Well, a few nights ago (end of June, 1997), someone at Simultronics goofed. For a short period, whenever anyone DREW their sword they would get a strange data string; upon closer examination, this proved to be the secret stats of the weapons! This data is normally supposed to be secret, but it accidentially got into the grubby hands of the players ;)
Unfortunately, since there's no context, we're not certain exactly how to refrence the statistics. I'm going to present them, what I think they represent, and how they compare to the data we get when we apraise an item in-game.
First, the "key" to the DRAW "appraisals". Most of this is pretty simple deduction.
Weapon Name | BAL | PW | PUN | IMP | SLI | WT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gleaming Longsword | 30 | 60 | 10 | 25 | 35 | 33 |
Jade-hilted Hanger | 40 | 50 | 7 | 14 | 30 | 31 |
Elven Longsword | 45 | 50 | 10 | 25 | 27 | 28 |
Razor-edged cutlass | 45 | 45 | 5 | 5 | 30 | 35 |
Darkened Steel Stiletto | 80 | 10 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
Straight-bladed Scimitar | 40 | 50 | 7 | 14 | 30 | 45 |
Scimitar | 40 | 50 | 7 | 14 | 30 | 31 |
Misericorde | 90 | 10 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 12 |
Heavy-bladed Scimitar | 30 | 60 | 7 | 14 | 30 | 41 |
Weighted Scimitar ("old") | 40 | 50 | 5 | 15 | 40 | 41 |
Broadsword | 40 | 50 | 10 | 20 | 35 | 35 |
Vicious Rapier | 70 | 20 | 30 | 4 | 15 | 25 |
Rapier | 80 | 10 | 25 | 4 | 10 | 18 |
Brown Skinning Knife | 50 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
Silver Carving Knife... | 50 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 9 |
Gold-hilted Greatsword... | 20 | 80 | 12 | 55 | 75 | 100 |
Battered Black Broad... | 40 | 50 | 10 | 20 | 35 | 35 |
This chart proves that individual damage categories can have a range of possible values, and the total range for all categories (except WT) seems to be 0-100. Compare a broadsword and a scimitar, for example. Both appraise as "moderate" slicing weapons, but the broadsword has a SLI score of 35 compared to the scimitar's SLI of 30.
The following is an attempt to group the numbers into the categores
we know. This is hardly going to be precise (escecially at the higher damages,
which I had less samples for), but it is as accurate as possible. Where
I had to make a guess (from lack of an example in that category) I added
"?" after the number. Thanks to Tzaar@aol.com for help on arranging the
numbers.
Word appraisal | Possible number score |
"Not suited" | 0? |
"Dismally" | 1-19 |
"Poorly" | 20-39 |
"Fairly" | 40-59 |
"Reasonably" | 60-79 |
"Well" | 80-99 |
"Excellently" | 100(+)? |
Word appraisal | Possible number score |
"None" | 0 |
"Poor" | 1-9 |
"Low" | 10-19 |
"Fair" | 20-29 |
"Moderate" | 30-39 |
"Heavy" | 40-54 |
"Great" | 55-69 |
"Severe" | 70-84 |
"Devastating" | 85?-95? |
"Bone-crushing" | 96?-100? |
"God-like" | 100(+)? |
--->Sarazak Daisuke