10-20-04 Commentary: Halloween Confinement of Sex Offenders Around the Nation!
Can Parole or Probation (or Supervised Release) Conditions or Policy be Abused?
Is Sex Offender Registry information being misused?
Do Sex Offender Registry Warnings apply to Public Servants and the Media?
While it may sound good to keep sex offenders away from children on Halloween, and some local jurisdictions did that, for a night or the weekend, we need to review the legality of what was done, by whom, and under what authority. Was this an "abuse of a normally legal process?"
Effectively, these Halloween programs which REMOVED SELECTED registered offenders from the community (by house arrest or confining them to an approved place) violated previously entered parole, probation or supervised release orders, even in Michigan where judges approved the programs.
Broadly speaking, some programs amounted to confinement beyond what was authorized by the offenders' sentences and the law, curtailment of personal liberties, and denial of rights of the offender's family members, as well as, placement in a false light before the community, and we believe, further punishment!
Various places claimed that -what was done was legal-, citing an ambiguity of related law or policy, but ambiguities are never intended to be law and some states have provisions prohibiting ambiguity reading. The spirit of the law should control, not a letter ambiguity which it seems permitted these programs. Wide discretion is granted Parole and Probation Officers, but discretionary acts can be abused and can be appealed.
A few offenders wanted to complain but "feared retaliation," yet a few were kind enough to see that we were made aware of what was going on, secondhand. The ACLU also gave a look-see in a few places and claimed it was barely within the law. We must note, the ACLU only looked at the concept, not the procedure by which it was accomplished. Today we will go deeper!
No jurisdiction took into account, that the restrictions imposed on the registered offender, in some cases, denied the registered offender's family members their rights in society. Do they have a claim for the courts?
Back to the Basics: What is parole, probation or supervised release?
A period of time where the offender completes his/her sentence, in society, under the watchful eye of a State or Federal Agent. The limits of parole or probation are established by the law at the time, or by the courts at sentencing. Our ex post facto clauses prohibit changing sentences after they have been handed down by the courts unless there is new conduct by a parolee or probationer.
When a person successfully completes parole, probation or supervised release (later abbreviated PPSR) then they are free to do whatever they wish, within the laws applicable to them at that time. Their rights, limited only by existing laws, are the same as the rights of the rest of the folks in society.
Those are the basic principles surrounding parole and probation, and where it ends.
DIVISIONS of OFFENDERS: Distinguishing between "Offenders"
The most unusual comments we found were by:
Russ Marlan (Michigan Department of Corrections' spokesperson):... "... There are sex offenders who haven't committed a crime yet, so parental supervision is probably the key most important thing,' said Russ Marlan
Tulsa Oklahoma Sheriff's Captain Bill Bass: "Even though you have those published, there are still some that we may not be aware of, some that have not been charged yet, and haven't been convicted yet,' Bass says."
We feel they were distinguishing between, -past offenders-, -new offenders-, and -non offenders-. As we read the news articles we found the distinctions between the different offenders has been ignored!
Past Offenders: These are prior offenders who are now lawfully in society, registered (known as registrants in registries) or lawfully exempted from that requirement, who are in recovery. Many of these folks have been in society for years abiding by the law.
New Offenders (Sex Offenders): These are offenders who are still offending, have not yet been caught, or have not yet recognized their need for therapy. These are not law abiding persons. Today's statistics show that approx 95% of new sex offenses are committed by new offenders, a person who has never been convicted of a sex offense before!
Non Offenders: These are persons who by some construction of law have been drawn into the realm of "sex offenders," often these are juveniles, and sometimes caused by technicalities in laws. See below for a more complete understanding of their circumstances.
Click for an in-depth discussion of "Terms, Phrases and Definitions." |
|
|
TREATMENT of OFFENDERS: by the Media and Law Enforcement
Sex Offender Registry Public Warnings:
One issue has been foremost in most legislative minds, that is, that persons registered (registrants) are not to be harassed or threatened, and that applies to their families as well. Unfortunately, it has become common place to accuse this class of future hypothetical horrific crimes and to publically make libelous and slanderous statements about them, with impunity. These comments and actions are against the public conscience and registry warnings, "Public Servants" are not exempted from Registry Warnings.
Halloween news articles, citing accusations and other false comments, by law enforcement, parole and probation officers, and others from the criminal justice sector, point out that -tougher laws- are needed, to quell what is being said publically! Public servants, in their official capacity, are crossing the line and fueling fears instead of maintaining the community peace. A standard of -official capacity professionalism- on issues of past offenders, is needed!
Not only do the "Registry Public Warnings" fail in their intent (some state legislatures haven't even required them), most police do little -if anything- to enforce them, and some actually take part in violating them! News reports show registered folks are to follow the law, but many public servants and others ignore the registry "Public Warnings" intended to protect the registrants and their families.
The Media:
The Halloween media articles were not without class harassing comments either, and clearly showed they love sensationalism, but at what expense? Journalists ignore that they are adding to public hysteria about past offenders. Past offenders are the focus of this article, and journalists failed to make the distinction between, past offenders and new offenders. Did the media follow in the footsteps of the criminal justice persons they spoke too?
|
|
|
News articles showed that the various Halloween Programs fell into one of the following categories: **Confinement (No): Public Advisory issued about past offenders:
**Confinement (Maybe): Past offenders told addresses would be verified:
Confinement (Yes): Under the Guise of Parole, Probation or Supervised Release:
** none of these folks were under PPSR. |
First, the Earliest Report of Confinement on Halloween is:
The oldest report of Halloween confinements appears to be in California, in November of 2000, "Sweet Tooth" Operation Boo keeps pedophiles in check on Halloween, by Amy Yannelle.
Apparently 104 child molester (or later termed rapists) parolees have been placed under "House Arrest" from 5 P.M. until 5 A.M. the morning after Halloween. Porch lights must be off and they cannot answer the door unless the person announces himself, and it must only be someone from law enforcement. There can be no Halloween decoration either inside or outside the home, no costumes and they cannot possess or hand out candy. Law enforcement may or may not return after their initial home check.
The article also tells us, "Operation Boo" is a joint effort of the California Department of Corrections and the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department. Operation Boo is the brainchild of two parole officers, Greg Cundiff and Bettenhausen and began several years earlier [1993], and is now being copied by a handful of law enforcement agencies throughout the state, including those in Shasta and Yuba counties.
|
Confinement (No): Public Advisory issued about past offenders:
(None of these folks were under parole or probation) |
Illinois:
DeKalb Advisory was issued asking the community to check the state's sex offender registry. Police offered the public safety tips, and hours of Trick or Treating were posted..
