for those that have an ear to ear.
So Nineveh is definitely of old, the intent thereof, it being from the tower of Babel and one of the first cities of Nimrod, the mighty hunter before the Lord. But all this can't really be understood by humans, even encodely. As I had said previously elsewhere:
You fallen ones did so when Jonah came to you back at Nineveh (built by Nimrod with Babel at an attempt at building the Gate of God), the same fallen ones that Christ said, "the men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it" (Matt 12:41). To get the idea of the term "this generation" read Mark 13:30, which in Matt 12:41 represent the final days generation and all the mystery of God is stirred and completed, including questions on a possible redemption of all fallen beings. Hence, the same men of Nineveh back in those days is present in these days, referring to fallen angels who never die and remain as humans by continued successive lives until the end of days. Even some among them who have a little fear of God, that dwelt in all the ancient attempts at the Gate of God, shall condemn this generation with their irreverent selves - as they were condemned when Jonah warned them. Like Jonah, no one wants to take that challenge to preach against or to them, because like Jonah, why should we seeing they are cursed fallen heathens worthy of the eternal destruction to come. But you see what God said to Jonah (Jonah 4:10-11), who like me or any other true preacher have this perception; that is, Jonah's. But
With all this evidence,
does it mean fallen angels can be saved and have been awaiting that liberator
from the time of the flood? Though God has been dealing with me concerning them,
with all this learning thus far, I'm very cautious for I'm not above being fooled
by the Devil and I wouldn't want to start a cult or damned heresy, so I use
the word possibly, even though. Waiting on the Lord for all the revelations
- for I'm only investigation, as a steward of the word, to prove it so or not
so (Acts 17:11).
God cannot strive with man in and of himself (Gen 3:15); that's the purpose for Jesus Christ. Through him, he can now be touched with the feelings of our infirmities (Heb 4:15); and through the foreknowing and promise of this he can begin to do so before Christ was born, "the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world" (Rev 13:8). It's through the promise of Christ why the Israelites survived after Moses, "the LORD thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the LORD thy God with all thine heart" (Due 30:6). That was the Jews, but humans on a hold would be utterly consumed by a terrible God if not from the first sin, from the first man, God promised Christ; and why he hasn't wiped us out since then, though there was a great purging through Noah's flood. However, now through Christ he can have mercy and expect us to. He especially will have mercy after he told us to forgive our brother 149 times in one day (Matt 18:22). I personally would hold him to that verse, because I know God is a being of his word.
Bearing in mind that same rhetoric with not wiping us out because of the promise, even with Noah's flood, could that be applied to fallen angels, seeing they too are not wiped out and the sole cause of the pre-Noah flood sinfulness. Even worst, at first some were purged - Gen 6:4. Two things would blow this away, one, satan is still around and not utterly wiped out, is he going to be saved, no, so we can't say because they are lingering it means salvation is imminent. However, what counters that is that where satan is going, the lake of fire, humans will also be going, whom the earth lingered for. Two, from the first man fell, the promise was made to man but we have no record of such a promise being made to them. However, the lamb was slain from the foundation of world, before man was born, so to speak; could their promise be spoken from then or even before they are created like we? And we are in time, and they fell before us so we couldn't have such a record and the bible doesn't says so explicitly as it does for man - Gen 3:15. Moreover, such undertaking would be through the institution of Christ, savior of all and hence the scriptures would say so or hint to us. Does it hint to us consistently without the prior record of such a statement in heaven? A few verses at another time seems to say something, but if they be true, it means I am true and if I am true it means that such a time has come.
There was 1656 years before
Noah's flood and his great Grandson was Nimrod, he could only live a max 300
years after, since the years of living has been diminishing with that embedded
calculation. So since the creation to the End of Nimrod would be approximately
1956 years, given that Nimrod, as a human, could only live a max of 300 years.
Nimrod was the first noted to attempt building what would be "The Gate
of God" or preparation thereof. Notice the years 1956 since Adam, which
correlates to another preparation beginning 1955 for 2005 (50 years), kinda
off with the 56 but close enough to notice the patterns and that 2006 correlate
to the number 13 in previous calculation since the birth of the last dispensation.
