PANDEMONIUM CHAT NOTES
14TH NOVEMBER, 2000
Part Three
Concerning The Ether
by Franz J. T. Lee
Now, we have to burn the midnight oil, to put enough oil in our neurone lamps, in order to follow the following summary of the course of events. Brush off the dust and cobwebs from your old secondary school and college handbooks on physics, peep into them again, and there we go. The question here is: To Be Ether Or/And Not To Be Ether? Thus, better even, read Bill's book, of, by and for yourself! We will just highlight especially selected aspects here.
A healthy, sane, functioning
brain can study and understand anything, especially this work, which touches
quintessential emancipatory issues, no matter how new, far-fetched or difficult
the material may seem to be. Thus, put your "brain" to the "iron test"
and measure its intellectual capacity, rational ability and emancipatory
potentiality. As Hegel and Marx had stated: "Hic Rhodus,
hic salta -- Here is the Rose, Dance!" Start hic et nunc to
sow Pandemonium to the Four Winds, and to reap the invincible Storm of
Free Energy and Emancipation!
In the first chapter of his book, Bill explained "The Occult Ether Theory and Electropulsion". Kindly read this part all by yourself; it is complicated, and it presupposes a fairly "good" knowledge of physics. However, let's proceed to the next chapter, which certainly is of "great" interest to us; it deals with "Exploring the Nature of the Ether".
The author studied various theories
about the nature of the "ether", and eventually
accessed a copy of the classic,
A
History of the Theories of the Aether and Electricity" (1951),
First Edition, 1910, by Sir Edmund Whittaker. And, students of modern
physics, surprise, surprise! "Neither the 1910 first edition nor the
1951 revision mentioned Tesla, ... Though information regarding Nikola
Tesla was omitted, there is much valuable related information."
However, Whittaker mentioned something very interesting: he "said that an alleged failure by ether theory proponents to observe the earth's motion relative to the ether, caused the downfall of the theory, but the facts show that the relativists, backed by corporate publishing interests, hastily dug the grave and threw the dirt over the corpse of ether theory while it was still alive, for the wrong reason."
Bill concluded that Whittaker's 1951 edition "intentionally skewered important facts concerning electropulsion, which I have attempted to straighten out for you in this book." Then he presented a brief history and documentation of pertinent ether physics.
Max Planck, the originator of quantum mechanics, partially conscribed to the "carry-along" ether theory. He said "that the ether had to be irotational, carried along at the same velocity as earth near its surface, and compressible and subject to gravity like the atmosphere, in order for the theory to be true."
The discoverer of the electron, J. J. Thomson (1856-1942), "conscribed to a different and more plausible ether theory". Based on Maxwell's earlier theory, in 1891, he stated that " ... the aether itself is the vehicle of mechanical momentum", giving the amount per unit volume, and in 1893, he claimed to have discovered "electromagnetic momentum". Thus, he linked electromagnetism with momentum in a mathematical manner, in a way, repeating what Tesla himself had expressed in an earlier lecture of 1891.
Bill, however, pointed out that "Tesla's theory was different from Thomson's, whose theory was incorrect." He continued " ... there is no way that Thomson could have reduced 'his' theory to practice or experimentally verified it." For this, he needed Tesla's laboratory.
Most of Thomson's work was based on previous theories, also on Faraday, who stated in 1831 that "movement of an electrostatically charged body is equivalent to a current, which was described as a tube of force created by movement and momentum." Apart from his theory of an elastic solid electric ether, and lines of magnetic force, Faraday considered all space as "filled"; it was Wm. Thomson (1824-1907), at the age of 17, based on Faraday, who had "introduced into mathematical science the idea of electric action at a distance by means of a continuous ether." By 1846, his early conception was that "material atoms move through the ether 'without displacing it or compressing it'". Later Tesla adopted these concepts, by stating "that the ether 'behaves as a fluid to solid bodies, and as a solid to light and heat'".
Around 1853, Bernhard Riemann
(1826-66), affirmed an ether "which resisted compression and changes
of orientation", thinking that this resistance to compression logically
brings about gravitational and electrostatic effects; while, on the other
hand,
that the resistance to changes
in orientation results in bringing forth optical and magnetic phenomena;
but, as Bill explained in detail in the following pages,
"he failed to develop these concepts further".
Enough now for our tortured brains, next time we will move on towards "Cosmic Motion and Local Momentum"!
(to be continued)
-----oOo-----
PANDEMONIUM CHAT NOTES
14TH NOVEMBER, 2000
Part Four
Cosmic Motion and Local Momentum
By Franz J. T. Lee
Remember, within the context
of our Science a n d Philosophy,
that Cosmos is a
"concept", an intellectual fabrication
or product of thought, a thought thing, arrived at by empirical investigation,
theory, science and philosophy. What is Cosmos, and what
we think what Cosmos is, are two different things. That
we thought for millennia that the Earth is flat and that it does not move,
and
what is the real shape of the earth and that it really and truly
moves, are two horses of different colours.
We call the term or idea "Cosmos" an intellectual Percept, derived from ontic perception. In fact, it is the material basis of Nature. Also philosophically, we have explained that Cosmos is related, is in Motion; similarly, in History, Nature is related to Society, is therefore, in Motion. Also, we should recollect, as Kant and Hegel had explained already, that "space", "time" and "spacetime" are only intellectual inventions, what they really are, and whether they really exist in the way we think about them, that's another story.