Illinois:
Rockford Advisory was issued asking the community to check the state's sex offender registry. However, here Sgt. Chuck O'Brien "accuses all sex offenders of having a problem, not only on Halloween, but 365 days a year. [11]
Oklahoma:
Tulsa Advisory "Parents think about the dangers of trick or treating. But, one thing they likely don't think about is pedophiles making contact with their kids and giving them candy. We were astonished when we discovered there are more than 450 registered sex offenders in the city of Tulsa alone. That's only counting the ones who have been convicted and registered with law enforcement. So, we wanted to know how we can keep our children from visiting a sexual predator on a night when they're taking candy from strangers. "
"When we were children, we knew all our neighbors. And, it seemed like Halloween was more treats than tricks. These days, we as parents have to be so much more careful about what our kids do on Halloween and how they do it. "Have the kids group up together as long as they have two or three adults with them," says Tulsa Sheriff's Captain Bill Bass. "It doesn't have to be that parent, if you work. You can have a close friend or family member go with them." Captain Bass says long gone are the days when children could go trick or treating alone or in strange neighborhoods. "Stay close to them, pay attention where you're going. Don't go to houses you don't know."
But even if you stick close to home, do you really know all your neighbors? You can quickly find out before trick or treating even kicks off. Most police and sheriff's departments, even our state, offer online sex offender registries. That's right, you can find out where convicted sex offenders live. It's easy, put in your zip code and the answers are there. Even though you arm yourself with this information, don't let your guard down when it comes to your child knocking on a door Halloween night or anytime. "Even though you have those published, there are still some that we may not be aware of, some that have not been charged yet, and haven't been convicted yet," Bass says. [14]
|
Confinement (Maybe): Past offenders told addresses would be verified:
(None of these folks were under parole or probation) |
Here the media posted articles citing law enforcement's intent to check addresses of all registered past offenders. Hence, the question of whether they had to be home or not was raised. Sometimes Law enforcement failed to answer that question in the media reports published before Halloween. Illinois:
Cook County spent the day doing ANNUAL Residence checks (offenders had to be home), further, not all of those checked had child victims. Yellow cards were left for those not home, requiring them to again check in with police.
Florida:
Tampa police say they plan to check up on registered sex offenders over the Halloween weekend, to make sure they live at the registered address. Interesting here is the use of crimes not committed on Halloween (8-28 & 10-5) to justify a Halloween blitz on sex offenders, ignoring that all other crime types which also occur affecting children. [12]
|
Confinement (Yes): Under the Guise of Parole, Probation or Supervised Release: |
California:
See "Operation Boo" above.
Florida: Jacksonville "The Florida Department of Correction parole officers say they will spot check homes of the supervised sex offenders Halloween night. Administrator Sharon Lord says they have rules as well. "They're not allowed to give trick or treat candies at the door, instructed to have their lights out and no Halloween decorations."
Florida:
St. Augustine "About 35 sexual predators are under supervision throughout the county. Parole and probation officers instructed those under supervision to turn off porch lights and not hang any decorations."
Florida:
Sulphur Springs Police officers also checked on 20 designated sexual predators and sex offenders living in the area "to make sure these people are reminded they cannot participate in Halloween and have that contact with children," Tampa police Lt. Chuck Stanbro said. "We want to make sure sexual predators are not putting candy out, decorating for Halloween, trying to entice kids to their houses," Police spokesperson, Laura McElroy, said.
Idaho:
Boise's "Operation Lights Out" "This year sheriff's deputies and probation officers have teamed up to make sure your child doesn't trick or treat at a truly spooky house this Halloween. They will patrol neighborhoods ensuring high risk sex offenders turn off their lights. " ""It allows kids to have a very safe night. It keeps sexual predators from having access to kids so it's a win win all the way around," says Captain Freeman." "Captain Ron Freeman says most registered sex offenders aren't allowed to have contact with children." [This comment is not true] See also Article 2. Note that it covers both Saturday and Sunday.
New York:
Operation Safe Sweets! ... Nassau County "Probation Officers will work overtime this Halloween to keep sexual predators from targeting kids, Nassau County Executive Tom Suozzi said yesterday. ... As part of this first-time Halloween crackdown, the county's probation department sent letters to registered offenders, reminding them to stay away from unsupervised kids, said Kevin Lowry, the county's criminal justice coordinator. 'We warned them not to decorate their houses to entice children,' said Lowry. 'And they can't open their doors to trick-or-treaters. That is considered unsupervised contact,' added Timothy Driscoll, deputy county exec for public safety. During prime trick-or-treating hours - 2 p.m. to 7 p.m. - probation officers will track known sex offenders through surveillance and random visits, said John Fowle, supervisor of probation's sex offense and domestic violence unit."
"Sexual predators may try to use Halloween as an opportunity to meet kids, officials said. 'They may not engage in criminal activity that day, but they may try to talk to children, find out where they live, what their names are,' Suozzi said. [13] ... " Michigan:
There were different programs going on in different counties. Several news articles misreported what was happening and where, so we have selected only those with correct information, and broken it down by county:
Washtenaw County: "Selected Probationers Only" In Ann Arbor, the Washtenaw County Circuit judges have ordered a group of sex offenders on probation to report to officials on Halloween to assure they are have no contact with children who will be trick-or-treating. The sex offenders on probation were sent notices ordering them to report to the county’s community corrections building by 3:30 p.m. Oct. 31. The measure, the brainchild of a Washtenaw County probation officer, will affect about 35 to 40 sex offenders convicted of either second-degree or fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct, said Leo Lalonde, a Michigan Department of Corrections spokesman. Second- and fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct are less serious offenses that do not include sexual penetration. Those convicted of first- and third-degree criminal sexual conduct are sentenced to prison and then released on parole. The Washtenaw County measure does not apply to sex offenders on parole because they are not supervised by the probation department.
