VANMAAREN'S INTERRUPTIONS PROBLEM SURVEY



ANNOUNCEMENT:
INTERRUPTIONS SURVEY UPDATE
BY MARION ROSE

01: Before I say anything else, I want to thank all of you who have participated int the survey on the "false call waiting interruptions" problem. Thank you for investing your time and effort in completing the long and complicated survey that was posted to this site in the last few weeks. I also want to express my thanks and gratitude to Pete VanMaaren, the host of this very informative and useful site for Webtv users, who has devoted many hours of his precious time to this project, and without whose support and friendship I would not have been able to continue on in my persistent effort to isolate the real cause of this very annoying problem of false call waiting interruptions, that so many users have been experiencing for so many months now. 02: Well folks, I have good news for you and bad news! The good first: I BELIEVE I HAVE ISOLATED THE MAJOR CAUSE OF THESE INTERRUPTIONS. Before I continue, and tell you what it is, I must first also give mention to ONE Webtv user who completed the survey, who very astutely gave me the first real clue to what was, perhaps, causing the problem. His comments to the survey can be seen HERE: David's comments:

THANK YOU DAVID, for your very astute observations, which led me to follow up with research and experiments that finally uncovered what I BELIEVE to be the MAJOR cause of this problem. 03: THIS IS IT: You have been told tht these mysterious interruptions have been due to possibly several things: too many phone devices on your tel. line; "noise" in your phone line wiring either inside or outside your residence; capability of your local phone companys' lines to handle certain high modem speeds, etc., and have been given advice by WeCare reps and users alike ranging from moving the box off top of tv set, to phone line filters, to batteries in your keyboards, to using surge protectors, etc., etc., ad infinitum! Well folks, this is what I believe to be causing the problem for most of you. The ISP (Internet Service Provider) you are using to connect to Webtv (the access numbers your terminal dials into to connect you to Webtv) has programmed in what is known as "timeouts" during periods of "inactivity" when you are online. This "timeout" is a common practice that most ISP's employ in order to alleviate the traffic congestion caused by too many people trying to connect to the Internet, and stay online, at any given time (not just "peak periods"). Webtv uses Concentric Networks and UUNET (major Internet Service Providers) to provide you with the access numbers assigned to you, in your location, to connect yur terminal to the Webtv service in California.I am not aware, at this time, if Webtv utilizes any OTHER network providers, other than Concentric and UUNET for their access numbers, but in any event, these are the two networks from which most of you are connecting to Webtv. I know this because I obtained a list of Concentric Networks access numbers for the entire U.S., and the majority of you (who reported your access numbers in the survey) are using those numbers for access and some are using UUNET access numbers. I called Concentric Networks' customer service and learned that they do indeed utilize programmed "timeouts", on a 24 hour basis, regardless of whether it is during a peak period or not.Their service senses when the person online is in an "inactive" state, and in intervals of 15 to 30 minutes will interrupt that users connection if they have been "inactive" for from 15 to 30 minutes. 04: Upon learning of these programmed timeouts, I realized that webtv had me on an 800 number for access while they were testing my connections from their offices in Calif. I experienced much fewer interruptions on this 800# access than when they put me back on the local access numbers, which were Concentric Networks and UUNET access numbers. (I don't know why this would be so, other than perhaps that those 800# access numbers do not go through the same Concentric or UUNET networks. So I then conducted several experiments (which I would like you all to try as well) that revealed to me that the false call waiting disconnections were indeed caused by these "timeouts" by the local ISP you are using to connect to Webtv. The first experiment I tried was writing a long email. I pulled up the "write" screen in email, and started a letter and noted the time I started. You will notice that when you are writing an e-mail (or doing anything else online) that the status bar at bottom of your screen, in the right hand corner, has a green line which is called the "heartbeat". When you are typing your letter and do nothing else but type, and do not use the "back" button, or link to anywhere else while writing the email, that the "heartbeat" line dos not move - it stays flat and straight. This means that you are not "loading" anything, and thus is interpreted by the ISP (your local access connection) as an "inactive" state, even though you are "actively" writing your email and creating "movement" on the screen by either typing or scrolling up and down. (If you leave the box for awhile, and do not create this "movement" the Webtv box will disconnect so as not to burn the image into your t.v. screen. This is the automatic 10 minute disconnect that we are all well aware of). 