CVMTitle2.gif (5161 bytes)

Vaccine Associated Feline Sarcomas
A retrospective study: Presented June 2000

         Vaccine Associated Feline Sarcomas, or VAFS, is a phenomenon that has been on the rise since 1991.  
First reported by Dr. Mattie Hendrick, a veterinary pathologist at the University of Pennsylvania, the increase paralleled the introduction of mandatory rabies vaccination for cats in Pennsylvania in 1987. Dr. Hendrick noted an increased incidence of fibrosarcomas submitted to her surgical biopsy service that were located at usual vaccination sites. These sarcomas shared a similar inflammatory character with aluminum deposits found in local macrophages. The lesions typically displayed a dense fibrous capsule made of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts and had characteristics of chronic inflammation with macrophage and lymphocyte infiltrates. Aluminum is a common ingredient used in vaccine adjuvants, either in the aluminum hydroxide or aluminum phosphate form. Vaccine reactions had previously been documented in dogs and humans. Further, foreign material that causes a prominent fibroplastic response has been associated with neoplastic transformation. An early hypothesis as to the etiopathogenesis of VAFS was that persistent inflammation and immune response coupled with chronic irritation caused by the aluminum adjuvant in the vaccine predisposed cats to derangement of connective tissue repair processes and proliferation of myofibroblasts and fibroblasts.

While fibrosarcomas predominated at the vaccine sites, other sarcomas were seen, including osteosarcomas, malignant fibrous histiocytomas, rhabdomyosarcomas and chondrosarcomas. These sarcomas displayed more aggressive biologic behavior when compared to sarcomas found in non-vaccinated areas. Further study revealed that these sarcomas were occurring in younger cats, were larger in size and had a low metastatic but high local reoccurrence rate. No association with breed, sex or neuter status was noted in these cases.

The recognition of VAFS as a separate clinical entity prompted much attention and study. Kass et al. were the first to study the disease from an epidemiological stand-point. Kass confirmed that indeed there was an increased incidence of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) associated with some vaccines and that these tumors were occurring in the interscapular and femoral regions of vaccinated cats. There was a statistically significant correlation between FeLV and rabies vaccinations and tumor formation within 1 year of treatment. He calculated a 5.5 and a 2 fold increased risk with FeLV and RV, respectively, in the formation of tumors. Kass calculated the association between number of vaccinations given simultaneously in one location with tumor occurrence. He found that there was a 50% increase when one vaccine was administered, 127% increase with 2 vaccines and a 175% increase with 3 or 4 vaccinations given to the same area at the same time.

The VAFS also shared similar histological and immunohistochemical characteristics. These tumors stained strongly positive for Platelet Derived Growth Factor (PDGF) and its receptor (PDGFR), Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and its receptor (EGFR) and Transforming growth factor (TGFß).  This is in contrast to immunohistochemical findings obtained from non-vaccine associated feline sarcomas (NVAFS), which revealed weak positive reactions to these growth factors and receptors. The lymphocytes associated with the post-vaccinal inflammatory response also stained positive for PDGF, but this was not seen in lymphocytes associated with other forms of inflammation or non-vaccine associated sarcomas. Some feel that the local lymphocytes recruit macrophages and cause fibroblast proliferation. There was an overexpression of c-jun (AP-l) in VAFS, which has been implicated in oncogenesis in vivo and in vitro. C-jun is a transcription factor which responds to signal transduction and leads to cell proliferation. The VAFS were typically vimentin positive and muscle-marker positive, consistent with myofibroblastic and fibroblastic phenotypes.

Histologically, the tumors shared several characteristics. They all had the inflammatory process already described with the associated macrophages and lymphocytes. They also displayed increased cellular pleomorphism, mitotic figures, and local invasion as compared to sarcomas not related to vaccines. The VAFS also usually involved the subcutis while the NVAFS involved the dermis. The SQ location in the interscapular and thigh areas and presence of the characteristic inflammatory lesions are pathognomonic for VAFS.

