Black Sand Basin
History
By Rocco Paperiello
[ Black
Sand Pool ] [ "Boiling
Egg Pool" ] [ Brown
Spouters ]
[ Cliff Geyser ] [
Cucumber Spring ] [
Demon's Cave ] [ Emerald
Pool ]
[ Green Spring ] [
Hankerchief Geyser ]
[ Hankerchief Pool ]
[ KelpPool ]
[ Marsh Pool ] [
Opalescent Pool ] [
Pentagonal Spring ] [
Ragged Spring ]
[ Rainbow Pool ] [
Specimen Lake ]
[ Spouter Geyser ]
[ Sunset Lake ] [
Whistle Geyser ]
[ Unnamed Geysers and Springs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ]
The name of Black Sand Geyser was given to this feature by the 1871 Hayden Survey, and A. C. Peale, in 1878, continued its use. However, by the late 1880s, the name of “Black Sand Spring” was one people were using.
At the same time, the name “Black Sand Basin” was being used to describe the area including “Black Sand Spring” and the extensive overflow basins (Specimen Lake) below the spring. (The name “Sunlight Basin” was being used for the area of springs along Iron Spring Creek, the main portion of today’s Black Sand Basin). Some confusion developed when the name of “Black Sand Basin,” by at least the late 1800s, was being used also by some for the “Black Sand Spring.” [Whittlesey 1988]
Arnold Hague used the name “Black Sand Spring” in his unpublished manuscript “The Geyser Basins” [circa 1911]. The usage of the names “Black Sand Basin,” “Black Sand Spring,” and “Sunlight Basin” continued in this fashion until the latter 1920s. Then, in 1927, the Yellowstone Park place names committee made Black Sand Pool the name for the spring, and the name Black Sand Basin to encompass the entire area from the spring itself to those west of Iron Spring Creek. The name “Sunlight Basin” was dropped. [RNM 1928]
For most of its history, this pool has been quietly overflowing. Discharge was much greater in the past causing the buildup of a series of overflow pools called Specimen Lake (see below) which occupied the gently sloping area below the main pool. In 1878, A. C. Peale described the pool as follows:
This is one of the most beautiful springs in the Upper Basin. It has a delicate rim, with toadstool-like masses around it. The basin slopes rather gently toward a central aperture that to the eye appears to have no bottom. The water in the spring has a delicate turquoise tint, and as the breeze sweeps across the surface, removing the steam, the effect of the rippling of the water is very beautiful. The sloping sides are covered with a light brown crust; sometimes it is a rather dark cream color. The funnel is about 40 feet in diameter. The entire space covered by the water is about 55 feet by 60 feet. Outside the rim of the spring is a border of pitchstone (obsidian) sand or gravel sloping 25 feet.
In 1926, the sign at Black Sand Pool read:
BLACK SAND POOL Maximum temperature 199 degrees F. (2 degrees above boiling point at this altitude). The superheat of two degrees causes active boiling in the center of the pool every few minutes. The deep shade of blue is probably due to the darkening effect of the black obsidian sand beneath the water, as well as to the depth of the water. [Hall 1926]
Periods of violent boiling were noted occasionally through at least 1929. [E.J.B. 1929, J. Thomas Stewart, Jr. 1929]
Rare periods of geyser activity for Black Sand Pool were noted in 1895, 1950, and for a while after the 1959 earthquake. [Whittlesey 1988, Marler 1950, 1973] In early August 1895 “the water in Black Sand Pool [was] much agitated and . . . turned to milk white . . ., and [on August 9th] the pool . . . turned into a genuine geyser . . ., throwing up water to a height of from 15 to 20 feet about every 10 minutes. [Whittlesey 1988]1
The geyser activity in 1950 was recorded in Marler’s annual report for that year.:
On June 17, [1950] the Black Sand Pool was observed playing to a height of about 12 feet. This is the first known record that this pool has ever functioned as a geyser. From the first observed date until mid-August several other eruptive periods of this pool were noted.
At least one more eruption was seen on September 3, 1950. [Old Faithful logbook]
Minor geyser activity followed the August 17, 1959-earthquake. “During the weeks that followed the earthquake, at 5-minute intervals, steam detonations at depth could be heard and felt. This was followed by momentary boiling and marked increase in discharge, [then ebbing]. These geyser characteristics persisted throughout the 1960 and 1961 seasons.” [Marler, Inventory. . .]
Another interesting fact concerning Black Sand Pool is its apparent connection to distant Giant Geyser. Two days before the eruption of Giant on September 7, 1978, the water of this pool turned murky gray. In addition to Black Sand Pool, a number of the non-overflowing pools in the Daisy Group turned a murky rust-color at about the same time. [Wolf]
During the first few decades of the park, this feature was one of the more popular in the Upper Geyser Basin. Everyone went searching for “specimens” to bring home as souvenirs, and this was a favorite collecting place. Almost without fail, the early accounts spoke of visiting the Specimen Lake, which was formed by the runoff from Black Sand Pool. Even as early as 1873, Henry Norton, in his guide book, recommended this area to visitors:
Follow up Iron-Spring creek. . . to Iron-Spring [Black Sand Pool], an enormous hot-spring fairly nestled into the mountainside. Here you can get fine specimens of wood petrifactions, crystals, etc.
In 1878, Dr. Peale was evidently very impressed by both Black Sand Pool and the area which would soon acquire the name of Specimen Lake:
From the west side [of Black Sand Spring] flows a considerable stream, which forms a most beautiful channel, in which the colors show a remarkable variety of shades. The extremely delicate pinks are mingled with equally delicate saffron yellows, with here and there shades of green. These colors are from deep yellow to pale creamy salmon. The stream or outlet runs down nearly to the base of the trachyte wall on the west side of the basin, spreading out over a large area, which is covered with its deposits. The main channel, which carries off the main proportion of the overflow, is underlaid with the most delicate salmon-colored silica. There is also a great amount of the soft gelatinous mater, which is the new variety (viandite). . .
In the Ninth Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey to the Secretary of the Interior 1887-’88, we find a long article written by Walter Weed [1889] entitled “Formation of Travertine and Siliceous Sinter by The Vegetation of Hot Springs.” The water from “Black Sand Spring,” took a prominent place in his description of how the formation of siliceous sinter was greatly accelerated by the presence of the jelly-like “algae” (recognized today as bacteria).2 The use of Specimen Lake in this study by Walter Weed was commented on by Arnold Hague in his unpublished manuscript “The Geyser Basins” (circa 1911):
The overflow stream [from “Black Sand Spring”] runs rapidly down to the level plain below, where it spreads out over a wide area and has built up a group of ponds and pools which collectively are known as Specimen Lake. There are few areas in the Park better adapted for the study of varied forms of algae and the building up of the stony sinter. The colors as shown at Specimen Lake are unsurpassed anywhere in the Park. . .
This area, hemmed in by a low bank bordering the stream, lends itself to the building up of these shallow pools and the consequent growth of algae. Again, as the underlying, moist, impalpable sinter is readily molded by the shovel it permits the construction of artificial pools and runways of any desired size and form. In this way both shallow and deep basins may be built up, and the rate of flow and rapidity of cooling controlled. According to changing conditions of temperature varying species of algae are made to grow. . .
Where the name of Specimen Lake came from is not known. The first time that it appears is as a caption on one of the earliest stereo-slides produced by Frank Haynes in 1881. In 1890, Frank Haynes wrote in his first guidebook (later to become the Haynes Guides):
The overflow from [Black Sand Spring] spreads out over a large and very interesting area, called Specimen Lake, which deserves more than a passing notice. Absorption of the surrounding silica has destroyed many of the trees in the vicinity, the dry lifeless trunks adding to the attractiveness of the place, geologically speaking, by affording the appearance of petrifactions.
The Ranger Naturalist Manual [reflecting conditions observed in 1926] stated:
The overflow of Black Sand Spring is a shallow basin called Specimen Lake. Here the silicious water has been drawn up into the interstices of the standing dead trees by capillarity producing so-called “petrified trees”. . .
It is clear from both early descriptions and photographs that Specimen Lake was comprised of a series of small shallow basins, spreading to a considerable distance below Black Sand Pool. This condition does not exist today. Sometime after the turn of the century, discharge from Black Sand Pool had apparently declined, causing Specimen Lake to largely disappear. Until recently, the water merely flowed down the shallow slope in a series of shifting rivulets. Interestingly, just over the past few years (1994-1997), the discharge from Black Sand Pool has increased enough to allow the rebuilding of at least a small upper portion of a “new” Specimen Lake.
This name first appeared in an 1882 guide book by W. W. Wylie. In another 1883 guide book, Herman Haupt wrote:
Demon’s Cave
Near the Black Sand Geyser is a deep pit in the geyserite, which has been washed out, leaving a crust suspended over a boiling cauldron, from which steam is constantly arising, filling the cave with a cloud of mist, which at times obscures the surface of the water. [Haupt 1883]
This was probably the spring shown as “Cave Geyser” on one of Gustavus Bechler’s 1872 maps. Captain J.W. Barlow [1872] described it in 1871 as having “its cavity extending beneath the surface of the ground in the form of a cavern.” According to George Marler [1960], this spring was stimulated into eruptive activity by the 1959 earthquake, but had no further eruptions.
Concerning more recent activity we have the following observations by Scott Bryan:
I have seen numerous eruptions of this in the past handful of years. Always fascinated by it and expecting more. I'm sure in its history it has had some pretty impressive eruptions, but the best I've ever seen is splashing, usually only a foot or so high but once to easily 6 feet. And another time I “think” while approaching from Punch Bowl I saw water several feet above the broken rim. In any case, it is an active geyser. [e-mail 25 Mar 98]
This spring is easily overlooked, but it lies just to the right of the entrance road into Black Sand Basin. It was so named by Walter Weed in 1884 from the spring’s five-sided shape. [Whittlesey 1988] Unaware of any previously given name, Ansel Hall called it “Cerulean Spring” in 1926, and gave the following description:
Temperature 171 degrees F.; depth 13 ½ feet. Large amounts of gas, probably mostly carbon dioxide, frequently rise to the surface. The small spring 15 feet northward boils at 197 degrees F. (Note: I named this spring on a day when the blue of the sky was reflected and gave it a cerulean color. A better name would be “ZINNOBER”. A.F.H.) [Hall 1926]
Thus the mystery of the “Cerulean Spring” references in Allen & Day [1935] is solved. I have not been able to find out what “Zinnober” could have meant to Hall (perhaps cinnabar), but his description would fit today.
This pool is located northwest of Spouter Geyser. Though not shown by A. C. Peale [1883], Walter Weed [circa 1884] drew it in on his map as spring #26 of the “Emerald Group,” and described it only as a warm pool with a soft border. [Whittlesey 1988] This spring is the “Algal Pool” of the Haynes Guides, and the “Black Sand Opal” found in many of George Marler’s reports.
On occasion, and under the proper lighting, this pool can be very photogenic. In 1957, naturalist Herbert Lystrup climbed to the top of the nearby Madison Plateau ridge and stated that this “pool revealed an opalescent azure as lovely as the sky above.” [Whittlesey 1988]3
This spring was labeled “Small Beehive” on Bechler’s 1872 “Map of the Upper Geyser Basin,” along with its description as a “constant spouter.” Yet, on another of his 1872 maps, “Map of the Upper and Lower Geyser Basins,” Bechler labeled this feature “Boiling Pond.” In 1878, Peale [1883] named it the “Great Spouter,” and by 1887, Arnold Hague had apparently shortened this name to the “Spouter.” In 1884, photographer F. Jay Haynes took pictures of this geyser under the name “Iron Spring Creek Geyser,” and by 1899 park tour operator G.L. Henderson was referring to it as the “Double Wave Spouters.” [Whittlesey 1988]4
Early descriptions of this geyser gave intervals of about 2 to 3 times as long as durations. The interval Weed logged in 1883, was 2 hours, with one duration of 45 minutes. [Weed 1883, Vol. III] The maximum height given was usually between 3 and 10 feet. [Hague 1883, Weed 1883, 1887, 1897] This very active geyser has no known dormant years, although, in February 1927, it was reported to have remained “dry” for a number of weeks. [MRofS 1927]
Walter Weed [1883, 1887] described the main basin: 35' in diameter
Principal Vent - 4 ¾ ft x 18' inches
Lesser " - 1¼' x 2¼' (top measure)
. . .The top crust or ledge of geyserite overhangs very much forming quite
a chamber. The deposit in the basin, and the lining of the overflow channel,
is a pearly, gray geyserite.
