An Enemy of the State *
Promoting lawful Constitutional government
in these united States of America.

* The Interrobang (once made on a manual typewriter by typing an exclamation point over a question mark) indicates surprised outrage or outraged surprise. In this particular usage, it carries connotations of, "How DARE you "

Per the customary flag etiquette as codified in Title 4, United States Code Annotated, Sec. 8(a): "The flag should never be displayed with the union down, except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property." these flags fly inverted in recognition of the un-Constitutional 'dire distress' imposed upon the People of these united States of America by the unconscientious persons purporting to be the United States Government.

Notice:
My God-given Right to present this intellectually-challenging and currently politically-incorrect information is protected and guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America and by Article 1 of the California Constitution.

Happy/sappy, public-school-educated, television-addicted, totally brainwashed, liberal/progressive/socialists [whatever you may call yourselves] should probably go away now; this site will just make you uncomfortable. You might even have to start thinking.

Here is why the 'liberal' folks just won't 'get' it:

Cognitive Dissonance and Perceptions:
[An explanation of George Orwell's 'doublethink'.]

---

Quotes from the United States Supreme Court (boldface emphasis added):

In doing this, I shall have occasion incidently to evince, how true it is, that states and governments were made for man; and at the same time how true it is, that his creatures and servants have first deceived, next vilified, and at last oppressed their master and maker.
Justice Wilson [seriatim opinion], Chisholm v. Georgia (1793), 2 Dall. (2 U.S.) 419, 1 L.Ed 440, 455.

This nation, as experience has proved, cannot always remain at peace, and has no right to expect that it always will have wise and humane rulers, sincerely attached to the principles of the Constitution. Wicked men, ambitious of power, with hatred of liberty and contempt of law, may fill the place once occupied by Washington and Lincoln; and if this right is conceded, and the calamities of war again befall us, the dangers to human liberty are frightful to contemplate. ... For this, and other equally weighty reasons, they secured the inheritance they had fought to maintain, by incorporating in a written Constitution the safeguards which time had proven were essential to its preservation. Not one of these safeguards can the President or Congress or the Judiciary disturb, except the one concerning the writ of habeas corpus.
Ex Parte Milligan (1866), 71 U.S. 2, 18 L.Ed 281, 297.

"All systems of government suppose they are to be administered by men of common sense and common honesty. In our country, as all ultimately depends on the voice of the people, they have it in their power, and it is to be presumed they generally will choose men of this description: but if they will not, the case, to be sure, is without remedy. If they choose fools, they will have foolish laws. If they choose knaves, they will have knavish ones. But this can never be the case until they are generally fools or knaves themselves, which, thank God, is not likely ever to become the character of the American people." [Justice Iredell] (Fries's Case (CC) F Cas No 5126, supra.)
Ludecke v. Watkins (1948), 335 U.S. 160; 92 L.Ed 1881, 1890; 68 S.Ct. 1429.

A longer quote concerning private Citizen's property rights from United States v. Lee (1882), 106 U.S. 196, 27 L.Ed. 171, 182, 1 S.Ct. 240.

American military forces were infiltrated into Russia to assist the 'friendly' Russian forces during a Russian civil war. While the American troops are inside Russia, open conflict erupts and they need to get out.
With the 'friendly' Russian troops, they commandeer a Russian train and unsuccessfully attempt to exit Russia.
Within a year, they have abandoned their efforts to escape, have killed the roving 'bad guys', and have established a viable trade among the villages along the railline they have adopted and protected.
One day the 'friendly' Russian officer comes and tells the ranking American officer that the Russian 'authorities' are really upset: "They have declared you an 'Enemy of the State'," he says.
The American officer ponders this and finally answers, "An 'Enemy of the State', eh? Well ... for that, at least, I am grateful."

The concept of an 'Enemy of the State' is a socialist/fascist conceit, based on two grossly false premises:
(1) 'The State', recognizing no other Diety, purports to be 'GOD' and demands mindless and unquestioning absolute loyalty and obedience from its subjects; and
(2) Anyone not automatically agreeing with 'The State' MUST be a 'criminal' and/or 'crazy,' and MUST also be committing 'blasphemy' against the self-evident 'GOD' State.
The reality is that no inherently-corrupt government, or religion, can long withstand objective observation or criticism:

Our Enemy, the State:

With the above articles in mind, and considering the present general lack of moral and ethical character within 'The United States Government'; I too expect to be vilified as an 'Enemy of the State'. I can think of few higher honors bestowed by the self-righteous.

