ALIENATION FROM SOCIETY
	On the relation of long term wars and national disasters or the collapse of believing a man or a nation from a particular ideology, or the disappointing dwonfallen doctrine from a sublime concept, an individual would place all his efforts and abilities and sacrifice all for doctrine or sublime concept in a result of that for some reason or other. The individual will be alienated from those individauls who still follow the doctrine  or sublime concept. If we take into consideration some of the thoughts refer all kind of disappointments to an ecconomic reason we still get to the idea of the economic reason is not the only reason for the collapse or disappointment of an individual (Marx - critique). Still, one of the more important economic reasons is not the only reason (anti-social disease). Unacceptable behaviour can evolve over generations. A sublime doctrine would stop a person from dong everything and guild up values and ethics, where you get disappointed for a reason you will sub-consciously withdraw from the circle finding reasons for his contradiction and self-fight. The conscience is the nominating picture of every day personality and the sub-conscience nominated the actual ego of the individual, both will be in a vicious war on every day basis and the behaviour will be reflected by the victory of any of them. If the individual could survive the complicated circle he would return to his egos arm, he will then be nominating and expressing his pure own self. But if he couldn't survive from that war then will be estranged from himself to match the circle. He will no longer get along with self, he will be feeling deeply hurt inside of hidden rejection however that rejection could express itself in varied ways, because he rejects the agreed legislation and he would have a deep feeling of the agreement of living together will become like a noose around his neck, this would  cover even the good side of society legislation. He would then follow the enforced parts only. I mean by enforced those things that he must observe to keep him from harm by society. He must do the minimum required of him to avoid punishment- punishment could be shame, disrespect etc. These are the ethics that have been guilt by religion, ideology and society. Sometimes man fights against their own beliefs because it connects to known familiar memories. If the economic situation worsened the relationship of the individual with the weaken, and as a result of that weakness will oppose the value and the forced ethic that comes from society, he will wihtdraw subconsciously from any unsigned protocol with society, the economic situation will then be only a fake reason to discontinue the relationship witht the big unity. Further on he would try to release his hatred by doing any weird things against the unsigned legislaiton and the usual values, that gives him relief from the unfair society, releeasing some heavy presuure from his mind and soul, if these societies sickenesses became for economic reasons and spread and settled, and remianed for generations. They will beocme a part of the new generational culture. the economicproblems could be fixed by political decisions but societies sickness that stems fromt he economic reason will not go away by fixing the economic problems. Society has unsigned afreement for individulas to live together, the individula has to accept an unsigned agreement to be part of unity. It contains sacrificing self advantage and easing the life of each other- work for unity to benefit from it, those agreements were there even before the existence of the individual. An individual would be happy to sacrifice his won advantage for the sake of unity and receive the protection and advantage as a public individual, on the other hand he has to ensure the others are doing the same- he gets the benefit of their sacrifisation, as he does. He would pay tax, serve in the army, obey the law and become loyal to the society of legislation by leaving behind his persoal things. He accepts the fairness of law to draw his fate, whatever and however. However he cannot stand against those powers because it is hte legitimacy of the majority and the equilibrium society must provide the individual with security of fair legal system, social security and took after his advantage and build up his personality- always giving the impression "he's one of us". In dividing the national resources and opportunity for education and a wide range of public services also. Under the social law protect the legal personality and the economic future. If we were to picture this equilibrium (social/ individual) both have to do their bit to uphold their rights and responsibilities. In an time any of them took their rights and neglected their responsibilities and wil occur and will cause a person to withdraw from that unity because of unfairness.