Important comment: Leo Lalonde / Russ Marlan, for the Department of Corrections:"The agents went through their cases and separated those who were deemed predatory from others, and those predatory people will be supervised," said Corrections spokesman Russ Marlan. "The judges were supportive of the idea." Washtenaw County sex offenders who were ordered to appear on Halloween and don't show up will be charged with a probation violation, according to the judges' order. The sex offenders were advised they can bring a sack lunch, headphones and reading material. They will be released when staff members decide to let them go for the evening, Lalonde said. Federal law definition: 14071. Jacob Wetterling Act, (a)(3)(e)..Predatory Definition: "(E) The term 'predatory' means an act directed at a stranger, or a person with whom a relationship has been established or promoted for the primary purpose of victimization."
Wayne County: "All Probationers & Parolees" Law enforcement officials in Wayne County are getting ready to fan out to the homes of 316 sex offenders to make sure they are not in violation of their parole or probation, and to remind them that they are not to have any contact with youngsters, especially on Halloween night. “We will be doing home checks to make sure they are living up to the conditions, (and) we think if we go out and to let them know we are watching, it is a deterrent,” said Wayne County Sheriff Warren Evans..
Wayne County Sheriff Warren Evans commented: “This is the population that has a history of the kinds of offenses that we are concerned about, particularly on Halloween.” “If we don’t go out, they will be out on Halloween to be predators. We are not trying to be draconian. We are just making sure they are not in violation (of their parole or probation).”[15]
Ingham County: "All Probationers & Parolees" Ingham County parole officers have instructed paroled and probated child sex offenders not to give out candy on Halloween. Further, they are instructed to turn out their front porch lights, act as if they're not home and leave trick-or-treaters alone. Parole officers will be making checks on these individuals to make sure they are meeting those requirements.
Oakland, Macomb and Montcalm: Russ Marlan, spokesperson for the Michigan Department of Corrections, said, "Offenders in Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Washtenaw, Montcalm and Ionia counties and in the Lansing area will be monitored in numerous ways, said Marlan, and those who have been told to have no contact with children have been reminded not to join in Halloween activities. The program is a preventive measure and not in response to an increase in child molestations on Halloween, he said. "
"In Oakland and Macomb counties, teams of probation officers and police on Halloween will monitor between 35 and 45 probationers in each county with no-contact orders, making unannounced visits and doing surveillance of their homes, Marlan said. The teams will concentrate on highly populated neighborhoods. Parolees in Macomb, Oakland and Washtenaw counties will not be monitored this year, he said."
In another news report, Russ Marlan said,
"says offenders are being watched, especially on Halloween. Offenders that are not to have contact with children have been warned by a letter or in person not to hand out candy or have any part in Halloween activities. Teams of parole and probation officers will be watching to make sure the offenders are doing just that.
'The offender may not even know the parole/probation officer is there watching. He may not even stop by, just sit outside the home and make sure the person is not participating in Halloween activities, and then move on to the next house,' said Marlan. This Halloween, even without a law requiring it, the Department of Corrections is running a pilot program in Washtenaw County requiring sex offenders there report to their parole officers at several central locations. But experts say, parents are still the best defense."
Texas: "Project Lights Out" is a program that began in Texas in 2002. As noted in this October-2003 news article "Terry Easterling, the head of adult probation in Potter County, got the idea from a television reporter three days before Halloween last year (2002) and implemented the program quickly." "Potter County began Project Lights Out last year (2002). Lubbock and Tom Green counties are using it for the first time Friday (2003).
2003: "Authorities in three West Texas counties have strict orders for sex offenders this Halloween: Go home, turn out your lights, close your blinds, and don't answer your door. Officials in Lubbock, Potter and Tom Green counties are requiring convicted sex offenders on probation whose victims were children to be home by 6 p.m. Friday. Officers will check on the 100 or so men and women throughout the evening."
2004 October: "The Texas Attorney General and the Texas Department of Criminal Justicewarn some paroled predators may try to use this weekend to lure in children. [16]Throughout this Halloween weekend, 20 parole officers in the Austin area will be making surprise visits to the homes of convicted child molesters. Trick or treaters, don't be fooled. Paroled child predators are out there, but so is someone else. "Across the state we'll have 80 to 100 parole officers who will be working this weekend checking on sex offenders whose victims were children," Mike Viesca with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice said. It's a violation for those parolees to decorate their homes for Halloween, pass out candy or even have parties around children.
2004 October: "Bexar County District Attorney Susan Reed is ordering all registered sex offenders in the county to sit Halloween out, 1200 WOAI news reported today.
"Reed says she has worked through the county's probation and parole officers to require that convicted sex offenders sign a statement agreeing that they will not participate in any Halloween activities at their homes. They won't decorate, they won't turn on their porch lights," Reed told 1200 WOAI's Bud Little. "They will not give out candy, they will not be on the streets after dark."
Reed says Halloween should be fun, and should not be 'curb service' for child sex predators. "In other words, we're trying to keep kids from going to sex offender houses, knocking on the door, and having a pervert meet them there." Reed says the program which she is implementing this year is believed to be unique in the country, and she plans to continue it on future Halloweens. [17]
NOTE: In Bexar County targeted offenders were forced to sign a statement, and confined to their home; under house arrest!
2004 October: San Angelo "About 60 sex offenders from across the Concho Valley signed in Halloween night for a first-of-its-kind program that got perpetrators out of the neighborhoods and away from trick-or-treaters. Project BATS, a Halloween-themed acronym short for Better Assurance Through Supervision, mandated that sex offenders with child restrictions check in Sunday night at a location in San Angelo during the hours children would be rustling candy door to door. Seven counties - Tom Green, Coke, Runnels, Concho, Schleicher, Irion and Sterling - participated in the program."
"Rachel Cyphers, the sex offender unit supervisor with the Concho Valley Community Supervision and Corrections Department, said the idea sprang from last year's program, which required that offenders remain at home with their porch lights off. Three were arrested last year for failing to comply, she said. ''This is the only thing we're aware of like this that has child restrictions,'' Cyphers said.
In Tom Green County, four officers, including Cyphers, monitor more than 50 sex offenders with child restrictions. Sunday's program - which featured Power Point lectures on the law, registering as a sex offender and the effect of sex abuse - was designed to ''create empathy for the victims,'' said John Wilmoth, director of the sex offender unit."
Virginia:
There were two different programs going on in Virginia: "Operation Trick-nor-Treat," and "Operation Porch Lights Out." These discretionary programs ("The department [VDOC] leaves it up to 43 regional probation and parole offices whether to participate in the programs," quoting Traylor) were applicable only to some sex offenders on parole or probation.