The incidence of new cases of VAFS range from 1-10/10,000 vaccines administered. Tumors can occur from less than one month to more than 10 years after vaccination. In one study, the average latent period before tumor incidence was 26 months. The average age of the affected animals was 8 years old as compared to the average age of 11 years in cats with non-vaccine associated sarcomas. The VAFS are, on average, larger at diagnosis than NVAFS tumors. The mean size of VAFS tumors was 3-5cm as compared to 1-3cm that occur in the NVAFS. The VAFS tumors are also much more aggressive than NVAFS, with a recurrence rate of 62-70% after surgical resection. These tumors have a relatively low metastatic rate of 10-25%.

Treating these tumors is difficult as they are very locally aggressive. The best therapy is an aggressive and radical first surgery. It is recommended that suspicious masses be biopsied first to facilitate surgical treatment planning. Granulomas can be removed with minimal resection. Confirmed VAFS should be removed with well planned and aggressive surgery. If surgery is non-curative, with each subsequent surgery, the time to disease recurrence shortens. A study by Hershey et al focused on the average TFR (time to first recurrence) comparing first operation at a general veterinarian with first surgery performed by a surgical specialist. The difference between TFR was highly significant, with general surgeons producing 66 days to TFR vs. 274 days when surgery was performed by a specialist. The study also compared the TFR when a marginal first excision, a wide first excision and a radical first excision was used as the initial surgical intervention. The results were 66 days vs. 419 days vs. 325 days, respectively. The differences between wide and radical excisions was not statistically significant. Tumors involving the limbs had a longer TFR when compared to those involving the interscapular/trunk area. Overall, the median survival time for the cats in this study was 576 days, even with multiple treatment attempts.

Using radiation therapy (RTH) as a single modality to treat VAFS does not seem to have much promise. In a 1999 paper by Hendrick et al, median tumor-free intervals and survival times were compared when only surgery or RTH were used as treatment tools. The results were 16 months/>24 months vs. 4.5 months/9 months, respectively. However, the combination RTH with surgery is the current recommended therapy. Completeness of the surgical excision is the most critical factor in an animal's disease free interval. A 1998 study from North Carolina State University evaluated 33 cats that received 48 Gy RTH 2-4 weeks before surgery. The overall disease free interval was 398 days and survival time was 600 days. The only factor that significantly influenced treatment success or failure was if the surgical margins were free of tumor cells. In this study, neither the number of surgical attempts nor the tumor volume seemed to influence tumor control or survival.

These tumors are not very chemotherapy sensitive, but drugs have been used as a part of a combined modality treatment with some success. Most commonly, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone and carboplatin were used. One study felt that a combination of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide decreased the tumor size and caused regression of metastatic lesions.

VAFS is a disease process that is still poorly understood. Aluminum adjuvant alone is not the cause, since both aluminum containing and aluminum free adjuvants have been implicated in tumor development. Ellis et al have shown that this disease is not retrovirus-linked. What predisposes 1 to 10 of 10,000 vaccinated cats to develop these terribly aggressive and usually fatal tumors? Is there a genetic predisposition? A tumor suppressor gene inactivation? An apoptotic gene modification? Are there differences in immune status? Are there differences in the reactions to the inflammation? Does the severity of inflammation make a difference? Obviously, the many unanswered questions will require the concentrated efforts of many scientists and clinicians to ultimately resolve and prevent this disease process.

 

Study Goals

The goals of this case series were to examine medical records of cats that have been treated for vaccine associated feline sarcomas at the University of Illinois Veterinary Cancer Care Clinic (U of I VCCC) to compare responses with those seen at other referral institutions. The variables that we considered are: 1) the median survival time for our patients; 2) the median disease-free interval; 3) age at onset; 4) duration of the mass prior to diagnosis; 5) impact of total dose of RTH on disease-free interval (DFI) and survival.

