Get your own Free Home Page
Fido-UFO / Date: 22 Sep 95 10:05:06 To: Michael D.
Sweet Sixteen
Subj: Pyramidiocy - Nasca, Baalbek, Coral Castle.
-=> Quoting Michael Danehy to JM <=- -=> Quoting Jiri M to All <=-JM> Why do so many dwell
on the idea that Nasca stands or
falls on
the local spaceport hypothesis. The length of the perfectly
straight lines would
indicate to me that fast orbiting vehicles could
take good
bearings from these to other places all over our planet....
MD> "What does God need of a starship?"
Dunno. To be a mote in God's eye?
MD> "What do advanced aliens need of a spaceport?"
Let's see what you have to say. By me, a first
class spaceport requires a bar
with genuine Czech beer, made in Pilsen and Budweiss.
(V V)<-<cheers>
MD> The skeptics, of course,
consider the "spaceport" theory to be
ridiculous. It is _the
believers_ who have suggested that "Well gee,
those Nasca lines
are probably spaceports!", but luckily the skepti-
bunkers are right here
to point out the obvious inconsistency and
laugh.
In my opinion, it's the skeptics, who always return
to this fallacy.
Every day, they celebrate a new anniversary of
their victory in the
battle of Daniken's 'alien spaceport' at Nasca.
How out of date...
My work has imbued the figures with new magic.
You've seen the gifs.
MD> If that old USAF handbook
is correct and the UFOs of today are
the mythical
"fireballs" and "flaming chariots" of ancient times -- as most
ancient astronaut
proponents sincerely believe -- then surely the B.C.
aliens would have landed
and flown back to their mothership at will.
No spaceports needed.
This is your Arbitrary version of what the aliens
were like. For the sake
of arbitrariness, neither did they need any motherships.
You conferred
a commuter status upon them. But, why should
they be commuters?
Are you a commuter? That explains it.
MD> Yet, the believers are
so quick to alienize _every_ extraordinary thing (eg. pyramids,
wheels within wheels, big
monkeys, etc...) that they lose all judgement. Incredible.
JM_ The length of the perfectly
straight lines would indicate to me
that fast orbiting
vehicles could take good bearings from these to
other places all over our
planet.
MD> I give you credit. This is certainly a more rational theory than that silly "spaceport" nonsense.
Actually, even slow moving archaeologists might
be able to take
good bearings from these to other places all
over our planet...
JM> Such as BAALBEK!
JM> The Baalbek Terrace
in Lebanon, made of record setting stone
JM> blocks weighing
around a thousand tons each could easily
JM> support a ten million
ton mothership transporting
beef to
JM> the planet Serius.
MD> It could support the
two huge turtles that lifted up the world for all I care! ...
And I don't care very much!
Such a marvel - and you don't care? Where has your usual curiosity gone?
MD> Where is the evidence that alien super-beings lifted those stone blocks?
Right there, of course. And it won't go away,
either. Perhaps,
the stone movers were alien, perhaps they were
Atlantean.
Perhaps, the Atlanteans had their technology
from aliens,
perhaps not. But Somebody had moved those blocks!
We know that all the world's debunkers tethered
together to
the stone known as Hadjar el Gouble, still couldn't
move it by
Low-Tech. Conclusion: It was moved by some kind
of High-Tech.
Right?
MD> If aliens did lift those blocks then how?
Help me categorize and solve the ancient pictorial-geometrical
time
capsules, which are unsolved on our hands, and
we may learn the
method. I think that the message Is there.
MD> Take a look at the past megalithic accomplishments of man: MD> The Pyramids, Stonehenge,
Corral Castle...
Yeh, and Sacsayhuaman, Macchu Picchu, Tiahuanaco,
etc. Isn't it
funny by the standards of linearly primitive
darwinism that the further
we go back, the bigger the stone blocks get?
Is this not inside out?
Re: Coral Castle. - "Edward Leedskalnin, I presume".
And how many
Aliens working with him silently, all night long?
<Grin> A ninety-pound
man. You know the story... My wrinkle is that
when querried as to how
he accomplished his incredible feats, he said:
"I did it for my sweet sixteen".
Everybody thinks that he meant his nostalgic love,
a girl who would
always be sixteen in his memory.. * Yet,
16 happens to give the first
two digits of the Phi-ratio, (also Divine Proportion,
Golden Section,
Golden Mean.) The Pythagoreans called it simply
the Section. This ratio
is also the principle behind the five-pointed
star, a naturally magical form,
which BTW, the satanists are trying to have to
thems- elves, so demonstrably,
but which is manifestly the sweet' organizing
principle of so much life around
us, and in us. As such, it must belong to God
the Creator, rather than Satan
the Destroyer. Sorry, for this over-reaction
to your quip, religion is off topic
here [Fidonet-UFO].
In memory of Leedskalnin, a good man, I call
the Phi-ratio - the Sweet Sixteen...
(At least this one time) Leedskalnin harnessed
the full potential of this sweet,
somehow. At least - that is the clue he gives.
Can you see it that way?
The same clue that the Knights Templar indicate
in their constructions re:
the Holy Grail - the San Greal - the Golden Fleece.
The center of the Templars'
activities was Chateau Rennes, located in the
same area of France, as La Marche
with its 14,000 years old Science-Art exploits
on the Phi-ratio, or Sweet-Sixteen...
Hmm, quite a coincidence, wouldn't U say? (!!!)
Anyway, the question to
Leedskalnin was How - not - Whom for. But he
had to make his answer a riddle,
so he said: For his sweet...
Naturally, to him it was a holy (sweet) symbol of all Goodness.
- I did it for my "Sweet" Sixteen
I did it for my "Mean" Sixteen
I did it for my "Sweet Mean"?
I did it for my Golden Mean? .... (Phi-ratio = 1.6 ***etc.)
(chorus) - Oh, mah Sweet Sixteen