This year (2004) about 80 offenders in Prince William County attended, out of 12,820 listed on the Virginia registry. "Last year, probation department divisions in Prince William, Petersburg and Norfolk were the only state divisions that held meetings on Halloween night, and more than 280 offenders attended, Traylor said. He was unsure how many would attend this year and declined to say where the Prince William meeting will be held."
It appears these, 3-year old programs, flow from the Virginia Department of Corrections, according to Larry Traylor VDOC spokesperson. Various Parole or Probation officers, and local police seem to claim title to implementing one or the other within their respective jurisdiction. The provisions of these programs seem to be:
Operation Trick-nor-Treat:
"Traylor said the meetings that will be held Sunday night in Prince William, Virginia Beach and in Petersburg south of Richmond will consist of presentations, educational classes and question-and-answer sessions. "It's just another opportunity for treatment and supervision, for them to talk about their case or their particular situation."
Operation Porch Lights Out:
"It requires offenders to keep their porch lights off during prime Halloween hours to keep children from knocking on their doors." Larry Traylor said. Another news report added "... sex offenders can't be at any house where treats are being given out."
NOTE: Effectively, either offenders were confined to a VDOC approved location, or they were placed under house arrest. The terms of each program varied by the probation and parole office administering it.
KeyComments by Authorities:
"We've not had a sex related crime during the Halloween trick or treating time since probation and parole implemented this. It's a deterrent and keeps them off the street. ... " said Sergeant Pat Kelleher of the Petersburg Police Department.
"I cannot recall that any of our offenders have offended while they've been on parole on Halloween," ... said. "Our goal is to make sure they don't." said Randi Evans of the state's probation and parole department.
"... the programs are no different than any other restraint placed on offenders who are on parole or probation, regardless of the crime." Larry Traylor, a spokesman for the department, said.
"It's an unsavory abuse of power, a roundup and temporary incarceration of people based on their past without any suspicion of wrongdoing in the present," said Kent Willis, executive director of the ACLU of Virginia. "This smacks of gimmickry more than sound criminal justice policy. Children are more closely supervised on Halloween than any other night of the year."
Asked if Virginia sex offenders are known to cause trouble on Halloween night, Traylor said: "I have no evidence of that." He could not specify what prompted the program but said it has been used mainly in the Norfolk area.
Evans instituted the program after hearing about similar programs in other jurisdictions even though she is unaware of any Halloween offenses by area parolees. "I cannot recall that any of our offenders have offended while they've been on parole on Halloween," she said. "Our goal is to make sure they don't."
|
*** ANALYSIS *** Political / Public Safety Reasons?
Legal / Illegal?
Was Anyone Harmed by these Programs?
Did anyone question or challenge these Halloween programs? |
Political -or- Public Safety Reasons?
Megans' laws were enacted years ago to let the public know where registered sex offenders (RSOs) lived. If parents have used Megans' laws as intended, then they have already told their children which houses to stay away from 365 days a year! Halloween being one of the 365 days.
The media reported that, largely parents go "Trick -or- Treating" with their children, to see that they are safe. During those hours with so many people out and about, it would be hard to conceive that if anyone had a problem, that no one would help them immediately.
Further, no public servant pointed out any crime committed by any RSO during Trick & Treat hours on Halloween, in fact, the very Public Servants that initiated these programs reported they have no record of anyone on PPSR committing a crime on Halloween.
So why is it that a tiny number [See note 20 below] of the hundreds' of thousands of "RSOs" nationwide, need to be under "house arrest" or "confined in an approved place" during Halloween "Trick -or- Treat" hours?
Michigan tried to justify its actions (for 35-40 offenders in Washtenau County, but no justification in other counties) by implying that, those chosen were "predatory" in nature. We wonder, was Michigan's definition of "predatory" consistent with the Megan's law Federal Guidelines definition? [50] The news report does not say.
Everywhere else, Public Servants, fantasizing, created a mental image of a horrific crime, that may be committed by one of the targeted RSOs if they were not confined or restricted. A mere mental image found only in their minds, and alleging public safety! Reality is, Public Safety was a pretext, a ruse, a subterfuge for illegally confining RSOs. A political ruse!
As to persons already on PPSR, the Parole Boards and Courts had already determined, on an individual basis, that these people had earned the right to PPSR in the community. Prior Court or Parole Board orders existed permitting them to be in the community, and stated the terms and conditions of release. None of the RSOs had violated any of the original terms or conditions whatsoever.
So, why is it that local Public Servants felt compelled to act as they did, when their state legislature had already provided the public with Megans' laws which already notifies the public of the addresses of RSOs' homes? Why?
Legal -or- Illegal?
Here are the legal issues we found under the 3-types of programs followed across the nation.
Confinement (No) Public Advisory Issued to Check the Registry:
Obviously there is no issue where local police merely advised the community to check Megans' law registry before going Trick -or- Treating. Illinois (DeKalb & Rockford Counties) and Tulsa Oklahoma. As it turns out these are the only places that followed the spirit and intent of Megans' laws.
Confinement (Maybe) under auspices of Annual Address Verification:
However, in Illinois, Cook County, and Tampa Florida, the local police via the media notified all registered sex offenders (RSOs) not just those on PPSR, that they would be verifying addresses during Halloween (day or weekend). RSos that read these articles, felt they had to stay home for the address verification process, and most all did. Apparently notices were left for those -not home- to report to local police.
In the news articles the police justified their actions by saying "We are required to do an Annual Check of Addresses." Again, why justify their actions, they were looking for a plausible reason where none really existed. Performing this specific pre-announced address check was a ruse for getting offenders to stay home of their own accord. A trick!
Also, as to those who were not home, should notes to report to police be left tacked to a front door, where anyone could just destroy them getting the person in trouble? The law to verify addresses, requires actions of the police not actions of the offender (checking back with police may have associated costs), therefore the police should be required to return as many times as necessary to comply with the law at public expense.
Confinement under auspices of Parole/Probation/Supervised Release (PPSR):
The main issues are: "Confinement" either at an approved place or under house arrest (forced to stay home with lights out); -AND-, "Denial of Rights of Family Members" to participate in Halloween festivities, if, they had a RSO on PPSR living with them.
There is no way to get around the fact that the offenders were "confined" at an approved place -or- at home. All officials actually agreed, that to "confine" without probable cause is illegal (a Fourth Amendment issue), where do they say this? The very fact that they try to justify their actions by calling it a "meeting" or "probation/parole condition" which are permitted, is proof that, if they did not have that justification, their alleged programs would be illegal.