Materials and Methods

Inclusion criteria were cats that had all, or part of their treatment at the U of IVCCC. The biopsy diagnosis of VAFS or presence of a soft tissue sarcoma either interscapularly or in the femoral region was adequate for consideration in our case series. Information was gathered from our records and from telephone contact with the owners or referring veterinarians on a retrospective data collection form developed by Dr. Dennis Macy of Colorado State University. If the cat received definitive therapy at another institution, i.e. RTH by linear accelerator, the case was excluded from this case series. The results were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier statistical methods to determine survival curves. If cats were still alive at the time of analysis or were lost to follow-up for any reason, they were censored for survival data.

Results

Thirty cases fit the inclusion criteria for this case series. All of the animals but two were domestic short-hair cats; the exceptions were a Persian and a Siamese. There were seventeen male neutered cats, twelve female spayed and one female intact cat that ranged from 3 years old to 16 years old at presentation. The median age at presentation was 9.5 years and the mean age was 9.1 years. The median/mean survival time for all of the cats in the series was 53/81weeks (range 1 week to 260 weeks). For the cats below the median age, the median survival time was 88 weeks, the mean, 94 weeks (range 20 weeks to 260 weeks). The cats above the average age, the median survival time was 50 weeks, the mean, 56 weeks (range 1 week to 153 weeks). The median disease-free interval (DFI) for all of the cats in our series was 16 weeks with a mean of 45.5 weeks (range 1 week to 208 weeks).

The duration of the mass until a diagnosis was confirmed ranged from 1 week up to 20 weeks; 4 weeks was the median and 5.6 weeks was the mean time. When a mass was present for <= 4 weeks (n = 21 cats) vs. >4 weeks (n = 8 cats), the differences between the survival times was statistically significant. When the mass was present <=4 weeks, the median survival time for those cats was 105 weeks with a mean of 98.7 weeks (range 6 weeks to 260 weeks). When the mass was present >4 weeks, the median/mean survival time was 32/34.7 weeks (range 1 week to 53 weeks), respectively.

For twelve of the cats, the area of the vaccination was known. Seventeen cases could not be specifically linked to a particular vaccination. In the group of cats for which the vaccination site was known, 3 had received a rabies vaccine at the site, 1 had received a feline leukemia virus vaccine at the site, 5 had received both rabies and FVRCP at the site and 3 received rabies, FeLV and FVRCP vaccines in the same area concurrently.

Twenty-two of the cats had received some treatment attempt before referral to the U of I. Ten of the cats had an excisional biopsy performed, 6 underwent conservative surgeries and 6 had wide excision with at least 1 cm margins. Of the 22 pre-treated cats, 15 had one pre-treatment, 4 cats were treated twice, one cat was treated 3 times and one cat treated 4 times before referral to the U of I for further therapy.

The treatment that the cats received at the U of IVCCC ranged from conservative surgery only to multimodality therapies combining surgery, RTH, chemotherapeutics and immunotherapies in various combinations. Three of the cats had conservative surgery only, two of the cats had wide excision surgeries, and six received radical surgeries. A radical surgery included an amputation, a partial scapulectomy or deep facial resection. When the group of cats that received surgery only was placed into one larger group to compare the DFI and survival times, the median/mean time was 21/44.5 weeks (range 1 week to 130 weeks) for DFI and 50/40.4 weeks (range 1 week to 131 weeks) for survival, respectively. There was one cat that had surgery combined with immunotherapy and one cat that had combined surgery and chemotherapy. Immunotherapy included nonspecific immunomodulation with Acemannan or a interferon.

Four cats received RTH at the U of I following surgery at the rDVM, six more received RTH either pre- or post-surgery at the U of I, four received RTH, surgery and chemotherapy while at the Cancer Care Clinic and two more combined surgery, radiation and immunotherapy during their treatment at this institution. Radiation therapy response was evaluated based on cats that received <54 Gy and >54 Gy here, regardless of treatment with other modalities. Those cats that received less than 54 Gy had an average survival time of 86.9 and median survival of 86 weeks (range 26 weeks to 219 weeks) and the cats receiving more than 54 Gy had a mean survival time of 19.8 weeks (range 19 weeks to 160 weeks). There were only 5 cats total, three of which were censored, in the cats receiving greater than 54 Gy.

