PANDEMONIUM WAR CRIMINAL WATCH

    DID YOU KNOW?

          " While you probably didn't hear about this because of the poor quality of "news"
                in the USA,  Henry had to "curtail" his trip to France and probably won't be going
                back there any time soon. Hitchens lays out a concise, compelling case for the
                indictment of  the evilest man to ever win a Noble Prize of any sort, let alone for
                peace. If there was ANY justice in the world, the self-aggrandizing Dr. Kissinger
                would be sitting in a cell in the Hague, awaitng trial."
 

   US Secretary of State & National Security Advisor, Henry Kissinger:  Poatmodern
  Aristotelian Logics & Syllogism:

  A Democratic Politician is ... "A good liar must have a good memory: Kissinger is a
  stupendous liar with a remarkable memory."

  This Plato already taught in his Academy, in The Republic!

  "The charges themselves are astonishing, as they link Kissinger to war casualties in
  Vietnam, massacres in Bangladesh and Timor, and assassinations in Chile, Cyprus,
  and Washington,  D.C. "

  " ... specific charges of Kissinger's responsibility for mass killings of civilians,
     genocide, assassinations, kidnapping, murder and conspiracy involving Indochina,
     East Timor, Bangladesh, Cyprus, Greece... read more."

   Now, who is really "democratic", wants "world peace", fights against
   'international terrorism"?

   Whatamansay? How dey ken lie, man!!! This is bad, bad, bad!!!
 

********************************************************************
 Date:
       Tue, 21 Aug 2001 18:28:09 -0700
  From:
       Carl Zimmeman <czfz@earthlink.net>
    To:
       franzjutta@cantv.net, jutta@aktionspotenzial.de, billlyne@earthlink.net,
       scott@imatech.com, kh9syl@sprint.ca
 
 

Hi, folks:

I'm posting this review to show how the NWO economic elites work, not
to put the blame entirely on Kissinger. He served his masters' well.
Thanks to Scott for calling my attention to this book.

Carl
 

****************************************************************************
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1859846319/qid%3D998423987/107-0505497-1860568
****************************************************************************

              The Trial of Henry Kissinger

                 by Christopher Hitchens

                Editorial Reviews
                Amazon.com

                Christopher Hitchens doesn't mince words when it comes to Henry Kissinger, the
                former secretary of state and national-security advisor: Kissinger deserves
                vigorous prosecution "for war crimes, for crimes against humanity, and for
                offenses against common or customary or international law, including conspiracy
                to commit murder, kidnap, and torture." The Trial of Henry Kissinger is a
                masterpiece of polemics; even readers who don't agree that its target is an
                emanation of "official evil" will appreciate the verve and style brought to
                Hitchens's fiery brief. ("A good liar must have a good memory: Kissinger is a
                stupendous liar with a remarkable memory.")

                The book is best understood as a prosecutorial document--both because Hitchens
                limits his critique to what he believes might stand up in an international court of
                law following precedents set at Nuremberg and elsewhere, and also because his
                treatment of Kissinger is far from evenhanded. The charges themselves are
                astonishing, as they link Kissinger to war casualties in Vietnam, massacres in
                Bangladesh and Timor, and assassinations in Chile, Cyprus, and Washington,
                D.C. After reading this book, one wants very badly to hear a full response from
                the defendant. Hitchens, a writer for Vanity Fair and The Nation, is a man of the
                Left, though he has a history of skewering both Democrats (he is the author of a
                provocative book on the Clintons, No One Left to Lie To) as well as Republicans
                (Kissinger).

                At the root of this latest effort is moral outrage, and a call for Americans, of all
                people, not to ignore Kissinger's record: "They can either persist in averting their
                gaze from the egregious impunity enjoyed by a notorious war criminal and
                lawbreaker, or they can become seized by the exalted standards to which they
                continually hold everyone else," writes Hitchens. "If the courts and lawyers of
                this country will not do their duty, we shall watch as the victims and survivors of
                this man pursue justice and vindication in their own dignified and painstaking
                way, and at their own expense, and we shall be put to shame." --John J. Miller

                From Publishers Weekly
                The arrest of Augusto Pinochet signaled a significant shift in enforcing
                international law, noticed by Henry Kissinger if not others. Vanity Fair columnist
                Hitchens (No One Left to Lie To, etc.), a self-described "political opponent of
                Henry Kissinger," writes to remedy the awareness gap, focusing on specific
                charges of Kissinger's responsibility for mass killings of civilians, genocide,
                assassinations, kidnapping, murder and conspiracy involving Indochina, East
                Timor, Bangladesh, Cyprus, Greece... read more

                                                        See all editorial reviews...
 

