Welcome to Brooks Mountain Range
The sense of place that draws me back and haunts my dreams,
isn't really here in the camp,
The water is so clear that I can see sizable greyling
darting away from my mule's hoofs, as they become blurs
past, a few short feet beneath me.
Hours later, in the fading scarlet light of the aurora
borealis, I sit on a high ridge above the lake. The
mountains sweep up on all sides, cradling the ever
darkening canyons in its hands. Except for an occasional
cool wind falling from the north, the silence is
absolute.
Between soft and short melodies played on my end-blown
maple flute, I whisper to the mountains, "I've come home".
They don't even glance away. Home, I say to the mountains.
There is no reply, just absolute silence.
As I sit alone, starring at the star studded sky far above,
waiting for the welcome that will never be offered, knowing
that I haven't been missed, I remain just another harvester
of natures treasures.
Henry David Thoreau
On many occassions predator math is easy for the normal
average adult but it seems to be quite difficult for game
department biologists. Here is a prime example:
Conversation between Game Biologist "A" and Environmental
Biologist "B".
Game Biologist "A" verbally indicates to Environmental
Biologist "B" that the average adult wolf kills one deer
per week.
Biologist "B" says, "Yeah, right around there."
Game Biologist "A" replies that the average adult wolf
kills about fifty (50) deer per year.
Biologist "B" acknowledges and agrees.
Then Game Biologist "A" asks how many wolves are in the
borough/provience?
Our Environmental Biologist "B" replies that there are
several thousand within the borough.
So our Game Biologist "A" states that mathmatically
speaking (lets make the arithmetic easy and call it 2000
wolves). So at 50 deer per wolf, 2000 wolves eat 100,000
deer per year.
The Environmental Biologist "B" replies, "Oh no, it can't
be that many".
These days, the politically correct line of thinking is
that predators don't affect the game populations much.
This is indeed a product of obsolete teaching and
scientific wildland studies within the realm of the Canis
lupus. Current research is showing that deer poplations
have drastically dropped across the northern sector of the
United Sates, vast areas of Canada and some sections of
Alaska this past decade.
Our noted biologists are quick to point out several factors
that can contibuted to the success and/or failure of a
specific species within a certain geographical area.
The factors are as follows but not limited to:
The official line appears to be that wolves eat deer and
elk in proportionate numbers while leaving plenty for human
harvesters. It has been widely published, given good
habitat, our natural deer population will take care of any
predator loss. But more recent studies suggest
otherwise.
Since 1972 when then President of the United States Richard
M. Nixon signed legislation which banned poisioning of
predators on public lands and with the construction and
impletation of the flawed 1973 Endangered Species Act, the
wolf, the mountain lion and even the coyote populations
have risen to levels of concern for other directly related
food chain species.
Numerous present day biologists and environmental activists
inconjunction with a majority of the American public
believe that the "benevolent" carnivores only kill as much
as they can eat (the old, the weak, the sick, and
genetically defective), leaving ample healthy young to
reproduce. This is their "Balance of Nature", but in
reality we are in the midst of an "Imbalance of Nature."
With no intension of passing judgement, I have personally
viewed many "Circles of kill" in the northern circumference
of the Alaskan Brooks Mountain Range of which the resident
wolf pack never returned to the partially eaten kill
although the carcaes provided hearty meals for a
splattering of fur and feathered species.
L. David Mech is without question the most famous and noted
wolf research biologist on the continent states within his
book, The Wolf: the ecology and behavior of an enangered
species:
It is my opinion that within the North American continent
game departments are having a hard time balancing wolves
and human wants. Wolves are a true part of our hertitage as
is the bald eagle but the wolf is also a huge political
headache within the ever changing world of today.
It has been lectured to me on several occassions within the
bush and out that more and more biologists suspect that we
need at least some natuaral predators in conjuction with
human harvesters, to prevent some species from eating their
own habitat down to the dirt.
One example might possibly be that of the whitetail deer.
Hunters have long claimed that we need to hunt deer and elk
to relpace the vanished predators of wilderness America.
Often, we haven't shown that we can do that. Even with
extremely liberal hunting seasons, whitetail deer are
becoming a plague of sorts over much of the eastern half of
the United States.
The whitetail deer are in the midst of browsing the ground
cover so severely that birds like the ruffed grouse and the
bobwhite quail have become rare over much of their former
range. Elk are becoming a problem, despite record hunting
sucess. It is being documented that Minnesota's
reintroduction of the wolf are in the midst of eating
themselves out of much of the northern half of the state.
The northern half of the state was supposedly to support
the wolves in balance with whitetail deer, but the most
recent count of wolves within this sector is in the
neighborhood of 3,000 wolves. For "Official Recovery" the
wolves in Minnesota needeed to reach a population of 1200
to 1500, not 3000.
The numerous wolf recovery programs throught the United
States, Canada & Mexico is an honorable one and essential
to the reestablishment of the wolf. The agreements to
reestablish wolves with proven breeding pairs appears to be
working quite well from all published reports and that
extra wolves can be controlled...but will the American
public in the lower 48 states allow any wolves to be
harvested?
SOME PREDATOR? Any human interference in the wise ways of
nature will never be acceptable to the fringe of the new
"environmentalist," but Homo sapiens live here too, along
with the wolves, the mountain lion, the coyote, the deer
and the elk.
The hardest part lies in finding ways for all of us to live
together.
It is my belief that here in the north sub-arctic and
arctic regions of Alaska, escape speed coupled with
endurance against wolf pursuit, rather than making a
fighting stand, is the primary defense of the barren ground
caribou against wolf predation.
