Apart from the above, the notion of a God are man made because he knew no other image for eternity, the end of Galactical processes, the essence of time, place and phenomenon.

How can man even think of something outside the cricle of his limited senses and knowledge.
The world has hosted many civilizations. They become close to breaking the boundaries and they in the blink of the eye vanish.

My believing in the axiom of opposites gets strengthened when I take the knowledge of measurement until I reach where time, place and measurement have no further meanings, life has been established on the axiom of opposing poles. Man cannot recognise an opposite pole, unless he knows what the other pole is like: if a man has not seen black he cannot identify white if originally black and white are opposites, if there was no sadness no one would know happiness, if there were no females a male cannot prove existence because the description would be hollow.

If there were no badness we would not know goodness until we reach the point where time and place are meaningless. Everything is even opposite at least for us to recongnise them, only God is the oddity above all opposites. Above oddity is incomparable because there is nothing like him or opposite to compare with, he is the essence of material and phenomenon that is why it is not unusual for a man's brain not to recongnise him because he is above understanding.

That is how I know God and this is how he proved himself to me. That is why I say God didn't find man even if he created him, but the correction is, man found God for the reason of his imperfection and limitation of his senses, even if he didn't create man. God is the end of the floating proven by the notion of this existence is man getting lost in the tornado of the big eternal questions of mankind. That is why in every stage since knowing one God man adapted God to suit his needs, he used hm for some of his wished, wishes that stem from imperfection and limitation of human senses and brain, then, when we advanced eh basically changed to another advanced God.

Some believe that all religions are related to an Alienation Religion not to Religious Alienation because it is simpler and older than all the others from Fetishism and Totemism these being the oldest form of worshipping. He then commences to worship statues (Idolatry) then the idea of multiple Gods- like Greek mythology having a god for every purpose.

Alienation has a direct relationship to existence of man. Everything else is trival. If man acknowledges his realtionship, then he would have been alienated when he became distanced from his god. He cannot live separated from his god. However if a material nude existence is concerned then undoubtedly coming closer to god would be the big Alienation. However it is all realted to ownership and how an owner would be alienated from his possessions, however he will feel freedom and peace by uniting them.

Man, for the sake of repairing his imperfection he has to find God as a solution to his imperfection, then if he is finding an established concept of God as in religions then he is being infromed and advised from a religious standpoint connected to public avantage, this will give the concept credibility for people to follwo. Most advisers delay peoples personal davantage for the sake of a bigger unit mostly for the sake of correcting humanity.

Man has to distance himself from the concept of evil which contains "bad" things from the religious viewpoint. Most religious advisers are opposed to man fulfilling his human desires, man must distance himself from his pleasures, to please his God. He must observe what God says or God will be displeased. If he is unhappy he will punish and take revenge in the worst possible way man can only imagine. Religions are always an obstacle in exploration for the sake of man's knowing his own God in his own way, they always want (in the name of the God) man to distance himself from pleasure, that is impossible, because pleasure and aesthetic apprecation are a part of the process of man's body and mind against the concept of pain and anguish, like I was trying to prove before God is uncomparable essence above all contradictions.

Lets say the ability of pleasure and aesthetic appreciation are from God (refer to prior point) that means, pain and anguish comes from there also. Thus we will be in that case shackled against the contractions of pleasure and aesthetics, pain and anguish for the balance of the theory for continuity of our life and proving existence, but how a symbolic essence of good and love would hurt one of his creations made for one of his express purposes.

God made us to experience the fullness of life, experiencing all pleasures, hurts, pains and desires- without these experiences we would not be what God created us to be " a whole being".