APPROVED PLACE - Meetings: They may have told RSOs (in the pre-notification letter) that it was a "meeting," their problem is they previously told the media their real purpose (the media published it up to 10 days before Halloween) was to get RSOs off the streets or to stay in their homes with lights out (i.e. confine them). If it quacks like a duck, it is a duck, calling it a meeting was a subterfuge!
While under PPSR "offender meetings" are permitted (in some states), their purpose is to be "informational or therapeutic" for the offender, not used (or misused) to further public safety in the manner explained to the media: Confinement! The alleged meetings were held outside of business hours and no therapists were present.
In Michigan "The sex offenders were advised they can bring a sack lunch, headphones and reading material. They will be released when staff members decide to let them go for the evening, Lalonde said"
In Texas "In Tom Green County, four officers, including Cyphers, monitor more than 50 sex offenders with child restrictions. Sunday's program - which featured Power Point lectures on the law, registering as a sex offender and the effect of sex abuse - was designed to ''create empathy for the victims,'' said John Wilmoth, director of the sex offender unit." RSOs already know how to register, their registered! Empathy and the effects of sex abuse are topics which have already been covered in therapy.
In Virginia "Traylor said the meetings that will be held Sunday night in Prince William, Virginia Beach and in Petersburg south of Richmond will consist of presentations, educational classes and question-and-answer sessions. "It's just another opportunity for treatment and supervision, for them to talk about their case or their particular situation." However, no therapists were present, and talk about their case to who, these folks are not supposed to associate with known felons? HOME - Lights Out: House arrest with additional conditions, lights out, don't answer door, no candy in home, no decorations, etc. Discussed further below under "Denial of Family Member Rights."
A Condition of Parole/Probation/Supervised Release (PPSR): In some jurisdictions specific parole or probation "offices" justified their actions by saying, we have the right to change supervision conditions as we see fit, which to some extent is true. The problem here is, it was done as a "mass change." Jurisdiction to make changes is granted to individual agents to make changes to individual offenders based upon violations.
All states have rules/laws to follow which allow changes to PPSR conditions. Forms must be completed, filed with the Parole Board or the Sentencing Court to get approvals, and the individual RSOs notified and given opportunity to accept or contest them. None of this was followed.
In Michigan their administrative rules R791.9901-9930 cover Probation, and R791.7730-7750 covers Parole. Probation conditions are given to the probationer at the beginning of his/her sentence. When "a modification of these conditions is necessary, the agent may petition the sentencing court ..." R791.9920(3). Likewise, at the beginning of parole a parolee is given his/her parole conditions. When "subsequent conditions are required they must be approved by the chairperson of the parole board within 60 days of the change." R791.7730(4). Again, none of these procedural due process requirements were followed.
Michigan's Ex Parte Change to Probation Conditions (In mass too): "Washtenaw County's Circuit Court judges have ordered a group of nearly 40 sex offenders on probation to report to the county's Community Corrections building on Halloween, a measure aimed at keeping them off the streets while children are trick-or-treating. The new program was the brainchild of a probation officer [Jan Nelson] in Washtenaw County and was signed by the four Circuit Court judges earlier this month, officials said. A letter given to sex offenders on probation orders them to report to the building near the Washtenaw County Sheriff's Department by 3:30 p.m. on Oct. 31."
Michigan Probation - Modification - Ex Parte - Confinement: An order of probation may be amended ex parte, and the defendant need not be given notice or an opportunity to be heard before the amendment, unless the amendment orders confinement of the defendant. People v Britt, COA# 143355, Released: December 7, 1993: 202 Mich App 714; 509 NW2d 914 (1993), lv den 445 Mich 929; 521 NW2d 10 (1994)
Need any more be said? What was done was illegal, at least in Michigan!
Ordering RSOs to an "approved place" or "to their home" with restrictions, and not permitted to leave, is well within the definition of "arrest or restraint" to warrant due process concerns:
"The apparent premise upon which respondent proceeded in revoking petitioner's probation was that petitioner had failed promptly to report an "arrest." But the issuance of the traffic citation was not an "arrest" under either Missouri or Arkansas law. By statute, Missouri defines an "arrest" as "an actual restraint of the person of the defendant, or . . . submission to the custody of the officer, under authority of a warrant or otherwise." Mo. Rev. Stat. 544.180 (1953). Similarly, Arkansas defines an "arrest" as the "placing of the person of the defendant in restraint, or . . . submitting to the custody of the person making the arrest." [412 U.S. 430, 432] Ark. Stat. Ann. 43-412 (1947). The record before us discloses absolutely no evidence that petitioner was subjected to an "actual restraint" or taken into "custody" at the scene of the accident or elsewhere." DOUGLAS v. BUDER, 412 U.S. 430 (1973)
Effectively, probation and parole, for the targeted offenders, was revoked although for a few hours, still revoked, they were confined. The following cases are instructive here:
GAGNON v. SCARPELLI, 411 U.S. 778 (1973): Due process mandates preliminary and final revocation hearings in the case of a probationer under the same conditions as are specified in Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972) , in the case of a parolee. Pp. 781-782.) Held:
Though parole/probation revocation does not call for the full panoply of rights due a defendant in a criminal proceeding, a parolee's [probationer's] liberty involves significant values within the protection of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and termination of that liberty requires an informal hearing to give assurance that the finding of a parole violation is based on verified facts to support the revocation. Pp. 480-482.
Due process requires a reasonably prompt informal inquiry conducted by an impartial hearing officer near the place of the alleged parole violation or arrest to determine if there is reasonable ground to believe that the arrested parolee has violated a parole condition. The parolee should receive prior notice of the inquiry, its purpose, and the alleged violations. The parolee may present relevant information and (absent security considerations) question adverse informants. The hearing officer shall digest the evidence on probable cause and state the reasons for holding the parolee for the parole board's decision. Pp. 484-487.
All the way up to the U.S. Supreme court cases say, there must be a violation by the parolee or probationer before confinement! These Halloween Confinement Programs violated law after law, in state after state. The ACLU merely gave this a cursory review. See: Revocation of Probation and Supervised Release by Frances H. Pratt, October 2004.
Was anyone harmed by these Halloween programs?
Denial of Rights of Family Members:
Sex offenders who are placed on PPSR have a very difficult time in finding housing. When they do find housing, they are often evicted for being on the state's sex offender registry. Homeless sex offenders abound in the nation.