Nonetheless, homo sapiens sapiens had created for himself a specific labour reality, an "historic" reality, within History, where his concepts, theories and things have their specific validity. Whether we like it or not, they also exist, but they are not the only existing things within Cosmos. We also have developed different levels, degrees and mensions of Motion that should not be mixed up, which not necessarily happen only within the parameters of Space and Time. We will see what Bill has to say with reference to the Cosmos and Motion.
Now, let's see how Bill
in his book differentiated Cosmic Motion. He wrote:
"The earth orbits the sun
at approximately 18.5 miles per second (66,600 mph). The solar system is
orbiting the centre of the Milky Way much faster, and the Milky Way orbits
the Magellanic Clouds much faster, and so forth."
With the above, he indicated a hierarchy of velocity that increases, from the moon, to the earth, to the sun, to the Milky Way, etc. Now, don't get dizzy or "cosmos sick", neither as a result of this tremendous velocity of our planet nor of the idea of travelling in your "flying saucer" at 45,000 mph., because these are insignificant as compared to electromagnetic velocity, simply because movement of force is relative to time.
Bill continued: "In all, the earth's velocity and polarity relative to the ether continually varies according to its rotation, orbital position, and galactic cycle." In other words, for example, when the earth finds itself between the sun and the Milky Way's centre, it rotates at a slower pace than when it moves "outside". He continued: "As the earth rotates each day, its polarity of movement through the ether rotates 15.2 degrees per hour, with a rotational surface velocity at the equator of approximately 1,041 miles per hour." Of course, this continuous change in polarity is barely perceptible, but it may modulate the gravity force, and -- what concerns us -- may even affect our emotional states.
If the earth's charge can be increased, and this is exactly what Tesla tried to do with his scientific gadgets, "he could have thrown the earth's timing off, slowed it down, and possibly caused it to drift toward the sun." Furthermore, as Don Albert indirectly has explained already, Tesla probably could even have spliced it into halves. We could imagine for ourselves, by using the Tesla technology, what NASA could be able to do nowadays; probably, it could even stop any huge cosmic rock from striking the earth, or even move planets out of their orbits. This is not wishful thinking or wild "speculation"; it is the logical scientific conclusion of what Bill tried to explain.
Now, let us focus on Local Momentum and Celestial Movement. This relation is of scientific significance for us, when within the context of our Science and Philosophy, we have to explain Rest and Motion, and the inter-relations between them. You may recollect that on our Web Sites we tried to explain Rest, Rest towards Rest, Rest towards Motion, Motion towards Rest, Motion towards Motion, and the various Inter-Relations among them, even the Relation "Neither Rest Nor Motion". What follows now throws some scientific light on our philosophic reflections.
But, let Bill relate: "It's an odd thing, momentum. If a body is in motion relative to earth, its momentum is in the direction of motion, yet as a body at rest on a spot on earth, it still has momentum along the spot's ultimate motion relative to the ether. The motion is compound, but the ultimate momentum of a body is truly a vector which represents all the forces acting upon it."
If across life one has acted and thought for oneself, has developed one's own Praxis and Theory, in other words, has developed one's own Science and Philosophy, only then, one could comprehend and understand anything related to Emancipation. The above, and what still follows, are excellent examples of the intellectual and rational operation of a healthy mind which is not controlled and enslaved. Surely, we did not study modern physics, we don't even need to do it; what we did, we strove towards originality and authenticity, that is, we acted, thought and studied our own cosmic, natural science and ontic, social philosophy. Later we may even discover similarities between our concept "Einai" and the very "Ether" which we are discussing here. This is the master-key to any kind of emancipatory knowledge.
Bill favours such an inquisitive, interested attitude: only then " ... we have a more complex pattern of movement, and since a body which is in constant, compound, gradual, ever-changing motion relative to the ether, more interesting effects are bound to be found." Just by the way, he also commented on the infamous "Big Bang" theory, permanently propagated by NASA, by stating that "the theory was created and promoted by the coercive energy monopolists, because of its apparent intent to negate the free energy available from the ether, due to what I call the 'Law of Conservation of Perpetual Motion' ".
Now, an interesting philosophic query: Are macrocosmic relations of momentum, velocity and motion also valid within earthly parameters? The author explained:
"The same principles of momentum which apply to the cosmos must also apply to the motion of immediately local bodies, except that the effects are skewered by the presence of earth's pesky electric, magnetic and so-called 'gravity' fields." We could add: also due to the presence of a disastrous, technological chaos created on earth, as a result of the dangerously advanced labour process, including its perverse energetic projects. To get rid of this alienating rubbish, of this labour debris, including its "Illuminati", would be an urgent immediate task of the cosmic, emancipatory process.
Towards the end of this chapter, Bill explained what Tesla's "free energy", which could accomplish the above, is all about:
"Electropulsion is a 'free energy' process in which energy existing in the environment --- 'gravity' and momentum --- are overcome by and replaced with the naturally stronger force of electromagnetism, to perform a greater amount of work during a given time, which theoretically is 10 to the 40th power times more work, using a smaller amount of 'input energy' to trigger the change. If 'energy' is 'the ability to do work', and 'work' is the 'movement of mass through a distance', then a stronger force will do more work over a given time period. A change of form of energy from a weaker to a stronger force (which exists in the environment) will use 'environmental energy' to do more work in a new way."
(to be continued)
-----ooo-----