So 1955 wasn't only preparing evil, but as said in that article, "coming
up both sides of the mountain." They sought to come back to God and fulfill
something they saw or was prophesied to them.
CONCLUSION ON NIMROD
They are different Nimrods throughout history, e.g., (Nimrod Ephipanes). But the Nimrod, hunter before the Lord, was the fallen one who tried to build a way to heaven and probably wouldn't have some of the stigma that surrounds his name. He's the one who built the first Babylon - Babel, Nineveh, Accad, Assyria, etc. I say this because you'll find many references to a Nimrod throughout history. Notice:
"This Amoritic name was one of the many names of Nimrod. Nimrod was worshiped under different names by various cultures in the Ancient Near East. The Amorites worshiped Nimrod as Yawi and Semiramis as Mari (later known as the Virgin Mary). Nimrod was known as Yareah and Semiramis as Anat or Anath among the ancient Phoenicians. To the ancient Chaldeans, Semiramis was known as Marratu. The ancient Elamite Persians knew her as Mariham, and Horus (her son, whom she claimed was Nimrod reborn) as Jahi."
Nimrod is also mentioned as some ancient trinity of Babylon, if he ascribed to this we don't know; as in "Nimrod, Tammuz, Simerimas." So they seems to be many Nimrods, as his very name would be left as a legend and many name thereof. Not necessarily defending him, for I know too little, mostly what the bible says. Yet I'm not ruling out that this might be diving / suckry by Nimrod, whether with hope or maliciously.
BABYLON THE GREAT WHORE
This was written in the Student Manifesto,
This section is even more inspired and thoroughly startling. It relates to prophecy and a fervent call to heed to that prophecy. As I said, I was reading from the book of Revelation and this verse spoke of what is to come, when, might depend on you:
"Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every fowl spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird" (Rev 18:2).
Chapter 17 and 18 of the book of Revelation has to be revealed for you to realize that this spoke of America. In other words, Babylon the great is not the Catholic Church or some missing fragment of prophecy - it speaks of America. No other nation on earth has the sumptuousness described, so much so that when John saw the metaphorical representation, he "wondered with great admiration." Verses 11, 12, 13, 15 and 23 of chapter 18 and verse 18 or chapter 17 clarified that this spoke of America.
Now notice verse 2 of chapter 18 again, it wasn't fallen because it was burnt with fire or some other disaster. No. It was fallen because it will "become the habitation of devils, and hold of every foul spirit" (Rev 18:2). It has fallen because the foundation of godliness that buttressed it was destroyed and everything now mobilized for extensive "devilry" and all imaginable evil - you might even hear of homosexual Presidents. It would have become so stink with sin that God now warns the saints to get out of her, "Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues" (Rev 18:4). Then after this moral collapse, the physical destruction will come in one hour (Rev 18:17). The one hour is also very Key. For it seems this will happen at the same time the ten Kings or world leaders of the east gave their power to the beast for one hour (Rev 17:12-13). So then, the ten kings, through the beast, will be responsible for America's destruction. In the one hour they gave power to beast, is the same one hour America will be destroyed.
They had always hated America and wanted to destroy her, because she "reigneth over the Kings of earth" (Rev 17:18). In other words, they hate her because America reigns supreme over all the mighty nations of the east, yet not having the prestige of their "kingly" governance. Or in loose terms, she is hated because she is the "Last" Super Power, affectionately called. When the foundations are fallen the "ten horns [kings/world leaders] which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire" (Rev 17:16).
