If one of these elements are removed the equilibrium will be unbalanced. If we say man was made with all elements 10, love and desire or any other element equals 1, if we take away desire that means the remaining 9 is definitely not 10 because they are basically two different numbers even if they have logical and and gradual relation - definitely 9 is not 10. Therefore I think it is a big sin if someone trys to touch the environs of man and God. A sin should be sin only because it harms others and it is a mistake opposed to the logic that is realted to the eternal chain of the galactical processes.
If a mn is not born he wouldn't die. God is not born, therefore God will not die, if for example we could take man away froom pleasure that would mean man cannot know what pain is, that would be against the theory I have attemppted to prove.
Man is man only with the ful whole element of his existence. the religions want to mould the man into a different man from his original elements that is not wholly him. He presents a different personality which is not a refelction of his ego, that is the essence of Alienation, because hiding a desire or feeling or an original element doesn't mean the element has vanished. The concept has ended, it mean it has disappeared and is hiding somewhere else and it is not expressed because of an ideological obstacle and then it will become a psychological and will grow up and buil a pressure until it is released. The capacity of carrying in a man is limited and you cannot fill a cup and a half of liquid to 1 cup- 1/2 cup will spill, that could reflect badly on man's life.
All the unsavoury things, bad, low, and miserable are related to our present life, all good and hig things including the "shackled" desire we talked about, are related (by the name of the God) to another, ever witnessed life. If we believe that God creatd everything that means no man dare to try and change the green colour of trees for the sake of an unproven and ideological reason that contains some peoples advantage. If God wanted to make them blue he would have made them without opposition. Why would he create them green after some millions believe they are blue, however, I don't think God wants to see man in a different wasy as he created him in the beginning. How a God would create man and then ask him to express a contradicting personality far from the first establishment.
Man had to alienate himself for his circle to please his creator and to be rewarded with eternal life- a life free from pain and suffering. Then this experiment would be unreasonable and rejected if we were to accept the axiom of God perfection, if God is perfect and that is what he is meant to be he won't experiment because experimental processes are for someone who doesn't know the result. Not knowing the result of the process is anti-perfection. Anti-perfection does not align with God's description to be the creator of existence and the universe. If we accept the axiom of God's perfection we have to believe God is the essence of all elements and the pure reason of everything and that of all eternal processes, man is only to have a little role in this vanished life and if we take up on and accept the axiom man has been created by God because he wanted to have ancestors on earth, like some religions says, it would be impossible to prove because only the one concerned for existence and afraid of deadwood would breed generations to give continuity to his life. We are likely to accept the perfection of God, therefore we cannot accept the experiment reason of punishment and reward, neither then concept of God wanting generations on earth.