When past offenders are released, largely they reside with spouses, family members or friends. Many of these folks have families of their own, and some with children. Further, many of those on PPSR are juveniles themselves, and many juvenile sex offenders also have siblings.
There was a point raised by someone about kids in Foster Homes where a juvenile offender also lives, were they too required to report to an approved place, or confined to a dark home? I'll bet the other foster kids will have a great memory of Halloween, something like the Michael Meyers story. I guess it doesn't take much thought to realize this goes beyond actual family members of ADULT RSOs.
These programs are going to leave quite a memory on the family members, especially children, and they will get to the point that they hate holidays. Yes, I said "Holidays," you know when RSOs on PPSR and their family members are out shopping for gifts, and interacting with the general public. Interacting is not a sex offense, nor should interacting be inferred to be the stage for further actions! Will that sentence leave Public Servants to fantasize even more?
Were these Halloween programs challenged or questioned by anyone?
Yes, in Michigan, the 2004 Detroit Free Press Editorial: Pedophile Watch: Halloween monitoring OK if rights aren't usurped
"Still, it's important to remember this is a proactive endeavor. No link has been made between Halloween and increased attacks on children. Officers in Washtenaw, Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Montcalm and Ionia counties and the Lansing area must be cautious not to employ the kinds of tactics that could easily escalate their efforts into widespread hysteria. The rights of these probationers -- and their attempts to turn their lives around -- must be protected as well. Questions and restrictions are legitimate, harassment is not. The goal here is to send a message of concern for children, not reindict those who already have been punished. Programs like this have a role to play as long as law enforcement doesn't overstep or overhype." In Florida, in 2000, the St. Petersburg Times reports: Plan to corral sex offenders is canceled: Department of Corrections planned a mandatory counseling session for Halloween night to keep them off the streets.
NEW PORT RICHEY -- They thought it was a good idea: Get pedophiles off the streets on Halloween night. And it had been successfully tried before, two years ago in Hillsborough County. This year, the state Department of Corrections wanted to try the same thing here.
Their plan: Order every convicted child sex offender on probation in west Pasco to a mandatory counseling session in the County Commission auditorium on Halloween during the hours when most children would be out trick-or-treating. "It's just to make sure the pedophiles are not participating in Halloween," said the DOC's Joseph Papy.
But on Wednesday -- as a defense attorney prepared to challenge the plan and the Times began asking questions about it -- the DOC abruptly canceled the whole thing. The program had been in the works since August.
The first explanation of the cancellation was that the private company responsible for providing the counseling at the program had pulled out because of the inquiries from the Times. Later, Papy clarified the reason: The counseling company, Psychological Management Group of Tampa, said they were canceling over concerns that they would be providing services to some probationers not assigned to them. ... The company did not return a message from a Times reporter seeking comment.
Bob Attridge, a local defense attorney, filed a motion challenging the program after several clients complained to him about it. The therapy session, Attridge argued, was merely a disguise for a mass illegal detention, and he questioned whether the probationers would receive any meaningful counseling. Attridge said the corrections department doesn't have the power to order hundreds of people to a mandatory function in a government building when such a program isn't specifically included in the terms of their probation. "A judge is the only person who can detain people like this," Attridge said.
Earlier this month, the DOC notified convicted pedophiles by letter and telephone that they had to attend the Halloween program. Papy did not know how many people were contacted. Howard Simon, the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, also criticized the Halloween night program, saying the sudden cancellation of the meeting demonstrates the "haphazard, ill-thought-out, irresponsible public policies dealing with sex offenders in this state." .... .... In closing,
These Halloween programs of isolationism did more harm that they prevented, and the programs violate Megans' laws because they further the illegal harassment of RSOs proscribed by Megans' laws. Further, how many of the RSOs' homes, darkened by these programs, were subjected to the "Trick" of Halloween's "Trick -or- Treat?"
The programs violated both sentencing orders and parole board orders. The mere media mention of these programs, harasses RSOs and their families, and fuels public hysteria even more, ultimately violating Megans' laws. After reading what Public Servants had to say about RSOs and those on PPSR there is no doubt in my mind that, a new Standard of Official Capacity Professionalism is needed! The violations of Megans' laws by non-RSOs needs to be curtailed.
Parents are responsible for parenting, Government is responsible for governing. I would urge legislatures nationwide to have vision, to look closely at what is being affected, and the effects of such programs. They are teaching "fear" and "isolationism" to all children in society. Children and society grows by interacting not by isolating.
eAdvocate
|
Footnotes:
11:
The Sgt fails to identify the "problem," but his public media comment implies it is a negative problem; in fact, he is harassing -ALL- RSOs publicaly. The Illinois Sex Offender Registry web site prohibits such harassing comments. See public warnings as they may be a crime! Further, if he is referring to recidivism, then he is wrong, because the Illinois recidivism rate is 3.5% as to another sex offense. We must remember that Illinois was one of the 15 states which made up the most recent Department of Justice study on Sex Offender recidivism which showed 3.5%.
12: It appears that either, the media or the Tampa Police, feel that all "600 registered offenders" are sexual predators because of the acts of the two mentioned in the article. The Florida Sex Offender Registry web site prohibits such harassing comments. See public warnings as they may be a crime!
13: Absurd comments! Such comments come because there are no facts of sex offenders committing crimes on Halloween. This has been affirmed by police agencies across the nation. These comments are not furthering the safety of the community, but instead, fueling the hysteria.
The New York Sex Offender Registry web site prohibits such harassing comments. See public warnings as they may be a crime!
14: Throughout the nation this was the best advice given to parents, and it followed the intent of the legislature with respect to the real purpose of Megans' laws. This is the only place that complied with all laws today.
15: One needs to look closely at the Sheriff's comment because it must mean that they go out to every RSOs' home every single day. We wonder if any person in Wayne county has been registered more than one day, if one is to believe the Sheriff, recidivism must occur whenever the Sheriff does not go out to the homes. Whose comments are absurd?
16: "... some paroled predators may try to use this weekend to lure in children." If all paroled offenders with child victims are confined in their homes, how can they try to lure in children, when children will not be visiting those homes. Such comments is designed to fuel the public hysteria concerning former offenders. Notice, no reports of any crimes ever committed by any parolee on Halloween.
