EYE CATCHING NEWS ARTICLES I READ


IRS SETTLES SUIT ALLEGING AGENCY SPURRED SUICIDE. (Manchester, N.H.)

A woman who accused the IRS in a $1-million lawsuit of driving her husband to suicide, said Wednesday that the agency has agreed to a settlement that will wipe out her tax debt of more than $400,000 and allow her to keep her home. "What happened to me could have happened to any taxpayer," Shirley Barron said. The Barron case, one of the first lawsuits filed under a 1996 amendment to the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights, was cited last fall during Senate hearings into IRS abuses. Bruce Barron, a 47 year-old lawyer, killed himself by carbon monoxide poisoning in his garage in 1996 after learning that a bank was foreclosing on the couple's home in Derry because the IRS had placed a lien on it. At the time, the couple owed $330,000 in back taxes, penalties and interest. After her husband's death, the IRS continued to pursue her. The agency seized a Cape Cod vacation home, Barron's wages and retirement account, and placed liens against her life insurance benefits.

(What do I think?) It's about time. Thanks to the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights.

SEX GOSSIP BEGONE: END THE TABLOID ERA TO FULFILL AMERICAN'S POTENTIAL.. BY KIRK DOUGLAS

My grandchildren, Kelsey,5, and Tyler,2, will be adults in the next millennium. They will look back with wonder at the end of this century. They will call it the Tabloid Era. With amazement they will reflect on this picaresque time: violence all over the world, suicide bombings, Iraq and Iran building nuclear and germ bombs, the Middle East on the brink of war, genocide in Yugoslavia and Africa. But all these headlines are subordinated to one story: the sex life of the President. Forget about the booming economy, ignore the low unemployment rate and the rising stock market, the sex life of the president dominates all. Millions of dollars are spent trying to find the answer to these questions. Did he ask Paula for sex, eight years ago? Did he have sex with Monica, an intern? Did he grope Kathleen Willey? It continues with almost religious fever. The rest of the world looks on us with bewilderment and amusement, but the search goes on. This all makes me very nervous. I feel eyes looking everywhere. You can't be too careful. I start to delve into my own past. Let's see, I remember that about two years ago a man presented himself at my front door. He announced to the maid that he was there to see his father. "Who is your father?" she asked. "Kirk Douglas." Before my maid can close her mouth, he continued. "My mother, on her death bed, confessed to me that Kirk Douglas was my father." When I was told this, I felt a constriction in my throat. I had made several movies in Europe and I must confess I was friendly with the natives. "Did he say when he was born?" I asked, trying desperately to sound calm. "Yes," my maid answered, handing me a photo of a very attractive woman holding a baby. "You met his mother in Stuttgart, Germany, during the war." I began to breathe more easily. I was in the Navy during the war, stationed in the Pacific. Years later, I traveled to Europe in 1952. I have never been in Stuttgart, but still I get letters from my "son." I have four real sons. Not long ago, I was having a drink with Michael. He put me in a warm mood telling me how proud he was of me for receiving the President's Medal of Freedom. "Dad, you took the time to travel all over the world, at your own expense, talking about democracy in America. I want to do something for my country too.""Well, why don't you?" "How?" "Go into politics." Michael's eyes widened. "Politics!" "Yes, politics." and then I leaned toward him and said earnestly, "Michael, you are a star. You have made a lot of money. You did it. Now go into politics and do something for your country." Michael laughed. I was startled. He continued to laugh. "What's so funny?" "Oh, Dad. Politics? And have them bring out that I smoked pot in college and I inhaled!" I said nothing and he continued. "And they will write about every love affair I had--or didn't have." Politics has become a dirty game played with sex, bribery and corruption. How many young men and women with the right qualifications to help our country have avoided playing this game? We have entered the tabloid era. All the media are contaminated by the cancer of sex gossip. Our generation has certainly left a mess for our children and grandchilderen to clean up. But I have faith. My mother, a Russian peasant immigrant, never tired of saying "America, such a wonderful land." We must have hope in our children. They will overcome the tabloid era and fulfill the promise of America.

(What do I think?) I voted for Mr. Clinton, believing that he is capable in making our country a better place to live in. For me, he is a human being, just like anyone of us, who has some "skeletons in his closets". BUT WHO DOESN'T. I think, it is only the pope, in this whole wide world, who has not succumbed to the life's temptations. I am looking at the whole picture. We have better economy, the interest rates are down and yes, unemployment rate is down. These issues are the ones that matter most. I don't see anything wrong, either, for any actor or actors to aspire and enter politics. They, too, have all the rights to serve our country. Thanks for this article, Mr. Douglas.