It is beyond my belief based on my own personal research
coupled with my field observations over a span of seven
years in the Arctic bush that wolves primarily take the
sick and injured, the aged and immature, and those animals
that have severe infestations of parasites.
Wolves have the strength, stamina, speed and killing
equipment to bring down the fit and strong, as they often
do on a rather regular basis. However, attacking a fit and
powerful ungulate, such as a prime moose of either sex
presents a considerably greater hazard factor that wolves
under most conditions, are unwilling to accept.
I am informed by noted in-field biologists that the general
belief that the wolf preys only on the "unfit" holds more
truth on the rolling barren grounds of the far north than
it does within the lower Canadian Rockies.
Just because one animal kills and eats another doesn't
necessarily make it a villian. The Wolf, the Caribou, the
Wolverine, the Fox, the Moose and even the Ravens and
Magpies do the best they can with the equipment that nature
has given them, to survive in a sometimes bitterly harsh
wilderness environment. The wilderness plays no
favorites.
On a couple of occassions and strictly by chance, I have
observed singular juvenile two-year old pups dead in the
immediate area of wolf kills. I suspect that the juvenile
pups were killed by the sweep of antlers and deadly hoofs.
These unfortunate juveniles become only carrion in the
frozen snow within mother natures unforgiving
wilderness.
I further suspect that wolf hunting accidents result in the
major cause of mortality during the first two years of a
wolf's life.
With the decline of the Russian ruble to less than a third
of its value a year or so ago it resulted in the sale of
wild furs at a loss.
U.S. fur dealers held with over-stocked goods were forced
to sell at a loss. Ironically Canadian fur trappers have
quotas and are required to harvest a minimum of fur bearing
animals.
Wild Fur Prices as of January, 1999 were as follows:
Beaver: $20 to a high of $30 dollars tops.
Prices given are current as of 01/01/99. These prices
reflect what a fur trapper might receive from a government
licensed fur buyer for properly spread and dried pelts.
Fur prices fluctuate throughout the season and vary by
geographical areas and pelt quality. This listing is
provided for the purposes of education and should not be
consulted.
This hasn't anything to do with the great Amagug but it is
just to good to pass up:
A beaver pond that dates back more than 3.5 million years
has been uncovered on Ellesmere Island, some 1,900
kilometers north of Canada's tree line. The pond is locked
in permafrost and so well preserved by the cold and
acidfree soil conditions that wood bearing the cuts of
beaver teeth from 3.5 million years ago is still fresh
enough to burn.
Paleo-biologist Richard Harrigton, of the Canadian Museum
of Nature calculated the size of the beaver from the tooth
marks and estimates that the ancient Castor Canadensis grew
to the size of a modern day bear before becoming extinct
about 10,000 years ago.
The Wyoming Fish & Game Department is currently polling the
states registered trappers to gather information on the
distribution and abundance of wildlife.
"They probably know more about some of the species like the
wolf, the lynx and the black-footed ferrets than anyone
else in the state." A release quoted Jay Lawson, chief game
warden. "It would be a shame for this knowledge to
disappear."
"These oldtimers lived closer to the wildlife than almost
any other group and the nature of their work forced them to
pay close attention to population trends. "Many of the old
trappers kept journals and most have some indepth records
showing annual fur sales".
It is hoped that the states trappers will take the time to
complete the survey, and makes any written comments they
believe will help wildlife.
State Fish & Game surveys went to 400 of the states
estimated 1,500 trappers. Information gathered from the
returned surveys will be used to promote trapping in
Wyoming and also to improve wildlife management. None of
the survey comments or specific trapper information will be
attributed to a particular trapper.
"WHERE IS MY WOLF RUFF"?
When it's too cold to snow, too cold for the wind to blow,
too cold it seems, for the sun to rise.SOMEWHERE OUT THERE
It's somewhere out there.TRACKS of MAN
Graeme Stevenson Print
PREDATOR MATH
1.) Loss of Habitat
2.) Competition from domestic cattle & elk
3.) Hard winters & dry summers in exteme
Mech wrote, "During two decades of wolf research, I have
learned that, far from always being balaced, ratios of
wolves and prey can fluctuate wildly. Wolves may actually
starve after killing off almost all of he moose and deer in
an area. This explains why wolf control programs may
sometimes ensure greater and more stable numbers of both
wolves and the animals they hunt".THOUGHTS ON WOLF PREDATION
Current Fur Markets
Otter: $50.00 (Far-East demand high)
Muskrat: $1.50 to $2.00
Nutria: $7.50 to a high of $10.00
Raccoon: $15.00 (Minn, Wisconsin & Dakotas)
Raccoon: $10.00 (Eastern U.S.)
Lynx: $75.00 to $100.00 (Rocky Mts)
Lynx: $50 to $60 (Southwest)
Lynx: $25 to $40.00 (Northern)
Canadian Lynx: $50 to a high of $75.00
Grey Fox: $5.00
to a high of $7.00
Red Fox: $10.00
Kit/Swift Fox: $25 to a high of $30 (Montana & Alberta)
Coyote: $20.00 tops..$15.00 (northeastern)
Fisher: $25
to $30.00 tops
Marten: $15 to $20.00 (AK & Canada)
Badger: $25.00 tops
Stripped Skunk: $4.00 to $6.00
tops
Opossum: $1.00 to $2.00 tops
Weasel: $2.00 to $3.00
Red Squirrel: $0.75 tops
Arctic Wolf: $300 to $400 tops
Grey Wolf: $200.00 tops
Timber Wolf: $100.00 tops
Wolverine: $200 to $250 topsJURASSIC BEAVER
TRAPPER SAVVY SOUGHT
"To Enjoy More Click Pages Below"
Sign
My Supply List
© 1997 lonewolf-grzle@wolf-web.com