Session 5: Am I an “Abomination”?
Begin by asking for one or two people to review, in a few sentences, what we have seen so far in our look at the Bible’s treatment of homosexuality.
Explain that, today, we are going to be looking at some of the most controversial texts that deal with sexuality in the Bible -- descriptions of particular forms of same-sex contact found in what is known as the “Holiness Code” of the Old Testament. In particular, we are going to look at Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13.
As we prepare to read these verses, remember the questions we’ve mentioned needing to ask when reading Old Testament texts: What does this verse really say and what does it not say? Is this a text whose command applies to all people in all time, or one which is not binding in the same way now, because it is fulfilled in Christ? What is the historical and cultural background of the text? How do these verses fit into the larger story of the books of the Bible surrounding them? How do they fit into the story of the Bible? Into the history of God’s work in the world? What does our reason and experience tell us? And most importantly, what light does Jesus’ life and teachings shed on these verses?
Have folks read the two verses:
Leviticus 18
22 " 'Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.
Leviticus 20
13 " 'If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.
First of all, keeping comments down to a few sentences, how have you heard this verse explained by religious people? What have they said it says about homosexual behavior or orientation?
(Allow comments)
Well, touching on the questions I told you to keep in mind, what are some things you notice that the verse does say and that it doesn’t say?
(Allow comments)
Well, here are a few facts about these verses that is often omitted by religious conservatives:
1. This verse says nothing about women being sexual toward other women. This is interesting, isn’t it? If this verse was intended to be a universal indictment against homosexual activity, why are lesbians omitted from these verses? And why do religious conservatives fail to notice Leviticus doesn’t condemn lesbian intimacy? There is some debate about what particular sexual acts this verse condemns, but whatever it condemns, it does not condemn sex between two women…
2 This verse calls for capital punishment for whatever act it describes. Whatever it is condemning, it is something that was viewed as very destructive either to God or the Jewish community who kept this law. Also, very few who quote this verse actually believe they should organize a gang to perform capital punishment, neither do they believe capital punishment should be performed for other acts that Leviticus calls for capital punishment about -- children disobeying parents, men sleeping with their wives during their period. So, this shows there is some real inconsistency with people who quote this verse as being in force today.
3. Though this verse is said to call homosexuality a sin, this verse doesn’t even describe whatever same-sex act is described as a sin, but as a “detestable” act or an “abomination” .
Can anyone think of what the difference might be between an “abominable act” and a sin? (Allow thought)
Pass out copies of “Abomination or to’ebah.” Explain that this sheet is a compilation from several resources that goes through the meaning of the word translated “abomination” or “detestable”. Ask people to read parts of this page. Then ask, what significance does this sheet’s content have in explaining what Leviticus 18 & 20 are saying?
Explain that this means that Leviticus does not say that a man to lie with man is wrong or a sin. Rather, it is a ritual violation, an uncleanness ; it is something dirty ritualistically, just as was eating shellfish, mixing fibers, and similar laws which Christians no longer consider binding on them.
Two things were to’ebah to the Jewish people: first, acts that went against the cultural norms in a way that one was considered ritually unclean or imperfect, and thus unable to go to the temple and worship God, are to’ebah. The idea is that you only take to God a perfect gift and, if you are somehow imperfect, you can’t go to worship until you’ve “cleaned up”. That’s why someone who had touched a woman during her period couldn’t go to the temple without getting stoned -- in their culture, that was believed to make someone imperfect.
Another list of things called to’ebah were practices that were connected with religions around Israel that had gone wrong in their worship of God -- practices like sacrificing children on the altar, practices like giving your children to be prostitutes in the temple as an act of worship. Stuff like that.