Considering the 4 cats that received only RTH, the average DFI was 25 weeks with a median of 10 weeks (range 5 weeks to 60 weeks) and the average survival time was 60.8 weeks with a median of 32.5 weeks (range 19 weeks to 159 weeks). Because of the limited numbers in this group, the total amount of RTH vs. survival or DFI was not calculated.

There were 6 cats in the group that received surgery and RTH, either pre- or post-surgery. For these cats, the average DFI was 83.2 weeks with a median of 73.5 weeks (range 2 weeks to 208 weeks). The mean survival was 33.3 weeks (range 20 weeks to 219 weeks). Of the 6 cats, four were censored for the survival analysis since they were either still alive or lost to follow-up.

 Four more cats received surgery, RTH and chemotherapy in any order for their VAFS. For this group, the average DFI was 26.3 weeks with a median of 11.5 weeks (range 5 weeks to 77 weeks). The average survival was 77.3 weeks with a median of 86 weeks (range 32 weeks to 105 weeks).

Reviewing the data from this case series, the most important variable with respect to the survival time for the patient is the amount of time the mass was present before a definitive diagnosis. Unfortunately, this is also a variable that we, as the referral center, cannot control. It is up to the owner to bring the cat in for evaluation as soon as possible after a mass is detected to prolong the life of the cat. It is further the responsibility of the veterinarian to educate clients and to refer promptly when VAFS is suspected or diagnosed.

 

Short Case Summaries

Case #017-624:  rDVM = 1 local surgery

                                    UITx = 1 wide excision surgery

                                                *rDVM does not have records for this animal and the owner could not be reached

Case #006-772: UITx = RTH 48 Gy

                                               Adriamycin 20 mg/m2 q 3 weeks  X2

                                               Carboplatin 200 mg/m2 q 3 weeks  X2

                                                2 wide margin surgeries

Case #015-856:  UITx = RTH 50 Gy

                                            Carboplatin 150 mg/m2 q 4 weeks X3

                                            Surgery to remove the scar

Case #020-608:  UITx =The cat began RTH here, but half-way through, the owner opted to discontinue

                                          therapy due to metastasis

Case #017-943:  UITx = RTH 60 Gy

                                            Partial scapulectomy

Case #012-684:  UITx = 1 wide margin surgery

                                            RTH 50 Gy

Case #009-024:  rDVM = 1 wide margin surgery

                                               1 radical surgery

                               UITx = 1 wide excision surgery

                                            RTH 44Gy

                                            Carboplatin 150-200 mg/m 2 q 3 weeks X3

Case #001-013:  UITx = 1 wide excision surgery

                                           RTH 48 Gy

                                           Immunotherapy = Acemannan X4 treatments

                                           *Specific date of euthanasia unknown, not in rDVM files and owner can not be reached

 

Case #198-382:  rDVM = 4 wide excision surgeries

                               UITx = RTH 48 Gy

 

Case #011-381: rDVM = 2 local surgeries

                                UITx = RTH 50 Gy

Case #008-486:  UITx = 1 local surgery

                                             RTH 40 Gy
     
                                             Carboplatin 150 mg/m 2 X1

                                           *Tumor regrew in the face of Carbo.