                Spotlight Reviews (what's this)
                Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.

                19 of 34 people found the following review helpful:

                       An exceptional book, June 17, 2001
                       Reviewer: Chris Green (see more about me) from Edgewood, WA USA
                       Mr. Hitchens starts his case against Kissinger with a rather shaky
                argument, to wit, that Dr. Kissinger collaborated with the Nixon campaign in
                1968 in helping "sabotage" the Johnson administration's negotiations in Paris on
                Vietnam through its friends in the South Vietnamese government. But after that
                he really starts to pick up the slack and puts forth really first rate stuff.

                His presentation on Kissinger's role in the slaughter in Indochina is important
                enough though I think he might have left out some juicy stuff e.g. Kissinger's acts
                in the 72-73 negotiations with North Vietnam, the Christmas bombings, and so on
                though he might have been able to include it if he hadn't spent so much time
                belaboring the 68' elections. He points out from the internal record and other
                sources some banal stuff about the U.S. deliberately bombing civilians in order to
                destroy the infrastructure provided to the resistance fighters, that is the
                infrastructure of the populations of Laos (I believe the "secret" bombing started in
                this country back in the mid-60's not in 69' as Hitchens seems to imply) ,
                Cambodia and Vietnam as demonstrated in the operation at the beginning of 69'
                called "Speedy Express."

                He goes on to discuss Kissinger's attempt to protect the generals in Pakistan as
                they slaughtered hundreds of thousands of people as a prelude to the granting of
                independence to "East Pakistan" Bangladesh in 1971 and the making of a military
                show of force against India, Bangladesh's supporter, who inspired Kissinger's
                rage at being disturbed in the conduct of his "ping pong" diplomacy with China
                through Pakistan, which is to say ruining potential photo ops for him though it
                seems that mostly he detested Bangladesh's new leader Sheikh Mujib as a sort of
                independent nationalist and helped block crucial assistance to this badly
                malnourished country and seems to have been well aware of the plans and the
                implementation of a coup which killed Mujib in 1975.

                He discusses Kissinger's role in helping Turkey's aggression against Cyprus in
                1974. Cyprus had been subjected to much subversion by both the fascist regimes
                in both Greece and Turkey and the colonels regime in Greece had launched a
                coup in Cyprus in July 1974 against the democratically elected Archbishop
                Makarios but not before they themselves suffered the happy result of being
                overthrown but Turkey invaded in response conducting a reign of mass ethnic
                cleansing against Cyprus's majority Greek population as was reported in 1976 by
                the European commission on human rights.

                He discusses Kissinger's role in the subversion of the democratic process in Chile,
                his funding of far right wing groups and military officers, economic
                destabalization and a supposed attempted kidnapping but which resulted in the
                murder of General Rene Schneider in Chile shortly before Allende took office and
                was confirmed by the Chilean parliament. He gives an all too brief account of
                Operation Condor the association of the National Security States of South
                America (Videla's Argentina, Pinochet's Chile, Stroesnner's Paraguay, etc.) which
                cooperated in the assassination and kidnapping of perhaps hundreds of South
                American dissidents.

                He goes on to discuss Kissinger's support for Indonesia's mass slaughter in East
                Timor and how obviously he and Ford gave the approval for the invasion when
                they visited Indonesia two days before it took place and approved new arms sales
                to Indonesia whose military at the time was ninety percent armed by the United
                States. This chapter contains a transcript of a question and answer session of a
                1995 Kissinger lecture about one of his latest books when he was confronted by
                Alan Nairn and Amy Goodman, two of the most courageous supporters of East
                Timor, and Constancio Pinto, the East Timorese resistance fighter. Kissinger lied
                through his teeth ("the United States can't solve all the world's
                problems"........We had no idea the invasion was going to take place," etc.) as he
                usually does and became somewhat belligerent when Nairn's argument started to
                get really devastating but fortunately for him he had a lot of supporters in the
                audience who booed and shouted down the questioners. It also contains the
                transcript of a very angry Kissinger meeting with his subordinates on December
                18 1975 a week and a half after the invasion of East Timor demanding to know
                why the issue of the legality of Indonesia's invasion and the U.S. selling weapons
                to it was brought up in a state department cable which, of course, could be leaked
                to congress and the media and create difficulties for Kissinger and his public
                image and towards the end declaring that "I don't care if we sell weapons to
                Indonesia or not. I get nothing from it, I get no rakeoff."

