Welcome to

December 19, 1998, the beginning of the end of the reign of william jefferson clinton.
So now he's been impeached, the first elected president to be impeached in US history. Does he demonstrate a sense of duty and honor and take the high road, that is resign, and spare the nation the spectacle of Monica testifying as to the nature of their relationship? Of course not, no-one ever seriously associates the term "honor" with william jefferson clinton. He will continue this national disgrace, one he could have avoided had he chosen not to attempt to deny Paula Jones her Constititional right to her day in court.
This man is an example for our children, in the tradition of Benedict Arnold, our most infamous traitor. This most infamous of all our Presidents, he has recklessly used our men in uniform for his own selfish motives, all the while refusing them the tools they need to safely complete their missions. He has demonstrated a callous disregard for the rule of law, the sanctity of the Oval Office, and the civil rights of our citizens. He must be removed from office. He has always been unfit for office, and there is no other possible finish to his disgraceful maladministration of office and his reckless endangerment of the Office of the President and our sacred national birthright, the Constitution of the United States.
A Prince, whose Character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the Ruler of a free People. Declaration of Independence, 1776.

Well, we've saved Kosovo. So many Kosovar Abanians died by NATO bombs they frequently wondered who the "war criminals" were. This operation's insanity shouldn't come as surprise, this clown never held the advice of the military in high esteem, and we know how they rescue children: by killing them (see Waco, Ruby Ridge, etc). And while one wonders why this operation had to start at the proposed release date of the Cox report, the circumstances surrounding the onset of bombing and the timing of the report on the most damaging spy scandal in US history lead me to conclude that the people of the US "needed distracting" so as not to become too alarmed by the treasonous activity committed by this administration. Yup, other countries have spied on us since day one, but no other administration has actively, aggressively and frequently secretly supplied our adversaries with the tools and technology to threaten or destroy our national security. This guy is the new millenium's Benedict Arnold. Please read the Cox report, it's available at many of the links listed below. You decide. Is it the economy stupid? Or are there some things so important that economic prosperity should only be considered after national security has been ensured.

And let's not forget, in the summer of 2001, with an economy sputtering along, layoffs fill the daily headlines, energy crisis a continuing threat thanks to his cronies' enviro-wacko policies, let's not forget that this is his economy. The stockmarket has hovered around 10,500 since March of 2000, and all of Alan Greenspan's machinations will never offset the effects of a Justice Department intent on punishing the productive and a liberal tax-and-spend approach that strangles the initiative of hard-working entreprenuers. We struggle to pay our mortagages and ease the debt burden on our own families' micro-economies, and the liberals (both Dems and Republicans) whine that giving us the pitiful tax-cut upon which Bush campaigned will threaten the surplus!!!! And its unfair(!) because by golly, those entitled classes who pay no income tax won't get a tax-cut!! The Founders of this nation rebelled at a 2% tax on goods - today we pay fully 50% of our sweat-earned income (assuming you are not in the idle entitlement classes) to Federal, State and local income taxes, property taxes for land we all too frequently are prevented from utilizing, school taxes that enrich non-productive bureacracies and teacher's unions, licensing fees, usage fees for public parks, gasoline taxes approaching or better than 50 cents per gallon, hidden fees on long distance service - the list goes on and on and on. And we sit back and re-elect the filthy leeches because we think we're going to get something! What a pathetic shadow we are of the rugged individualists our Founders were and envisioned we'd always strive to be.

And now, September 11. Is it too strong to suggest that slick's legacy must include a footnote on his administration's culpability for this murderous crime? Well, let's review his "legacy".

Now this is not only my idea. Frontpage Magazine has a piece by Marc Rotterman on this very issue. None other than Dick Morris, in a Wall Street Journal article, has suggested bill's lack of focus on foreign policy helped set the stage for this attack . And I could provide you with others.

Here is my reply to the Rotterman article: Let it never be in doubt that much of the blame of the attacks - a guilt of criminally feckless neglect - falls on Slick himself. No, he didn't fly those planes, but on whose watch was the CIA finally completely hamstrung? But for his appeasement of the anti-America-left we may have had sufficient intel to prevent this outrage.

On whose watch was the FBI's mandate turned on its head, from being the nation's principle law-enforcement agency to nothing but a blocking tool for Janet Reno's reckless attempts to shift focus from the lawlessness of Slick and the rest of his administration? For crying out loud, they waged war on casual drug users and the children at Waco more vigorously than they did the 1993 bombers of the WTC.

Khobar Towers, US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, the USS Cole, the 1993 WTC, and more. And each time he responded with mere pin-pricks, misguided and ineffective efforts made more to deflect public attention from the impending milestones in his legal travails than to act as his job description demanded - to protect and defend the Constitution (our Nation) from all foes, both foreign and domestic.

On whose watch was the INS turned into a defacto recruitment arm of the Democratic National Committee, more intent on bringing in new (illegal) immigrant voters than securing our borders?

On whose watch was the US military converted to the global equivalent of soccer-stadium security, tasked with breaking up fights within dysfunctional nations; hopelessly over-whelmed, over-extended and under-supported?

On whose watch was the Hyphenated-American glorified to the point of near deity, when such a concept does nothing but enflame envy and hatred and fantasies of retribution so harmful they have not only turned back the clock on race relations, many now feel comfortable blaming an entire race for the crimes of September 11?

No spin will cleanse this legacy. Long may it rot.

So yeah, as I've said since '92, we couldn't trust him then, he'll bring us shame and dishonor. And this attack is precisely the product of a POTUS more focused on skirts than defense, more involved with protecting his own ass than ours.

That said, how 'bout a little humor?

This is the most appropriate commemoration of the Slickmeister I have ever seen, and one which may someday be realized, given the continued evidence piling up around this guy's dropped trousers.

Of course we're well respected around the world. This AP photo comes from a recent festival in Germany. In this parade float, bill's favorite method of supporting Liberty is depicted.

His actions really influenced the way the Democratic Party is perceived.

But his biggest contribution was to change the way we saw the office of the president.

We can't forget the senator!

Many were happy to see them go.

Especially the children.

But hey, at least he's got his dog!

His highest crime, the sale of our security to the Red Chinese.

Current Headlines from AP, Reuters, ABC, etc.

Return to

Send mail to the Shorthair Compound at:

shrthair@sprynet.com