Jinnah
Exposed.
Jinnah (1876 - 1948)
was amongst the band of westernised men who were part of the British educational
system founded by Lord Macaulay to form a class who may be interpreters
between us and the millions whom we govern - a class of persons, Indian in blood
and colour, but English in tasks, opinions, in morals and in intellect.
Simply put, it was founded by the British to nurture their agents from a very
young age. The British Government had plans and they chose Jinnah to be the
man who would turn their plans against the Ummah into a reality. Jinnah was
going to be the man who would rob the Muslims of their land which had been conquered
by Mohammed Bin Qasim centuries ago, and initiate the problems faced by the
Muslims today in the Indian subccontinent by depriving the region of Islam and
implementing Kufr over the land where Islam had governed for centuries before.
Jinnah Adores
the Enemy of Allah (swt) ~ KEMAL
Having completed
his studies in London, Jinnah returned to India in 1896 and quickly earned himself
the title The ambassador of Hindu - Muslim unity. Jinnah was an
avid member of the Hindu dominated Congress Party. He left Congress because
the British were cooking him for a bigger task - the complete capitulation of
the Indian Muslim. He returned to his masters in England in 1930, where he lived
for five years . In London Jinnah was greatly influenced by a study on the life
of Mustapha Kemal Ataturk (may Allah curse him), the Turkish leader responsible
for abolishing the Islamic State established by Muhammad (saw) and his sahaba
(ra). Kemal is responsible for the humiliation and oppression being faced by
the Muslims of today because of his efforts in removing Islam as a way of life
under the Khilafah. With the enemy of Allah as his role - model, Jinnah was
inspired to build the nation of Pakistan and somehow managed to earn himself
the title Quaid-i-Azam (Great Leader). Allah have mercy on those who sincerely
but naively associate this name with this treacherous man.
In a speech made
by Jinnah on 4th March 1948 in reply to the speech made by the first Turkish
Ambassador to Pakistan, Jinnah praised the enemy of Islam: ...the rise
and career of the great Ataturk, his revitalisation of your nation by his great
statesmanship, courage and foresight...
Jinnahs adoration
for this heretic is a clear indication that he never intended to create a Pakistan
in the name of Islam for the benefit of the Muslims. If his objective had been
to rebuild a truly Islamic state again then he would have followed the way of
our Prophet (saw) rather than this renegade. But his actions clearly indicate
his intentions were insincere.
JINNAH DEFIES ALLAH
Jinnah is revered by many Pakistanis
to an extent which no other political personality approaches even remotely and
modern textbooks invariably portray him as the architect of an Islamic ideological
state: The All India Muslim League, and even the Quaid-i-Azam himself,
said in the clearest possible terms that Pakistan would be an ideological state,
the basis of whose laws would be the Quran and Sunnah, and whose ultimate
destiny would be to provide a society in which Muslims could individually and
collectively live according to the laws of Islam.
In another speech in November 1945
Jinnah said: Muslims are demanding Pakistan so that they may live according
to their code of life and traditions, and so that they may govern themselves
according to the laws of Islam.
How does one interpret these speeches
of Jinnah, together with others of essentially similar nature, with the outright
secular and Kufr declarations quoted earlier in his career? Islam believes
in democracy (Speech at Aligarh Muslim University, 6th March 1940) We
learned democracy 1300 years ago. It is in our blood... (Presidential
address at the session of All India Muslim League, Delhi, 24 April 1943)
These are the kinds of things you
would say if you learnt your Islam from a Kafir and were too ashamed of the
deen to speak about the truth purely because you would be considered backwards
and uneducated.
It takes a man of very little intelligence to point out the contradictions in
these statements made by Jinnah when compared to what
Allah says in the Quran:
And he who does not rule by Islam is a kafir [TMQ
5:47]
The rule is for none
but Allah [TMQ 6:57]
Judge by what Allah has
revealed... [TMQ 5:49]
Jinnah also said: The constitution
and the government would be what the people will decide. (Presidential
address at the session of All India Muslim League, Delhi, 24 April 1943)
But Allah (swt) says in the Quran:
It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allah and His Messenger
have decided on a matter that they should have any option in their decision.
And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger has indeed strayed in plain error.
[TMQ 33:36]
The constitution and Government of
an Islamic nation have been already decided by Allah (swt), it is the Quran
and the Sunnah, and structure of Government is also clearly illustrated in the
seerah of the Prophet (saw). On this matter man cannot take a decision. But
once again Jinnah choose to ignore this commandment of Allah (swt) as well. These are only some of the
examples where Jinnah clearly defies Allah (swt) and chose the way of the Kafir
over the way of the Prophet (saw).
