Reproduction of biospheres and civilizations.
Our human Civilization is the constituent part of the Earth's biosphere. We will
speak here about the ways of biospheres reproduction in cosmos. It is clear that
the reproduction of human civilizations is the constituent and final part of more
general process, - the reproduction of biospheres.
But is that possible?
Let's try to answer the following questions, at first, and after, we'll try to make
some conclusions, according to scientific definitions and observations.
Is our biosphere a living organism? Or, is it superorganism?
Is human a living organism or a living superorganism?
Biosphere[1].
The concept that the biosphere is itself a living organism, either actually or metaphorically, is known as the Gaia hypothesis.
James Lovelock, an atmospheric scientist from the United Kingdom, proposed the Gaia hypothesis to explain how biotic and abiotic factors interact in the biosphere. This hypothesis considers Earth itself a kind of living organism. Its atmosphere, geosphere, and hydrosphere are cooperating systems that yield a biosphere full of life.
Gaia hypothesis [2].
The Gaia hypothesis is an ecological hypothesis proposing that the biosphere and the physical components of the Earth (atmosphere, cryosphere, hydrosphere and lithosphere) are closely integrated to form a complex interacting system that maintains the climatic and biogeochemical conditions on Earth in a preferred homeostasis. Originally proposed by James Lovelock as the earth feedback hypothesis, it was named the Gaia Hypothesis, after the Greek supreme goddess of Earth. The hypothesis is frequently described as viewing the Earth as a single organism. Lovelock and other supporters of the idea now regard it as a scientific theory, not merely a hypothesis, since they believe it has passed predictive tests.
One of the criteria of the empirical definition of life is its ability to replicate and pass on their genetic information to succeeding generations. Consequently, an argument against the idea that Gaia is a "living" organism is the fact that the planet is unable to reproduce.
Organism [3].
In biology, an organism is a living thing (such as animal, plant, fungus, or micro-organism). In at least some form, all organisms are capable of response to stimuli, reproduction, growth and development, and maintenance of homeostasis as a stable whole. An organism may either be unicellular or be composed of many billions of cells grouped into specialized tissues and organs. The term multicellular describes any organism made up of more than one cell.
A superorganism is an organism consisting of many organisms. This is usually meant to be a social unit of eusocial animals, where division of labor is highly specialized and where individuals are not able to survive by themselves for extended periods of time. Ants are the most well known example of such a superorganism. Thermoregulation, a feature usually exhibited by individual organisms, does not occur in individuals or small groups of honeybees... When these bees pack together in clusters of between 5000 and 40000, the colony can thermoregulate. James Lovelock, with his "Gaia Theory" has paralleled the work of Vladimir Vernadsky, who suggested the whole of the biosphere in some respects can be considered as a superorganism…
It is also argued that humans are actually a superorganism that includes microorganisms such as bacteria. It is estimated that the human intestinal microbiota is composed of 1013 to 1014 microorganisms whose collective genome contains at least 100 times as many genes as our own. Thus, humans are superorganisms whose metabolism represents an amalgamation of microbial and human attributes.
The first conclusion: Humans are superorganisms. Planetary biospheres can also be named the superorganisms, if we will find some proves to the last missing property, required by the definition of the living organism, - the ability of reproduction.
Panspermia [4].
Panspermia is the hypothesis that "seeds" of life exist already all over the Universe, that life on Earth may have originated through these "seeds", and that they may deliver or have delivered life to other habitable bodies.
Panspermia can be said to be either interstellar or interplanetary. Mechanisms for panspermia include radiation pressure (Arrhenius) and lithopanspermia (microorganisms in rocks) (Kelvin). Directed panspermia from space to seed Earth (Orgel and Crick, 1973) or sent from Earth to seed other solar systems (Mautner 1979, 1997) has also been proposed.
Sir Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe were important proponents of the hypothesis who further contended that lifeforms continue to enter the Earth's atmosphere, and may be responsible for epidemic outbreaks, new diseases, and the genetic novelty necessary for macroevolution. This extension has also been adopted by proponents of Cosmic ancestry.
In the strongest version of panspermia, life never originated, but always existed — this axiom would require amending the big bang theory.
The mechanisms proposed for interstellar panspermia are hypothetical and currently unproven.
The second conclusion: Official science persistently denies the Steady State models of Universe and the Panspermia hypothesis, despite the fact that there are a lot of observations and physical evidences of these theories. This leads me to the thought that the official science is some organ of our living Biosphere, which has genetic innate property, aimed at implementing of the suicidal reproduction of biospheres.
