Writers Anonymous
  Developmental Stages of a Writer in Three Acts
  Act 2: "I am a good writer".
Developmental Stages of a Writer in Three Acts
Act 1
Act 2
Act 3
Main Page
Individualistic approach with publishing as the goal; over-reliance on image of self as a good writer and need for confirmation of this image, just want to hear their stuff is good, that's all.
Difficulty tolerating any questions about their work during critiques because questions seem to indicate that a piece is not done; in this stage, writer tends to obsess over done or not done; they want to produce finished pieces (would die to hear some poets talk about how they have been writing a certain poem for five years).

No sense of journey, not for self or others, in other words, they have arrived, S/he is a good writer now, they are done; can be impatient with beginners, why waste time on their stuff, they won't be as good as I am; sometimes harsh or nit-picky critiques of others.
Tend to be focused more on self than on the group; what is best for me as opposed to what is best for everyone; e.g., question in coffee house is how many poems can I read tonight, as opposed to how many poems would it be good for the audience and participants to hear?
Tend to vent poems in an automatic way; no sense of the preciousness of words; would just as soon read twenty of their poems in a row to other people as five or ten; they do not think that maybe by the tenth poem, listeners could be burned out, distracted, no longer hearing them; they think that they are so good, people always want to hear them.

Have a belief that other people need to hear their stuff, that other people would benefit from hearing their stuff; tend to read multiple pieces at open mikes or meetings with no sense that the reading is for themselves; not clear on why they even need to read; the poem or story is done, so they're not looking for reactions, they seem to think they are doing the audience a favor by reading their work to them; ironically, they think people would love to sit and hear them read their stuff, but they do not typically go out and hear other writers read or perform.
No sense of having to work or prove anything to generate an audience - they are a good writer, after all, isn't it obvious? Reading their stuff should be enough; do not seem to have clue of how much Western culture disparages poetry and literature - or in the very least does not understand it... they also do not see themselves as amateurs in this restrictive, limited environment.


  Copyright Writers Anonymous © 2001