The researcher experienced a paralysis of inaction when first charged with crimes for actions he undertook in conjunction with the conduct of his research. That powerlessness and inactivity was reinforced through hints that the police, the prosecutor, the judge, and the prosecution system in general would act with moderation and rationality if only the defendant would cooperate with the authorities and would not assert his innocence or disclose the questionable circumstances of his arrest to the public. Such actions by this researcher would, contradicting and, therefore, anger the authorities. He was made to feel that ontradicting the official version in the media would lead to embarrassment of the prosecution and to increased levels persecution. Inaction was seen as the best alternative. As it turned out, a reporter for the area media admitted, that, after consultation with her editors, the area media were not interested in presenting issues of child sex slavery to their readers, so the media would not have been interested in a complete accounting of the arrest and charges even if this researcher had chosen to go public.
Of course, efforts at active cooperation with the prosecution were rebuffed. In spite of offers to agree ot be interviewed, made through the attorney, the prosecution refused to interview the defendent to determine the truth of the situation, prefering to rely on prosecution's fantasy and subconscious personal perversions to determine what to believe and what not to believe. But, to assert a claim that the prosecution violated its moral and legal obligation to determine the truth, not merely win the prosecution, would anger the prosecution and cause it demand even more persecution, so the defendant became increasingly powerless to act. Even efforts on the witness stand to offer an explanation were met with overtly and obvious hostile reactions by the assistant district attorney. Again, the defendant did not press the truth in order to prevent raising more hostility from the prosecution. Even character witnesses were addressed with hostility in spite of court protocol requiring them to be addressed with courtesy. After conviction, the system continued to demand that the defendant remain paralyzed to rise to his own defense for fear that sentencing recommendations would be more severe or he be declared "violent" and a "preditor.".
This continued paralysis on the part of the defendent and his attorney is similar to the paralysis faced by sex slaves. If they act in defense of themselves or to free themselves, they are made to feel certain that their situation would become ever more severe and hopeless. But, if they remain inactive and compliant, the system they face may be lenient or at least less severe. They are made to belive that resistance is futile-- even counterproductive.
Pedophile madams claim that a typical way to convince newly acquired sex slaves or rebellious pedophile daughters that resistance is fulite is to allow temporary, controlled escape, then use the incest/pedophile subculture's members and friends within the law enforcement community to apprehend the escaped slaves or daughters and return the escapees to custody of their Masters. The captives realize there is no escape when those who should help them are allies of their Masters.
This researcher experienced the same realization that there was no escape and no hope when he saw evidence of collaboration between law enforcement and the incest/pedophile subculture in his own arrest and persecution. During late 2000 and early 2001, self-professed incest/pedophile Master and child sex slaver Jerry Grant/Morgan described several individuals he claimed were members of his subculture. These included a professional Domme and infantilist from York, PA and a member of the justice community who appeared to be a person later identified as an investigator with the PA Attorney General's office. Immediately after this investigator's arrest, documents-- and later testimony-- proved that the prosecution was in direct collaboration with both the infantilist Domme and the Attorney General investigator and that the collaboration preceeded his arrest. The hunter had been trapped by the hunted and the hunted had the full force of the law behind them. Resistance was futile. Efforts to put the Attorney General investigator on the stand were futile as he spent two days running from a constable armed with a defense subpoena as investigator waited for the trial to end.
Knowing the symbiotic relationship between the legal authorities and the incest/pedophile leadership made it difficult to raise witnesses for the defense. Those who knew of the investigator's research from as early as April 2000 were afraid to have their identities known and were, therefore, intimidated into inaction. A recruited breeder, saved from the subculture by this investigator's actions, was similarly afraid to provide testimony, for fear authorities would take actions to harm her or to harm her father. Her father serves in law enforcement himself as a guard at a juvenile boot camp in western Pennsylvania. The father also had direct communications with both Jerry Grant/Morgan and Dana and would suffer employment consequences if his relationship with the subculture was to become known. The breeder's estranged husband was also a member of the U. S. Airforce and she believed he would suffer negative personnel consequences from exposure of his wife's association with the incest/pedophile subculture.
The fears by potential witneses are justified and this researcher was, and remains, reluctant to have names provided to the incest/pedophile subculture. Perhaps the prosecution did not know of the the Domme's and child sex slaver's activities and were merely taking guidance from these individuals without knowing of their involvement in the incest/pedophile subculture. Perhaps members of the prosecution knew exactly what was going on and were acting deliberately. In either case, harm could befall any potential witness. Slavery of women and children is nearly equal in income with drug sales and illegal arms sales. There is no reason to suspect that witnesses to the crime of slavery would be dealt with any different than witnesses to the crimes of producing and selling drugs or marketing in arms.
Pedophile madam Dana often remarked in conversations with this researcher that one of the keys to the multi-generational survival of the subculture was the subculture's ability to compromise both its victims and its potential enemies into inaction. This reasearcher has been witness to that ability and knows how powerfully that ability can be applied, both to its sex slave and submissive victims and to those who would expose the activities of this subculture to the world.