Walter Weed’s early accounts describe only 2 vents; however, there is a third vent outside of the main basin. Its small third vent (the one closest to the road) was later to acquire the name of the “Grumbler.” It was named from the sound it makes by park tour operator G.L. Henderson in or about 1899, and erupts simultaneously with Spouter Geyser to heights of 1-2 feet. [Whittlesey 1988]5
By 1926, the durations of Spouter Geyser’s eruptions seems to have been longer than in the 1880s. The following is from the 1926 from Ranger Naturalist Manual:
...the Spouter [is] a constantly playing geyser whose steady turmoil occasionally develops into a real eruption that throws jets in every direction without reaching a height of more than 20 feet. These eruptions continue until the crater is dry; it commences to refill shortly and the normal splashing is resumed. [Charles Phillips 1927]
The sign at the Spouter in late 1926 read in part: “The eruptions last for several hours, occasionally even for several days, the pool becoming totally empty for about an hour between eruptions.” [Hall 1926]
Various reports from the 1930s through the 1940s, show some very widely varying durations usually from about a half hour to several hours. In 1950, Marler described durations of 8 to 10 hours, being active 90% of the time. This type of activity seemed to typify the 1950s, and 1960s. Then in the 1980s some changes occasionally took place. In 1982, Sam Holbrook, who monitored it all summer, came to the conclusion that “it appeared to be drained most of the time and erupting for relatively short periods each day.” In 1986, durations of 1 to 3 hours, with intervals of 2 to a little over 5 hours were recorded. [Bohman 1986] In 1987 recorded durations and intervals averaged 3 hours 20 minutes and 5 hours 57 minutes respectively. [Landis 1987] The one duration and interval recorded by Landis in 1988 were 1 hour 56 minutes and 4 hours 5 minutes respectively. [Landis 1988]
In 1993, Spouter Geyser had an average interval of about 5 hours with extremes of 2 hours 26 minutes to 7 hours 13 minutes. The durations ranged from 50 minutes to 4 hours. [Keller 1996] In 1996, however, durations of about ½ to 2 hours and intervals of 2 to 5 hours predominated. This trend of increased interval and decreased duration continued in 1997, with the geyser being active well less than ¼ of the time.
This spring lies directly across the road from Spouter Geyser within a log fence enclosure. Its large irregular vent lies along an obvious fracture line. The hard gray sintered basin attests to its long presence as a hot feature, but only in 1976 was it ever noted as an active geyser. [Martinez 1976]
It was noticed by Mike Keller and his wife Cynthia in 1993 and 1994 that when Spouter Geyser was erupting, the water level in this geyser basin was 6 to 8 inches lower than when Spouter was inactive.
The position of this small geyser is difficult to locate unless it is actually seen in eruption. The following is a report by Mike and Cynthia Keller:
On some cold mornings in 1993 and 1994 when Cynthia and I were doing thermal cleaning at Black Sand Basin, we would occasionally see a small vent somewhere behind and down the slope from Spouter Geyser erupt from 2 to 8 feet in height. The play would last about 3 to 5 seconds. I never could find the exact location of the vent, and for a long time I thought I was only seeing steam from Spouter, but once I was in Cliff’s basin and saw WATER. The only thing I could find in the area was a small crack about the length and width of a deck of cards.
This small group of spouting vents, northwest of Opalescent Pool, was given the name Brown Spouters in Walter Weed’s 1887 notebook (page 7 & 8). The description given by Walter Weed in an 1883 notebook, could very well have been written a century later:
Three basins connected together.
According to Scott Bryan [1995], either one of these vents, or one close by, is a geyser [BSB-5], with frequent activity of 3 to 10 feet in height.
(The following text is from Lee Whittlesey). This spring “is located on the right (east) bank of Iron Spring Creek several hundred yards below Sunset Lake. It runs into the creek and is shaped like a long trough.
“This low temperature, elongated, spring appears to have been named in 1888 by geologists Arnold Hague and Walter Weed for its algous growths which resemble kelp (a greenish-brown seaweed). Weed stated that year that Kelp Pool was 100 feet long, and 20 to 30 feet wide with a temperature of 122.5º F. “Arnold Hague used Kelp Pool as a reference point for some of his geological descriptions in 1891.” [Whittlesey 1988]6
The following is from an 1887 notebook of Walter Weed:
Temp. at point of issue - 151° F. Cross section of channel 11" - 6" deep 18" broad. Surface velocity of stream - 13 ft. in 10 seconds. Algous lining of gelatinous growth, red overlaid by green spreading familiar brown tone. No basin or bowl.
***need to find location *** ENTRY NOT COMPLETE***
This name was given by George Marler in 1959:
A large cucumber-shaped spring is located on the creek bank directly below Spouter [Geyser]. Its shape, as well as its color, suggested the name cucumber. Its limpid, greenish appearing water was very turbid on the morning of the 18th [the morning after the earthquake] . . . In the east end of Cucumber Spring’s crater a small vent was spouting on the 18th for the first observed time. This activity continued without respite for the rest of the year. [Marler 1959 report]
This spouting activity to about a foot or so continued through the 1960s. In 1969 a steam explosion ended its life and it is now merged with the spring. [Marler 1960, 1961, 1962, Whittlesey 1988]
In 1878, A. C. Peale described this spring as “a very handsome oblong pool of greenish-tinted water, with an overhanging white scalloped rim. There is a boiling center at the back of the spring.” Its given depth was 6-7 feet. This spring was previously named “Black Ledge Spring” by Walter Weed [1887] and at that time measured 11½' by 43'.
This geyser was originally labeled “Conical Spring” on both of Bechler’s 1872 maps [“Map of the Upper Geyser Basin” and, “Map of the Upper and Lower Geyser Basins”], but this was most likely meant only as a descriptive epithet. A. C. Peale, of the 1878 Hayden Survey, left it unnamed in his report, although he suspected it was a geyser. Walter Weed, in 1884, heard the “very loud roar” of its steam phase, and knew it to be a geyser, but neither he nor Arnold Hague, the next head of the USGS after Hayden, gave this feature a name. Its first known name, that of “Hazle[sic] Fairy Mound Builder,” given in 1899 by park tour operator G.L. Henderson, was never widely used. [Whittlesey 1988] Not until the 1912 Haynes Guide do we see the name of “the Whistler,” which was soon transformed into its present name.
Prior to 1900, reports about this geyser were scarce. In 1878, A. C. Peale [1883] wrote: “The basin was empty when we saw it this year, but the water could be heard boiling far below in the tube, and there is no doubt that it has periods of spouting, although the column may not be projected to a great height.” I would consider this evidence of a recent eruption. In his 1883 report, Walter Weed noted a full basin “the water being in vigorous ebullition.” [#3899-C, Volume III, 1883, page 6] And then in 1884, Walter Weed recorded the only described eruption before 1900:
[Spring #1 was showing] evidence of its geyseric character, for a violent jet of steam was issuing from the vent, with a very loud roar of varying intensity, but heard all over the basin. A 2 lb. fragment of sinter thrown into the vent was thrown up into the air some 20 ft. This intensity gradually decreased, but the steam period was fully 1½ hours duration. . . There is little doubt . . .that this is a geyser of unknown period and judging by the violence and duration of the steam period, of considerable power. [Whittlesey 1988]
Arnold Hague, in his unpublished “The Geyser Basins,” (circa 1911) wrote:
Another small vent [in the Black Sand Basin] gives off at times, at least in recent years, immense volumes of steam which rise in the air with a loud roar heard for long distances.
At about this same time, the newly revised 1912 edition is the first of the Haynes Guides to mention this geyser and give it a name:
The Whistle, situated near the road leading towards Old Faithful Inn, preforms only at great intervals; but when the great rush of steam commences, as it does several times each season, a whistle-like roar is produced which is audible half a mile, and lasts several minutes. [Haynes 1912]
I think it entirely possible that this name was given by Jack Haynes himself. A number of editions later “the Whistle” became Whistle Geyser.
We do not find any new mention of Whistle Geyser erupting until the early 1920s. In a 1923 “lecture” on the Upper Geyser Basin, Landsdowne wrote the following based on observations during 1921 and 1922:
The WHISTLE plays once or twice a season. Some visitors who were close by during the last eruption were surprised because, as they said, “We could hardly hear ourselves think.” As a matter of fact the sound can be heard for half a mile. . . [Landsdowne circa 1923]
This is corroborated in part by the report of a specific eruption noted for August 27, 1922 at 8:00 a.m. [Bound Volume # 189]
Throughout the remainder of the 1920s there are specific records found of only 5 more eruptions. Two eruptions occurred in 1924. [MRofS, Aug 1924] Then, on July 28, 1926, the “Whistle Steam vent whistled at five twenty p.m.” [Martinsdale, Upper Basin Ranger Station Report of July 31, 1926, Box W-121 #3] There was one eruption recorded for 1927, that on August 21. [MRofCR, Aug 1927, Philip Martinsdale Box W-73, see also MRofS, Aug 1927] And finally, there was at least one eruption in 1929, in the early part of August: “Crater dry for one day following eruption then filled slowly.” [E.J.B. 1929 card file]
But there are a few hints of more than this one eruption for 1929. The following terce reports (all for 1929) are from the old card files: “Eruptions infrequent. . .” [E.J.B. 1929] “Height of eruptions now only 10-20 ft.” [E. A. F. 1929] “Have never seen it play in 4 seasons for more than 20 feet usually less.” [P. U. 1929]
In 1926, Charles Phillips wrote the following in his article on the Upper Geyser Basin for the 1927 Ranger Naturalist Manual:
The low mound on the left is of unusual interest. It was evidently an active geyser at one time but later took on the characteristics of a hot spring probably as its vent became partially closed by geyserite and the steam found an exit elsewhere. However, at rare intervals, seldom more than once a summer, it erupts with extraordinary power ejecting the little water in the tube as a spray while the released steam rushes through the narrow opening with a peculiar high-pitched roar that has given it the name of Whistle. [Phillips 1927, p 146]
This would seem to jibe with the meager scattering of reports as seen above. However, from the recently discovered manuscript by Ansel Hall [1926] entitled “A Report on the Permanent Educational Improvements at Upper Basin, YNP, Wyoming, Made in the Season of 1926” we find out that a new sign then erected at Whistle Geyser bore the following legend:
WHISTLE GEYSER
This geyser erupts about once every four weeks to a height of 50 feet. Its name comes from the roar caused by steam rushing out of the narrow opening during the eruption--a noise which can be often heard as far as a half mile away. A fine spray of water is thrown out with the steam. Duration of eruption is 20 to 30 minutes.
Unfortunately, no other known report found can corroborate this activity of “once every four weeks.”
In the 1930s there are only 4 or 5 known eruptions. According to Thomas “Geyser Bill” Ankrom, a noted geyser gazer, “the Whistler . . . was in action several times during the [1931] season. . .” But only two specific eruptions could be found in the record for that year -- the first of these in July:
Between 1:30 and 2:00 P.M. on July 18 the Whistle Geyser erupted to a height of 40 feet (as determined by Mr. Oberhansley). A long steam period followed with a distinct sharp roar. Afterwards the crater was dry for 2 days. All algae was killed which was growing around the vent. [Lystrup 8/4/31, Lystrup card file, George C. Crowe 1931 report & MRofS, July 1931]
This eruption was publicized in a park memorandum. Interestingly, we find that the sign at Whistle Geyser in 1931 read that it was “an extinct geyser” and incorrectly claimed that it had not erupted since 1927:
“Memorandum for the Press” 1931-- 97
Yellowstone Park, Wyo., August -- It doesn’t always pay to believe in signs. At least one recent visitor to Yellowstone National Park would convince you of that. Standing before a sign near the Whistler[sic] Geyser, she read with interest the legend which stated that the Whistler[sic] was now an extinct geyser, had been since 1927 when it erupted last. According to the sign it was now just a hot pool like hundreds of others around it.
Even while she was reading the sign, the visitor heard a gurgling noise emitted from the geyser and presently with a swish of steam and a volley of boiling water the Whistler[sic] went into eruption.
Eager to carry the message to others, the lady dashed to a ranger naturalist with the news that the Whistler[sic] was erupting. He doubted her story, but nevertheless hurried to that area. Long before he arrived, he heard the strange noise that gave the Whistler its name.
“It sounded like about four locomotives at a distance, with a shrill, ringing tone to it,” the ranger declared.
Rising to a height of about 40 feet, the Whistler played for more than 30 minutes. It emitted a great deal of water and killed all the algae on the formation. A checkup just the morning before revealed the entire wall of the geyser covered with beautifully colored algae. The presence of algae indicated a temperature below 187 degrees Fahrenheit.
This strange and unexpected eruption was followed by a long steam period and continuation of the sharp roar. For two days after the eruption the crater of the geyser remained dry and then filled again, and apparently it is today again nothing but a hot pool. [Memorandum for the Press 1931 #97, J.H.M., (also in: Livingston Enterprise, Aug 9, 1931)]
Another of the “several” eruptions of Whistle Geyser for 1931 occurred on August 2nd. A “Mr. F. D. Ritter [of] Beverly Hills, Calif. observed [the] eruption at 4:30 P.M. [It played water to a height of] 50 ft. for 5 minutes. [A] violent steam period [lasted] for at least 30 minutes.” [Lystrup, Aug 1931 card file]
In 1934, one eruption of Whistle was recorded. “It erupted to a height of 50-60' on August 3. [A] sharp roar [was] heard ½ mile away at Black Sand Pool and Black Sand Hill by [the] road crew who saw the play. I saw only steam and [a] dry crater at 9:00 A.M.” [F. Oberhansley 8/3/34, card file] This eruption was reported in the Bozeman Courier, Aug 24, 1934. “So violent was the eruption that a crust of vari-colored algae was blown off the formation.”
The next recorded eruption, that in 1937, occasioned the following article by Philip Fix:
“Whistle Geyser”
by
Ranger Naturalist Philip F. Fix
This geyser, located near the road in Black Sand Basin, is visited by many curious people every summer, but ordinarily it gives no indication of activity. The curious name was given by the Hayden party in 1872 [incorrect, they did not name it at all].
