My Zodiacal Portrait...Continued

My Zodiacal Portrait...Continued

Sidenotes: Jupiter and Neptune are mutally receptive, thus the power of both are increased. Ironically, Neptune (as well as Venus, and my North Node) is in my combustion field and is thus weakened. Due to this "balancing out", it makes Jupiter more powerful than Neptune.

Right now, I believe that 10.54 VIR and 10.50 SAG are the two most important "Critical Points" due to the closest aspect of each, and both of these points have an Arabic conjunct either a Midpoint or a Persona. Due to the fact I have more Harmonics, Personas, Antiscia and other Arabics yet to explore, I may find two critical points (or more) that are closer than these two points. But for the time being, these two hot points shine hotter than any other in my astrological findings.

I have no idea what the quake formulas refer to on this additional Arabics page.

There is controversy/debate about switching some of the Arabic formulas. From my online research, people either adhere to Theory 1, or Theory 2. I've not seen Theories 3 and 4 discussed before, so I proposed them on my own. I used Theory 2 in my above analyses.

  1. The 1st theory would be based on A.M./P.M. P.M. births would have some of the formulas reversed.
  2. The 2nd theory is based on Sunset/Sunrise. All births where the Sun is below the Ascendant/Descendant line would have some formulas reversed.
  3. I believe there is also a 3rd theory, in which the Sun is going from THAT CHART'S MC to THAT CHART'S IC. This will correspond closely to the 1st theory, but it has no regard for P.M. or A.M. The reasoning behind this theory is that the Sun is transiting from the MC/IC line, (the 2nd most powerful line of the chart), and thus is losing power once it starts heading away from the MC. Thus in this theory, some formulas would be reversed. If the Sun is between THAT CHART'S IC and MC then no formula would be reversed.
  4. This provides groundwork for a 4th theory, similar to the 3rd theory, except that the EXACT uppermost/lowest part of the chart will be looked at. The MC/IC line is ignored. The reasoning behind this theory is that the Sun is losing its energy once it reaches the EXACT top part of the sky of that chart. Those with the Sun between the EXACT bottom of the chart through the EXACT top of the chart would not reverse any of the formulas.

I've just started researching the Transneptunian planets -- research on them is still difficult to find online.

If the Sun rules the 5th house...(it makes common sense that)...it would rule the 5th Harmonic. It is CONJUNCT 3 Arabics (with the same formula), as well as a Midpoint.

If Jupiter rules the 9th house...it would rule the 9th Harmonic. It is CONJUNCT the square of my moon by 0.01. The other respective rulerships of Harmonics via this theory however, I have failed to find anything else as breathtaking.

It is possible that Vesta is the most powerful of the 34 placings, due to the fact that it is the highest placement in the sky (nearest the MC), in addition to Vesta being conjunct a Harmonic. Also it is possible that Nessus is the most powerful planet, because it is the lowest planet (nearer to the IC than Vesta is to the MC), but the Nessus influences are still being studied for intrepretation.

I have never seen "Phoenix Zone" before, so I created that term myself. It is the opposite of the Combustion Zone. Whereas the combustion zone is 8.30 on both sides of the Sun (life burning into ashes), the Phoenix zone is 8.30 on both sides of the Opposition Sun (ashes burning into life). What is interesting to note, is that Maia is conjunct the beginning of the Phoenix Zone. This term was created 7:18 am September 19, 2004.

It is said to look at the persona chart of the planet that is the ruler of the ascendant. In this case, I looked at my Neptune Persona. What really stands out on it is that the Moon is PRECISELY square Pluto.

I just found the Betty Arc, but I found a discrepancy on this page. It says 4.28 is used for 7 years, but this is inaccurate, because equally it averages out to 31.16 degrees for a 7-year cycle. I did some math to try 4.18 for 7 years but this created a closeness at 30.03. I then figured out on a 3rd mathematical solution (all 3 done longhand) that 4.17 is used 6 times, and 4.18 is used once, it makes sense to use 4.18 on that 4th year, since it is centered between 3 years on both sides. This solution was "corrected"/found at 6:31 am September 24, 2004. I think an alternative name for the "Betty Arc" is the "Uranian Sun" (term created at 6:46 am).