05: In my experiment, with call waiting ENABLED, I continued writing my letter without using the back button at any time, which would create the "heartbeat" to pulsate indicating "activity". After exactly 30 minutes of typing, I then received my first interruption producing the screen message: "Your connection to Webtv has been interrupted, freeing your line for another call", and, of course, THERE WAS NO CALL! I reconnected to the same place I was on screen and continued to type my letter for another 30 minutes. Exactly 30 minutes later, I received the second interruption, same screen message stating I was interrupted to free line for another call, still no call. After reconnecting again, I continued on for another 30 minutes and received yet another disconnection, with same screen message, exactly 30 minutes from when I reconnected in the same email. I then ended my first experiment. 06: I then tried several other experiments: 1: I DISABLED call waiting in dialing options set up, performed the same experiment in email, with the "heartbeat" remaining still throughout my typing, and at exactly 30 minutes I received a disconnection with the screen message that says: "Your connection to Webtv has been interrupted" without the added "freeing your line for another call", the TYPE 2 interruptions, as described in the survey. 2: I then did the same experiment while connected to my secondary access number, which is a UUNET access number, and produced the same results: disconnection every 30 minutes, with same "freeing your line for another call" screen message popping up. 3: I then did same experiment while viewing a website, by reading a long page from that website, without ever linking or loading anything else, the "heartbeat" remaining still while I read the page, or scrolled up and down in it. this test also produced the same results: disconnected every 30 minutes, same screen message. 07: At this point I was jumping up and down with excitement, exclaiming: "THIS IS IT", "This has GOT to be IT !", I had isolated the MAJOR cause of these interruptions!!! If I can manipulate the disconnection screen messages to pop up, then it can't possibly be a phenomonen exclusive to my own Webtv terminal, and I MUST have isolated the real cause of these interruptions, that MUST be effecting all other users experiencing this problem as well. 08: EXPLANATION: When the local ISP senses that you are in an "inactive" state, i.e., the "heartbeat" is still and not loading anything, the ISP then "hangs up the line", thus triggering the screen message that you are disconnecting "freeing your line for another call" (this is a Webtv screen message, it is not programmed in by the ISP). This particular screen message is only available in the box when you have call waiting ENABLED. When c/w is DISABLED, or whenyou don't even have call waiting phone service on your line, the only screen message available in your Webtv box is the one where it merely tells you you have been disconnected, without the "freeing your line for another call" part. It is not available because the box "knows" that you have "blocked" call waiting in Dialing Options Set-up, or chose "no call waiting on my line" in Dialing Options. The box recognizes the local ISP "timeout" as though it were a "hang-up" of your telephone line. Notice that if you pick up the receiver of your telephone while online, it will produce the same screen message you get when you get these false call waiting interruptions, or real incoming calls. 09: I have asked two other Webtv users who have had this disconnect problem to conduct the same experiments. They both produced the same results as I did in my experiments, at the same 30 minute intervals. I want to caution you that when you do this experiment, you MUST not just leave the screen still, you MUST KEEP IT IN MOTION by typing or scrolling. If the screen is not kept in motion, you will then get the automatic 10 minute "screen saver" disconnection, which then in just a few minutes will show the rolling Webtv logo until you log back in. If you get this type of disconnection you will have to log back in (reconnect on the "reconnect" box on the screen) and start the timing all over again. Likewise, if you get a real incoming call during the experiment, you will have to reconnect and start the timing of the email all over again. 10: I would like to ask all those who complete the survey to conduct the same type of experiments. Do one when you are writing email with call waiting enabled; do another when you are viewing a website, and perhaps another when you have call waiting disabled. Also, check to see if your secondary ISP access number produces the same results: disconnected after 30 minutes of "inactivity" (remember, do not link to anything else, or use back button while you are conducting the experiment). 11: I would also like for all of you to be aware that Concentric Networks informed me that these "timeouts" (disconnections) for "inactivity" programmed in for all their customers, regardless of whether you are on a p.c. or Webtv box to access the Internet. They also told me that they can't answer any questions about their "contract" with Webtv, and cannot know if Webtv can do anything to alleviate this problem for Webtv users. (some pc users can actually write email when they are not logged in to the Internet, so that that "activity" is not recognized as "inactivity", and they can't get bumped offline. I doubt if Webtv can do this for Webtv users). Also, Concentric informed me that the timeout intervals can range from 15-30 minutes of inactivity before you are disconnected. It was also not made clear to me whether this is a standard interval for ALL areas of the U.S., or whether ALL Webtv users have this timeout programmed in by their local ISP connection through Concentric's access numbers and network. Therefore it is still unclear as to why MOST users of Webtv, in all areas of the U.S., have not complained to Webtv about the same type of call waiting interruptions. This MAY be explained by finding out if ALL Webtv users, in ALL areas of country, are ALSO getting these "timeouts" set at intervals of 15-30 minutes, or if they are not, why not? This remains for the Webtv engineers to determine. NOTE: READING THIS LONG ANNOUNCEMENT MAY VERY WELL CAUSE ONE OF THESE TIMEOUT INTERRUPTIONS. As you scroll and read this page, you may get the interruption every 30 minutes you spend in this "inactive" state, while NOT EVER using the back button to create the "activity" needed to override the programmed timeout. Reading this page may very well produce your first "experiment" to see if you get these interruptions every 30 minutes, or every 15 minutes as the case may be. While reading this announcement myself, I DID get the interruption after 30 minutes of reading and scrolling. 