In elementary and high school, I said (and meant) the pledge on the flag hundreds of times, but I, subsequently, have not read in any statute which states that I should pledge any allegiance whatsoever to the subversive usurpation of these united States of America represented by the gold-fringed military Color / Standard / Ensign currently displayed in courtrooms, government offices, and some churches. I don't know what it MEANS; I don't think THEY know.

My friends sometimes say:

" [Oooooo] You're really anti-government, aren't you?"
Or, " [Oooooo] You're some kind of an anarchist or something, aren't you?"

So I tell them the truth:

"No; I am not 'anti-government', an 'anarchist', an 'extremist', a 'radical', nor any other derogatory/defamatory/slanderous/stupid label.
"I am, and have always considered myself to be, a loyal American.

"I have absolutely no problem with the legitimate, lawful Constitutional government of these united States of America. I, together with all the other honest People of these united States of America, AM the lawful government.
"As the political posterity of the Founders of this Nation, I have, from God by birthright, an undivided interest-in-common in this Nation [my interest-in-common divided-by the combined interest-in-common of each-and-every other member of this Republic].
"I just don't believe that our public servants [those supposedly elected or hired and PAID to work FOR me and us] feel, believe, understand, or have ANY concept that, by force of Law, they work for us; not for themselves, not for their families, not for their union(s), not for some foreign country, not for the U.N.O. I don't think they understand that without the Constitution and the Law in FULL force and effect, they have no lawful job.

"I have no patience with public servants who seem to claim a Right to annoy, harass, persecute, prosecute, and, perhaps, kill me or us, while fully expecting to be exempt from the very same Constitution(s), statute(s), and regulation(s) to which they demand that I and we unfailingly and unquestioningly conform.
"Nobody in his right mind takes insubordination/insolence/flack/abuse from his/her public servants. That is not lawful government, that is unlawful oppression and tyranny.

"I have no need or desire to live in Nazi Germany, fascist Italy, Communist Russia, or 'frantically-Terrorist-seeking' America!
"My duty to God and to my Nation is to prevent that from happening. 'Zero Tolerance' works both ways.

"Under lawful Constitutional government, if public servants misbehave, the lawful remedy is to discipline or fire them.
"Under lawful government, when public servants practice Subversion against us, the lawful remedy is to fire and jail them.
"Under lawful government, when public servants commit Treason against us, the lawful remedy is to hang them ... by the neck ... until dead ... with hemp rope.
"Maybe that is why we no longer have lawful Constitutional government (or hemp rope) in these united States of America."

The Communists have said for years that their 'friends' are: other True Communists, Fellow Travelers, and Useful Idiots. It may occasionally be appropriate to ask oneself:

The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution for these United States of America are still the ONLY lawful and legitimate foundation of our Republic. The only article of the Constitution which may ever be legitimately suspended is the writ of Habeas Corpus in times of invasion or insurrection.
The Constitution is NOT 'old,' 'time-worn,' 'outdated,' 'obsolete,' 'irrelevant,' 'nationalistic,' 'isolationist,' nor any other derogatory characterization.
Nor is it 'flexible', 'living', 'mutable', or 'interpretable' by any court.

Anyone who tells you differently is:
(1) Ignorant [does not know any better, but can learn if he/she will];
(2) Stupid [does not know any better and can't/won't/doesn't-want-to learn]; or
(3) Deceitful [knows better and is lying to you or trying to cheat you].

Lacking a firm understanding of the basic principles of this Constitutional Republic by each and every Citizen, we have become ignorant 'subjects', mis-educated and oppressively mis-governed by an un-principle-d 'United States Government'.

If you have not had a chance to read these documents, here is your opportunity:

Both The Federalist Papers: and The Anti-Federalist Papers: are collections of articles urging or opposing the adoption of the new Constitution. They were intended to be read by the average literate and educated man of the time. The reader was expected to be familiar with and to understand the arguments, the references, the social context, and to agree/disagree strongly. American courts sometimes rely upon the Federalist Papers to determine what the original intent of the Constitution was.

[I suspect the Confederate States of America may have taken the position at their creation that, "This Constitution thing is just not working properly for us; we're going back to The Articles of Confederation." (Hence: Confederate States).]