Some feel that this verse refers to male-to-male intimacy as merely unclean, like eating pork made someone unclean in Jewish religion. This would be then connected with the way Jewish people of the day understood sex. They viewed semen as having a life-giving property. Not understanding about eggs, they believed all semen needed to become a baby was a woman’s womb. So, men who masturbated were unclean, because semen that could have become a baby if put in a woman was wasted and fell on the ground. Likewise, men who had wet dreams were unclean and we are told in Leviticus that a man who had a wet dream had to go through a time of ritual purification before entering the temple. They had to bathe and wait a day before they could come to worship. This is also why women weren’t allowed in the temple during their period -- that was the blood of pregnancy, which could some day produce a child, which was spilling out of them. This made them imperfect.
If this was the case, then this verse is condemning male-to-male intimacy because of this pre-scientific understanding of semen. It is a concession to a cultural notion we don’t share any more Semen is getting wasted that could be used for making babies! How bad! Under this logic, since women don’t produce semen, it is ok for women to have sex with each other. After all, no baby-making fluid is wasted. Only during their periods are they unclean.
Any thoughts about this understanding of this verse? Do you think this is persuasive?
As we’ll see, these verses don’t condemn all male-to-male sexual intimacy. Likewise, they probably don’t merely condemns what it does condemn as ritual uncleanness or an imperfection that has to be “washed away” to go to worship. Instead whatever it describes is connected with the horrible practices of the religions in Canaan that have really lost their way and thus more serious. Evidence of this is that no one is stoned for mere acts of ritual uncleanness like eating pork or touching dead bodies or having a period or ejaculation. The sex acts described in Leviticus 18 & 20 have the death penalty. This shows how serious they are in Bible times.
The “story surrounding the story” helps us understand what is being condemned, as does the original Hebrew words used in this text.
How do you think they fit into the story as a whole?
Well, first we have the context in the Bible these verses fit into. They are in the book of Leviticus, a book where God outlines rules for how the Jewish people are to worship him, how their priests are to perform sacrifices, and the like.
And, these two commands are a part of a list of prohibitions connected with how Israel worships God. In the beginning and ending of chapters 18 and 20 a rationale for these command is given.
Would somebody read Leviticus 18:1-5? Leviticus 18:24-28? Leviticus 20:22-24?
1 The LORD said to Moses, 2 "Speak to the Israelites and say to them: 'I am the LORD your God. 3 You must not do as they do in Egypt, where you used to live, and you must not do as they do in the land of Canaan, where I am bringing you. Do not follow their practices. 4 You must obey my laws and be careful to follow my decrees. I am the LORD your God. 5 Keep my decrees and laws, for the man who obeys them will live by them. I am the LORD .
24 " 'Do not defile yourselves in any of these ways, because this is how the nations that I am going to drive out before you became defiled. 25 Even the land was defiled; so I punished it for its sin, and the land vomited out its inhabitants. 26 But you must keep my decrees and my laws. The native-born and the aliens living among you must not do any of these detestable things, 27 for all these things were done by the people who lived in the land before you, and the land became defiled. 28 And if you defile the land, it will vomit you out as it vomited out the nations that were before you.
22 " 'Keep all my decrees and laws and follow them, so that the land where I am bringing you to live may not vomit you out. 23 You must not live according to the customs of the nations I am going to drive out before you. Because they did all these things, I abhorred them. 24 But I said to you, "You will possess their land; I will give it to you as an inheritance, a land flowing with milk and honey." I am the LORD your God, who has set you apart from the nations.
After these are read, ask, Why is it God condemns the acts he list in Leviticus 18 & 20?
Explain that God is trying to keep the Jewish people from engaging in religious practices that the peoples around him engage in. That may sound weird to us in our day, when we try to stay open-minded to the beliefs and practices of other religions, but if you understand what these religious practices and views were like, God’s words make more sense.
One of the messages God gives again and again throughout the Bible is that, you can’t worship him any old way or believe any old thing about him. This doesn’t mean that there is only one way to worship God or all other religions but ours (whichever ours is) are wrong. That’s not the point.