12: Some of you MAY experience these disconnections more frequently than others, or more frequently than at 30 minute intervals (it could be that certain areas of U.S., or during certain "peak periods" of Internet usuage, Concentric or UUNET have their timeouts set at 15 minute intervals, not 30 minutes). Furthermore, some of you reported in the survey that you get these interruptions sporadically, or infrequently, or not at all for days or weeks. The reason for this, I believe, is in your online "habits" - some of you may write more long emails than others, some may only write emails taking more than 30 minutes occasionally, some may hardly ever write long emails, but do view websites with long pages to read that keeps you on the same page (without linking anywhere else) as your most frequent activity. Some of you may be getting these interruptions when you are editing homepages, because it takes you longer than 15-30 minutes, and you are not linking anywhere else while you are doing your editing. Sometimes you may not be getting these interruptions for days, weeks, months even, because you are not engaging in these types of online activities that trigger the disconnects for that period of time. This would explain the frequency or infrequency of these disconnections for each individual user. 13: Many of you have been told that these disconnections may be due to telephone line "noise" in your residence phone line wiring. Please be aware that I am not concluding here that telephone line "noise" in not "possibly" also causing some of these disconnections. But it is my own gut feeling that the ISP "timeouts" are the MAJOR cause of these interruptions. Try the experiments and see for yourself, and draw your own conclusions. 14: I would like to recommend to all of your experiencing this problem to take the following steps to identify the cause of your individual disconnect problems. 1: Before you try ANYTHING try the suggested experiments described above . Even if you get the same results as I did, do not presume that it is the ONLY cause. Try step 2. 2: have the phone company check your lines from their central office (they will not have to come to your home to do this, as of yet). If they find "noise" in your phone lines, "static" let's say, they will then have to come to your home to check your outside tel. lines. If they find no noise in those lines, (but they did at the central office) they will then have to check your inside telephone wiring. If no line noise is found there (if they do find the problem you can then correct it) then you can safely bet that the local ISP timeouts is the main cause of the disconnect problem you are having. 3: also ask the phone company what modem speeds your voice telephone line (as opposed to a "data" tel. line) are capable of handling. Webtv box uses "up to" 33.6bps modem speeds. Sometimes the speed of the modem connection is operating at less than that speed. (The phone company, in my case, said that my voice tel. line are near perfect for data transmission, after which I concluded, as did the phone co. technician, AND the engineer at Webtv, that line noise was not the cause of my particular disconnection problem.). 4: some of you have tried EMI and RF filters on your phone lines - some reporting that they "never" got these interruptions again; some saying they started all over again a few days or weeks later. for your information, an EMI filter (electromagnetic interference) may be useful to prevent interference like when you turn on an air conditioner while you are connected to Webtv. An EMI filter may help prevent any problem that may be causing, but I doubt if it DOES ANYTHING to eliminate the disconnection problem. Likewise, and RF filter (radio frequency interference), like if you are hearing radio stations when on the phone, or over your tv speakers. Try it, if that has been your experience. 5: Surge suppressors, protectors: the Webtv boxes have surge protectors already built in to them, but who is to say that these built in surge protectors are functioning properly? Enough said! 15: I am now going to introduce to you a letter I received from a webtv engineer just this past Thursday, May 8th. On that day I had called a Webtv rep with whom I correspond and talk to frequently. I told this rep what I had learned through the survey responses, my research and digging, and my experiments. I asked her not to pass this on to the engineers as of yet because I wanted all of you to do these experiments first, to bolster my theory, and not just have the engineer think that it was I alone who had "confirmed" my theory. I can't be sure, but I suspect that this rep DID tell the engineer about my "discoveries" because that same day I received the following letter from the engineer. See his letter HERE:, and then return to this page to hear "my side of the story". 