|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New National Colleges of Education and Teacher Centres were also established. Further, computer education is also being strengthened in schools and steps were taken to establish sophisticated Computer Education Centres on a regional basis. The shortage of teaching materials and educational equipment due to resource constraints hindered the efficient implementation of reforms. At the same time, the utilisation of foreign funds was not at a satisfactory level. Delays and other shortcomings in the administration procedures also slowed down the implementation of reforms. Despite these shortcomings, the overall response to the general education reforms was satisfactory. In the higher education sector, the Wayamba University was established in 1999. The progress of university education reforms has been slow as there was much diversity in the responses to the proposals for university education reforms. The implementation of tertiary education reforms, based on the recommendations made by the Presidential Task Force on technical education and vocational training, was continued in 1999. The total expenditure on education in 1999 was Rs.29,294 million, an increase of 10 per cent when compared with 1998. The total expenditure on education as a percent of GDP was 2.6 per cent in 1999. General Education General and University Education : Some key indicators
(a) Provisional Sources : Ministry of Education and Higher
Education Technical Education and Vocational Training The Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission (TVEC), the apex policy setting body in the TEVT sector, took a number of measures for the systematic development of the sector. The commission has prepared and published Vocational Education and Training (VET) plans for five priority industry sectors namely, gems and jewellery, construction, printing, textiles and garments and hotel and tourism. The government provided Rs.50 million to TVEC to promote skills training in private sector industrial establishments. The TVEC assisted 33 companies in order to expand and upgrade their training facilities. It also took initiatives to publish a Labour Market Information Bulletin on a regular basis. The government has identified the importance of developing the TEVT sector in line with the general education and higher education sectors. In the context of the increasing demand for skilled labour in the domestic market as well as in foreign markets, it is important to expand the reforms in this sector. In the meantime, the private sector should be encouraged to undertake more vocational training programmes for prospective students. Tertiary
Education The
tertiary education sector in Sri Lanka consists of university education
and technical education and vocational training (TEVT). The university
education system, a monopoly of the government, consists of 13
universities inclusive of an open university. A regulatory authority set
up by the government, the University Grants Commission (UGC), selects
students for entry into each university, and sets academic standards and
policy with respect to university education in the country. Admission to
university education is severely competitive. Annually, out of the total
number of students (about 183,000) who sit for the G.C.E.(A/L)
examination, about 50 per cent become eligible to enter a university.
However, no more than 16 per cent of the students, who become eligible,
are admitted. From Year 1 entrants to schools of any age cohort, no more
than 2 per cent enter a university 13 years later. The competitiveness
has adversely affected the expectations of average students. The TEVT sector consists of technical colleges and vocational training institutions owned and operated by the government and fee levying private sector institutions. Training institutions under the purview of the government provide specialised training in sector specific skills, while private sector institutions cater to market needs by fulfilling training requirements in demand driven fields. A considerable number of early school leavers and students, who do not gain admission to universities, seek training in the TEVT sector. Tertiary Education in Sri Lanka : Issues, Reforms and Prospects The existing university education system in Sri Lanka has not been able to provide the country with a work force ready to face the challenges of a dynamic, market oriented economy. The inability to match modern industry skills and trends in economic and industrial development have shut off job and income opportunities for a substantial number of persons. Courses and programmes directed at government employment, which is being downsized at present, have exacerbated the problem. A high unemployment and under employment rate among university graduates points to a mismatch between supply and demand conditions for graduate employment, reflecting a supply driven education system with little relevance to labour market conditions. A number of reasons can be cited for the deficiencies in the present tertiary education system. With regard to university education, full-time degree courses still remain a highly restricted and centralised public sector monopoly. The transmission of knowledge is mainly by traditional teaching methods and courses. The uniform curricula, syllabi and teaching materials used do not cater to present day industrial requirements while lagging behind international developments in science and technology. Standards demanded by industry are gradually increasing both here and abroad. Moreover, as prices have played a very minor role in the provision of tertiary public education services, the resort to budgetary financing as a means of funding university education has resulted in restricting opportunities and reducing the quality of the service provided. The intense competition for scarce government resources has led to the under-financing of this sector. The quality of the TEVT education sector is also being questioned with regard to the relevance of the curricula for demand driven courses. The government has initiated far-reaching reforms in university education with a view to restructuring and developing the existing public sector tertiary education system. On going reforms aimed at improving the quality of teaching and research include curricula reform and staff development. Curriculum reforms include the introduction of course units and modular systems with a view to giving more flexibility in the choice of courses for students, and the introduction of new degree courses which are demand oriented. Moreover, the mode of assessment is also being changed from end year examinations to continuous assessment. Improvements to staff development are being met with the provision of orientation courses in teaching and learning methodologies to probationary lecturers and refresher courses for other teachers. Meanwhile, facilities for career guidance and counseling are being encouraged with a view to developing university - industry linkages. Reforms with respect to university financing centre around fund raising activities and revenue generation from nongovernment sources. Reforms in the area of expansion of university education focus on increasing the number of universities and expanding intakes to universities. Meanwhile, universities are also expected to come up with corporate plans indicating the way forward. Reforms in the TEVT sector are also being implemented with a view to improving the quality of courses and the training provided. Private sector participation in TEVT has been emphasised in the reform agenda. The most recent initiatives announced by the government in its proposed ‘Tertiary Education Strategy’ give a further impetus to reforming the tertiary education system.1 As part of its unfinished agenda for policy reform, the government is expected to give passage to a new Universities Act. In its broadest terms, the new Universities Act envisions the ultimate goal of producing a wellinformed graduate equipped with problem solving capabilities required by the changing environment and new skills demands.2 More specifically, the objectives of the proposed new Universities Act revolve around improving the quality of education, decentralising admissions policy, increasing access to information technology, reducing the reliance on state funding to incorporate other nongovernment sources of financing and further strengthening industry - university linkages by providing incentives for private sector participation in post-secondary education and encouraging industry participation in almost all aspects of tertiary education. It is also proposed to develop a master plan for university reforms incorporating a shared vision and mission between stakeholders to tertiary education reform i.e., students, faculty, administrators, government and industry. Budgetary constraints in the future will necessitate extensive changes to the tertiary education system. New avenues of financing university education on a cost recovery basis should be sought to replace traditional sources of financing. A key area in this regard would be to harness and encourage the private sector to mobilise resources for development of the tertiary education system. However,
opportunities for private sector participation in university education
are still minimal. Although there are provisions in the existing
Universities Act No. 16 of 1978 to recognise degree courses conducted by
private sector institutions, the process involved is tedious and
procedures Gains
from allowing private sector institutions in tertiary education are
many. International experience with university education suggests that
competition among public and private sector universities leads to the
development of the entire education system. The quality of education and
training will be improved through competition between private and public
institutions. Labor market requirements Changing
state ownership of the tertiary education system is not an easy task.
Private sector universities have been the cause of wide ranging disputes
between the government and several interest groups. These differences
could be minimised with awareness programmes, continuous dialogue and
compromise. Ongoing discussions in the media on this issue are an
excellent move to understand the importance of private sector
institutions in the provision of tertiary education in the country. New
policies should be presented for public discussion within and out of
Parliament. Such open debate will help form public opinion on this issue
and provide confidence to the general public on the proposed reforms.
The way forward therefore would be for the government to open up
tertiary education to the private sector by gradually relaxing existing
rigid regulations and offering an appropriate incentive package. At the
same time, a regulatory framework should be established to ensure
standards, quality and accountability in the new entities and to promote
a competitive environment between government and private sector
institutions. The existing public tertiary education system should also
be improved with ongoing and proposed reforms aimed at quality |