Bauer, in “The Story of Yellowstone Geysers” (page 119) also says it has not been known to erupt in recent years. Its interval was irregular when it was active, and the average height of the eruption was about 15 feet [incorrect again]. The distinct whistle produced during the eruption was its most interesting feature.
An eruption of this geyser was reported to the writer by a visitor on the Nature trail, August 31, 1937. He said his party witnessed an eruption the afternoon of the 30th, the height estimated at 40 to 50 feet by him, was chiefly due to steam, for there was little or no water erupted. A very loud, piercing whistle was produced. The length of the eruption was not noted.
The eruption “was witnessed by Mrs. Robert Beets and party from Saginaw, Mich. This party witnessed the eruption at 6:15 P.M. 8-30-37.” [Lystrup Aug 31, 1937]
There may possibly have been as many as 9 to 11 eruptions of Whistle Geyser through the 1940s. There was one recorded eruption in July of 1945. [RofND, July 1945] The reports of activity of Whistle Geyser from 1946 through 1950, are all from George Marler, but there are unfortunate contradictions. In his 1973 Inventory. . ., Marler claimed that there was ONE eruption of Whistle in 1948, and this was “the first that [Marler was] aware of.” Yet in three other sources, all written by Marler himself, this is contradicted. In his own typewritten preliminary geyser report for 1946 the name Whistle (and a few others) were later inserted by hand in the typewritten table of active geysers for that year. These insertions were made by Marler himself (his handwriting was very distinctive).
Then in the very next year, Marler wrote a 24-page article entitled “Are Yellowstone Geysers Declining in Activity,” in which he recorded:
The Whistle Geyser. . . has been active this season for the first recorded time since 1931 [hard to explain in light of Marler’s 1946 Annual Report]. The number of eruptions have[sic] not been determined, but there have been several. Next to the cone of the Whistle Geyser an oiled road had been built over a raised sheet of sinter. During May of this season steam and water broke through two sections of the oiled mat at this point. [Marler 1947]
But we are not yet quite through. The following is found in a letter from George Marler to Jack Haynes, dated April 12, 1951, concerning suggested changes for Haynes’ guidebook:
Whistle Geyser - On duration “1½ minutes” should be changed to 2-3 hours. During the past three seasons [one would assume Marler meant 1948, 1949, & 1950] I have witnessed 5 eruptions of the Whistle all of which lasted for the duration time I have indicated. It has a more powerful steam phase than the Castle.
Of Marler’s reports for these 3 years, only in his 1948 report is Whistle shown as active. (I suspect that these 5 witnessed eruptions could date back to 1947). At least the eruptions in 1947, and 1948, are partly corroborated by other reports. The July 1947 Report of Naturalist Division has:
During July the Whistle Geyser in the Black Sand Basin was observed in eruption twice by Park Ranger Naturalist George Marler and physical evidence indicates that it had erupted at other times.
And for 1948:
Whistle Geyser erupted at 7:15 pm on September 24, [1948] for the first time this season. [RMR OFD for Sept 23-30, Box W-90 Frank T. Hirst]
Determining the activity of Whistle Geyser during the 1950s is also not without problems. According to Marler’s Inventory. . ., Whistle erupted once in each of the years 1954, 1955, and 1956. But his yearly reports show Whistle active only in 1954, and 1956, while he believed that two additional eruptions, the one on August 31, 1951 and one in 1955, were the result of the geyser being soaped. [Marler 1951, 1954, 1955, 1956, and BYU notebook for 1951] In addition, the 1956 Old Faithful logbook recorded 4 eruptions for Whistle that year: June 30 at 7:35 pm, July 19 at 5:45 pm, Sept 8 at 1:30 pm, and Sept 19 at 2:00 pm, with intervals of 19, 51, and 11 days.
The year 1957 was even better than 1956 for Whistle Geyser. According to Marler’s notebook for that year, there were EIGHT eruptions (not 7 as written in his 1957 annual report and 1973 Inventory. . .). The eruptions occurred on May 10th, June 12th & 25th, July 17th & 30th, August 19th & 29th, and finally on September 4th. The seven intervals were respectively 33, 13, 22, 13, 20, 10, and 6 days. [Marler 1957 handwritten notebook, BYU] Marler’s report for that year stated:
In view of the fact that many seasons will elapse without any activity of the Whistle, the seven [actually 8] eruptions during the current season would seem quite remarkable.
No great amount of activity has been recorded for the Whistle during Park history. This might be due to the fact that it is in the waning stages of old age. The structure of the large mound and the nature of the small orifice are highly suggestive that it is nearing the stage of a sealed unit, as is the case with some of the mounds near Old Faithful and many others.
An eruption of the Whistle lasts from two to three hours. It is only during the first moment or two of play that any water is discharged, and then in scarcely sufficient quantity for the flow to more than reach the base of the cone. [Contrast this description with that of the two eruptions in 1931, and the one in July of 1991]. Following this initial discharge the rest of the eruption is characterized by an impressive steam phase. Steam under great pressure is forcefully ejected with slowly diminishing force for the duration of the activity.
After the 8 eruptions of 1957, the next eruption of Whistle was not until August 13, 1968. According to the Old Faithful Log Book entry that day by Ranger Hollis, the eruption started at 1:30 p.m. The water phase lasted 7 minutes, and reached a height of 40 feet. The steam phase (or “whistling” phase as reported) lasted 47 minutes. Rocks were thrown out during the first 15 minutes. This eruption came a little more than a year after drill hole Y-1 was put down to a depth of 214.6 feet, just a short distance from Whistle Geyser.7
According to Don White:
[The drill hole lies] on the southeast slope of Whistle Geyser’s cone and 47 ft east-southeast of its summit pool which is 5.5 ft above the collar of the hole. The geyser’s pool is 6½ ft in diameter, and, in recent years, water has just filled the pool to seeping overflow. The visible vent is a shallow bowl that narrows downward to about 1 ft in diameter at a depth of about 1½ ft. The geyser’s tube was probed vertically below seepage level to 9.5 ft, where a shelf prevented deeper vertical penetration. Surface temperatures at a depth of about ½ ft commonly ranged from 40 to 60°C, being lowered by evaporation, cold air temperatures, and wind; just below the constriction, temperatures ranged from 90.5 to 92.5 [°C]. Water seeped from five or six places around the pool’s perimeter for a total discharge of about 0.5 gal/min.
In preparation for drilling, these small surface seeps were blocked off except for the largest, which was deepened slightly to install a pipe for measuring total discharge. A water-stage recorder was installed to provide a continuous record. [Don White, “Whistle, A Nearly Dormant Geyser in Upper Geyser Basin, YNP, Wyoming: The First Geyser to be Studied by Research Drilling,” 1990]
This deepening of one portion of the geyser’s rim is not evident today, and a seeping discharge is now seen on only rare occasions.
Perhaps the 1959 earthquake altered some underground heat source. Whatever the reason, Whistle Geyser, which only erupted once in the 1960s, did not erupt for the next 22 years -- so that the eruption of July 1, 1990 came as quite a surprise. There were two more eruptions the next year, one in mid-May and the other on July 18.
The July eruption was witnessed by Clark Murray. He wrote:
The steam cloud was spotted at 21:00 (exactly). . . .I was surprised to find the geyser in a full water phase eruption. This eruption consisted of two to three meter bursts, looking a great deal like Little Cub Geyser. . . .the water phase continued until 21:04. . . At 21:04, the water and steam began to mix, spraying 20 to 25 meters high and, at first, chugging like a steam locomotive. After five minutes. . ., this converted into a violent steam-only phase, roaring, but not whistling, for about 40 minutes. By 21:50 there was a detectable decrease in the strength of the steam phase.
As noted with some of the earlier eruptions, the pool took about 2½ days to refill.
1878 | 1 | 1931 | 2+ | 1951 | 1 |
1884 | 1 | 1934 | 1 | 1954 | 1 |
1910 | 2+ | 1937 | 1 | 1955 | 1 |
1911 | 3+ | 1945 | 1 | 1956 | 4 |
1921-1922 | 2+ | 1946 | 1 | 1957 | 8 |
1924 | 2 | 1947 | 4+ | 1968 | 1 |
1926 | 1 | 1948 | 1+ | 1990 | 1 |
1927 | 1 | 1949-1950 | 1+ | 1991 | 2 |
1929 | 2+ | ---- | |||
Total | 47+ |
Will Whistle Geyser erupt in the future? Who can say for sure? According to Don White of the USGS, Whistle Geyser “is probably near the end of its eruptive activity.” And Marler stated that “it might be nearing the stage of a sealed-in unit.” But how long does it take for this self-sealing to take place? And is this the actual reason for the (apparent?) decline of Whistle Geyser? Perhaps both of the above interpretations are wrong. I agree that the mound of Whistle definitely took many years to form. But this moderately eroded hard geyserite mound has more the look of a slightly overflowing spring rather than that of a geyser. I believe that it is more probable that this geyser has NEVER had any history of frequent eruptive activity. I think it more likely that the history seen over the past hundred years, is similar to its past history. Its apparent lack of eruptive activity is possibly more due to a lack of sufficient thermal energy. Perhaps momentary shifts in thermal energy, cause periods of eruptive activity. These infrequent upswings of thermal energy characterize almost the entire Black Sand Basin as a whole. Cliff Geyser, Ragged Spring, Green Spring, Rainbow Pool and Sunset Lake have all experienced such on-again-off-again years of activity, and (except for Cliff Geyser), with inactivity predominating. If my interpretation is correct, I would expect this geyser merely to repeat past historical performance. I would suggest that occasional periods of activity (perhaps a few years in duration) with one to several eruptions a year, will occur about every one to two decades. (Of course this is assuming that the 1959 earthquake did not unalterably change the region’s plumbing).
This spring lies about 60 feet ENE of Whistler Geyser. This name was given to this spring in recent years by members of the USGS. [Don White, Whistle, “A Nearly Dormant Geyser in Upper Geyser Basin, YNP, Wyoming: The First Geyser to be Studied by Research Drilling,” 1990]
There is another vent near Whistle Geyser and immediately north of “Boiling Egg Pool” that is sometimes a small subterranean spouter to a few inches. [Keller 1996]
Minor eruptive activity for this spring was noted as early as 1878. It was then spring #14 of A. C. Peale’s “Emerald Group”: “18 by 23 ft. . . . 189º. . . on the bank of the creek at a bend, and its basin rises from the water’s edge. The water has an inky tinge over one orifice, and at the other the basin is grayish white. The border is corrugated, with a gray edge and yellow beaded silica on it. The main orifice bulges at short intervals.”
This geyser was named by Arnold Hague. In an 1884 report (commenting on work done in 1883), he wrote: “I have also to add one new geyser to those reported in the Upper Basin. It is situated in the Emerald Group [Black Sand Basin]. I have named it the Cliff Geyser, as it lies so close under the abrupt wall which skirts the west bank of Iron [Spring] Creek.” [Hague 1884] During this same summer Walter Weed, Hague’s assistant, described this spring as follows:
Spring basin with raised rim, projecting out into the channel of Iron Spring Creek. The water is clear and bulges occasionally 2 or 3 ft. high. The corrugated rim is quite handsome, and has a beaded edge. The bottom of the basin is covered with round geyserite nodules and pierced with two vent holes. [Weed 1883, Vol. III]
In his notes for 1886, Hague noted that Cliff Geyser “was not playing this year. The blue pool which has built up such a fine circular mound extending out into Iron [Spring] Creek, is well deserving a name.” [August 4, 1886 notes]
In his unpublished 1911 manuscript, Hague wrote:
Cliff Geyser.-- On the bank of Iron Creek and near a sharp point in the stream not far from the Emerald, is situated Cliff geyser, a singularly picturesque basin. It has built up from the stream a semicircular wall several feet above high-water level, the corrugated outer rim being produced during the building up of the sinter by an incessant downflow of water. According to Mr. Weed “The two vents of Cliff Geyser seem built up along the same fissure, though their activity is slightly different. The west vent bubbles quietly and the basin about it is lined with light gold algae. The main vent is undoubtedly a fissure 1 to 3 feet wide and 5 feet long, the hole being 5 feet below the surface of the pool.” The interesting peculiarity of the Cliff is that it is known ordinarily as a spring and is supposed to have been dormant for a long time. It was, however, active in the summer of 1883. It was seen by the writer to throw a jet of water several feet in height, for several successive days in 1891, and again in 1902. It is, nevertheless, certain that the Cliff is at times in a quiescent state, as is shown by the fact that algae, requiring a moderate temperature, live in the basin, which could not be the case if the water, during that period, ever reached the boiling point.
It is also apparent that Walter Weed had (at least for a number of years) misunderstood to which feature Arnold Hague had given the name of Cliff Geyser. In both his 1883 and 1887 formal notebooks, Weed used the name Cliff Geyser for today’s Rainbow Pool. Perhaps this occurred since it was Rainbow Pool which had suddenly become a major geyser in 1883, with eruptions seen to as high as 50 feet. (See under Rainbow Pool). In his 1887 notebook, Weed had given the name of “Fortress” to today’s Cliff Geyser.