The nations of the East - EU, Middle East, Asia and most all the East - had always wanted to do this, why in this hour they got the chance? Because the thing that made America great, and was protecting them from the wrath of God, was removed. What is that? Godly biblical foundation. "If the foundation be destroyed, what can the righteous do" (Psalms 11)? When the ten kings see that the foundation has fallen or the humanist and ACLU has ultimately won, they'll say, "aha, nothing is holding us back now, God is removed and their protection is gone, let us combine our powers as one and align ourself with the beast (anti-Christ) and strike America at once." America might be filthy now, but it hasn't reached that point, especially with many turning to Christ tremendously; when it does, the very angels in heaven will declare with the angel that said it, "Babylon the great is fallen" (Rev 18:2). The beast and the ten kings of the east shall know it and America will be wasted. In other words, end time prophetic events are held back by America; because the inhabitants still hold onto the little godliness that is left. In fact, America is the only nation to spread the gospel throughout the world this greatly. Presently, the evangelism of the rest of the world is done through America, a great reason for the beast to hate her. That's the reason when the destruction comes, the bible said, "the light of a candle shall no more shine in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom [Christians] and of the bride [God's spirit] shall be heard no more at all in thee" (Rev 18:23). So you see why the Humanist manifesto wants to replace God in the schools
This will be a sad time, when devils will be destroyed by devils. Spiritually, the fallen angels of the East, ten Kings and beast, will destroy the fallen angels of the West.
The difference with the fallen ones from the East and from the West is that the ones from the East are extensively ruthless and seek only to war and destroy God literally, also his saints (Rev 17:14). All they want is to kill God and rule as God, epitomize in Isaiah 14:14. The fallen ones in the West just want to get away from God's rulership and live how they want to live, sinfully (Rev 17:4); they'll do this even if saints stand in their way. They seem to care less about "Killing" God and taking over, as the ones in the east. Nonetheless, both fell from heaven and are utterly evil, being devils. However, those who are west minded might not be fully categories as "*satan and his angels" - probably another reason for Part 1, Section 14, Paragraph 3, Sentence 1.
Before the fall of Babylon
what was being done throughout the world was preaching extensively, whereby
Babylon is the vehicle God would use; as it is the reality today. America has
promoted the gospel more than any other nation. This along with other reasons
cited in the Student Manifesto (1) give rise to the anti-Christ needing its
fall and why its fall comes before his rise. To counteract this onslaught, the
best method is to pollute it from within - hence the humanist and their agenda;
amongst the other pollutants in the entertainment industry. In a newsletter
done sometime ago I had said that Israel was captured and the other nations
wasted by the original Babylon because God was also spreading his word and Jewry
to the world by this. Hence we find in Mordecai's time an epitome of this -
"And many of the people of the land became Jews" (Ester 8:17). Shortly
after that they built the second temple but it too was destroyed, they were
not getting the picture; then another temple arose, the real temple - Jesus
Christ or Yahoshua Ha Mashiah (Mark 14:58). The same thing will happen today:
O
L D B A B Y L O N
Middle East |
C
U R R E N T B A B Y L O N
America |
1. Babylonian Capture was used to spread Jewry. | Current Babylonian is used to spread the gospel. |
2. Second temple was built after Babylonian exile. | A third temple will be finished after the fall of the great whore called Babylon. |
3. That temple wasn't really God's intent. | The third temple built today is not of God but will be used by the Anti-Christ. |
4. Second temple after Babylonian exile was destroyed for salvation through grace - Christ. | Third present day "satanic" temple destroyed by Christ return and a New everlasting City built or descended after the second resurrection (Rev 21). |
So present day Babylon, being America, as said in the manifesto and Revelation might not be wrong. America would be "the Gate of God" for them, given all that I've learnt and the Isaiah 5 song ("Now will I sing to my wellbeloved a song of my beloved touching his vineyard. My wellbeloved hath a vineyard in a very fruitful hill...and built a tower in the midst of it...brought forth wild grapes" -Isa 5:1-2.)...
Another thing Isaiah 45 mentioned which I didn't realize until I found out the meaning of Babylon much later...was, "I will loose the loins of kings, to open before him the two leaved gates; and the gates shall not be shut" (Isa 45:1). Which is the quintessence of Babylon, "The Gate of God." This was rightly situated with ancient Babylon and Cyrus, to which he named before his prophecy happened.