17: "Reed says Halloween should be fun, and should not be 'curb service' for child sex predators. "In other words, we're trying to keep kids from going to sex offender houses, knocking on the door, and having a pervert meet them there." It is clear that Reed has no faith in the state's sex offender registry which already notifies parents of which homes they should not visit. These comments also add to the hysteria in the community.
20: Less than 500 of those on parole or probation nationwide reported to be 4,848,575 in December of 2003.
50: Federal law definitions: 14071. Jacob Wetterling Act, (a)(3)
(B) The term “sexually violent offense” means any criminal offense in a range of offenses specified by State law which is comparable to or which exceeds the range of offenses encompassed by aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse (as described in sections 2241 and 2242 of title 18 or as described in the State criminal code) or an offense that has as its elements engaging in physical contact with another person with intent to commit aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse (as described in such sections of title 18 or as described in the State criminal code).
(C) The term “sexually violent predator” means a person who has been convicted of a sexually violent offense and who suffers from a mental abnormality or personality disorder that makes the person likely to engage in predatory sexually violent offenses.
(D) The term “mental abnormality” means a congenital or acquired condition of a person that affects the emotional or volitional capacity of the person in a manner that predisposes that person to the commission of criminal sexual acts to a degree that makes the person a menace to the health and safety of other persons.
(E) The term “predatory” means an act directed at a stranger, or a person with whom a relationship has been established or promoted for the primary purpose of victimization.
51:
HALLOWEENITIS: Halloween-itis is a coined term used to describe a mental abnormality often occurring in public servants and politically aspiring persons who can pass this psychological disorder onto others, generally occurring around holidays and elections.
The disease is characterized by abnormal delusional visions of perceived horrific events creating an aura of public fear; these doomsayers get their rewards by painting a picture of "the sky is falling" and alienating the public.
Significant harm is caused by people so afflicted because the objects of their obsession are persons which society already looks down on (including their family members), and the collateral harm caused society is truly a tragedy.
Halloweenitis is a subset of offenderitis, and both are incurable social diseases because these people refuse to face reality, or facts and statistics which prove them wrong, they discount these facts and statistics because in their minds they only see horrific events in everyday life circumstances.
Those afflicted with Halloweenitis, fear based, focus on denial of civil rights of other persons under the pretext of public safety.
OFFENDERITIS: Offender-itis is a coined term used to describe a mental abnormality often occurring in public servants, politically aspiring persons, and others who can pass this psychological disorder on.
People so afflicted perceive that, others who may or may not have a previous criminal conviction are all highly dangerous to the general public. The disease is characterized by abnormal delusional visions of perceived horrific events creating an aura of public fear; these doomsayers get their rewards by painting a picture of "the sky is falling" and alienating the public.
Significant harm is caused by people so afflicted because the objects of their obsession are persons which society already looks down on (including their family members), and the collateral harm caused society is truly a tragedy.
Offenderitis is an incurable social disease because these people refuse to face reality, or facts and statistics which prove them wrong, they discount these facts and statistics because in their minds they only see horrific events in everyday life circumstances.
Those afflicted with Offenderitis, which is fear based, focus on denial of civil rights of other persons under the pretext of public safety.
52: Our Commentary previously posted on this story.
Commentary 10-29-2004:
Michigan's Confinement of Selected Probationers on Halloween
According to the Ann Arbor News, 10-20-2004, "Court: Sex Offenders must sit out Halloween" article a "new program [which] was the brainchild of a Washtenaw County probation officer" will require selected sex offenders to be confined on Halloween, from 3:30 P.M. until a probation officer permits them to leave.
Then the Detroit Free Press, 10-28-2004, "Pedophiles to be overseen on Halloween," has more information on the alleged incident that formed the basis for the confinement of this specific group of sex offenders.
The Free Press article reveals many disturbing points.
Apparently the probation officer (today the Washtenaw County probation office supervisor [Jan Nelson]) reports, in 1992 when she was a probation officer in Paw Paw, took her daughter Trick and Treating and an incident occurred which haunts her today, 12 years later.
While standing at the end of a driveway, her daughter went up to a home with another girl, that girl was refused candy by the man in the home, and her daughter ran down the driveway crying, the man allegedly tried to lure her daughter into the home to show her a picture.
The mom, a probation officer, said "I realized in an instant that she could have been pulled into that house and harmed." However, there is no report of the Mom doing anything about the incident for 12 years so far!
What is not said, is even more disturbing and begs these questions?
Was a police report filed, was the man charged, was the man even questioned, did the man have any criminal record, was the man a convicted sex offender, was the man married, did he have his own children in the home, was a party going on with other children present, and a dozen more questions?
As a parole officer she is fully aware of the law, including attempting crimes, which her statement seems to prove, she knew where the home was, its address and more than likely his name. Further, there is no mention by either news reporter of any attempt to contact the daughter (now 19) today, just to see if she the daughter even recalls the incident, and to see if she had any lasting effects of the incident, or if there was any counseling sought.
In 2003 another legislator proposed a bill to make it law to do what the judges have done today, the legislature did not pass the bill. I wonder if this probation officer testified at the hearing on the 2003-proposed bill, and whether she will do the same now, in 2004, given that Rep. Fran Amos has proposed a similar bill?
If in 1992 she recognized "in an instant" that her daughter was in harm's way, why has she done nothing for 12 years?
This article raises even more questions. A careful read of the article shows that probation officer visited homes of many offenders, not only sex offenders, and they found some probation violations.
It appears the facts of the non-sex offender probation violations is also being used to get the sex offenders confined on Halloween. I would hope those facts were not presented to the judges as support for confining the sex offenders. The articles are not clear on that point.
One thing is very clear, these offenders are not being confined for anything they have done, but unfortunately they are being confined based upon perceived visions of horrific events, which even the local police say, there is not a single recorded event of a child sexual assault or attempted assault on Halloween.
If this much effort were placed into "Why Sex Offenses Occur" rather than on past offenders it would be far more helpful. But as usual, society opts for ineffective "It Sounds Good."
eAdvocate |
|
|
Commentary 10-30-2004:
Are "Rights" Violated -IF- Michigan's Administrative Rules are Violated?
Requiring probationers to report to a building or telling them they must stay home places them in an -in custody- situation, done so ex parte. They are not permitted to leave, not an issue of minutes but hours, may even affect their employment, they are in custody as if they violated their probation.
These are significant infringements on that probationers' liberty granted by the sentencing court.
