1. Paleontologists cannot find a course of ape turn to men
        If I say men came from apes, or according to some Paleontologists says that "men is came from a hunchbacked kind of ape", if that's so, they should found the process of change from ape to men. But facts tells us that there is only fossils of men and ape, no apemen or humanoid fossils. There were birds and mammals that swam like fish, but none with gills; that were dogs of many sizes and shapes, but no dogcats or dogcows or feathered dogs (Daniel C. Dennett).

2. The structure of Man's blood is different from Ape's blood
        Man's blood, according to scientific analysis, it's the same to any skin type. But Ape's blood is totally different from Man's. This proves that Man and Ape is not in the same descendant. That's why man cannot use Ape's blood for blood transfusion. Although the blacks and whites are from the same descendant, does not mean that blacks came from ape and whites came from blacks. Man can stand straight and have long hair but apes have none of those.

3. According to the principle of birth
        There is a very high principle in biology, different kind of animal cannot give bird. Man and Ape cannot give birth together, that's why man and ape is in the different kind. But blacks can give birth with the whites, not only they can give birth, but also born intelligent and healthy descendant, and they can continue to bred children.

4. Any kind of animal cannot change mutually
        Cats cannot turn to dog, dog cannot turn to chicken. Thousands and thousands of animal or life forms cannot change from one form to another. Every kind of life forms must have an ancestor. Like the bible says in GEN 1:25, "And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and everything that creepeth upon the earth after his kind......(KJV)".

5. Acquired change cannot be inherited
        Change of environment can affected one's body structures and traits but it cannot be inherited to the next generation. The changes after we born cannot be inherited, and this is the Inherited Law of genetic. That's why an Ape will always be an Ape, no environmental change can affect the structures and traits of our descendant.

6. According to the living of creatures
        If evolution really exists, why the way that creature lives is still the same as before ? We couldn't see any changes. Birds still make nest, Bee's still get pollen from flowers etc. Only we see minor change in human. If ape can turn to man, then we should see another special being that have such a great success like us. Can we find a being like us ? A mental deficient Ape and a intelligent monkey, both of which has also a wide gap, no scientists can prove there is a link between these two animals.

7. Man is not evaluating but regressing
        The invention of scientists, is just another copy of past inventions, add and change something on it. If we destroy all the inventions of our ancestors, we human could not have been so sophisticated. If we try to compare us with our ancestors, for example, in craftsmanship, arts, fine arts, poems, music, literature, we are so short of it. One biologist says, "man's golden periods lies in the beginning of mankind". Thus, we are not came from apes.

8. Few questionable answers
        In the past, we think that our cecum and coccyx has no usage, then we thought that those were left over from the evolution of our ancestors. But scientific evidence has proven that no any structures of human being can left out.
        We all thought that human's enbryon growth is just the same like fish, reptiles, bird and beast. They found that the embryon growth of human exists a gill-like structure; this is the evidence of human came from fishes. Although there exists a gill-like structure in enbryon, but it has no gill's functions, and it later became the gum and the tongue after the baby had born.
        Another thing is that, in the growth of an enbryon, it first forms the heart, then the blood cells. But in the evolution is different, or opposite; lower stage animal first exist blood cells, then the blood vessels, then lastly, the heart. This is not totally with the fact.

9. The Java's and Beijing's
        There is no evidence to support the Java and Beijing's people. They couldn't find the whole structure of the Beijing people; they just found those fossils from different locations, time and period and match them together. But is the fossils really is from man ? or just a mixture of man and monkey ? or others ? They even got mixed up one time that they actually match with the wrong fossils, its the teeth of a wild pig and they thought its from man.
        The Java people is found by one of the doctor in Holand, in 1891, he found 1 fossil of the head, 3 teeth, and one bone from the left tight, then he said its the Java's people. But is it really from one single people ? He has no answer for that. But that place has a mixture of 24 kinds of animal fossils. And 1937, somebody says he's wrong. Now be still not sure where we came from; can we really agree that we are actually came from apes ?

11. One thing that evolution cannot explained
        The polar bear in North Pole, we can see that their paws have lots of furs. But we couldn't find a single animal paws that has furs. The fur is to protect the polar bear from sliding to the sea when they running. But think back, who predicted the polar bear will live in the North Pole and made them furs ? If we say that polar bear's furs is due to evolution, the growing of furs is due to the ancestors of polar bear, they  came from China and moved to the north pole, in order to survive, they grow furs. But think clearly that, if they have no furs, how can they survive before they have grown their furs ? They should be all died in the sea and all the polar bears extinct. How can this answered by a single hypothesis of evolution ?

12. Two things that Darwin did
        a) Darwin classified living creatures from fossils and bones.
        b) He created a hypothesis, and said man came from these creatures from an order, a lower level to a higher level.
        The first one was fitted the scientific theory. But the second one, says that all creatures is evolutionised, and that doesn't give any solid evidence. A hypothesis is different from a theory. Hypothesis based on theories but have no evidences. If a hypothesis has enough evidence to support, it then became a theory. But now it's just a hypothesis.

13. Darwin believe in God
        "I believe the most original life forms must be created by our mighty God. If there is no absolute reason, the universe will not have existed".

(actually there is still more to prove he is wrong)

Dennis Yap Tsong Hsih