Human Resource Management
Zubin R. Mulla
E-mail: zubin.mulla@gmail.com
Learning Objectives:
Reference Texts
Timeline
[Session 1] Introduction to HRM: Nature & scope.
Ø Ulrich, D. (1998). A new mandate for human resources. HBR, 76(1): 125-134.
Ø Case: HR department? (case)
[Session 2] Environment of HRM & Strategic HRM
Ø Becker, B., & Huselid, M. (2003). Measuring HR? HR Mag., Dec, 48(12): 56-61.
Ø Rucci, A. J., Kirn, S. P., & Quinn, R. T. (1998). The employee-customer-profit chain at Sears. HBR, Jan- Feb, 82-97.
Ø Flying high at Jet Blue (case)
Ø Lorenzo and Texas Air (case)
Ø Turbulent Times for Airlines in India (case)
[Session 3] Planning for Human Resources, Recruitment, & Selection
Ø Mills, D. Q. (1985). Planning with people in mind, HBR, Jul-Aug, 97-105.
Ø Drucker, P. F. (2002). They’re not employees, they’re people. HBR, Feb, 70-77.
Ø Mathys, N. J., & Burack, E. H. (1993). Strategic downsizing: Human resource planning approaches. Human Resource Planning, 16(1): 71-85.
Ø Roychowdhury, S. (2004, Jan 3). Globalization and labour. E&PW.
Ø Manpower planning calculations (class exercise)
Ø Film Clip: Charlie & the chocolate factory
[Session 4] Managing Performance-1
[Session 5] Managing Performance-2
[Session 6] Rewarding Human Resources – Compensation & Benefits-1
Ø Pfeffer, J. (1998). Six dangerous myths about pay. HBR, 76, 109-119.
Ø Kerr, S. (1995). On the folly of rewarding A while hoping for B. AME, 9, 7-14.
[Session 7] Rewarding Human Resources – Compensation & Benefits-2
Ø Note on “The Pay Model” [From Milkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. M. (2005). Compensation [Eighth Edition]. Tata McGraw-Hill, pg. 14-20.]
Ø Chapter 5 and Chapter 8 from Milkovich & Newman (2005). Compensation
Ø Jaques, E. (1979). Taking time seriously in evaluating jobs. HBR, Sep-Oct, 124-132.
Ø Parthasarathy, A., Menon, K., & Bhattacherjee, D. (2006, Sep 30). Executive compensation, firm performance, & governance: An empirical analysis, EPW, 4139-4147.
Ø Mapping a total compensation strategy (class exercise)
[Session 8] Training & Development-1
Ø Kesner, I. F. (2003). Leadership development: Perk or priority, HBR, May, 29-38.
Ø Wiggenhorn, W. (1990). Motorola U: When training becomes an education, HBR,Jul-Aug, 71-83.
[Session 9] Training & Development-2
Ø Film Clip: The Karate Kid
[Session 10] HRM in Emerging Workplaces
Ø Kapur, D., & Ramamurti, R. (2001). India’s emerging competitive advantage in services, AME, 15(2): 20-33.
Ø Hansda, S. K., & Ray, P. (2006, July 8-15). Employment & poverty in India during the 1990s: Is there a diverging trend? EPW, 3014-3023.
Ø Noronha, E., & D'Cruz, P. (2006, May 27). Organizing call center agents: Emerging issues. E&PW. 2116-2121.
Ø Singh, P., & Pandey, A. (2005). Women in call centers. E&PW, Feb 12, 684-688.
Ø McMillin, D. C. (2006, Jan 6). Outsourcing identities: Call centers and cultural transformation in India. E&PW, 235-241.
Ø Class exercises I & II
[Session 11] Industrial Relations & Labor Laws
Ø Case studies on Industrial Relations & Labor Laws
[Session 12] Labor Unions & Employee Welfare
Ø Note on unorganized sector workers’ social security bill
Ø Noronha, E. (2006). Trade unions: Today & beyond tomorrow. IJIR, 39(1): 95-107.