When a person is sentenced to probation Michigan's Administrative code (Part 9 Probation) requires that, a list of probation statutory conditions (including all other terms & conditions) be given to that probationer. Effectively a list of do's and don'ts.
That person's probation officer (PO) is permitted to make inquiries of a host of people to determine if the probationer is complying with his/her probation conditions.
However, the administrative code places a restriction on the PO when a modification to probation conditions are concerned. The sentencing court must be petitioned for a modification of that probationer's conditions and a reason given. The court's new list of probation conditions must then be given to the probationer. The PO must then explain the new conditions to the probationer.
It does appear that, the reason provided each individual sentencing court judge (one of these offenders may offend), is overhype since there seems to be no police who can recall an incident on Halloween involving a child, much less with these probationers.
Administrative code carries the full force of the law, supported by U.S. Supreme court, especially as to in custody situations on parole and probation, but is it wise to send these recovering law abiding probationers the message that, the law doesn't matter where they are concerned? Does due process, even procedural, play a part?
At least the children will be safe (from these specific probationers), as they have been for many years now when this new probation condition did not exist!
I wonder, do any of those being confined, have children of their own, and if so, how will this effect their Halloween, today and in the future?
eAdvocate |
|
|
10-30-2004 Michigan Pedophile Watch: Halloween monitoring OK if rights aren't usurped
.There's something creepy about a new pilot program to step up scrutiny of child sex offenders this Halloween. But not as creepy as the crimes they have committed. Seven counties are scheduled to keep closer tabs on offenders this weekend through unannounced home visits or mandatory appointments with corrections authorities. ... ...
It's not unlike the programs that require drunk drivers to take Breathalyzer tests on holiday weekends. Still, it's important to remember this is a proactive endeavor. No link has been made between Halloween and increased attacks on children.
Officers in Washtenaw, Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Montcalm and Ionia counties and the Lansing area must be cautious not to employ the kinds of tactics that could easily escalate their efforts into widespread hysteria. The rights of these probationers -- and their attempts to turn their lives around -- must be protected as well. Questions and restrictions are legitimate, harassment is not.
The goal here is to send a message of concern for children, not reindict those who already have been punished. Programs like this have a role to play as long as law enforcement doesn't overstep or overhype.
..more.. Detroit Free Press Editorial
Commentary:
Illegal Confinement Under the Pretext of a Condition of Probation -or Illegal Modification of Sentence?
Ordering probationers to a place were they cannot leave until permitted by Probation Officers does not sound like a "condition of probation" it sounds more like illegal confinement!
The very fact that the Legislature did not enact a law last year which would do this, is proof that it may not be legal. While it may "Sound Good" that is not a sufficient basis for such acts.
It is very surprising that judges would order this given no one could ever recount any such acts ever taking place. Their basis would be? What happened to our system of "evidence and probable cause," has that been suspended for only sex offenders?
I wonder if everyone on probation regardless of crime type, or those guilty of domestic (or child abuse) on probation, were also ordered to be so confined?
Should parents be concerned that, drug offenders on probation may do something to the candy they give out to children? Previously convicted drunk drivers could also be a problem to children crossing streets. Are these possibilities to far fetched?
Most likely the sex offender probationers were originally sentenced by these judges, therefore is this, a legal or illegal, modification of that sentence? Generally a hearing is required to modify a sentence, or is this too, to be abrogated for just sex offenders?
Ex Parte hearings in mass, judged guilty without evidence, sentenced to confinement, and one cannot be present at the hearing or have legal representation? Sounds like a Bill of Attainder or at least a Bill of Pains & Penalties.
It seems under the pretext of public safety, for PREVIOUSLY CONVICTED sex offenders on PROBATION (Washtenaw County only), there is no legal system? The legal standard being "if it sounds good!"
eAdvocate |
|
|
10-20-2004 Michigan Court: Sex offenders must sit out Halloween: Goal is to keep streets safe during trick-or-treating
.Washtenaw County's Circuit Court judges have ordered a group of nearly 40 sex offenders on probation to report to the county's Community Corrections building on Halloween, a measure aimed at keeping them off the streets while children are trick-or-treating.
The new program was the brainchild of a probation officer in Washtenaw County and was signed by the four Circuit Court judges earlier this month, officials said. A letter given to sex offenders on probation orders them to report to the building near the Washtenaw County Sheriff's Department by 3:30 p.m. on Oct. 31.
Washtenaw County sex offenders who were ordered to appear on Halloween and don't show up will be charged with a probation violation, according to the judges' order. At least one other Michigan county is taking steps to monitor sex offenders on Halloween, and a bill proposed in the state House of Representatives would force parolees convicted of certain sex offenses to report to their parole officer each Halloween.
However, no local police officials could recall a Halloween where a child fell victim to a sexual assault or attempted assault. "The agents went through their cases and separated those who were deemed predatory from others, and those predatory people will be supervised," said Russ Marlan, a spokesman for the Department of Corrections. "The judges were supportive of the idea." ...
Rep. Fran Amos, R-Waterford, got the idea for the bill (last year, which died in committee) while on the campaign trail on Halloween two years ago, said Bonnie Bochniak, her legislative aide. "We were going around to doors talking to people and saw children walking around as it was getting dark, and some were being watched and some weren't," Bochniak said. "We saw people handing out candy and thought, 'What if someone grabbed an innocent child?' We wondered what happened to sex offenders on parole that night, and when we researched it, we didn't find anything. I think this would give a sense of security for parents."
..more.. AMALIE NASH News Staff Reporter
10-27-2004 Texas Halloween Cancelled for Bexar County Sex Offenders (On Parole or Probation)
.Bexar County District Attorney Susan Reed is ordering all registered sex offenders in the county to sit Halloween out, 1200 WOAI news reported today. Reed says she has worked through the county's probation and parole officers to require that convicted sex offenders sign a statement agreeing that they will not participate in any Halloween activities at their homes.
"They won't decorate, they won't turn on their porch lights," Reed told 1200 WOAI's Bud Little. "They will not give out candy, they will not be on the streets after dark." Reed says Halloween should be fun, and should not be 'curb service' for child sex predators. "In other words, we're trying to keep kids from going to sex offender houses, knocking on the door, and having a pervert meet them there."
Reed says the program which she is implementing this year is believed to be unique in the country, and she plans to continue it on future Halloweens.
..more.. Jim Forsyth
|
|