Zelena Narava - Stalisca o vetrnih elektrarnah v Sloveniji in o Golicu
Stalisca Ekologa Timi Ecimovic, Zeleni Slovenije, SEG,Umanotera, Dopps,Slo. E-Forum
Opinions Ecologist Timi Ecimovic, Green party of Slovenia, SEG, Umanotera, Dopps,Slo. E-forum
21 . Oktober - 11. November 2003
Zasanjana pokrajina na Golicu - jo bomo znali ohraniti ?
Beautiful landscape on Golic - we'll know to keep ?
Stalisca do postavitve vetrnih elektrarn na Golicu :
Oponions about setting up wind turbines on upland Golic :
Ekolog - Timi Ecimovic - Stalisce nominiranca za Nobelovo nagrado, clana Evropske komisije za okolje, aktivnega clana Evropske akademije za znanost in umetnost, predsednika Svetovnega foruma mislecev in ustanovitelja SEM - Instituta za klimatske spremembe.
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 at 06:14:03, Timi Ecimovic wrote:
Pozdravljen David !
Zahvaljujem se za elektronsko posto. Mislim, da ni prav, da
dajem ad hock
mnenja, za zadeve, ki so nedorecene. Vendar v primeru vetrnih elektrarn
lahko omenim, da zemljepis Slovenije ni primern za vetrne elektrarne. Namrec
v primerjavi z drugimi dezelami (ob Atlantiku in drugimi), ki imajo veliko
stevilo ur stalnih vetrov, nalozbe v vetrne elektrarne v Sloveniji nimajo
moznost gospodarnega dela.
Mislim, da sedanja prizadevanja nekaterih za postavitev vetrnih
elektrarn v
Sloveniji predstavljajo poskuse, ki niso namenjeni dolgorocnem gospodarjenju
s prostorom.
Na splosno omenjam, da je prihodnost energetske dolgorocne
preskrbe
prebivalstva (upam tudi v Sloveniji) v vodikovi energiji.
Prosim prejmite lepe pozdrave!
Timi
Ecologist - Tims Ecimovic - Opinion
nominee for Nobel's prize, member Of European committee for environment,
active member Of European academy for science and art, president Of world
forum of philosophers and founder SEM - Of institution for climatic change.
Greeted David !I'm thanking for e-mail.
Think, that is not right, that give ad hock of opinion, for matter, which
are not conclude. However in instance of wind power plants can mention,
that geography of Slovenia is not suitable for wind power plant. Namely
in comparison with other countries (against Atlantic Ocean and other), which
have a lot number of hours of permanent winds, of investment to wind power
plants in Slovenia not have possibility economical part.I'm thinking, that
of sitting down striving of some for setting up of wind power plants in
Slovenia represent experiments, which are not intended long-term manage
with place.Roughly speaking mention, that is future of energy long-term
supply population (hope also in Slovenia) in hydrogen's energy.Please receive
kind regard!
Timi
Stalisce ZELENIH SLOVENIJE, g. Franc Maleckar
Zeleni Kopra smo prvi sprozili plaz proti vetrnicam.
Mislim, da je nase stalisce jasno:
izgled krajine, unicenje rezervata - naravne in kulturne dediscine;
ekonomika! Drugod po Evropi take elektrarne zapirajo.
lep dan zelim, Franci
Zaradi predstavnika iz Postojne, ki zadnje case nastopa v medijih in se predstavlja kot predstavnik Zelenih Slovenije pa :
Ne, ta predstavnik je samozvani clan Zelenih Slovenije, njegovo
mnenje v
nobenem primeru ni tudi stalisce Zelenih. Omenjeni gospod je svoboden strelec,
LP, Zeleni Slovenije
Zeleni Kopra - Green party of Koper
are the first trigger landslide against Wind turbines.
I'm thinking, that is our opinion clearly: appearance of landscape, destruction
of reserve - of natural and of cultural heritage; economy! Elsewhere round
Europe of such power plant close.
have a nice day , Franci
Stalisce SEG - STRANKA EKOLOKIH GIBANJ SLOVENIJE , g. Lado Srecnik
Spotovani varuhi narave!
Osebno sem proti krutim posegom v naravo in zato tudi nasprotujem postavitvi
vetrnic na Golicu.Pri svojem dolgoletnem delu sem pri rednem delu, drutvenih
dejavnostih in drugih institucijah, vedno deloval v smislu varovanja narave.
(Bil sem clan Zveze tabornikov Slovenije, direktor Komunalnega podjetja
Trzic, strokovni delavec Samoupravne komunalne interesne skupnosti, predsednik
komisije za varstvo okolja pri Turisticni zvezi Slovenije in e drugih
zadolzitvah. Sedaj sem tudi podpredsednik Stranke ekoloskih gibanj Slovenije.)