Indeed, this song might be coming to pass for them, "By the rivers of Babylon, where we sat down, there we wept when we remembered Zion." The gates were opened for the Jews and then for us Gentiles and (Having written all this still use the word PROBABLY) will be opened for the repentant fallen ones. All God commissions me, us, to do is ask. As written in another article, that reads:
In late 2005, I had anticipated reading Isaiah 45 with an encoded prophetic sense, now reaching there in a book-by-book drain out read from Genesis down, chronologically; as against the first time doing it, which was purely contextual (direct and prophetic). But when approaching Isaiah 45 I was led away in that devotion, way back to Isaiah 31 and didn't get to read it, but learnt the above of the horsemen then and the term. When I went back to read Isaiah 45 now I wasn't that stir in finding more encoded oodles and probably was wondering if I was correct in it's possible pointing of a redemption for the fallen ones. But then it suddenly jumped out at me from the leading of the Lord, the correction I made in The Voice (Do animals go to heaven?) and the learning of the horsemen in the last devotion. Isaiah 45:9 reads, "Woe unto him that striveth with his Maker! Let the potsherd strive with the potsherds of the earth." Firstly, woe on him that strive with God their maker, in other words, none of God's creation can really strive with him, what is man? What is Angel? Then it said, let the potsherd (earth ware, created) strive with their created potsherd and don't let this come up to me. If God created can't strive with him, how much things his created has created, so don't let this come up to me at all. Possible speaking of the horsemen, as it said, "or THY work, He hath no hands?" Then it said,
"Thus saith the LORD, the Holy One of Israel, and his Maker, Ask me of things to come concerning MY SONS, and concerning the work of MY hands command ye me. I have made the earth, and created man [HUMANS] upon it: I, even my hands, have stretched out the heavens, and all their host [ANGELS] have I commanded" (Isaiah 45:11-12).
This was the verse he used in personal mode to speak to me about the fallen ones, but it not only solidifies that but also open and close the brackets on salvation. That is, ask me about salvation for my sons, the works of my mine, the intelligent beings I have created. Then gladly for the hopefuls, this didn't speak of man only for it said "the heavens and all their host." So salvation for any fallen being would be for his creation, his sons. Reason being, in the FAQ, Do Animals Go To Heaven, I had said salvation is only for intelligent beings, not saying it but if found out was including the fallen ones in that loose definition, if not, it didn't state that. But indeed the definition was loose, "For he also is wise." And would mean that horse men can be saved because they are "intelligent beings." But God made it clear in his directive to me, "Ask me of...my sons...the work of my hands."
The last point that would close the brackets on salvation would be his narration to me, "I the LORD, the first, and with the last" (Isa 41:1). Moses the first, Yahoshua (Jesus) the second but first of the Lion of Judah and lastly, the last dispensational Lion of the Tribe of Judah, possibly. In that same pattern, Moses was succeeded by Joshua (Yahoshua or Jesus) who was succeeded by Othniel (who married Caleb's daughter - of the same family/specie, Jews that is). "The last" would suggest that it finishes with the last; and with that command of asking about humans and angels, then it means it finishes with angels possibly; or in this pattern, Jews > Humans > Angels. So Isaiah 45 not only speaks encodely of a possible redemption of the fallen ones, as I'd thought of and was looking for more nuggets, but it opened the brackets wide and closed it.
Isaiah 46 went further with it encodely but I didn't include this because I don't know how these possible horsemen are created on a whole, if carried in our women's womb at all. But the verse from Isaiah 46 says, "Hearken unto me, O house of Jacob, and all the remnant of the house of Israel, which are borne by me from the belly, which are carried from the womb."
This is a motherly reason why he would care for us and why if argued by God through me for a possible fallen angel redemption, this verse from the said Isaiah 46 would come into play, "I have made, and I will bear; even I will carry, and will deliver you." He created you and if you want, he will redeem you. It's just the nature of the parent.
Though called Babylon the
Great Whore, that doesn't necessarily disqualify God's grace; and actually,
"MYSTERY" was written on her head. A mystery means things are not
exactly as it seems, but a mystery. Not wanting to go into this in this book,
but if Demonology Appealed is written, if God be willing, I might show the case
of the Two Mary's, one with inherent sins (Mary mother of Jesus) and the other
blatantly a sinner (Mary the whore); both got saved after repenting. Remember,
where sin increase grace much more increase (Rom 5:20).