Ø Interaction with union leaders
[Session 13] Competency Based Management & Reservations in the Private Sector
Ø Briscoe, J. P., & Hall, D. T. (1999). Grooming & picking leaders using competency frameworks: Do they work? An alternative approach & new guidelines for practice, Organizational Dynamics, Autumn, 37-51.
Ø Omvedt, G. (2001, Sep 10 & 11). Infosys & Microsoft I & II, The Hindu.
Ø The Hindu Business Line (July 29, 2006). India Inc divided over quotas.
Ø Ghildiya, S. (2007, Feb 26). Affirmative action: Infy takes the lead. The Times of India.
[Session 14] HRM in practice
Ø Presentation by students on group projects
Evaluation Schedule:
No. |
Method |
Description |
Credits |
1. |
End term examination |
Objective questions, descriptive questions, & case study Performance Management (taught by Prof. Rimmi Joneja) will have 5% weightage in end term examination |
60% |
2. |
Class Preparedness & Participation |
Surprise quizzes & Questions asked by the faculty during the class. Preparedness for the class will be tested individually through oral questions but scored team-wise (5% weightage) Surprise quizzes will be tested & scored individually (3 quizzes of 5% weightage each) |
20% |
3. |
Group Project / Assignment |
Each group will submit an integrated group project which will cover all the areas of HRM. This project will carry 20% weightage [5% for data collection due before Session 5; 5% for analysis & draft report due before Session 8; & 10% for final presentation to be done during Session 9]. Failing to adhere to the deadlines will result in loss of marks for that section. All submissions must be made in soft copy format by email to zubin.mulla@gmail.com For details of group project refer Appendix 1. |
20% |
Appendix 1: Guidelines for Group Project
Objective:
The group project will involve a comprehensive study of the HR practices of a single organization. The objective of the group project is:
1. To understand the working of an HR department at the ground level
2. To understand the linkages between HR practices and business performance
3. To be able to identify HR issues and propose solutions by application of theory
Methodology:
Select an organization of your choice where you have access to information. The organization must have a turnover greater than Rs. 50 crore and must have more than 50 employees. You are required to meet and interview at least 3 persons in this organization viz.
The objective of interviewing three
people is to identify commonalities and differences in their viewpoints and
thereby understand how the same HR policy / practice may be viewed differently
by different people.
Data to be collected:
a) When was the practice introduced?
b) What process was followed for introduction?
c) What were the challenges faced during introduction and implementation? How were they overcome? What challenges continue to exist?
d) How does the organization fare on this practice viz. its competitors? Has this practice has any impact on the competitive position of the company?
e) What are the future plans for further development of this practice?
Milestones:
Appendix 2: Description of HR Practices
Sr. No. |
HRM Practice |
Description |
Examples |
1 |
Employee involvement |
Extent to which there are structured initiatives for involvement and empowerment of employees. |
Information sharing plans, Suggestion schemes, Surveys of attitude/ organizational health, Total Productive Maintenance Total Quality Management Six Sigma |
2 |
Talent Management |
Extent to which a structured approach is used for identifying and developing talent. |
Job analysis, Recruitment strategy, Competency development Leadership development Succession planning |
3 |
Employee development |
Extent to which systems and processes for learning have been set up. |
Training process, Tie ups with educational institutes, Own training infrastructure |
4 |
Performance management |
Extent to which there are formal systems for measurement, review, and improvement of the performance of individuals. |
Employee motivation programs, Pay for performance, Variable pay Incentives, Competency assessment, ESOPs |
5 |
Efficiency of HR processes |
Extent to which the HR processes have be electronically enabled to improve efficiency & service levels. |
E-enablement of HR processes, Implementation of ERP software, Knowledge management |
6 |
Measuring HR |
Extent to which HR processes and outcomes are being measured. |
Balanced score card, Assessing the value of HR |