Slogan, ki ga uporabljam ze desetletja pri raznih aktivnostih je: "NARAVA
NAM VRACA NAO PRIJAZNOST" Upam, da se je ze mnogim utisnil v
spomin, moral se bo pa e tistim, ki pripravljajo, oblikujejo in sprejemajo
zakonodajo s podrocja varstva narave. Clovek je eden od sestavnih delov
zivljenja na zemlji. Za dolgorocni obstoj, cloveku primernega zivljenja,
mora delovati celotni krog zivljenja.
Trzic, 8. 10. 2003 Lado Srecnik, org.dela
PARTY OF ECOLOGICAL MOVEMENTS OF SLOVENIA
Personally am against cruel interventions to nature and therefor also oppose
to setting up wind power plants on Golic. Slogan, which him use already
of decade at raznih activities her: "NATURE US RETURNS OUR KINDNESS"
Hope, that is already many retain to memory, must will still that, which
prepare, form and receive legislation from field of custody of nature. Human
is one from component part of life on land. For long-term exist, to human
of suitable life, must to act entire circle of life.
Stalisce UMANOTERE , Slovenske fundacije
za trajnostni razvoj
UMANOTERA - Slovenian Foundation for Sustainable Development
E-posta: info@umanotera.org
http://www.umanotera.org
Nimajo se izrazenega stalisca .
They don't have expressed opinion.
Stalisce DOPPS
Bird Watching and Bird Study Association of Slovenia (DOPPS)
dopps@dopps-drustvo.si
Nimajo se izrazenega stalisca.
They don't have expressed opinion.
Stalisce Slovenskega E-Foruma -dodano - add 10.11.2003
se-f @siol.net
Kratka izjava NVO o NEP (Nacionalnem energetskem programu) in OVE (Obnovljivih virih energije):
Prva slovenska prioriteta je zmanjanje energetske intenzivnosti,
enako pomembna prioriteta je zmanjevanje vsega obremenjevanja okolja
z energetiko. Tretja prioriteta in poti do prvih dveh ciljev pa so - internalizacija
"eksternih" strokov in okoljska javnofinancna reforma,
- ukrepi za bolj ucinkovito rabo in transformacije energije,
- razvoj lokalne energetike in
- nadomecanje neobnovljivih virov z OVE!
Socasno je treba optimirati stroke in povecati zanesljivost oskrbe
z energijo. Obnovljivi viri energije lahko prispevajo k trajnostnemu razvoju
in k tirim splonim ciljem energetske politike: strateka
zanesljivost oskrbe, zmanjanje obremenjevanja okolja, konkurencnosti
druzbe in socialna kohezivnost. Vendar mora biti razvoj OVE uravnotezen,
saj tudi raba teh virov energije obremenjuje prostor, predvsem naravne vrednote
in kulturno krajino. Neustrezno zastavljen razvojni program OVE lahko povzroci
sprevrzene socialne, energetsko-politicne in gospodarske ucinke.
Zecetne poteze pri razvoju vetrne energije so pokazale nekatere slabosti,
ki lahko kodijo celotnemu razvoju OVE, v smislu kriterijev uspenosti,
ki bistveno obsega tudi promocijo trajnostnega razvoja, regionalni razvoj,
socialno kohezivnost, inovativnost itd.
Zlasti bode v oci navezava drzave, javnih podjetij in tujih investitorjev
ob pomanjkanju zanesljivih kriterijev in podatkov za naravovarstvene presoje
in odsotnost kakrnekoli tehnoloke (vkljucevanje slovenskega
znanja v mednarodne grozde) oziroma trzne inovativnosti (zelena elektrika).
Opomba: sedanji vzorec ima veliko karakteristik ¨neo-kolonialne¨
razvojne paradigme-zrtvovanja naravnih vrednot in dedincine, odkup
soglasij in zemlje ¨domorodcev¨ v zameno za dobicke zasebnih oziroma
privatizirajocih se investitorjev z drzavno podporo.Odkupne cene so (primerjalno
z drugimi OVE), glede na prispevek vetrne energije k trajnostnemu razvoju
v Slovenije neupraviceno visoke, postopki pa nedodelani in glede dostopnosti
pomembnih strokovnih podlag (npr. zmanevanje obratovanja drugih elektrarn)
netransparentni (npr. nedostopne podjetnike tudije okoljskih
vplivov in energetsko-strateke upravicenosti.).
Predlagani prvi korak k razvoju VE v Sloveniji je: postavitev manjega
vetrnega parka na lokaciji, ki okoljsko ne bo sporna. Tak projekt se lahko
sofinancira v skupini ¨komercialno e nekonkurencnih OVE¨,
torej s ciljanimi dodatnimi spodbudami.