Over much of its known history, eruptions of Cliff Geyser have been uncommon, yet beginning with the first edition in 1890 (under the pen name of A. B. Guptill, Frank Haynes’ accountant), the Haynes Guides’ tables gave Cliff Geyser’s height as an amazing 100 feet, with interval 4 to 8 hours, and duration of eight minutes. (These same statistics were carried in every edition through 1919). This error very possibly occurred because of the major eruptive activity of Rainbow Pool in the 1880s. Major activity is definitely known for 1883, and is probable for 1894. (See Rainbow Pool below). One might speculate that the name of “Cliff Geyser” was associated with this major activity since Walter Weed thought Rainbow Pool was Cliff Geyser, and since he was placing name boards at some of the geysers. In spite of what was found in its geyser table, the 1912 Haynes Guide stated more correctly that “Cliff Spring usually is boiling violently, and though credited by some with having occasional eruptions, it is usually considered to be only a spring.”
The history of Cliff Geyser can generally be divided into 2 periods -- that before June of 1975, and that after June of 1975. Before 1975, only in 1941, 1950, 1958, 1959, 1963, 1965, 1966, and 1967 did Cliff Geyser have any known periods of frequent eruptions.
In fact, after 1902, the next known recorded eruption of Cliff Geyser was not until June 19, 1921. [Box W-73] In late 1926, the newly erected sign at the feature read:
CLIFF GEYSER Thought to be only an active spring until recent years. It erupted to a height of 40 to 50 feet at least five times during the 1926 season, the bowl emptying and filling before and after the eruptions like a geyser. The eruptions last about one hour. Beautiful mineral colorations of deposit are revealed when bowl is empty and are due (probably) to deposit of iron compounds. Temperature 196 degrees F. [Hall 1926]
From the late 1920s through the 1930s eruptions remained uncommon:
And then suddenly a much greater frequency of eruption, previously unknown for Cliff Geyser, occurred in 1941 (not in 1939 as written in Marler’s Inventory. . .)8 For 1941, there are at least 4 reports, 3 by Marler himself, of major eruptions, as high as 60 feet, with durations as much as 3 to 4 hours. One report for July stated that “Cliff Geyser, which has been dormant for the last 3 years, has been erupting regularly at 3 day intervals for the past 30 days.” [Box 90 MRofCR OF Dist July 1941 John Bauman]
Again, Cliff appears to have gone back to its usual pattern. It was not observed to erupt at all in 1945. [Lystrup 1945] For 1946, the eruption on July 28th was the only one reported for the season. [Marler 1946] Marler, in [1947] merely listed Cliff as active. Three eruptions were recorded in 1949. The durations were all over an hour and a half. [Marler 1949] One of these was an eruption to 50 feet on June 16. [MRofCR Kowski Box 90]
And then in 1950, the promise of Cliff’s eruptive potential, glimpsed at in 1941, was again made known. Marler [1950] reported that “since June 14 the Cliff has played at least once each day. This geyser is cyclic in its performance. During most seasons it is quiescent. An eruption of the Cliff lasts about 2 hours. It is only during the first 20 to 30 minutes of the eruption that the activity is spectacular, being characterized by explosive bursts of water which rocket to heights varying between thirty and fifty feet.”
This “occasional good season” pattern was maintained through 1974, with much more activity in the post-earthquake years. The 1950s generally saw little activity. Only in October and November of 1958 was any regular frequency recorded -- every 3 to 5 days. [McClelland April 12, 1959] Finally, it was the 1959 quake that again reawakened Cliff Geyser. Marler [1959] wrote: “ During 1959. . .2 eruptions [June 16, & June 22] are known to have occurred [prior to the earthquake on August 17]; due to the length of the active phase, 6 to 8 hours, these two eruptions, no doubt represent its total 1959 pre-earthquake activity. As a result of the quake Cliff became far more active than during any previous eruption cycle. . . Almost constant after the earthquake, . . .the eruptions had decreased to 2 to 3 per week by the end of the year. [Marler 1959 report, 1959 Old Faithful logbook]
And so the pattern continued:
One particular occurrence in 1965, detailed what would eventually become Cliff Geyser’s normal function:
On July 7, I saw an eruption start while there was still jetting from the previous eruption. The crater suddenly filled with water. This was immediately followed by explosive jetting from the water filled crater. [K-44, MAR, July 1965]
It was in 1975, that these dramatic changes occurred in Cliff Geysers eruptive patterns, changes which would continue to the present time. During the early season of 1975, “at least one period of minor activity was observed per day with durations ranging from 9 to 27 minutes.” [Hutchinson 1975 #5] But the type of activity from June 1-7 was fundamentally different and is described in Rick Hutchinson’s 1975 report as follows:
Cliff geyser has not been seen in a true quiet stage during the whole period. Commonly it has intermittent bursts from a drained or nearly empty crater from 5 feet up to almost full eruption height. The true eruptions have generally been less than ½ hour in duration, 25-40 feet in height, and starting from a drained crater and filling it gradually as the eruption progresses as opposed to the reverse drop in water level as observed before by Mr. Marler.
It is curious that this increased activity in Cliff Geyser occurred before the 1975-earthquake.
In 1982, Cliff continued its being in eruption almost half of the time. Eruptions lasted over a half hour and at the end, bursts reached as high as 50 to 60 feet. In 1984, it was active most of the time with 13 to 34 minute eruptions recorded with pauses of only 2 to 3 minutes. Maximum heights were 35 to 60 feet depending on the eruption. In 1986, eruptions of 9 to 16 minutes were most common with occasional longer durations of up to 20 minutes. Infrequently, durations of 3 to 4 minutes were also seen. Intervals ranged from 30 to 45 minutes. [Bowman 1986] In 1987, average durations of 12 minutes and average intervals of 34 minutes were recorded. Many minors of 1 to 5 minutes were also noted. [Landis 1987]
In 1988, both minor and major activity patterns continued. “Major” eruptions had maximum bursts of 25 to 30 feet; durations ranged from about 10 to 22 minutes with an average of 14 minutes. Intervals ranged from about 28 to 39 minutes with an average of 32 minutes. Occasionally “minors” of less than a minute duration occurred between “majors.” By the end of the season both durations and intervals were noted to be a little longer; the occurrence of “minors” was a little more common. [Landis 1988 & author] In 1991, the major eruptions were a bit more powerful with bursts reaching as high as 50 feet, with slightly shorter intervals and durations. [Cross 1991, author] By 1995, a similar pattern was still occurring, with perhaps some longer intervals, and at times bursts could reach as high as 50 feet. [Cross 1995] In 1996, and 1997, a little more energy was apparent, with more forceful bursts and fewer minors. Again in eruption most of the time, there were small pauses of a few minutes occurring between eruptions, with the pool draining. Bursts reached a maximum height of 40 to 50 feet.
Ragged Spring & Unnamed Geyser:
Just after the walkway leaves the parking lot at Black Sand Basin, there lies to the northwest a large collapse basin, which, though a geyser, remains unnamed today. Just beyond is a smaller spring surrounded by a highly convoluted circle of sinter, lying off-center in a roughly circular basin. In a couple old photographs, this spring has been called Ragged Spring.9 Both Ragged Spring, and the now large rift in front, are notable geysers whose activities are commonly closely synchronized. An earlier report by Walter Weed [1883] described this Ragged Spring (then unnamed) as a geyser: “1 ¾' x 2 ½'. Basin 9' x 10'. Spouter with overflow channels, showing recent activity.” The rift in front was much smaller: “Basin in crust 3 ½' x 6' - Water 18" below.
In 1935, this front rift in front of Ragged Spring was possibly inactive and partly filled in. In 1941 it was reported that “the one opening next to the parking area which in 1935 was a sputtering hole of a few inches has increased its activity to where it occasionally plays 15 to 20 feet. . .” [YNN Lang and Replogle] Marler [1973] also noted that the front collapse rift “was not observed to have eruptive activity until the 1941 season. [The eruptive vent] is located on the northwest end of a rift which is about 20 feet in length. On the southwest end of the rift large blocks of sinter bridging the break caved in during the 1930s, which would seem to indicate a greater amount of activity.
This geyser erupts from 12 to 15 feet in height. . . The 1959 earthquake stimulated a greater degree of activity.” [Marler 1973 Inventory. . .] Eruptions of 15 feet from this rift were noted for a couple years after the 1959 quake and in 1975. [Marler 1962, Hutchinson, “Geothermal Activity in Black Sand Basin for 1975,” (type 2p) #5]
Both Ragged Spring and the front rift were relatively quiet during the later 1970s and the early 1980s. But it September of 1984, their true potential was again noted. On September 20th of this year a tourist was startled when a sudden 20' spike erupted from this collapse and got him wet. Activity in both springs was very frequent and definitely synchronized. During the next couple of hours it was noticed that eruptions in Ragged Spring preceded those from the collapse by about 10 to 20 seconds. Eruptions in Ragged Spring and in the collapse rift were of a very cyclic nature with a few eruptions of “major” character scattered throughout much minor activity. Within the next few hours a few eruptions from the collapse sent 2 to 5 spikes of water to heights of 8 to 20 feet. The largest eruptions of Ragged Spring coincided with these and reached heights of about 4 to 6 feet, and were sustained for 20 seconds or more.
In addition to the main vent of Ragged Spring, another, smaller vent, lies a few feet closer to Iron Spring Creek. Though it does not erupt, it does discharge heavily. There are also 4 more “holes” surrounding the large collapse basin in front. There are 3 holes to the west, and a small vent to the north. The larger eruptions of this collapse also send an exploding spout of water obliquely out of the closest of the western holes, and occasionally a small spurt can be seen coming from the vent to the north. That activity like this had been previously uncommon for Ragged Spring was attested to by the fact that great amounts of erosion in the sod and dirt around its basin occurred that season.
Activity tailed off somewhat for almost the next decade. In May of 1993, and during periods of 1995, activity again approached that of 1984. In 1995, when seen, “majors” occurred erratically with intervals from about 15 to 75 minutes. [Cross 1995] In 1996, eruptions of Ragged Spring were again seen close to this same magnitude, but subsequent bursts from the rift sometimes only hit 3 to 6 feet. On January 8, 1997, eruptions of 10 to 15 feet were again seen from the collapse vent in front. Periods of substantial activity was seen at times through the next summer.
There is an old slightly raised sinter mound about 80 feet west of Ragged Spring. Its vent, about a foot or so across, has been clogged by sintered debris for years. When I first noticed this vent in the early 1980s, it appeared to be totally dormant. But in recent years, a small spouting vent has opened up within the small crater formed within this old vent. It has been active throughout the 1990s. [Keller 1996] By 1996 a small amount of water partially filled the crater.
Green Spring was shown as “Emerald Spring” on Bechler’s 1872 Map of the Upper Geyser Basin. This map also labeled today’s Emerald Pool as “Great Emerald Spring.” I believe that both were meant as a descriptions only. A. C. Peale [1883] named this spring in 1878. He wrote:
This spring, on the map of 1872. . .is called Emerald Spring, but the tint is bluer than an emerald color, so I have called it simply Green Spring, especially as there is an Emerald Spring on the opposite side of the creek. . . . [It is] 25 feet deep.
In Walter Weed’s [1883] formal notebook, Green Spring is described as follows:
Deep basin, 50 feet long and 20 wide. The lining of the basin is a chocolate colored deposit, which assumes a brown tint when dry. A low rim of scalloped geyserite surrounds the spring, but is badly broken in places. . . The water is clear and in quiet ebullition, tho[ugh] the spring evidently overflows, at times, as the outer basin and the channel are both coated with fresh and moist geyserite. [Weed 1883, Vol. III]
This “brown tint” has been greatly enhanced only in recent years by the steady accumulation of bison droppings. The greatly increased numbers of these non-native animals have been gradually destroying some of the beauty of the park’s thermal areas in recent years, and in some cases completely obliterating the thermal features.
Over the years, Green Spring has been an uncommonly erupting geyser, with its best eruptions to 25 feet. Eruptive activity is known for at least the following years: 1883, 1934, 1937, 1941, 1949 through 1957, 1959 (the night of the quake only), 1975, 1976, and 1985.
In one of his 1883 notebooks, Walter Weed noted that Green Spring was a “periodic bulger.” I think it is significant that this is the same year that Rainbow Pool was first noted to be a major geyser erupting to 50 feet. In Arnold Hague’s unpublished manuscript “The Geyser Basins” (circa 1911) we see that Green Spring was also well known to Hague as a geyser, in spite of the fact that by 1911, we only have definite record of eruptive activity in 1883:
. . .only a few of [the springs on the eastern side of Iron Creek] can be said to be characterized by explosive action, and of these in only one or two instances is the eruption in any sense regular, that is to say, following periodic intervals. . . Observations of these springs date back to 1883. . . Green Spring, near the stream, takes its name from the color of the pool, although at certain seasons it has been noted as a clear, transparent blue. The pool, somewhat larger than its neighbors, always stands at a high temperature, and is often agitated by escaping steam, but is apparently less frequently in eruption. Within these limitations it does not appear to have changed since earliest observations.