In the Christian religion, for instance, there are branches of Christianity that, in the name of God do horrible things. I have distant relatives who are part of white supremacist groups, that say that all people who are not white are inferior to white people. After all, God is white, Jesus is white, and so white people are more godlike than black people, Hispanics, Asians, or Jews. So they feel the right to beat up, harass, and persecute those not like them because of their understanding of God. So, when they see races mixing, they burn crosses, put on masks, and form lynch mobs, in the name of God.
Theirs is a type of religion, a way of being a Christian, but one that, seen through the eyes of Christ, has lost its way, one that is evil and led more by negative spiritual forces than by the loving God and Parent of Jesus Christ.
Something like that had gone on in much of the religions of the people around the Jewish people God was working with in Leviticus. The nations around them conceived of the Divine as several small-minded, petty tyrants much like the warlords and blood-thirsty tyrants of their own lands. These were selfish, sex-crazed, hungry, egotistical beings, who had to be entertained and appeased by any means necessary. In their mind, the Divine was like a much more selfish, thoughtless, powerful version of themselves, and as such, didn’t have respect for human life and choice.
So they built up practices to appease these gods. The gods were hungry all the time -- for blood. Human blood was the prime rib of the gods, so the nations around Israel sacrificed animals, slaves, and their own children on altars, so that their blood would keep the gods from hurting them.
They believed that the gods sent rain when the gods were happy and horny. So, to make them this way, they took small children and slaves and enslaved them, teaching them to be prostitutes in the their temples. When it didn’t rain, people would gather at the temple and have all kinds of sex -- men with their sisters and mothers, with children, even straight men with men and little boys, as a way of getting the gods aroused so that they would send rain.
(For further information, you may wish to print out copies of http://community.gospelcom.net/Brix?pageID=2725, which gives detailed info on Canaanite fertility religion)
Many scholars agree acts God is condemning in Leviticus 18 and 20 are not just acts of love between consenting adults, like we see in, say, gay marriages, for instance, but sexual acts connected with the temple prostitution and temple orgies of the nations around Israel. Included in these lists are also laws against sacrificing human beings and babies on altars.
This is further demonstrated, not just by this historical context, but the language used in these verses. Two different words are used for man in these verses – ish and and zakhar: “a man [ish] shall not lie with a male [zakhar] as with a woman”. Ish is the general word used for man in the sense of a male human being. Zakhar is a technical term meaning literally “holy one,” a man or male animal specifically dedicated to a deity for some sacred purpose. This technical term is used elsewhere in the Old Testament to describe male temple prostitutes of the type I’ve already described.” (taken from a series of articles on this passage at http://www.epistle.us/)
What God is doing is condemning a set of religions that have gone wrong. He is trying to say to the Israelite people: you were in slavery and I didn’t rape you, I didn’t kill you, I didn’t prostitute you, I didn’t ask the Egyptians to sacrifice you. No, I set you free, I gave you land and room in which to grow, I taught you how to stand on your own two feet. So, don’t imitate these religions around you that enslave others, rape others, prostitute others, kill their children and neighbors. Let your religion be one that sets other free and grants life to others, one that loves your neighbor, one that frees your slaves every 7 years, and so on. That is what God is saying.
Ask, Is having sex with small children and slaves who have been made into prostitutes as a part of worshipping idols the sort of sex most gay couples, lesbian couples, and bisexual people are engaged in, when they are intimate with each other? If not, is this a fair verse to throw at gay people, lesbians, bisexuals, and transgendered people to condemn their relationships?
Finally, ask, Do you see any implications of this in understanding Leviticus 18 & 20? Are there any positive lessons we can gain from it?
(Allow comments)
The purpose of these verses isn’t to limit same-sex intimacy between two committed and loving partners, but to limit practices that are exploitive and abusive, particularly temple prostitution, in which men and young boys were exploited sexually as a way of appeasing the Divine, in ways God never intended or approved.