Case #004-282:  UITx = 1 local surgery         

                                            1 wide excision surgery                          

                                            1 radical surgery

                                            RTH 48 Gy

                                            Immunotherapy = alpha interferon 3 x 10 6 units/m 2  IM

                                           *The original date of diagnosis could not be found

Case #196-113: UITx = 1 local surgery

                                            2 radical surgeries

                                             Adriamycin 25 mg/m 2  X2 after second radical surgery

Case #190-174:  UITx = 1 local surgery, the owners went to Purdue and were lost to follow up

Case #186-523:  UITx = 1 local surgery, the animal was lost to follow up when the owners moved

Case #003-399: UITx = 1 local surgery

                                            RTH 48 Gy

Case #199-357:  UITx = 2 local surgeries

                                           Immunotherapy = Acemannan l mg/kg X6

Case #016-008:  UITx = 1 local surgery

                               RTH 60 Gy

                               1 radical surgery

  *There was a complication after the local surgery and a seroma formed. During the delayed healing,   the mass  regrew, so the cat went to RTH to decrease the mass size and a radical surgery was performed post-RTH

Case #017-757:  UITx = 1 wide excision surgery

                                           RTH 6O Gy

Case #017-262:  UITx = 1 local surgery

                                            RTH 60 Gy

                                            *Tumor reoccurred and the owners went to Kentucky. The animal was lost to
                                             follow up

Case #016-532:  rDVM = 2 local surgeries

                                              RTH 60 Gy

Case #009-276:  UITx = 1 surgery, type unknown

                                            Carboplatin, amount and number of treatments unknown                        

                             rDVM = 1 surgery, type unknown

                                             Holistic medicine therapy-regression of small masses

                                             Immunotherapy = Acemannan  X4

 

References

Bergman PJ: Etiology of feline vaccine-associated sarcomas: history and update ; JAVMA 213(10): 1424-1425, 1998.

Couto CG, Macy DW: Review of treatment options for vaccine-associated feline sarcoma. JA VMA 213(10 ): 1426-1427.

Coyne MJ, Postorino Reeves NC, Rosen DK: Estimated prevalence of injection-site sarcomas in cats during 1992. JAVMA 210(2):249-251,1997.

Cronin K, Page RL, et al: Radiation therapy and surgery for fibrosarcoma in 33 cats. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 39(1):51-56, 1998.

Doddy FD, Glickman LT, Glickman NW, Janovitz EB: Feline Fibrosarcomas at Vaccination Sites and Non-vaccination Sites. J. Comp. Path. 114:165-174, 1996.

Esplin DG, McGill LD, Meininger AC, Wilson SR: Postvaccination sarcomas in cats. JAVMA 202(8): 1245-1247, 1993.

Hendrick M J: Feline Vaccine-Associated Sarcomas. Cancer Investigation 17(4):273-277, 1999.

Hendrick M J: Historical review and current knowledge of risk factors involved in feline vaccine-associated sarcomas. JAVMA 213(10): 1425-1426, 1998.

Hendrick MJ: Feline vaccine-associated sarcomas: current studies on pathogenesis. JAVMA 213(10): 1425-1426.

Hendrick MJ, Brooks JJ: Postvaccinal Sarcomas in the Cat: Histology and Immunohistochemistry. Vet Pathol 31:126-129, 1994.

Hendrick MJ, Kass PH, McGill LD, Tizard IR: Postvaccinal Sarcomas in Cats. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 85(5):341-343, 1994.

Hendrick MJ, Shofer FS, Goldschmidt MH, et al: Comparison of fibrosarcomas that developed at vaccination sites and at nonvaccination sites in cats: 239 cases (1991-1992). .JAVMA 205(10): 1425-1429, 1994.

Hershey AE, Sorenmo KU, Hendrick MJ, Shofer FS, Vail DM: Prognosis for presumed feline vaccine-associated sarcoma after excision: 61 cases (1986-1996). JAVMA 216(1):58-61, 2000.

Macy DW, Bergman PJ: Vaccine-Associated Sarcomas in Cats. Feline Practice 23(4):24-27, 1995.

Macy DW, Hendrick MJ: The Potential Role of Inflammation in the Development of Postvaccinal Sarcomas in Cats. Vet Clinics of North America 26(1): 103-109, 1996.

To return to Sylvia's Cyber Kitty Condo just scratch her banner below...