Traitors of Islam

 


Jinnah Exposed.

Jinnah (1876 - 1948) was amongst the band of westernised men who were part of the British educational system founded by Lord Macaulay “to form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern - a class of persons, Indian in blood and colour, but English in tasks, opinions, in morals and in intellect.” Simply put, it was founded by the British to nurture their agents from a very young age. The British Government had plans and they chose Jinnah to be the man who would turn their plans against the Ummah into a reality. Jinnah was going to be the man who would rob the Muslims of their land which had been conquered by Mohammed Bin Qasim centuries ago, and initiate the problems faced by the Muslims today in the Indian subccontinent by depriving the region of Islam and implementing Kufr over the land where Islam had governed for centuries before.

Jinnah Adores the Enemy of Allah (swt) ~ KEMAL

Having completed his studies in London, Jinnah returned to India in 1896 and quickly earned himself the title ‘The ambassador of Hindu - Muslim unity.’ Jinnah was an avid member of the Hindu dominated Congress Party. He left Congress because the British were cooking him for a bigger task - the complete capitulation of the Indian Muslim. He returned to his masters in England in 1930, where he lived for five years . In London Jinnah was greatly influenced by a study on the life of Mustapha Kemal Ataturk (may Allah curse him), the Turkish leader responsible for abolishing the Islamic State established by Muhammad (saw) and his sahaba (ra). Kemal is responsible for the humiliation and oppression being faced by the Muslims of today because of his efforts in removing Islam as a way of life under the Khilafah. With the enemy of Allah as his role - model, Jinnah was inspired to build the nation of Pakistan and somehow managed to earn himself the title Quaid-i-Azam (Great Leader). Allah have mercy on those who sincerely but naively associate this name with this treacherous man.

In a speech made by Jinnah on 4th March 1948 in reply to the speech made by the first Turkish Ambassador to Pakistan, Jinnah praised the enemy of Islam: “...the rise and career of the great Ataturk, his revitalisation of your nation by his great statesmanship, courage and foresight...”

Jinnah’s adoration for this heretic is a clear indication that he never intended to create a Pakistan in the name of Islam for the benefit of the Muslims. If his objective had been to rebuild a truly Islamic state again then he would have followed the way of our Prophet (saw) rather than this renegade. But his actions clearly indicate his intentions were insincere.

JINNAH DEFIES ALLAH

Jinnah is revered by many Pakistanis to an extent which no other political personality approaches even remotely and modern textbooks invariably portray him as the architect of an Islamic ideological state: “The All India Muslim League, and even the Quaid-i-Azam himself, said in the clearest possible terms that Pakistan would be an ideological state, the basis of whose laws would be the Qur’an and Sunnah, and whose ultimate destiny would be to provide a society in which Muslims could individually and collectively live according to the laws of Islam.”

In another speech in November 1945 Jinnah said: “Muslims are demanding Pakistan so that they may live according to their code of life and traditions, and so that they may govern themselves according to the laws of Islam.”

How does one interpret these speeches of Jinnah, together with others of essentially similar nature, with the outright secular and Kufr declarations quoted earlier in his career? “Islam believes in democracy” (Speech at Aligarh Muslim University, 6th March 1940) “We learned democracy 1300 years ago. It is in our blood...” (Presidential address at the session of All India Muslim League, Delhi, 24 April 1943)

These are the kinds of things you would say if you learnt your Islam from a Kafir and were too ashamed of the deen to speak about the truth purely because you would be considered backwards and uneducated.
It takes a man of very little intelligence to point out the contradictions in these statements made by Jinnah when compared to what

Allah says in the Qur’an:
“And he who does not rule by Islam is a kafir” [TMQ 5:47]

“The rule is for none but Allah” [TMQ 6:57]

“Judge by what Allah has revealed...” [TMQ 5:49]

Jinnah also said: “The constitution and the government would be what the people will decide.” (Presidential address at the session of All India Muslim League, Delhi, 24 April 1943)

But Allah (swt) says in the Qur’an:
“It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allah and His Messenger have decided on a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger has indeed strayed in plain error.” [TMQ 33:36]

The constitution and Government of an Islamic nation have been already decided by Allah (swt), it is the Qur’an and the Sunnah, and structure of Government is also clearly illustrated in the seerah of the Prophet (saw). On this matter man cannot take a decision. But once again Jinnah choose to ignore this commandment of Allah (swt) as well. These are only some of the examples where Jinnah clearly defies Allah (swt) and chose the way of the Kafir over the way of the Prophet (saw).

