Framing the Disabling Analysis |
|
---|---|
This page intends to frame how ENST209 approaches the Disabling Analysis |
This analysis was built into the legacy course, Social Ecology, and distinguishes World Sustainability from conventional treatments that resemble environmental management. |
The legacy of disabling in World Sustainability as Social Ecology |
The third part of the course reconstructs some of the
major planetary and American transformations that have created these
contemporary crises and have led to the imperial ideologies of the existing
system of domination. We examine the dynamics through which this domination
occurs, explaining how people worldwide are disabled and disempowered as a
result. |
Note where the disabling analysis goes: economic globalization |
In the interest of world sustainability we also examine
the pathologies of empire and corporate domination, asking: What are the
origins of domination? How does domination block people from achieving
psychological and moral-ethical consciousness, even forcing regression toward
progressively less mature forms of behavior? How does domination distort
reality via the production of disinformation and propaganda? |
Why? Aporia vs problem |
Aristotle, in his seminal Metaphysics, posed difficult problems as aporiae, or impasses. This also implies the imposition of a barrier, not simply failing to discover a path. |
Consider change resistance towards sustainability |
Read the Wikipedia entry, then turn to Thwink.org: The Phenomenon of Change Resistance, couched in The Limits to Growth and resistance to paradigm shifts. Note the implications of Dueling Loops. |
A prelude: The path towards World Sustainability is right in front of us. |
This concluding statement from Economic Strategies for Sustainability reveals where we are heading in this course toward a path for World Sustainability. |
The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines aporia as:
an irresolvable internal contradiction or logical disjunction in a text, argument, or theory. 2 Rhetoric the expression of doubt. ORIGIN C16: via late L. from Gk, from aporos impassable.
The issue, then, is this: Whether sustainability depends on finding a path through an impasse or whether an obstacle must be overcome? Is World Sustainability merely a matter of changing our world view or paradigm or must active opposition be identified and an active strategy be devised? Or both?
Thwink.org, dedicated to sustainability, refers to what it calls Dueling Loops, with these key findings: