From: GALLIS --ENDVM5, Date and time 03/24/93 10:16:31
To: GIBBY --WMAVM7
*** Reply to note of 03/23/93 18:10
Guy E. Allis Jr.
IBM Ideas Manager
T/L 853-5151
Subject: (U) Suggestion No. 923032017
The files are tracked on the system when the decision to open them occurs. In the meantime they reside in my office.
From: GIBBY --WMAVM7, Date and time 03/23/93 18:10:12
To: GALLIS --ENDVM5
Keith S. Gibby, Senior Subcontract Administrator
IBM Federal Systems Company
301/240-6070 TL: 372; PITNEY FAX: 301/240-6229 TL: 372
Subject: (U) Suggestion No. 923032017
Guy, I'm glad to here that my suggestions are in good hands! Can I assume from your 3/22/93, 12:26:59 PROFS note (copy below) that these suggestions are included in your "all of your suggestions are being followed via the system as any other suggestion would be" comment?
======================================
This PROFS note is dated 03/22/93, 12:26:59
To: GIBBY --WMAVM7
*** Reply to note of 03/22/93 09:28
Guy E. Allis Jr.
IBM Ideas Manager
T/L 853-5151
Subject: (U) Suggestion No. 923032017
Keith, All of your suggestions are being followed via the system as any other suggestion would be. I only asked you to stay in contact with me or Patty so that we are directly aware of any issues you are interested in.
======================================
*** Forwarding note from GALLIS --ENDVM5 03/23/93 10:52
To: GIBBY --WMAVM7
*** Reply to note of 03/23/93 10:00
Guy E. Allis Jr. -
IBM Ideas Manager
T/L 853-5151
Subject: (U) Suggestion No. 923032017
Keith, The box of the re-eval requests are here in my office for safe keeping but Patty has been assigned responsibility for any open files. Nothing will happen to them while waiting for the responses.
From: GIBBY --WMAVM7 Date and time 03/23/93 10:00:56
To: GALLIS --ENDVM5
Keith S. Gibby, Senior Subcontract Administrator
IBM Federal Systems Company
301/240-6070 TL: 372; PITNEY FAX: 301/240-6229 TL: 372
Subject: (U) Suggestion No. 923032017
Guy, it appears that with the exception of the six (6) CP suggestions recently sent out for reevaluation (i.e, 923040059, 60, 82, 93, 105, and 109), the other 30+ reevaluation requests all sent via Airborne in the same package still show closed on the system. Don't you have a "Pending" evaluation status you can put these in? I don't want to mess up your measurements, but I really don't want any more of my suggestions to be misplaced again (i.e., George Hansen).
Thank you for your assistance.