In 1926, the sign at Green Spring read:
GREEN SPRING Temperature 176 degrees F. Named in the early days, possibly when it had a green appearance due to presence of yellow algae below the blue water. The change in color in the last few years presents an interesting unsolved problem. It may be due to cutting off of the supply of carbon dioxide gas, thus starving the algae. [Hall 1926] Not until 1934 was Green Spring again noted as having eruptive activity. Frank W. Childs reported the following:
All indications of having erupted. [March 26] Ground on all sides of the pool was freshly washed. At present the pool is a light blue in color and is no longer a similar[sic] color to Emerald Pool. The water over-flow is greater than usual. [Frank W. Childs March 29, 1934]
Some activity apparently continued through at least August of that year. [RofND Aug 1934]
Its next known active period occurred in 1937. Herbert Lystrup wrote the following:
Green Spring this year has been observed in frequent eruptions. The eruptions are irregular to a height of from 12 to 15 feet. From observations of Ranger Naturalist Thompson the following is gleaned: “It appears as though a new opening has developed in the west side of the pool and that black sand has been thrown up out of the tube, and deposited on the shelf above. A great deal more water is now coming out thru the vent than in the past. As a new area is being flooded during the time of eruption indications are that a great volume of water is thrown out at each eruption.” [W-41, old card files Lystrup July 31, 1937]
Green Spring’s 1941 activity has been well documented. The Sept-Oct YNN reported that Green Spring was “active in August to 12 feet, every 35 minutes, for 4-5 minutes. [YNN Sept-Oct 1941, pp 57-58] In his August 1941 report, George Marler described eruptions occurring “about every one to two hours. Occasionally water domes up to a height of 20 or more feet. The eruptions last about 5 minutes.” [Marler August 1941] From activity seen on August 8, 1941, Ranger Naturalists Lang and Replogle made a study of the cyclic action of the pool. The 5 minute eruptions were of the “fountain [type], the gas explosions being large enough to raise the water to a beautiful mound five to ten feet high over the surface of 100 sq. ft. The play is not constant but intermittent as is the case with normal fountain geysers. Four large plays are usually counted after which the pool resumes an attitude of normal quiescence and a repetition of the cycle.” [YNN Sept-Oct 1941 Lang & Replogle] In his September 1941 report, Marler described intervals of 1 to 3 hours, and noted connections to Rainbow Pool. During “Rainbow’s [previous] period of activity the water ebbed about 18 inches in the Green Spring and the water cooled sufficiently for brown algae to line the basin. During the current season this situation has been reversed.” [Marler September 1941]
According to George Marler [1949], the next period of activity for Green Spring occurred “from July 1 to July 20, 1949. . ., playing several times each day.” Marler noted that “its functioning periods are rare and apparently of short duration. . . An eruption of the Green Spring last from four to five minutes. Its eruptions are fitful, with occasional splashes going about twelve feet high. Considerable water is discharged during the entire period of play.”
For the 1950s, Marler’s 1973 Inventory. . ., states that Green Spring was active at times during the 1950, 1953, and 1957 seasons only. However, in his own annual reports, Marler shows Green Spring active every year from 1950 through 1957. In these reports, Marler gave no other details. However, eruptions were also recorded for Aug 27, 1950, and for Aug 2, 1952 to 15 feet in the respective Old Faithful logbooks.
Except for the night of the 1959 earthquake [Marler 1959], Green Spring was not again active until 1975. Rick Hutchinson reported the following;
Eruptive activity began sometime during the later part of May and continued to around August 6th. . . Green Spring showed extreme variability in all parameters of height (3-25 feet), duration (10 seconds to greater than 4 hours), intervals between eruption groups (42 minutes to days), and amount of ebb after playing (2-12 inches).
. . .Green Spring erupts as a fountain geyser preceded by strong wave action while overflowing heavily (approximately 100 gallons per minute). Activity is centered near the center of the north side of the crater. Durations are usually 8 to 10 minutes and maximum heights range from 8 to 25 feet, discharge increases to approximately 180 gallons. There appears that there may be active phases with several eruptions in a series averaging about 45 minutes apart. No interval between active phases [have been determined]. [Geothermal Activity in Black Sand Basin for 1975 by Rick Hutchinson]
It is interesting to note that the 1975 activity erupted from a vent on the north side of the crater, while that of 1937 eruptions came from the west side of the crater.
Green Spring was again active in 1976. [Martinez 1976] Finally, 1985 saw the last known active period for Green Spring. Scott Bryan reported that “early in the season eruptions with long and irregular intervals were occurring. While they lasted as long as seven minutes, the bursts were no more than 3 to 6 feet high.” [Bryan 1985]10
This geyser erupts from a small vent in the sinter shield to the east of Green Spring. It lies 30 feet from the edge of Green Spring and about 70 feet from the boardwalk. There are 2 vents on this area of exposed sinter sheet. The geyser is the smaller of the two and the one closer to Green Spring. Its vent is oval-shaped and about 7" by 3". Its sinter basin is about 3 ½ feet in diameter. It was in 1986 when I first noted geyser activity from this vent, but I never could catch more than one eruption on any given day. The eruptions were continuous to about 2 to 3 feet (gradually diminishing), and lasted for a considerable time (well over 10 minutes). Heavy discharge ran down a channel toward the far end of and behind Green Spring. Active periods were again noted in 1989 and 1992.
Another unnamed geyser in this area has been noted by Scott Bryan, labeled BSB-2. The vent of this geyser lies. Scott Bryan writes:
During 1980, it was a highly regular geyser, with intervals of 40 minutes, durations of 5 minutes, and heights of 5 feet. Inactive by 1981, the crater quickly disappeared entirely, but it reappeared as a bubbler in 1987 and probably had some eruptions during the winter of 1992-1993. [Bryan 1995]
This pool is located about 12 feet from the southeast edge of Rainbow Pool and in a line with the southwest edge of that pool and the footbridge over Iron Spring Creek. The earliest reference to this pool by name occurs in Olin D. Wheeler’s Wonderland 1902 (a yearly publication of the Northern Pacific Railroad). This reference consisted solely of a photograph of the small pool surrounded with handkerchief wielding tourist along with the caption “Tourists around Handkerchief Pool.” For the next 25 years or so it would become one of the most famous features in the park.
That it was a point of interest well before 1902 can be attested to by an account of Mrs. James Hamilton’s trip through Yellowstone in 1888:
It was a small pool that would suck the water down and in a few minutes it would come gushing out again. If you put a handkerchief in, the handkerchief would be sucked down and would come up in a few minutes nice and clean. [Whittlesey 1988]11
Whittlesey [1988] notes that by 1906, tour guides were telling visitors on their walks that this was the pool where the devil took in washing, and by 1913 the spring was sometimes called the “Devil’s Laundry.”12 By 1910, a description of Handkerchief Pool and its action made its way into the Haynes Guides, but was deleted by the 1930 edition. In an unpublished article by Arnold Hague entitled “The Geyser Basins” (circa 1911), we read:
Handkerchief Pool.-- It may be well to mention an obscure spring scarcely more than 30 feet east [actually south] of the edge of Rainbow Pool, and known to tourist as Handkerchief Pool. It lies on the level with the sinter plain, and, like many other geyser vents, exposes only a shallow circular depression without any well-defined rim or mound. It measures 3 feet in diameter and has in the center a vertical, funnel-shaped tube connecting with a small reservoir only a short distance below the surface. The pool fills with water, which boils gently for a few seconds. Interest in this pool lies mainly in the fact that if a handkerchief is thrown into the water it is carried to the edge of the basin by convection currents and drawn down through the tube only to be again thrown to the surface with the water by accumulations of steam under the reservoir. The entire movement, from the time it is placed in the basin till its recovery, seldom requires more than two minutes, - at least this was the case during several successive years. Handkerchief Pool meets the needs of the tourist as the experiment takes so short a time and is made with security and safety certainty. The conditions, however, do not vary essentially from those at similar pools throughout the geyser basins, but in other localities the work is not done so systematically and wearing apparel is usually injured. The fact that articles of clothing could be thrown into certain geysers and again brought to the surface, has been known since the early days of travel in the Park, and has been the subject of many curious tales by stage drivers to the credulous public.
The 1926 Ranger Naturalist Manual had:
The walk completely encircles Handkerchief Pool [a curbed sidewalk completed before 1920], a “trick” spring that seems to fascinate some of its visitors. . . The object is drawn into the tube by the downward movement of the water around the periphery of the funnel and brought up again by the rising current of heated water in the center. . .
Not only a sidewalk, but for the convenience of the visitor “an iron post with a chain and poker attached was cemented in the rock.” [Whittlesey 1988]13
Exactly what caused the demise of Handkerchief Pool, and exactly when this occurred is a matter of somewhat conflicting reports. A 1926 account by Ira Edwards stated that its action was “not as brisk as it formerly was, for in recent times certain misguided visitors have partially blocked the opening of the spring with pebbles thrown into it. [Whittlesey 1988]14 The Monthly Report of the Superintendent for September 1927 stated that it had “not functioned properly at any time [that] season.” In a 1936 journal, Ranger Douglass wrote that some years ago a visitor had “jammed a log in[to it’s] orifice and broke[n it’s] lips so that convection currents no longer [occurred]. [Douglass 1936 #4, p 12] At any rate it was definitely no longer functioning by 1928. “. . .all efforts to make the Handkerchief work have been made except pumping it out.” [Superintendent Albright 1929] The August 1, 1929 Yellowstone Nature Notes had:
On June 21, 1929 Ranger [Carlos] Davis stationed at Old Faithful, acted in capacity of plumber.
Among the objects removed from the Pool were the following: one broken bottle, portion of a spark plug, over one hundred hair pins, nails, stove bolts and nuts, a small horse shoe, badges, about one dozen handkerchiefs and bits of material not belonging to the surrounding formation. Evidently some visitors have the idea that Handkerchief Pool acts on the same principle as the slot machine, for U. S. coins amounting to the sum of $1.98 were also removed. The total amount of material removed about 1½ bushels.
At present the convection currents are much more apparent than before the plumbing work, but the indication is that further work will be necessary. . .
By 1929, great efforts were made to find a “successor to” or a “new Handkerchief Pool.” A pool located near the east end of the footbridge crossing Iron [Spring] Creek, and leading to Handkerchief Pool [about 50 feet north] was suggested to Park Superintendent Roger Toll by Mr. F. A. Stearns. In a letter the superintendent wrote to Director Albright of the National Park Service we read:
I visited this pool in company with Ranger LaNoue. . .
The pool has features of interest, but I doubt it is of sufficient importance to attract public attention to it. The pool is perhaps three feet in diameter, with the central throat of something less than a foot in diameter. It is constantly boiling, but is not a geyser. A handkerchief placed at a certain point in the pool is drawn into the current and returned to the surface later. Sometimes the handkerchief does not disappear from sight and sometimes it disappears for varying intervals. In one case the pool failed to return the handkerchief at all.
I am suggesting to Mr. Yeager that this pool be brought to the attention of the Ranger Naturalists, but I do not feel that its action is sufficiently uniform and dependable to make it much of a general attraction to visitors. [August 27, 1930]
This pool was, for a short time, called New Handkerchief Pool, but it never quite measured up to its old namesake. In 1931 it was also noted to be a geyser and was named Handkerchief Geyser. A press memorandum written that year stated:
. . .Now comes Handkerchief Geyser which has all the properties of Handkerchief Pool plus the spouting characteristics of a geyser. . . Immediately after each eruption it becomes quiet, and then the double convection current is set into motion causing a suction which will draw handkerchiefs deep into the pool. Cold water is sucked down the west side of the pool and the hot water rises up on the east side.
Ordinarily the pool holds a handkerchief ten to 20 seconds, but at times it has held them as long as eight minutes, Mr. Oberhansley says.
“Occasionally it keeps a handkerchief for commission”, he reports, “but invariably it is coughed up later on, so that the visitors get two and three handkerchiefs in return for one.”
. . .the geyser is drawing an average of 500 people daily. It handles between 50 and 100 handkerchiefs daily. [J. H. M. 1931]
Today this feature is still called Handkerchief Geyser. (See an additional write-up about this spring below under Handkerchief Geyser).
By 1931, Handkerchief Pool was found “at the beginning of the season [to be] filled almost completely with a columnar algous growth.” [H. Lystrup 1931, vert. files, hand 3pp] During this same year, another replacement for Handkerchief Pool was attempted. In his unpublished 1931 article entitled “Geysers of Yellowstone National Park,” Thomas “Geyser Bill” Ankrom, a well-known geyser gazer at the time, wrote:
This geyser [Jewel] was first tried as a handkerchief geyser the afternoon of August first [1931] by Ranger Naturalists Frank Oberhansley, and worked 100%. It was used as such by the Auto Caravan. . . this morning of August 2nd[. R]eaching there a few mornings later I found a large piece of brush jammed under the ledge so tightly that it had to be broken out, from then on there was some delay at times before the handkerchief was returned. [Thomas Ankrom 1931]
In September 1931, Herb Lystrup wrote the following remarkable description and recommendation:
Jewel Geyser - Interval checked by Mr. Oberhansley and Geyser Bill [Thomas Ankrom] found to be 6 - 8 minutes. The two above discovered the convection currents 8/1/31. Handkerchiefs placed in the vent near the main vent draws them down into Jewel Geyser and are thrown out at the eruption. The feature is in placing the handkerchief in one vent and having it returned by another. Jewel Geyser is fast becoming very popular. I believe a sign should be placed there explaining how Old Handkerchief Pool was destroyed and how to keep this one intact.
