Simple Blood Test for
Radiation Damage to Cells
A simple blood test has been devised called the Transferrin Receptor Red Cell Assay, or E- Tr assay, measures the amount of radiation that has been absorbed by the body. Using a specific biomarker, it reveals the extent of stem-cell mutations due to exposure to X-ray, or to anything potentially carcinogenic that mimics X-ray damage, such as many chemicals used in the microchip industry.
EMR Application as a Therapeutic Tool
Certain frequencies of EMR, applied as a therapeutic procedure, under controlled and specific circumstances, with patient consent, have been successful. (6) in treating depression, migraine. Parkinson’s tremours and epilepsy also have responded favourably to such treatment. While EMR has been found to reduce side effects of withdrawal from drug addiction, exposure may be a factor in accelerating alcohol and drug addiction. Empirical evidence shows that avoidance of EMR can eliminate migraine episodes, depression and petit mal episodes.
What of Side Effects ?
The conclusions of some published scientific studies, dealing with the biological effects of EMR, are described as ‘exciting’ by those looking for a drugless healing tool. The results of studies, suggest that EMR may well become the drugless healing tool of the future. That there are claims of an absence of side effects though, is a concern. The side effect aspect of EMR is denied despite evidence to the contrary.
It has been found that radiotherapy treatment, while arresting and curing some cancers, will predispose the patient to developing other cancers, later in life. This has been found to be the case, as has impaired brain function, resulting from treatment of radiotherapy for childhood leukemia (19) So EMR effects can create a paradox by both eliminating disease and yet under certain circumstances, promoting disease.
There are cases on record of EHS developing after the diagnostic procedure of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and after treatment with radiotherapy for lymphoma, a case of EHS was found to exacerbate. With radiotherapy there are extremely strong electrostatic fields evident, at the time of treatment. Of course, where a life threatening condition may be involved any procedure is of value regardless of the after-effects. The point is that there are side effects from EMR emitting technology and this must be recognized for the operator of the apparatus as well as the patient undergoing treatment/diagnostic procedure. As with X-rays, the radiographers administering radiotherapy treatment leave the vicinity of the treating equipment while the machine is in operation to minimize exposure. It is believed that orthopedic surgeons have the highest EMR exposure in the medical profession.
Post-treatment risk of
patients developing further cancerous
and other serious conditions is a powerful argument for developing cancer
prevention strategies rather than seeking to develop bigger and better
treatments. While studies that
actually affirm EMR as a serious health risk
are thin on the ground, there is empirical evidence gathered from real
life experiences, that clearly reveals the extent to which
be degraded by interaction with environmental EMR.
Here it may be said that – “experience
really does count.” (32)
and should be carefully considered by designers of
scientific studies into EMR health effects.
AS EMR/CFS/MCS/ AND EHS HEALTH EFFECTS ARE INTERLINKED ALL ASPECTS OF AVOIDANCE AND REMEDIAL ACTION NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.