The unfortunate truth of the matter
is that Jinnah and his counterparts could not offer anything to the Ummah apart
from lip service to Islam. Jinnah expounded his views with such eloquence and
force that most Muslims, and even some Hindus, came to believe in them. Jinnah
had no understanding of Islam and had no intention to learn about Islam. The
founders of Pakistan used Islam to achieve their Kufr objectives. Once achieved,
Islam was discarded and put back onto the shelves in the form of history books.
Jinnah went one step further than
most traitors, the man also had the audacity to justify his kufr actions by
Islam. His disrespect for the Prophet Muhammad (saw) is evident in the fact
that he was prepared to lie about Prophet Muhammad (saw) to deceive the Indian
Muslims and strengthen his position as a political leader. Thirteen hundred
years ago he (saw) laid the foundations of democracy (Speech on Prophet
Muhammads (saw) Birthday at Karachi Bar Association, 25th January 1948).
It is my belief that our salvation lies in following the golden rules
of conduct set for us by a great law giver, the Prophet of Islam. Let us lay
the foundations of our democracy on the basis of truly Islamic ideals and principles
(Speech at Sipi Durbar 14th February 1948).
How dare this man associate a Kufr concept
such as democracy with our Prophet (saw)! The Prophet (saw) fought People
Power (more commonly known as democracy) for the entire twenty-three years
of Prophethood. Muhammad (saw) said words to the effect of: Anyone who tells
a lie about me intentionally, let him take his place in the hellfire.
PAKISTAN: Where Muslims
would cease to be Muslim!
In his personal life, Jinnah was
liberal and westernised. He maintained his inner secularism even in the seething
cauldron of communal hatred following partition, as is evident from the fact
that he appointed Joginder Nath Mandal, a Hindu, to serve in Pakistans
first cabinet. He also chose a Qadiyani as his foreign minister. His famous
speech 11th August 1947 before the nation is the clearest possible exposition
of a secular state in which religion and state are separate from each other:
We are starting with the fundamental principle that we are all citizens
and equal citizens of one state...Now I think that we should keep that in front
of us as our ideal, and you will find that in due course of time Hindus would
cease to be Hindus and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious
sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual but in the political
sense as citizens of the state...You may belong to any religion or caste or
creed - that has nothing to do with the business of the state.
This speech states very clearly that
Jinnah felt that Islam should have no role in the politics of the state and
should be confined to individual belief. He did not allow Islam to play a role
in the everyday part of Muslims life and advocated the understanding that Islam
could not deal with the complex political situations faced by man today. He
felt that his kufr methods of dealing with societal affairs would be more effective
than the way of Muhammad (saw). Looking at the mess Pakistan is in today, we
can see that Jinnah could not have been more wrong. As we can see from the structure
of the Prophets (saw) Islamic state in Madinah, Islam commands that there
is a clear distinction between the Muslim and non-Muslim (dhimmi) in an Islamic
state and even goes as far as having a separate tax structure for them. The
dhimmis are given their rights and protection as long as they agree to live
by Islam or else face the Hudood for their crimes. They are not allowed to be
a part of the system in an authoritative position nor can they hold the security
of the Muslims in their hands. Once again, Jinnah chose to neglect this commandment
of Allah. These are only some of the examples, the list is endless. But it is
very clear that Jinnah never intended to create an Islamic State in Pakistan
and his objective was most certainly not to benefit and give security to the
Muslims. So he wasworse than Ataturk, in the sense that Ataturk made his hatred
for Islam open, while Jinnah was a hypocrite when he praised Islam to deceive
the people about his British Masters real objectives of creating Pakistan.
In an interview to Doon Campbell,
Reuterss correspondent in New Delhi in 1946, Jinnah made it perfectly
clear that it was Western style democracy that he wanted for Pakistan: The
new state would be a modern democratic state with sovereignty resting in the
people and the members of the new nation having equal rights of citizenship
regardless of their religion, caste or creed.. Note the highly significant
phrases sovereignty resting in the people in contrast to the Prophets
(saw) Islamic State where sovereignty rests with Allah. On the record
of these writings and speeches, Jinnah comes out to be far more liberal and
secular than Gandhi - who was a Hindu.
* These are the most
important classics of Muslim modernism. They belong on the "black-list"
and should be approached with extreme caution because they have all done (intentionally
or unintentionally) irreparable harm to the
Islamic cause.
Source:
Khilafah Magazine, London