Po vsestranski oceni izkuenj tega projekta se pristopi k javni strateki
presoji vloge VE v slovenski energetiki.
Preberi vec na strani : http://www.ljudmila.org/sef/
oziroma neposredno: http://www.ljudmila.org/sef/stara/Izjava%20SE-F%20o%20OVE.pdf
S pozdravi
Miha Tomic
Our short statement sounds:
Short statement National energy program
and renewable sources of energy (RTE):The first Slovenian priority is decrease
of energy intensity,the same important priority is reducing all loading
of environment with energetics.
The third priority and of way till the first two of targets are:internalizacion
of external costs and environmental public financial reform,measures for
more efficiently use and transform energy,development of local energetics
and substituting unrenewable sources from RTE.
Coincidently it is necessary formulate optimum costs and to increase reliability
of supply with energy.Renewable sources of energy can contribute to sustainable
development and to four to general targets of energy policy:
strategic reliability of supply,decrease of loading of environment,of competitiveness
of company and social tenacity.However must to be development RTE balanced,because
also use of this sources of energy loads place,above all of natural value
and cultural landscape.
Unsuitably asked developmental program RTE can causes quibble social,energy-of
political and economical effects.
Initial of move at development of wind
energy have shown of some disadvantage,which can damage to entire development
RTE,within the meaning criteria of successfulness,which essentially contains
also promotion sustainable development,regional development,socially tenacity,inovvation
asl.
Especially butt to eye see state,of public services and of foreign investors
against lack of reliable criteria and of data for nature protection judgement
and absence of any technological (including of Slovenian knowledge to international
clusters) respectively of market inovvations (green electricity).
Remark:sittings down pattern has a lot characteristics neo-colony developmental
paradigm-of sacrifice of natural values and heritage,purchase of consents
and of land of natives to exchange for profits of private respectively private
investors with state support.
Of purchase price are (comparatively with other),as for contribution of
wind energy to sustainable development on Slovenia unjustifiedly high,procedures
pa not finish and as accessibility of important professional bases (e.g.
reduce of operation other power plants) not transparent (exclusive enterprise
study of environmental impacts and energy strategic legitimacies.
Proposed the first step to development WPP in Slovenia : setting up of smaller
wind park on location,which environmental no will uncertain.Such project
can so financial in group commercially still not competite,so from target
additional stimulations.
For comprehensive estimates of experiences this project joins to public
strategic judgement of submission in Slovenian energetics.
Read more : http://www.ljudmila.org/sef/
or: http://www.ljudmila.org/sef/stara/Izjava%20SE-F%20o%20OVE.pdf
Miha Tomic
Hvala Vsem, ki so nam poslali svoja stalisca in jim ni vseeno, kako se ¨DELA¨ v Sloveniji z naravnimi bogastvi.
Upamo, da se gospodarstvo in politika zavedata, kaj Slovencem pomenijo
Nasa pestra in raznolika pokrajina, ki nam je omogocila obstanek in zivljenje na tem koscku planeta Zemlje.
Ljudje postajajo vedno bolj obcutljivi in zaskrbljeni glede ogrozanja okolja.
Ravno Natura2000 - evropski pogled , ki daje popolnoma enakovrednost varstvu narave z drugimi sektorji
kot so energetika, kmetijstvo, industrija itd., bi nam hotela povedati, da vetrne elektrarne ne sodijo na neokrnjena obmocja,
se posebno ne na kraske kamnite suhe travnike kot sta Golic in Volovja reber. Ji bomo znali ali ji bomo morali prisluhniti ?
Da za vetrne elektrarne, vendar na primernih obmocjih, ne pa v naravnih parkih.
Slovenci smo za vetrne elektrarne, vendar ne na neokrnjenih
krakih planotah in po raziskavi javnega
mnenja, sta Golic in Volovja reber med najmanj zazelenimi potencialnimi
lokacijami za vetrne elektrarne, ki pomenijo grobo
industrializacijo in so v svetu ze oznacene kot novodobni
onesnazevalec okolja in kradljivec tiine. Vetrne elektrarne
niso ne zelen nacin pridobivanja energije in
ne poceni, za svoje delovanje so prostorsko najbolj potratne pa e
nae burje ne marajo. Po svetu je ze preko esto skupin ljudi,
ki so proti vetrnim elektrarnam in tudi Greenpeace ne podpira postavitve
kjerkoli. V Veliki britaniji, ko so jih mislili postaviti v nekem okrozju
, je cerkveni moz povedal :- to
bi bilo vandalsko dejanje ekvivalentno Talibanskim unicenjem starodavnih
kipov Bude v Bariyanu v Afganistanu.
