Kleb's Board Building: Design(?)
![[board comparison]](compare_sm.gif)
(The following contain the raw data used to generate this plot:
erock265.dat,
owave262.dat, and
kleb264.dat.)
Unless you have really put a lot of thought into the
elements of board design, the best bet for your first few boards is
to copy an existing model that you like.
The first board we made was a very rough copy of a
Fox 8'6" bump and
jump board. (We measured it on a picnic table with a marked boom
tailpiece and used the handles of a pair of channel lock pliers
as a thickness guage.)
This board is turning out to be somewhere between
a Bic Electric Rock and a
Protech Onshore Wave with a lot
less volume in the aft portion due to the blank that we're stuck
with. The above image shows a comparison of the boards.
In summary,
- The overlength is around 264cm (8'8").
- The planform is a straight average of the Onshore Wave and
the Electric Rock.
- The thickness/volume was also supposed to be an average,
but the old 8'11" Clark blank that we had around was too
thin to accomodate.
- The rails are very similar to the Onshore Wave. (Data is
available on the Shaping page.)
- The rocker is similar to the Electric Rock, but with
slightly more nose rocker. (Again, a by-product of the old
blank that we had on hand.)
- Slight vee.
If you're interesting in computer-aided design,
there are at least two pieces of sailboard design software out
there in cyberspace: Shape 3D
and DAT
Designer. Currently, however, they are only for those
afflicted with PCs.
[Next]
[Up]
kleb@oocities.com
Last modified: Fri Jul 31 23:30:50 EDT 1998