The third conclusion: Scientists, who are interested in the launch of the Large Hadron Collider, can be named "the curiosity cells" of our Biosphere. Scientists, who are crying everywhere about the possible global risks, can be named “the good reason cells” of our Biosphere. If the first large group of physics will win, then our Biosphere will die, as a thoughtless female-animal. If the second very small group will win, then Biospher will survive and look like a reasonable, thinking female, able to anticipate the danger.
The forth conclusion: The mechanism for interstellar panspermia is absolutely clear; it is the explosion of the planet, where the biosphere had grown to the reproducing age. The method of biosphere's reproduction is similar to that of exploding cucumber. The more powerful explosion, - the more reliable reproduction.
Possible detonators of global explosion:
1. Collision of particles with the energy about 1 TeV or higher per particle.
2. Creating of Bose-Einstein Condensate in the laboratories, experimenting with the matter under extremely low temperatures.
3. Underground tests of nuclear weapons, which can lead to thermonuclear detonation of geological stratum of such nuclear fuel, as KH.
4. Creating the transuranium elements.
How it must look in order to better
preserve the seeds of life.
With some part of fantasy.
Magnetic hole absorbs the inner part of our planet. Planet self-contracts. Oceans cover the mainland by water. Magnetic hole is growing exponentially and, finally, a huge explosion occurs, which sends the shell of the Earth's into outer space. All of us, with grass, cats, fish, tadpoles fly, covered by ocean water, with the speed of ten times more, than the speed Voyagers. Due to the reduction of pressure the water boils, transforming into foam, and soon it freezes. Thus the comets are formed. The temperatures are about "minus" 150-250 degrees Centigrade. Flies and tadpoles in comets are in a state of hibernation.
Finally, some comet enters some Earth-like platen’s atmosphere. The comet splits, and its icy parts drop into warm lakes. There the comet’s parts are melting. Flies wake up and fly away, some fishes and tadpoles, too, wake up, and swim away.
The human will appear on this planet on the next stage, when n’th comet will arrive to this planet, when comet’s shell will melt under the rays of that star, when human's DNA molecules will subside to that planet.
The cosmic space has a huge amount of organic substance.
Each year, only in our Galaxy, containing approximately 150 billion stars, from one to ten civilizations die. Mourning marches, that are, nova and supernova explosions, play several times frequently. Part of the nova stars exert repeated explosions. The cause is clear - magnetic hole, reaching a mass roughly equal to 1/20 of solar masses, transform into a black hole. Their radii at this mass are equal, and the transition is accompanied by explosion. Therefore, the Sun will be eaten in twenty receptions, accompanied by explosions that would occur with intervals of several tens of years. Supernovae are exploding at once, because they have thin shells, and magnetic holes fail in supernovae’s rarefied central parts.
From the letter (slightly corrected).
In his commentary to the article
How do we know the LHC really is safe?, published in NewSientist the 21
January 2009, James Tankers wrote:
"To mitigate possible risk, I would like CERN to agree to follow Dr. Habil Rainer
Plaga's compromise recommendation to increase energy levels only slowly and examine
results before significantly increasing energy levels further."
James, say me, please, is it possible to prevent sperm ejaculation by "increasing
energy levels only slowly" at the time of sexual intercourse?
Our civilization is a huge alive superorganism. Organisms must reproduce themselves.
CERN is the possible reproductive organ of our Civilization. The launch of LHC is
the sexual act, leading to the explosion of Earth, and to the launch of Civilization’s
seeds into cosmos.
We must postpone the act of Civilization reproduction act as far as possible. The
sexual act of our Civilization, which is the launch of collider, must be forbidden.
The “slowly LHC-sex” will not safe us from reproductive suicide.
Some thoughts and questions.
Is our Biosphere a brainless organism, or it is able to reasonably
think?
What is the Biosphere's brain: governments, religious organizations, scientific
organizations, independent researchers? Can very rarefied "cells of good reason"
prevent or postpone the reproductive suicide of Biosphere? Who are you, dear reader:
"a cell of good reason", "a curiosity cell", or "thoughtless muscular cell"?
External referred links: Pages from Wikipedia: 1, 2, 3, 4.
You are here:
Reproduction of biospheres and civilizations. Who are
you, dear reader:
"a cell of good reason", "a curiosity cell", or "thoughtless muscular cell"?
Magnetic
trap of Devil. Recent calculations show that it is not excluded that microscopic
magnetic traps were already created,
and they are growing now somewhere inside the Earth.
Arguments, proving that "The LHC will
lead to global catastrophe"; "Magnetic holes exist";
"We will not be able to prevent the LHC launch and the following global catastrophe".
Religious and mystic arguments.
The failed report "What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil?"
The Letter to the President of Russia.
The Letters to the Prosecutors Office of the Russian Federation.
Read the frequently updated page Save Yourself - the Business Offer for more news, llinks and developments of this topic.
To index of Space Genetics