The unfortunate truth of the matter is that Jinnah and his counterparts could not offer anything to the Ummah apart from lip service to Islam. Jinnah expounded his views with such eloquence and force that most Muslims, and even some Hindus, came to believe in them. Jinnah had no understanding of Islam and had no intention to learn about Islam. The founders of Pakistan used Islam to achieve their Kufr objectives. Once achieved, Islam was discarded and put back onto the shelves in the form of history books.

Jinnah went one step further than most traitors, the man also had the audacity to justify his kufr actions by Islam. His disrespect for the Prophet Muhammad (saw) is evident in the fact that he was prepared to lie about Prophet Muhammad (saw) to deceive the Indian Muslims and strengthen his position as a political leader. “Thirteen hundred years ago he (saw) laid the foundations of democracy” (Speech on Prophet Muhammad’s (saw) Birthday at Karachi Bar Association, 25th January 1948). “It is my belief that our salvation lies in following the golden rules of conduct set for us by a great law giver, the Prophet of Islam. Let us lay the foundations of our democracy on the basis of truly Islamic ideals and principles” (Speech at Sipi Durbar 14th February 1948).

How dare this man associate a Kufr concept such as democracy with our Prophet (saw)! The Prophet (saw) fought ‘People Power’ (more commonly known as democracy) for the entire twenty-three years of Prophethood. Muhammad (saw) said words to the effect of: ‘Anyone who tells a lie about me intentionally, let him take his place in the hellfire.’

PAKISTAN: Where “Muslims would cease to be Muslim”!

In his personal life, Jinnah was liberal and westernised. He maintained his inner secularism even in the seething cauldron of communal hatred following partition, as is evident from the fact that he appointed Joginder Nath Mandal, a Hindu, to serve in Pakistan’s first cabinet. He also chose a Qadiyani as his foreign minister. His famous speech 11th August 1947 before the nation is the clearest possible exposition of a secular state in which religion and state are separate from each other: “We are starting with the fundamental principle that we are all citizens and equal citizens of one state...Now I think that we should keep that in front of us as our ideal, and you will find that in due course of time Hindus would cease to be Hindus and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual but in the political sense as citizens of the state...You may belong to any religion or caste or creed - that has nothing to do with the business of the state.”

This speech states very clearly that Jinnah felt that Islam should have no role in the politics of the state and should be confined to individual belief. He did not allow Islam to play a role in the everyday part of Muslims life and advocated the understanding that Islam could not deal with the complex political situations faced by man today. He felt that his kufr methods of dealing with societal affairs would be more effective than the way of Muhammad (saw). Looking at the mess Pakistan is in today, we can see that Jinnah could not have been more wrong. As we can see from the structure of the Prophet’s (saw) Islamic state in Madinah, Islam commands that there is a clear distinction between the Muslim and non-Muslim (dhimmi) in an Islamic state and even goes as far as having a separate tax structure for them. The dhimmis are given their rights and protection as long as they agree to live by Islam or else face the Hudood for their crimes. They are not allowed to be a part of the system in an authoritative position nor can they hold the security of the Muslims in their hands. Once again, Jinnah chose to neglect this commandment of Allah. These are only some of the examples, the list is endless. But it is very clear that Jinnah never intended to create an Islamic State in Pakistan and his objective was most certainly not to benefit and give security to the Muslims. So he wasworse than Ataturk, in the sense that Ataturk made his hatred for Islam open, while Jinnah was a hypocrite when he praised Islam to deceive the people about his British Masters’ real objectives of creating Pakistan.

In an interview to Doon Campbell, Reuters’s correspondent in New Delhi in 1946, Jinnah made it perfectly clear that it was Western style democracy that he wanted for Pakistan: “The new state would be a modern democratic state with sovereignty resting in the people and the members of the new nation having equal rights of citizenship regardless of their religion, caste or creed.”. Note the highly significant phrases “sovereignty resting in the people” in contrast to the Prophet’s (saw) Islamic State where ‘sovereignty rests with Allah’. On the record of these writings and speeches, Jinnah comes out to be far more liberal and secular than Gandhi - who was a Hindu.

* These are the most important classics of Muslim modernism. They belong on the "black-list" and should be approached with extreme caution because they have all done (intentionally or unintentionally) irreparable harm to the Islamic cause.

Source: Khilafah Magazine, London


Islamic Revival Homepage

http://islampages.cjb.net   http://pzq.cjb.net


Site designed and maintained by Sultanah X