Has been functioning very well all season with handkerchiefs. [H. Lystrup 1931]
In 1932, Lystrup reported that “Jewel Geyser [had again] been functioning admirably all season as a handkerchief geyser. It prove[d] more spectacular than the Handkerchief Pool.” And in a 1933 report Lystrup stated that “handkerchiefs [were] spectacularly thrown out during an eruption.” [Lystrup Aug 3, 1933]
But Lystrup & Oberhansley’s use of Jewel Geyser, eventually, did not go uncontested. A June 19, 1935 Memorandum for Chief Ranger Francis D. LaNoue read as follows:
Due to the fact of the Handkerchief Pool failing to function in the last few years, the Jewel Geyser on the Biscuit Basin has been substituted so to speak, to demonstrate the qualities of the Old Handkerchief Pool.
For those who are familiar with the eruption of the Jewel Geyser, it is very evident that it is extremely dangerous to be within range of the geyser while it is playing. There are also several small pools in the vicinity of the Jewel Geyser cone and this tends to add to the hazard of someone being injured.15
On the Auto Caravan, the Ranger Naturalist demonstrates the ability of the Geyser to erupt the handkerchiefs that have been placed into the opening near the crater before the eruption. This practice seems to be out of order for a man in the Park Service uniform to perform when it is contrary to Park Regulations to place any article in the Geysers or Hot Springs. It is understood that the Ranger Naturalist explains to the visitors that it is not advisable to attempt the demonstration themselves but this evidently does not relieve the hazard of someone getting injured by attempting the demonstration anyway in the absence of a Ranger.
This situation has been mentioned to Senior Ranger Naturalist Lystrup and he confirms[sic] with the above situation and danger of someone being injured. He also stated that he was once burned rather seriously on his back in giving a demonstration at the Jewel Geyser.
There have been no accidents at this Geyser to date, but last season there were several reports of visitors being burned at this Geyser. However, none of these reports were reported by those injured but were reported by visitors that witnessed the accidents.
This matter is brought to your attention, to be considered for those concerned to decide if this practice is to be continued at the Jewel Geyser.
George A. Walker
District Ranger, Old Faithful
Appended to this letter in pencil was the following:
Believe we should discontinue this laundry demonstration at Jewel Geyser and at all hot pools or geysers. CMB [Clyde Max Bauer]
Such use of Jewel Geyser as a “Handkerchief Geyser” did so end. On July 1, 1935, Lystrup wrote that Jewel Geyser was “an exceedingly interesting geyser both for its beauty and active manner of play. The formation a few feet East of Jewel has been broken but has not affected the play. The area however is dangerous and the demonstrations with handkerchiefs have been dispensed with.” [Lystrup, July 1, 1935]
During these same years, the old Handkerchief Pool was variously described as being “. . .a small remnant of its former self,” “. . .only about half full of water,” “. . .having strong downward currents,” “. . .not strong enough,” “. . .heating up and discharging,” “. . .with action not as good ,”. . .and so on. [C. Kay S., Jan, Feb 1932, Lystrup, June 1933, Box K-10, ARofED, Bauer 1933, RofND, June 1934] Only for a very brief period in 1933 did it ever again come close to having its “normal function.” Clyde Max Bauer wrote in August of that year:
This season Rainbow Pool in the Black Sand Basin has become hotter and killed out the algae, boiling violently it erupts to a height of 30 feet every 20 minutes. Since this is quite near the old Handkerchief Pool it has been affected. Since August 10th the old Handkerchief Pool has been able to circulate handkerchiefs as it did prior to 1928. [Box K-10 ARofED Bauer 1933]
However, the “New Handkerchief Pool” was thought to still “operate more spectacularly and does carry the handkerchiefs out of sight.” [H. Lystrup 1933]
By 1933, eruptions of Rainbow Pool were washing debris into Handkerchief Pool, and by the next year Handkerchief Pool was just about defunct. [RofND Jan. 1934]
Handkerchief Pool would never again be the attraction it had once been, but it would be brought back to life. From a letter to Superintendent Rogers from George Marler dated November 18, 1950 (page 5) we read the following:
With Old Faithful Geyser and Morning Glory Pool, Handkerchief Pool has shared the honor of being one of the three most popular and highly publicized features in Yellowstone. One of the most frequent questions of the visitor relating to hot spring activity is, “Where is Handkerchief Pool?” Since the 1929 season the Handkerchief Pool had ceased to be a functional unit. The foreign material, other than handkerchiefs, it had been forced to engulf finally proved too much for it. It not only became non-functional but its source of water failed also. Eruptive activity on the part of Rainbow Pool during 1938, washed fragmented sinter into the remaining unfilled bowl of the Handkerchief Pool obliterating all traces of its former position. Handkerchief Pool had completely passed out of the picture as one of Yellowstone’s thermal units, a victim of a vandalism that is threatening the uniqueness of every hot spring in the pathway of the curious who seasonally enter the geyser basins.
As one of the projects this fall, in the effort to erase some of the visible misuse made of hot springs by unappreciative visitors, it was decided to probe into the former surface plumbing of Handkerchief Pool. Little was expected in the way of rehabilitation. The fragmental sinter filling and covering the old bowl had become cemented with geyserite from the water of Rainbow Pool, forming an impervious cover. It was with difficulty that this hardened surface was penetrated with shovel and pick. Digging revealed that a small amount of water was struggling for egress. As the bowl of the pool was reached the rocks and debris that had helped to bring about its demise were encountered and slowly removed. With the removal of the rubble the supply of water gradually increased.
After several hours of digging and probing the shape and contours of the old pool were finally revealed. Except for considerable quantities of sand in the bottom of the bowl most of the debris was finally removed. Further probing revealed that the main supply of water for the pool had entered from a small vent on the east side and above the bottom of the bowl. Plugging this vent was the real mischief maker. After considerable effort a section of lodgepole about six feet long and four inches in diameter was removed. Immediately water began jetting into the bowl producing the convection and roll of water in the bowl which had made possible Handkerchief Pool’s fame.
Handkerchief pool had been disinterred: experimentation with a handkerchief proved that it had been resurrected. Handkerchief Pool lives again!
In 1988, a more recent test had been performed, this time by Rick Hutchinson’s assistant, Phil Landis. He reported:
The pool’s surface always exhibited pulsing and bubbling. John Railey supplied a handkerchief for the purpose of ascertaining whether or not the pool still drew pieces of cloth down out of view, and then returned them clean.
At the surface, the pool was bordered by brown algae on the east and west. To the north the pool received runoff from springs upstream via an orange runoff channel. To the south the pool supplied a constant outflow to a gray runoff channel. The pool itself was clear. Large patches of orange algae lay at each side of the entrance to the pool’s gray southern runoff channel, and a rim of orange algae surrounded the main pool, as well as extending north of the pool as previously noted. The pool’s bowl was gray sinter, with the main vent located in the center of the gray bowl. Numerous bubbling vents were located in the pool’s gray sinter bowl and also in the gray runoff channel located south of the pool’s main vent. The main vent has an hourglass shape, with a constriction located about 1 - 1 ½ feet below the pool’s surface.
Numerous locations were tried to determine the best place for the submergence of the hanky. A location west-southwest of the pool’s main vent worked best. The hanky was occasionally pushed around by convection cells within the pool, only to remain above the constriction mentioned earlier. Balling up the hanky proved helpful in promoting the submergence of the hanky to the area below the constriction. The hanky began its descent slowly down the west-southwest wall of the vent. Sometimes the hanky was caught in the upward current, it was quickly expelled to the pools eastern rim. On other occasions the hanky continued its slow descent down the wall of the vent, toward the constriction. Stronger venturi effects sped up the downward motion of the hanky as it passed through the venturi of the hour-glassed shaped vent. The hanky would literally shoot through the constriction and disappear. Once the hanky was below the constriction it either remained out of sight until upward forces sent it back through the venturi, or it was swirled round and round as if in a washing machine. At this time the hanky would be drawn out lengthwise in an arc-shape, swirling a complete circle in under two seconds. Eventually the hanky would be caught by upward forces and shot upward through the constriction to the surface immediately in the pool’s eastern quadrant. Overall, the hanky descended in about 4 - 6 seconds, and ascended in about 2 seconds. The overall average submergence time (below the pool’s surface) was 14 seconds. If the hanky made it through the constriction, then the time of submergence averaged 17 seconds. After the experiment, John said his hanky needed another group of washings to really clean it. [Landis 1988]
In more recent times, Handkerchief Pool has been seen to have taken on some spouting activity. Minor spouting activity has been seen in at least 1975, and in 1991. [Hutchinson 1975] This activity is usually cyclic in height of play, and at best to only a few feet. For a short time in September 1984, wildly cyclic spouting activity was noted. Continuous spouting of 1 to 1 ½ feet was interspersed by eruptions of 3 to 8 feet in height! Definite geyser activity has been noted for at least at some time during most years from 1980 through 1991. In 1988, eruptions of 8 feet were again seen. [Landis] For a brief time in 1991, eruptions reached 6 to 8 feet. [Bryan 1995]True geyser activity was again noted for a brief time in May of 1996, during a rare eruptive period of Rainbow Pool. By early June Handkerchief Pool became quiet, at about the same time that Rainbow Pool ended its eruptive period. By the Winter of 1997, Handkerchief Pool was again spouting cyclicly to a height of 3 to 8 feet.
This small geyser lies about 70 feet from the south edge of Rainbow Pool and south of Handkerchief Pool. First mention of a Handkerchief Geyser is found in a 1931 memorandum:
...Today the park boasts a Handkerchief Geyser.
So named by Ranger Naturalist Frank Oberhansley, who discovered the peculiar characteristics of this vent, it is destined to attain even greater popularity than its predecessor. Handkerchief Pool gained fame because it would gobble up handkerchiefs thrown in by visitors, suck them into its vortex and give them up some time later. Two years ago a thoughtless visitor tossed a rock into the vent breaking part of the fissure and destroying that peculiar feature. [This last is patently false].
Now comes Handkerchief Geyser which has all the properties of Handkerchief Pool plus the spouting characteristics of a geyser. It erupts at regular intervals of four minutes, reaching the modest height of three feet. Immediately after each eruption it becomes quiet, and then the double convection current is set into motion causing a suction which will draw handkerchiefs deep into the pool. Cold water is sucked down the west side of the pool and the hot water rises up on the east side.
Ordinarily the pool holds a handkerchief ten to 20 seconds, but at times it has held them as long as eight minutes, Mr. Oberhansley says.
“Occasionally it keeps a handkerchief for commission”, he reports, “but invariably it is coughed up later on, so that the visitors get two and three handkerchiefs in return for one.”
. . .the geyser is drawing an average of 500 people daily. It handles between 50 and 100 handkerchiefs daily. [J. H. M. 1931]
This geyser was probably spring No. 10 of Peale [1883]. In 1887, Walter Weed described it as “active.” No more information could be found concerning this feature until recent times. It was usually seen to be active as either a geyser or spouter throughout the 1980s. Eruptions were frequent, and usually reached heights of about 2 to 5 feet. But for a short period in September of 1984, it was seen in constant eruption of 3 to 5 feet, with frequent pulses up to 15 to 20 feet high. Though dormant in 1987, it was again active in 1988. “Intermittent bursts reached about 2 feet in height four minutes into an eruption, and soon after reached 3 - 8 feet in height. . . The overall play was only 2 - 3 feet high about six minutes into an eruption. . . . . .30 minutes into an eruption [the] geyser’s pool level would be 4 - 6 inched below the rim. . . Eruption durations and intervals averaged about 36 m[inutes] and 1 h[our] 51 m[inutes] respectively.” [Landis 1988] It was again active in 1990 [Bryan], but dormant in 1991. In very recent years, its activity has been more that of a cyclic perpetual spouter. In 1995, it was barely reaching 1½ feet, but did somewhat better in 1996, and in January, 1997.
But some time between early January and April, 1997, a new vent “blew-out” immediately southwest and adjoining the vent of Handkerchief Geyser. Handkerchief Geyser was rendered dormant, and activity was transferred to this new vent.
This spring was apparently formed by a “blow-out” sometime between early January and April, 1997. Its perpetual activity in 1997 to about 1 foot, rendered Handkerchief Geyser, and the “new” unnamed spouter about 90 feet south of Handkerchief Pool, dormant.
This small crack vent lies about halfway between Handkerchief Geyser and Iron Spring Creek. In April and may of 1997 it was seen spouting to about one foot.
About halfway between Handkerchief Pool and Handkerchief Geyser, is a small vent. Usually inactive or a very minor spouter, on unusual occasions it can become a true geyser. This occurred for at least a short period of time in September of 1984, reaching about 2 to 5 feet a number of times a minute. It was a continuous spouter to about 1 to 2 feet in 1995, and in the winter of 1996-97.
This very small geyser erupts from a small vent about half way down the steep north sinter embankment above Iron Spring Creek, and about 80 feet downstream from the bridge. The eruptions, as seen in 1985, were very small and brief. It was again seen active in 1990.
There is a relatively new spring about 90 feet or so south of Handkerchief Pool and just south of the present boardwalk. It formed on a long fracture which runs south toward Emerald Spring. The following 1933 report described this same fracture:
There is a spot about 80' south of the Handkerchief Pool where a little water escapes under high pressure. For a distance of 20' around this vent the formation throbs like it might blow out any moment. There is apparently nothing to do but watch it and if it get[s] more active keep people away from it entirely. [Crowe 7/24/1933]
During the mid-1980s, a number of places along this tight fracture would show some minor spouting activity. During the summer of 1988, the activity along this entire fracture was heating up again. Some spray was escaping from the northern end of this tight fracture which at the time ran under the boardwalk. By April 1989, a small boiling pool had opened up on this fracture and was spouting. Part of this pool ran under the boardwalk and one support was resting only on boiling water. This problem was reported to the visitors’ center. They hurriedly corrected this potentially dangerous situation in about a month, when part of the boardwalk was finally moved to the north.
