Home Page Introduction ERBC / RHCBM FAQ Photos


Earthquake Resistant Building Construction (ERBC),

With Reinforced Hollow Concrete Block Masonry(RHCBM)

 

Technique

Reinforcing the hollow concrete block Masonry,

by taking advantage of hollow spaces of blocks

Image1n.gif (7464 bytes)

 

 

CONCEPT

Reinforced Hollow Concrete Block Masonry (RHCBM) elements are designed both as load bearing walls for gravity loads and also as shear walls for lateral seismic loads, to safely with stand earthquakes. This structural system of construction is known as shear wall – diaphragm concept, which gives three-dimensional structural integrity for the buildings.

Image2n.gif (13748 bytes)

 

 

Reinforced Hollow Concrete Block Masonry (RHCBM) System for Seismic Resistant Construction

Structural Features:

Image3.gif (130952 bytes)

 

 

Reinforced Hollow Concrete Block Masonry (RHCBM) System for Seismic Resistant Construction

Structural Advantages

Constructional Advantages

Architectural and Other Advantages

 

 

Studies on the Comparative Cost Economics of RHCBM

There is a general apprehension that the RHCBM would be a costlier system, as it advocates reinforcing and use of concrete grout in the hollow spaces within the masonry. To dispel this apprehension, the relative cost-economics of RHCBM structure are worked out in comparison with the conventional construction systems.

Structural Schemes                                                Cost(1997) per sq. m, in Rs.

Reinforced Hollow Concrete Block Masonry                          1822 /-

                RC Framed Structure with Brick Masonry infill                     1845 /-

                Load Bearing Masonry                                                             1782 /-

Summary of relative cost economics

No.

Proposed construction

system of reinforced block masonry

Conventional construction systems

As compared to load bearing brick masonry

As compared to RC framed structure with brick masonry

1

Percentage saving in cost

-2.19

1.26

2

Percentage increase in floor area

6.10

2.15

3

Percentage reduction in total dead load at foundation level

35.19

15.34

 

As per the figures of the above table, it reveals that RHCBM is not a costlier construction system. Rather, it has additional advantages of lighter dead weight and increased floor area. These advantages are quantitatively worked out from the fact that, RHCBM is built of 20cm (8") thick hollow block wall, when compared to the 23cm (9") thick one brick wall of RCC framed structure and 34cm (13.5") thick one and half brick wall (for the ground and first floor) of load bearing structure.

 

 

Experimental Programme

One of the national R&D laboratories, took up detailed and extensive experimental investigation on the materials, assemblages and full scale wall panels of different kinds of masonry. The testing programme included ten full-scale masonry panels of blocks and bricks with ungrouted, partially grouted, fully grouted and reinforced / unreinforced systems. From these experimental studies, very useful data was obtained to assess the relative performance of each masonry construction system in resisting the in-plane lateral loads under a constant superimposed vertical load.

Full Scale Wall Panel Testing

To give brief account of summary on the experimental programme, the experimental results on the comparison of the ultimate load capacity and ductility of the full scale models of RHCBM panel and reinforced brick masonry panel are presented in the table.

Brief summery of the experimental results

PARAMETERS

Reinforced Brick Masonry Panel

Reinforced Hollow Conc. Block masonry panel

Ultimate lateral load

4.79 t

6.35 t

Displacement Ductility Obtained

2.66

3.14

In crease of ductility when compared to unreinforced brick masonry

28.50 %

51.69 %

The specifications of the specimens are also listed below:

Specifications of full scale wall panels (with openings)

Size of wall panel : 2.2m(width) X 2.5m(height)

Size of opening : 1.0m(width) X 1.8m(height)

Designed for seismic zone : IV as per IS 1893-1984

Construction method : IS 13828-1993 & IS 4326-1993

Constant superimposed vertical load : Ten tonnes

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

Please contact at guru.bhagavan@rediffmail.com for any further details

 

Concrete shelter for rural poor @ Rs.20,000/- (U.S.$400 only) - First invention of SPERC dedicated to rural poor

SPERC Home Page