THE ACTOR VS THE MILLIONAIRE...(Los Angeles Times Editorials)

Presidential election in the Philippines pited a popular former actor against the ruling party's millionaire candidate, who trailed badly in the polls but insisted he could make up ground over the weekend. That claim in most other elections might be laughed off, but the Philippines'long history of vote tampering has raised doubts of a clean election. Leading in the polls is Vice President Joseph Estrada, a populist and college dropout best known for his movie roles as tough good guys. The flamboyant 61-year-old sports an Elvis Presley hairdo and claims his womanizing, gambling and hard-drinking ways are behind him. Estrada's main opponent is House Speaker Jose de Venecia, a jounalist turned rich businessman. He is supported by President Fidel V. Ramos, who made no secret of his distaste for Estrada in his six years in the presidency. Ramos, a popular general and a key figure in the 1986 People Power revolution that drove Ferdinand E. Marcos from the Phillipnes, has not spoken to his vice president in months and suggest that the Philippine media conduct a "demolition" campaign against him. What makes Philippine elections so vulnerable to cheating are the old-fashioned hand counts and extended delivery times, as ballot boxes are carried from the country's 7,000 islands to Manila. Congress officially announces the winner several weeks after the election. This year, even the respected Roman Catholic Cardinal Jaime Sin believes that Estrada will win unless he is derailed by vote rigging. Under Ramos, the Philippines has made significant economic progress and firmed up democratic institutions. An unblemished election this year would add to that record. And if Filipinos want Estrada to lead their country, they would not be the first voters to put the national reins in the hands of an actor.

(what do I think?)I subscribed to the most popular channel among Filipinos here-THE FILIPINO CHANNEL and based on what I have seen thru this channel, P.I. have progressed. I learned that several actors have entered politics and they are as good as any well educated, college graduate peers. The U.S. had an actor as President and I believe, that it is high time for my country (I am a naturalized american citizen) to have an actor to manage the Philippines.

A DEVALUED PRESIDENCY-(The San Diego Union Tribune)

As chastened yet combative Bill Clinton addressed the nation to acknowledge lying about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, one question seemed inescapable: Why didn't he tell the truth from the start, and spare the American people the wrenching scandal that now threatens his presidency? In the seven months since he wagged his finger at the television camaras and flatly denied having sex with a White House intern half his age, Clinton has enmeshed his administration in a tangle of falsehoods of his own making. By lying repeatedly- under oath in the Paula Jones case and directly to the American people on subsequent occasions- Clinton has recklessly compromised the stature of his office. The sad result is a devalued presidency, one whose credibility has been undermined, whose moral authority has been squandered, whose vital bond of trust with the country has been broken. The Clinton presidency may not be crippled, but it has been permanently tarnished. The question now is whether the president's televised mea culpa will be enough for him to regain all that he has forfeited. Although he grudgingly accepted responsibility for his misdeeds, his carefully massaged words seemed calculated to turn the political tables on special prosecutor Kenneth Starr and the Republican Congress. Indeed, his remarks were punctuated less by personal remorse than by defiance toward the many others he blames for his predicament. And his claim that his false sworn testimony in the Jones case was "legally accurate" was yet another vintage-Clinton attempt to manipulate the truth. The president was correct, certainly, in declaring that the country has been distracted by this matter for too long. But still to be resolved are very serious allegations - potential obstruction of justice, perjury, witness tampering- that go well beyond Clinton's private life. Most Americans are uncomfortable, and understandably so, hearing the intimate details of the president's sexual encounters. That aversion may help explain Clinton's continued high approval ratings. Had his relationship with Lewinsky remained simply a private indiscretion, a strong case could be made that it should have remained part of the president's private life. But Clinton himself made it a public matter when he lied about it under oath and stonewalled for seven long months in a bid to conceal the truth. Ultimately, the American people will pass final judgment on the president's conduct. They very well may forgive this drawn-out episode in the Clinton presidency, but they are not likely to forget it. More important, a definitive decision cannot be reached until Starr completes his report and sends it to Congress. Only then will all of the facts be available. If they show that Clinton told the whole truth last night- there was no effort by the White House to obstruct justice-impeachment proceedings would be highly unlikely. In that case, censure by Congress would the stiffest penalty the president likely would face. But if Starr's investigation produces compelling evidence of other crimes in high places, the sense of betrayal that Americans feel today will be significantly magnified and the future of Bill Clinton's presidency decidedly uncertain.

(What do I think?)I am very dissappointed in our President. I feel my trust for him was betrayed. I was one of his fans and supporters and I defended him against friends and relations in the past. My feelings have changed. I now see him as a failure and anything he would say and decide for this nation are no longer effective for me. I feel he shame this country and he does not belong there in the White House any longer. I agree that he is just a human being like any other like him, but he has a respected high position, and he should have controlled his sexual desires while in office. He should have valued the leadership that was given to him by us. I now think, he must have a lot of time in his hands to be able to do some hanky panky; his concentration was not to make this nation gain more respect from other countries. He humiliated the American people with his uncontrollable womanizing..

return to main page

or sign my guestbook| go to chatroom | friends | advice corner | pictures | about me