In 1995, this vent was vigorously spouting from a pool about 6 feet across and to a height of about 3 feet. In May of 1996, it was highly cyclic in activity, at a time when nearby Rainbow Pool was also active. It would at times burst up to 4 to 6 feet for minutes at a time, and then quiet down for a long period of time to about 1 to 3 feet. This extreme cyclic activity ended at about the same time that Rainbow Pool ended its period of geyser activity in early June of 1996. Its 1 to 2 foot spouting continued into January, 1997. However, sometime between early January and April, 1997, the blowout of a new vent immediately southwest of Handkerchief Geyser, apparently coincided with the dormancy of this spring.
Several small springs can be seen in the flat area south of the boardwalk as you walk from Rainbow Pool toward Emerald Pool. Several small eruptions were observed from one of these springs during the summer of 1997. It is situated about *** feet from the boardwalk and about *** feet *** of Emerald Pool. This spring lies in a sintered basin
***entry not complete***
Originally labeled the “Great Emerald Spring” by Bechler in 1872, I believe that this was meant only to be descriptive, not a name -- he also labeled today’s Green Spring “Emerald Spring.” Later Peale [1878] used Emerald Spring as its name, (and changed Emerald Spring to Green Spring). Arnold Hague wrote the following in (circa) 1911:
The bowl of [Emerald Pool] is 36 feet wide, 30 to 40 feet long, with a depth at the center estimated about 35 feet, although the color -- a deep green -- is too dark to be transparent for so great a depth. The outer edge of the bowl is surrounded by a marginal area from 1 to 5 feet in width. The pool is noted for its overflow channels, full of algous growths of various colors and tints. All fresh deposits are due to algae. The Emerald was never in eruption, and as it does not overflow its rim, and is without geyser action, there is no precipitation or growth of sinter by evaporation. As a study for algous growth it is worth a visit.
A 1927 park superintendent’s place names committee accepted the name Emerald Pool to perhaps prevent confusion with a feature at Norris called Emerald Spring. [Ranger Naturalists’ Manual 1928, p.144]
Its deep green color, created by the blue of the water combining with yellow of the bacteria growing in its bowl, has drawn the eyes of visitors from the first days of the park. The view from the hillside above is quite worth the climb as you look down into a number of large springs whose colors are all different.
Visitors of 1912 were told by their tour guide that Emerald Pool received its name because an Irishman fell in and was drowned here. Emerald Pool was called “Amethyst Pool” by an 1890 visitor who saw the yellow in it. Curiously, this spring was the site of a fictionalized murder story in the early 1950s.[Whittlesey 1988]
In 1962, a pumping operation was set up at Emerald Pool. George Marler wrote the following in his annual report for that year:
On the morning of October 25, 1962 pumping operations started at Emerald Pool. The specific object of the pumping was to lower the level of the pool, hoping thereby to reduce the hydrostatic pressure sufficiently to permit the evolution of hotter waters from depth.
Over the years Emerald Pool has been the recipient of great quantities of trash, ranging from rubble to trees. Many trees were removed in the 1920s by Superintendent Albright, but a great many cris-crossing logs still line the crater.
Until recent years the water in Emerald Pool appeared to be of a bright emerald hue, due to the bowl being lined with yellow algae. It was one of the very beautiful springs in the Park. During the 1950s the water in the pool cooled about 5 degrees, which was sufficient to give a brownish-orange cast to the algae. The change in the color of the algae resulted in the water taking on a brownish-green coloration. This darkened algae further reduced the beauty of the pool by making it no longer possible to see into the crater at depth.
Whether the decline . . . resulted from natural changes . . . or [from] the vent, or vents . . . becom[ing] partially blocked . . . could only be surmised. . .
As a result of work carried on at other springs, it had been determined that by lowering the surface of the spring, thereby reducing hydrostatic pressure, a point would be reached when a sudden evolution, or surge of hotter water from depth would take place. In the case of Emerald Pool, it was hoped that a sudden surge of hotter water would aid in opening partially blocked channels, which thereby might result in a sufficient increase in temperature to restore the original beauty.
The pumping began at 11 a.m. and was continuous until 3 p.m. . . . The drop in water level. . . amounted to a little over 8 inches per hour. At the beginning . . . the temperature was 150° F. At the pumping progressed there was a slow increase in temperature. The rate of increase accelerated with increasing drop in water. By the time a 34 inch drop had been achieved, (3 p.m.), the temperature was 159°. Conditions seemed very promising. . . However, at this point it became necessary to desist with the pumping, due to the most unusual nature of the deposits composing the walls of the crater.
. . .In Emerald Pool, at a depth of about 2 feet below the rim of the crater, massive shoulders project out into the pool. This situation is characteristic of many springs. In all springs where the sinter can be examined, it is hard and relatively dense.
The sinter lining Emerald Pool proved to be of a very different composition from that described above. The massive shoulders, instead of being solid geyserite, consisted of very friable, spongiform material. This condition began to manifest itself when the dropped water level was about 30 inches. It was indicated that by a few spallings that sloughed from the shoulders. Then as the supporting water was further lowered some of the shoulders began to slump and show fracture on the surface next to the crater walls. At this point, pumping operations were stopped.
By the following morning, the crater was full and overflowing. The shoulders that had slumped were in original position with little evidence of fracture. . . .within a week all evidence [of the cracks] was effaced. The temperature . . . on the . . . 26th was 155°, or 5° warmer. . . on October 31, 1962[,] it was 152°. It is believed that if the pumping could have been continued for another hour or two the result sought could have been achieved.
In June of 1932 an Assistant Park Naturalist, George Crowe, [June 1932] made the statement that due to recent eruptive activity and hotter water, Rainbow Pool “no longer [had] the rainbow effect afforded by the algae in previous years.” Nowhere in either Walter Weed’s or Arnold Hague’s notes of the 1880s does the name of “Rainbow” appear. But in 1894, Isidor Rothschild used the name of “Rainbow Lake” in her account of her trip through the park. [Whittlesey 1988]16 It is not known where this name came from but it quickly came into wide usage, suggesting that by at least 1894 there likely was a sign board in place. And this was commonly done by Walter Weed, Arnold Hague’s assistant. Hague wrote the following (circa) 1911:
Rainbow Lake, separated by a narrow sinter ledge [from Sunset Lake], resembles Sunshine Pool [Sunset Lake], but is smaller and correspondingly less brilliant. Both pools are probably connected below the surface, although no direct evidence of the fact can be shown. The thermal waters apparently reach the surface through fissures in the underlying rock. The interesting feature of these pools is their unchanging conditions through successive years.
The present form of the name, Rainbow Pool, first appeared in print in the 1912 edition of the Haynes Guide.
Evidence of the connection between Rainbow Pool and Green Spring has been known for years. But it was not until 1995, that a connection between Rainbow Pool and Sunset Lake was definitely established. During the course of that year Sunset Lake was having near unprecedented eruptions -- very frequent heavy bursts of 10 to 25 feet with a heavy discharge of water. What was unusual was not just the size of the eruptions, but that such activity continued unabated for more than a year. By June of that year, Rainbow Pool had lowered 1½ to 2 feet below overflow (along with Handkerchief Pool).
Strangely, Walter Weed, in both his 1883 and 1887 formal notebooks called this feature Cliff Geyser! Yet there is no doubt that Arnold Hague gave the name Cliff to the present feature in 1883. (Weed named today’s Cliff Geyser, “Fortress” in his 1887 notebook. Further still, the 1904 Hague Atlas. . . also misplaced the name of Cliff Geyser onto today’s Rainbow Pool). Perhaps Walter Weed misunderstood to which feature this name was given especially since it was today’s Rainbow Pool which proved to be a major geyser this same year (1883). Weed [1883] wrote:
9 Cliff Geyser. Shallow basin, with rather ill defined margin formed of thin plates of honeycombed geyserite. The water near the edge is turbid and 2 to 8 inches deep and was in vigorous ebullition at a large number of points bulging a foot or so occasionally.
A few minutes later the water bulged violently to a height of 6 ft. in the center of the basin, sending out waves in all directions, which broke open and ran over the margin. This was soon followed by another bulge 8 feet high; succeeded by a series of spurts and bulges lifting the central mass of water to a height of 30 to 50 feet. This continued for 2½ minutes, when the violence of the eruption became less and less, until the jets were but 3 to 8 ft high, continuing for two minutes, when the water receded, still boiling vigorously.
*The inner basin was now seen to be approximately 30 ft. in diameter, with a somewhat muddy bottom, blotched with black and orange and surrounded by a shallow gray & white, & black lined outer basin 50 by 60 ft. Half an hour later a second eruption occurred, which was quite similar to the first.
These eruptions were somewhat like those of the Giantess in appearance. Date Aug 27th 1883.
* Seen before the eruption the geyser presented the appearance of a basin 80 x 60' filled with boiling milky water. [Weed 1883 Vol. III]
Another early eruptive episode of Rainbow Pool may have occurred in 1894. The following is an excerpt from the Livingston (MT) Post, Aug 30, 1894:
“New Geyser in the Park”
Seismic geyser disturbances have been of unusual frequency in the National Park this year and greater activity is apparent in all the geysers in that weird region, says the Livingston correspondent of the Standard. Geysers that have been extinct for years have suddenly leaped into activity again, while the earth has opened in many new places and belched forth great rocks and mighty streams of boiling water. The latest disturbance in the Park occurred at 2 o’clock last Thursday afternoon in the Upper Geyser basin. While a number of tourists were viewing the Black Sand basin they were startled by a mighty rumbling noise and the quaking of the earth beneath their feet. A moment later a new geyser broke forth with terrible fury, boiling hot water and rocks being thrown from the new aperture in the earth over a radius of 200 square feet. The water gradually formed into a column and shot up into the air hundreds of feet. The geyser played for three hours and flooded the entire basin. One tourist, Lorenzo E. Anderson of St. Louis, was quite badly scalded and had to be conveyed to the hotel. The new geyser is in a remote section of the Upper basin and there have been no disturbances near it in recent years. [Livingston (MT) Post, Aug 30, 1894]17
Though undoubtedly an exaggeration, it is entirely possible that this is an account of another early eruptive episode of Rainbow Pool. There are no more eruptions recorded for Rainbow Pool until the 1930s. The newly erected sign at Rainbow in 1926 merely read:
RAINBOW POOL Five types of hot water algae are plainly shown here--white, yellow, and orange catches around the bowl, and brown and blue-green in the cooler outlet. These are thought to be different species which grow in different temperatures. [Hall]
Other years with noted geyser activity include 1932, 1933, 1935, 1938, 1939, 1942, 1943, 1945, 1946, 1947, 1948, 1949, 1967, 1973, and for a few weeks in May of 1996.
Through June, July, and August of 1932, Rainbow Pool was frequently seen erupting to heights of 5 to 10 feet. [George C. Crowe, June, August 1932, RofND July, 1932] “On the morning of July 22nd, it became more active than ever. It plays every 4 or 5 minutes to a height of 10 to 15 feet, and then about every 20 minutes to a height of 40 feet. Just before the play, waves pulsate from the center outward and huge bubbles burst into the true eruption.” [Aug 3 Lystrup]
Periods of frequent activity were again noted in 1933, with reports of minor eruptions of 6 to 10 feet with about 5 to 11 minute intervals. On June 16, a 35-foot emption was seen, and again on July 22, it erupted to 30 feet, [Thomas Ankrom], and to 60 feet on July 25. [Lystrup J-A 1933 YNN] Later in the season Clyde Max Bauer [1933] reported that it was erupting “to a height of 30 feet every 20 minutes.” No activity was seen during November. [Childs 1933]
Rainbow Pool remained dormant through 1934, and some of its color returned. [RofND Aug 1934] Though active as a geyser again in the summer of 1935, it was very infrequent and irregular [Lystrup June, July 1935] -- that is until September. From the 19th through the 24th, (and probably beyond), eruptions of 15 to 50 feet occurred about every 5 to 20 minutes. The walks that surrounded the pool were “badly washed.” [George A. Walker 1935] [George A. Walker 1935, RofND, Sept 1935]
The year 1938 saw some of Rainbow Pool’s most impressive activity. Cylde Max Bauer started calling it Rainbow Geyser. Activity was first seen on June 8th, then on the 17th, then played every day (at least once) through the end of the month. On the 25th it played to 60 feet. Marler [June 1938] reported that it was “a fountain type of geyser and beautiful to behold. Immense waves roll out from the bursting of the water in the center of the crater. The waves wash over the sides of the pool the heavy discharge being down the path leading to Iron Creek.” In July, intervals decreased and size of eruptions increased. Marler’s July report had the following:
Beginning on the 9th the interval seemed to jump from 8 hours to about three. All eruptions seem to differ a great deal in character. The duration of the activity is usually between ten and fifteen minutes. During each day there would usually be one eruption that would last from one half to one hour. Always following a long play there would be a long interval before the next eruption.
Another change in interval and type of play was observed July 24th. From that date until the end of the month the time between eruptions has varied between four and five hours. Since the 24th I have observed no activity that terminated in less than 45 minutes. Since that date the duration of each play is about one hour. On July 25th Rainbow played from 4 P.M. until 6:30 P.M. One eruption was in excess of 100 feet. During this activity on the 25th there were no less than 90,000 gallons of water discharged.