16: As you saw, if you have already read the engineers letter, is that he refers to having spoken with the phone company technician that was at my home, and they concluded that my lines were "within tolerances" for a voice line "data" transmission. He then says that "he took the liberty" to monitor my lines over "the last few days" and found only ONE "carrier loss" (which means he saw only one disconnect of my line while I was online, in the last few days). He says that a "carrier loss" reflects not only legitimate incoming phone calls, but also the disconnection kind when there is no call coming in. I can tell you with absolute certainty, that in those "last few days" I had received at least 10 real phone calls, in addition to at least 10 other false call waiting interruptions I had when I was doing my experiments. Whatever his methods of monitoring my connection, it was obviously not even close to being correct. I have since spoken to the engineer who wrote that letter, and he does not know why his monitoring of my connection only produced ONE "carrier loss", in view of what I told him as stated above. 17: He then says that he and "others" at Webtv "talked it over" and based on "previous conversations" (with ME?). THEY NOW BELIEVE I AM EXPERIENCING THESE INTERRUPTIONS BECAUSE OF THE LOCAL ISP'S TIMEOUTS. I can tell you that in all my many conversations withthis engineer, as well as the head engineer, we NEVER, EVER even touched on the fact that the local ISP had these types of "timeouts" in place, or the fact that I was experiencing these interruptions during writing emails of 30 minutes or more duration, or that I ever told him I was getting these interruptions "every 30 minutes". he did not know that "fact" until I told the Webtv rep all about my discoveries, that same afternoon as his letter to me. "NOTE: he now says that they are indeed giving me credit for this "discovery". I think I deserve it, pardon my lack of humility, here! And I will eat my Webtv box if this "theory" of mine turns out to NOT show that this is, in fact, the MAJOR cause of this problem for ALL of you as well. 18: I now believe, after talking to the engineer, that the Webtv engineers never really considered that the local ISP timeouts may possibly be the cause of the "mysterious" 'false CALL WAITING interruptions" problem. It took little ol' me, a webtv user with absolutely no computer knowledge, to analyze this problem (almost to death!) until I finally came up with the MOST LIKELY cause of this problem. (or, perhaps, what MAY turn out to be the major cause. I will exercise at least a little "healthy self-doubt" here, ok?) But, in my opinion, the engineers, who have so brilliantly presented this wonderful product to us, were certainly not exercising their full creative abilities on this issue, to find the cause. And to that I say this: "It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows", Epictetus. I don't know who "Epictetus" is, but that little piece of wisdom was sent to me in an e-mail the same day I started writing this announcement, and I thought it applied very well here. It has been SIX MONTHS now, that we have been enduring these annoying disconnecting problems. 19: In his letter he also states that they can do nothing about these timed disconnections because they are needed for a good reason (I agree), and it is Webtv's POLICY not to override these timeouts by the ISP's. He then states that they can do nothing further to help me with this problem. But please be aware that this particular engineer does not have the last word on Webtv policy. It remains to be seen what Webtv can and will do about it. In my next letter to them, I will propose various solutions, that I do not know will work or not work, to alleviate the problem, or whether my proposed "fixes" will be possible from a technical or "policy" standpoint. SUGGESTIONS from other users may very well be useful here, so if you have any, please write to me and I will pass it along to the engineers. 20: Now I say this to all of you: If you find it acceptable that these "timeouts" during very legitimate "activities" of writing email, or viewing a long website, or editing a homepage, SHOULD be interpreted by the Webtv box as legitimate periods of "inactivity" (because we are not loading or linking anywhere else during that time online) then you will have to decide if you feel you can live with the disconnections you get. If you feel this should not be considered an "inactive" activity, then it is up to you to take it up with Webtv, and object to their "policy". 21: To conclude: all of the above is my opinion (although I am not alone in this opinion) and analysis of the interruptions problem. Please take it for whatever it is worth to you. Do the experiments, if you wish, and if you do, and find the same results as did I, or even find different results, I wold very much like to hear from you, and would appreciate it if you would write to me about what you have discovered in your own situation. But at thispoint, I really want to wash my hands of the whole affair, and say I gave it my best shot--which is, I feel, alot more than the engineers at Webtv have done. 22: I must end here, but if you wish, after doing the experiments and finding that you get disconnected in 30 minute intervals while doing ANY activity on Webtv, please let me know and I will send you a tip on how to possibly avoid the interruptions before the 30 minute limit. Thank you for taking the time to read this very long announcement, and if you any questions, please feel free to write me at marionrose3@webtv.net, any time. Thank you, Marion Rose (just another webtv user).

View Guestbook
Please Sign Guestbook
width=30