Home Page | Introduction | ERBC / RHCBM | FAQ | Photos |
With Reinforced Hollow Concrete Block Masonry(RHCBM)
Technique
Reinforcing the hollow concrete block Masonry,
by taking advantage of hollow spaces of blocks
CONCEPT
Reinforced Hollow Concrete Block Masonry (RHCBM) elements are designed both as load bearing walls for gravity loads and also as shear walls for lateral seismic loads, to safely with stand earthquakes. This structural system of construction is known as shear wall diaphragm concept, which gives three-dimensional structural integrity for the buildings.
Reinforced Hollow Concrete Block Masonry (RHCBM) System for Seismic Resistant Construction
Structural Features:
Reinforced Hollow Concrete Block Masonry (RHCBM) System for Seismic Resistant Construction
Structural Advantages
Constructional Advantages
Architectural and Other Advantages
Studies on the Comparative Cost Economics of RHCBM
There is a general apprehension that the RHCBM would be a costlier system, as it advocates reinforcing and use of concrete grout in the hollow spaces within the masonry. To dispel this apprehension, the relative cost-economics of RHCBM structure are worked out in comparison with the conventional construction systems.
Structural Schemes Cost(1997) per sq. m, in Rs.
Reinforced Hollow Concrete Block Masonry 1822 /-
RC Framed Structure with Brick Masonry infill 1845 /-
Load Bearing Masonry 1782 /-
Summary of relative cost economics
No. |
Proposed construction system of reinforced block masonry |
Conventional construction systems |
|
As compared to load bearing brick masonry |
As compared to RC framed structure with brick masonry |
||
1 |
Percentage saving in cost |
-2.19 |
1.26 |
2 |
Percentage increase in floor area |
6.10 |
2.15 |
3 |
Percentage reduction in total dead load at foundation level |
35.19 |
15.34 |
As per the figures of the above table, it reveals that RHCBM is not a costlier construction system. Rather, it has additional advantages of lighter dead weight and increased floor area. These advantages are quantitatively worked out from the fact that, RHCBM is built of 20cm (8") thick hollow block wall, when compared to the 23cm (9") thick one brick wall of RCC framed structure and 34cm (13.5") thick one and half brick wall (for the ground and first floor) of load bearing structure.
Experimental Programme
One of the national R&D laboratories, took up detailed and extensive experimental investigation on the materials, assemblages and full scale wall panels of different kinds of masonry. The testing programme included ten full-scale masonry panels of blocks and bricks with ungrouted, partially grouted, fully grouted and reinforced / unreinforced systems. From these experimental studies, very useful data was obtained to assess the relative performance of each masonry construction system in resisting the in-plane lateral loads under a constant superimposed vertical load.
Full Scale Wall Panel Testing
To give brief account of summary on the experimental programme, the experimental results on the comparison of the ultimate load capacity and ductility of the full scale models of RHCBM panel and reinforced brick masonry panel are presented in the table.
Brief summery of the experimental results
PARAMETERS |
Reinforced Brick Masonry Panel |
Reinforced Hollow Conc. Block masonry panel |
Ultimate lateral load |
4.79 t |
6.35 t |
Displacement Ductility Obtained |
2.66 |
3.14 |
In crease of ductility when compared to unreinforced brick masonry |
28.50 % |
51.69 % |
The specifications of the specimens are also listed below:
Specifications of full scale wall panels (with openings)
Size of wall panel : 2.2m(width) X 2.5m(height)
Size of opening : 1.0m(width) X 1.8m(height)
Designed for seismic zone : IV as per IS 1893-1984
Construction method : IS 13828-1993 & IS 4326-1993
Constant superimposed vertical load : Ten tonnes
CONCLUSIONS
Please contact at guru.bhagavan@rediffmail.com for any further details