No pools in the immediate vicinity of Rainbow seem to have been in the least affected. Green Spring, however, on the other side of Iron Creek is slowly being drained. Since the first of the month it has been gradually ebbing. That Rainbow is responsible for its loss would seem to be indicated by a slight rise of water in Green Spring that always precedes Rainbow’s activity followed by an increased ebbing following each eruption. [Marler, July 1938]
In August 1938, “Rainbow Geyser [was] not. . . as predictable. . .” Intervals were similar, but overflow periods had less regularity. “The eruptions never last[ed] less than 30 minutes. The general duration of play [was] about an hour with an occasional longer period of play.” [Marler August 1938] At its best, this summer Rainbow Geyser reached heights of 40 to 80 feet [one eruption to over 100 feet], with durations of ½ to 2 hours, and intervals of 3 to 5 hours. [Attachment of handwritten changes to geyser tables to letter (1 page plus attachment) from Jack E. Haynes to Dr. Clyde Max Bauer dated October 29, 1938, Marler May, 1938]
One of the park’s Memorandums for publication dated August 6, 1938 included the following:
"Boiled "Kerchiefs Pop Up"
Yellowstone Geyser erupts linen lost in Extinct Neighbor.
Yellowstone Park, Wyo, Aug 6 -- The mystery of the missing handkerchiefs in Yellowstone National park has been solved, park naturalists believe.
For many years, tourists took great delight in dropping ‘kerchiefs into Handkerchief Pool--most of which were returned after a vigorous boiling far below the surface. But some never came back, and finally old Handkerchief pool became extinct.
This year a neighboring pool, Rainbow, became a major geyser. And it began to erupt silica covered handkerchiefs and scraps of cloth.
Naturalists are inclined to believe there may be an underground connection between the two pools and Rainbow’s eruptions contain the articles retained in Handkerchief’s crater for years.
Activity continued through much of 1939. “[In May]. . .the eruptions [were] more infrequent than last summer, . . .[and] quite distinct from last season [with] a continuous overflow into Iron Creek.” [Marler, May 1939] Marler reported the following in his September 1939 report: “During the current season the Rainbow, due to a constant overflow during its quiet phase, has not been as spectacular as last year. The eruptions this year seldom exceed 20 feet in height while one or two explosions during each eruption last season would go 50 and 60 feet in height.” By June of 1940, it was found that Rainbow Pool had since returned to dormancy. [Marler June 1940]
In spite of what is written in some of the 1950s’ and 1960s’ editions of the Haynes Guide, Rainbow Pool was not active again until May of 1942.18 Green Spring again ebbed with its temperature lowering 30 to 40 degrees. [Marler May 1942] Eruptions in June occurred every 2 to 3 hours with heights of 30 to 40 feet. [Marler June 1942] Activity continued through the rest of the summer. Smaller eruptions were sometimes frequent, with occasional larger eruptions of 15 to 20 feet, and less common ones of 40 to 70 feet. [H. J. Brodrick]
“District Ranger Bauman saw the only [known eruption of Rainbow Pool in 1945] during the latter part of May. He estimated the height at about 65 feet.” [Lystrup 1945] Smaller eruptions only were noted in 1946, with heights of 10 to 15 feet, and active one or more times a day. [Marler 1946] In 1947, activity was not noted until July 15. “On this date for several eruptions it played quite spectacularly. After the first few hours the magnitude of its eruptions began to subside, with boiling and discharge occurring frequently. [“Are Yellowstone Geysers Declining in Activity,” George Marler, 9/17/47] Through the rest of 1947, and into 1948, only small eruptions of less that 10 feet were observed. [Marler letter to Jack Haynes, April 28, 1949] But again on July 22, 1948, Rainbow Pool “put on a violent series of eruptions, tossing out large pieces of sinter and causing the waters of the area to be highly turbulent.” [RofND July 1948] Eruptions were further recorded for July 23, 24, 25, 27, 29, and August 3. On the 23rd, intervals were as short as 15 minutes and as long as 55 minutes. [Old Faithful logbook] Rainbow Pool was reported active again from September 29 through at least October 20 with intervals of 3 ½ to 4 ½ minutes. [MRofCR,OFD Sept, Oct 1948 Box 90 Frank Hirst] “These eruptions [were] not violent and there [was] only an occasional spectacular spout to any great height. There has been lots of sinter broken loose and the entire terrace around the old Rainbow Pool has a devastated look with the huge chunks of sinter strewn over it.” [RofND, Oct 1948] There was another “active eruptive phase for the better part of [the] winter” of 1949. [RofND, Apr 1949]
Coinciding with a “good year” for Cliff Geyser, Rainbow Pool next reactivated as a geyser in 1967. [Marler 1967] (No other description is available).
In 1973, a “few days prior to May 11th and on the night of August 21st, Rainbow Pool had major eruptions. Much sand and gravel size sinter and a few larger slabs and blocks were thrown out.” [Hutchinson 1973]
Only very infrequent episodes of minor eruptions were recorded from 1973 through 1995. On June 1st, 1975, Rainbow Pool had occasional splashes from a couple of minor vents to a height of 3 to 4 feet with moderately strong wave action in all directions. [Wolf 1975] Minors of 1 to 3 feet were again seen in 1981, and in 1984. [Wolf 1981, Paperiello 1984]
During 1995, Rainbow Pool very gradually dropped in water level all year as Sunset Lake experienced unusual eruptive activity and much greater discharge. This finally proved that there indeed was a connection between these two features. By mid-Summer, Rainbow Pool was down about 2 feet.
In 1996, Rainbow Pool had major activity for the first time since 1973, unfortunately no one actually saw it. One report had the following:
When I saw Rainbow Pool on Tuesday, May 21, it was evidently clear from the ripped up sinter, dead [bacteria] beds, and extensive debris fan extending away from Rainbow Pool, it had an eruption of major proportions. The debris fan extended around the entire pool, although in the direction of Spouter Geyser, it was minimal. But in the direction of the Pitchstone Plateau, the fan of material extended for more than 25 yards beyond the boardwalk. When I returned on Sunday, May 26, it was obvious that Rainbow Pool had had at least one more episode of major eruption. The debris fan was more than doubled in all directions. This time some sinter and sand was deposited in every direction. Some of the debris was now pushed into Sunset Lake, and in the direction of the plateau, the deposits were sent almost all the way to the trees more than 50 yards from the pool. Subsequent to this major eruption (or eruptions), minor eruptions were seen at least on Saturday night, Sunday and Monday (May 25-27). At least one eruption witnessed at about 9:30 Saturday night was estimated at 20 feet and yet sent a wave of water only several yards past the boardwalk. Eruptions of about 6 feet, consisting of several bursts, were seen on Sunday and Monday. Intervals on Sunday were about 45 minutes, but were much lengthened by Monday. From Tuesday through Thursday morning, no more eruptions were seen though there remained a nearly continuous upwelling/boiling over two vents (on the southern end of the pool), along with very heavy, and slightly cyclic, overflow, mostly to the south and west. [Paperiello 1996]
Rainbow Pool’s last known series of eruptions in 1996 occurred on May 30th. The first eruption reached about 10 feet and was about 10 feet wide. It lasted about a minute. Rainbow Pool then dropped several inches below overflow and Handkerchief Pool also dropped. Follow up eruptions occurred at 50 to 60 minute intervals each growing weaker. [Clark Murray 1996] Rainbow Pool, although remaining hot with heavy overflow, has not erupted since (1998).
The vent of a small geyser lies at the edge of the present boardwalk between Sunset Lake and Rainbow Pool (on the Rainbow Pool side ). It was seen active to a few feet in 1990.
At the end of July 1992, this geyser was erupting “every few minutes to 1 meter. Durations varied from a few seconds to over a minute.” [Cross 1992] In 1993, it was active with intervals of 4 to 6 minutes, and durations of 30 to 90 seconds, with height of 1 to 3 feet. It was active in the spring of 1994, but was dormant and cold (64°F) by August. It was inactive in August of 1995, and buried by debris from Rainbow Pool’s eruptions in 1996. [Keller 1996] The vent is now (1997) very difficult to find.
Lt. G.C. Doane described this spring in 1870 as “a lake of Bluestone water, a hundred feet in diameter.” On both of Bechler’s 1872 maps this spring was labeled “Great Hot Basin.” Later in 1878, Peale used this descriptive title as a name, and also described “bulging” eruptions:
Great Hot Basin.-- 140 by 200 feet; could not get depth. . . Has yellow, white, and grayish basin and 6 or 7 centers or spring holes; bulges in one of the central ones, throwing water into waves. The overflow goes in two directions over brilliantly colored terraces.
In his 1886 notes, Arnold Hague was using the name “Sunshine Pool,” and in 1887, Walter Weed was using both “Hot Lake” and “Sunshine Lake,” and gave its dimensions as 137 by 150 feet. This latter name is the one found in Hague’s 1904 Atlas. . . By 1897, Walter Weed started using the name of Sunset Lake. (The earlier guide books used the name of Sunlight Lake for this spring, and Sunlight Basin for the entire area west of Iron Springs Creek, but by 1910 the names of the area were presented as they are today).
In about 1911, Arnold Hague wrote the following:
Sunshine [Sunset] Lake, the larger of the two, is a saucer-like depression, deep in the center and filled with hot water, receiving its supply from the vents near the center, and as the outer edge is shallow, the surplus water readily falls off toward the stream. From this pool volumes of steam are constantly rising, and the accompanying display of red and yellow tints upon the surface is only surpassed by Prismatic Lake in Excelsior Basin.
Though the 1910 Haynes Guide explicitly claimed that Sunset Lake never erupted, Sunset Lake has been known to have long active periods of frequent minor geyser activity, especially in recent years. Relatively unknown, however, is the fact that major activity to as high as 60 feet has also been recorded!
Two to 15 foot eruptions of Sunset Lake were noted in July of 1932. The highest seen in August was 6 feet. [H. Lystrup card file & George C. Crowe, RofND, July 1932] In 1933, “during the early part of the season, eruptions were noted at fairly regular intervals (14 - 25 minutes). Maximum height -- 60'.” [L. W. C. card file 1/1/34] Minor activity was again reported in 1937 [Phil Fix card file], and again in 1941 [YNN Lang and Replogle]. Sunset Lake also erupted the night of the 1959-quake. [Watson 1961] But minor eruptions were not seen again until 1963. “Most of the surges were about 3 feet high but at times one would rise 8 to 10 feet. The surges occurred about every 2 to 3 minutes. During 1963 there were some days when no activity was observed.” [Marler Inventory. . .] Similar activity occurred in 1967, 1968, and again in 1975. [Marler 1967, 1968, Hutchinson 1975]
From 1976 to 1990, minor eruptions were commonly seen. However, in August of 1981, and again in September of 1984, eruptions of 30 feet or more were finally again noted. These larger eruptions had a sustained “Artemisia-type” fountain, in addition to its frequent bursting activity, which on this date was easily reaching as high as 10 to 15 feet. In 1985, activity was again much reduced with some bursts perhaps reaching 15 feet. [Bryan 1985]
With few exceptions, this diminished activity continued through much of the next decade. In 1991, eruptions as high as 10 to 15 feet were again seen, but only on occasion. [Cross 1991, author] Sunset Lake was barely active in 1994, but the activity in 1995 was unprecedented in that such sizeable performance lasted for so long a time. Eruptions to 15 feet were seen in the winter, and activity increased as the year progressed. In fact, activity, similar to that seen of 1981, and 1984, gradually lowered the level of Rainbow Pool -- thus for the first time confirming a connection between these two pools! Series of burst usually of 10 to 15 feet were commonly seen, with an occasional series reaching as high as 25 feet. A couple unusual spikes to about 35 feet were seen on rare occasions. Though not the “Artemisia-type” as seen in 1984, it was still truly impressive.
In May of 1996, there were some interesting developments in Black Sand Basin. The ongoing bursting type eruptions of Sunset Lake had diminished a little bit from the previous year, but probably of more importance, there were now periods of a few minutes to well over 30 minutes in which the activity of Sunset Lake was characterized by only infrequent small boils which barely sent waves to the edge of the pool. This activity coincided with a few rare major eruptions of Rainbow Pool and quite a few minors occurring over a few-week period. But in early June, soon after the eruptive activity ceased in Rainbow Pool, so did that in Sunset Lake. For the next couple months the largest activity was minor boiling over one or another of its vents. The pool had cooled enough so that you can actually see into its depths. Eruptive activity resumed toward the end of August but ended again sometime in the fall. In January 1997, Sunset Lake was still quiet. During the following summer, occasional eruptive periods were recorded with eruptions of 3 to 10 feet occasionally seen.
Thanks to T. Scott Bryan who supplied some new information and a number of helpful comments after reviewing this text.
[ Geyser
Hill Group - Map ]
[ Old Faithful Area - Map
]
[ Castle Group - Map
] [ Sawmill
Complex - Map ]
[ Grand Group - Map
]
[ Grotto Group - Map
] [ Daisy
Group - Map ]
[ Giant Group - Map
]
[ Riverside/Morning
Glory Group - Map
] [ Old Road Group
]
[ Biscuit Basin ] [ Black Sand Basin ]
This Page is hosted by Geocities.