Kakorkoli, so podrocja na katerih je treba prepovedati postavljati
vetrne elektrarne :
- naravni rezervati
- nacionalni parki
- podrocja v blizini naravnih znamenitosti
- podrocja v odprtih prostorskih in pokrajinskih nacrtih s izjemnimi posebnimi
naravoslovnimi pomembnostmi
- na posebno zavarovanih podrocjih v pokrajini, kjer bo zavarovanje ogrozeno
z umestitvijo vetrnih elektrarn
- na zgodovinsko kulturnih pokrajinah
In na predelih pokrajin , ki so izkljucno namenjeni rekreaciji.
Thank you All, which are us send one's opinions and them is
not still, how ¨ WORK ¨ in Slovenia with natural wealths.We're hoping,
that economy and policy realize, what Slovene mean our variegated and diverse
country, which us is enable to subsist and life on this part of Earth. Humans
become always more sensitive and worried as threatening of environment.
Straight Natura2000 - European view , which gives completely equivalence
to custody of nature with other sectors as are energetics, farming, industry
etc., would us want to tell, that of wind power plant don't judge on intact
ranges, still particularly no on Karst stone dry meadows as are of Golic
and Volovja reber. We'll know or her will must to listen ?
Yes for wind power plant, however
on suitable ranges, no pa in natural parks.
Slovenes are for wind power plant, however no on intact Karst plateaus and
for research of public opinion, are of Golic
and Volovja reber between at least desirable potential locations for wind
power plants, which mean brutally industrialization and are in world already
marked as newage pollutant of environment and thief of silence. Of wind
power plant are not no green manner of production of energy and no cheaply,
for one's activity are spatially the most exstravagance still of our wind
- Burja no like.
Across the globe is already by the sixth of groups humans, which are against
wind power plants and also Greenpeace doesn't support of setting up anywhere.
In United Kingdom, when are them think to set in a certain district , is
church man tell :- this would be an act of vandalism equivalent to the Taliban
destruction of the ancient Buddhist statues of Bariyan in Afghanistan.
Landscapes which must be excluded from wind power plants :
- nature reserves
- national parks
- areas surrounding natural wonders
- areas in open-space plans and landscape plans designated with special
scientific significance
- parts of landscape protection zones where protection objectives would
be essentially compromised by wind turbine installations
- historic cultural landscapes
- and landscape zones used exclusively for recreation.
Projekt : Ohranitev Golica pred postavitvijo vetrnih elektrarn je verjetno najvecji projekt ohranitve naravnega okolja in
kulturne dedincine, ki poteka v letu 2003 v Sloveniji in mogoce v EVROPI - projekt smo prijavili na razpis Nagrade druzbe FORD za leto 2003.
Project : Protection Plateu Golic before setting wind power plants is for at the moment the biggest project of preservation of physical environment and of cultural heritage, which goes in Slovenia in 2003 or maybe in EUROPE - Project registration to Ford Conservation and Environmental Grants 2003.
Prav tako Greenpeace ne podpira postavitve vetrnih elektrarn povsod, e posebno ne , na pomembnih obmocjih za ptice
in kjer je Obmocje Nature 2000.
Also Greenpeace reply, that
not automatically supports the construction of wind turbines in any place,
particulary not
not in places imortant for birds ( habitat ) and
not in places in natura2000.
David Stepan, Zelena narava
e-mail: varovanjenarave@email.si
Upamo, da se ministrstvo zaveda, da planota Golic spada v Drugi vodovarstveni pas reke Rizane, ki skoraj v celoti pokriva
s preskrbo pitne vode vso Slovensko Istro in da nikjer na svetu Vetrnih elektrarn ne postavljajo na taka obmocja zaradi potencialnega onesnazenja pitne vode s sinteticnim oljem ( vsaka vetrna turbina ima okoli 370 litrov olja, 370 x 80 vetrnih elektrn = 30.000 litov olja ). Da bodo vetrne elektrarne vidne iz Hrastoveljskega tabora in da na tem podrocju ze poteka Evropski projekt Natura2000.
Hope, that ministry realizes, that plateau of Golice belongs
to Second water protect zone
of river Rizane, which almost to whole covers with drinking water entire
Slovene Istria and that nowhere on world of wind power plants no set on
such ranges because of potential pollution of drinking water with synthetic
oil ( every wind turbine has round 370 litres of oil ,370 x 80 Wind turbines
= 30.000 litres of oil ). That will of wind power plants of visual from
Hrastovlje church -
tabor ( The dance of death - freske ) and that on this field already goes
European project Natura2000.
Let of Golice stays goal and let him however Mr. minister Janez Kopac at once put in to spatial plan between most highly Natural treasure R. Of Slovenia.
Naj Golic ostane gol in naj ga vendar g. minister Janez Kopac ze enkrat umesti v prostorski plan
med najvije Naravne vrednote R. Slovenije.
Nazaj na stran Zelena narava - Home - klikni