                He devotes a chapter to showing pretty persuasively that Kissinger was in on the
                plans of the colonels in Greece to kidnap and murder a famous, respected and
                well connected Greek dissident journalist living in Washington D.C.

                He devotes a section to Kissinger's career as a lobbyist for multinational
                corporations seeking to do business with some of the most vile regimes in the
                world from Burma to Iraq to Indonesia (even the U.S. government's Overseas
                Private Investment Corporations decided to cancel insurance for political risk for
                Kissinger's associates at Freeport McMoran which had created an environmental
                and social catastrophe in its Grasberg mine in Irian Jaya) and in this capacity
                uttered an immortal defense of the massacre of demonstrators in Beijing in June
                1989: "No government in the world would have tolerated having the main square
                of its capital occupied for eight weeks by tens of thousands of demonstrators."
                He even tries to link Kissinger with one his prime bugaboos of the last decade,
                Slobodan Milosevic.

                Another reviewer brings up a question of Hitchens's "credibility." I personally
                don't care if he slandered Clinton. What worried me more, since we are on the
                subject of war crimes, was his violent support for one of Clinton's greatest war
                crimes, the attack on Yugoslavia, using arguments so absurd, which he is
                unfortunately still making, that it was hard to belive he was seriously making
                them. But anycase we are not dealing with what Mr. Hitchens may or may not
                have done in the past or what he may or may not be but what he has done with
                this particular book. This book is superb and honest and free of the preposterous
                stuff he has been afflicting his readers with in the past few years. I don't care
                how many times he goes to speak to David Horowitz's Wednesday Morning Club
                or gives Chris Mathews some agreeable platitudes on "Hardball" as long as he
                keeps doing stuff like this.

                I think his treatment of the "overfed" NGO's and human rights organizations is
                somewhat unfair. Many of them do outstanding work on human rights issues
                while depending substantially for support on powerful interests. Going after
                Pinochet is one thing; but going after a chief ornament of the American empire
                might get them into serious trouble. At most any legal action against Kissinger
                would be symbolic but it is probably worth the effort. More effort perhaps should
                be made to concentrate on the current occupant of the white house or rather the
                current occupant's advisors who have already committed one clear war crime
                (bombing Iraq) and are sure to commit many more (Colombia, Iraq or who
                knows where else).

                Was this review helpful to you?
 
 

                24 of 38 people found the following review helpful:

                       Henry, Portrait of a Serial Killer, July 4, 2001
                Reviewer: Austin Cooley (see more about me) from Houston, TX USA
                Christopher Hitchens offers up a brutal condemnation of one of the most odious
                politicians of the 20th Century. From derailing the Paris Peace talks in 1968,
                thereby getting Richard Nixon elected President, to formenting genocide in East
                Timor, Kissinger certainly is an accomplished sociopath. In June of this year
                (2001) Timothy McVeigh was executed; Slobodan Milosevic was placed on trial
                in July. Yet Kissinger, whose crimes against humanity far outweigh both
                McViegh's and Milosevic's, remains free to continue to reap the rewards of his
                murderous work. Still, Henry must be sleeping a little less easily these days,
                having been subpoenaed by a French court investigating the "disappearence" of
                French citizens in one of Kissinger's "client states", Pinochet's Chile. While you
                probably didn't hear about this because of the poor quality of "news" in the USA,
                Henry had to "curtail" his trip to France and probably won't be going back there
                any time soon. Hitchens lays out a concise, compelling case for the indictment of
                the evilest man to ever win a Noble Prize of any sort, let alone for peace. If there
                was ANY justice in the world, the self-aggrandizing Dr. Kissinger would be sitting
                in a cell in the Hague, awaitng trial. Essential reading.
****************************************************************************
NEXT

TO FRANZJUTTA.ORG

TO FRANZJUTTA.COM

TRANSHISTORY.COM

BACK TO GEOCITIES

BACK TO PANDEMONIUM

TO STEVE'S PAGE

EXILES, ISSUES & EVENTS
 

**********************************************************************