
The Unknown Hero
He who walked a hundred yards in silence...
With a single act of defiance, a lone Chinese hero revived the world's image of courage.
Almost nobody knew his name. Nobody
outside his immediate neighborhood had
read his words or heard him speak. Nobody
knows what happened to him even one hour
after his moment in the world's living rooms.
But the man who stood before a column of
tanks near Tiananmen Square--June 5,
1989--may have impressed his image on
the global memory more vividly, more
intimately than even Sun Yat-sen did.
Almost certainly he was seen in his
moment of self-transcendence by more
people than ever laid eyes on Winston
Churchill, Albert Einstein and James Joyce
combined.
The meaning of his moment--it was no more
than that--was instantly decipherable in any
tongue, to any age: even the billions who
cannot read and those who have never
heard of Mao Zedong could follow what the
"tank man" did. A small, unexceptional
figure in slacks and white shirt, carrying
what looks to be his shopping, posts
himself before an approaching tank, with a
line of 17 more tanks behind it. The tank
swerves right; he, to block it, moves left.
The tank swerves left; he moves right. Then
this anonymous bystander clambers up
onto the vehicle of war and says something
to its driver, which comes down to us as:
"Why are you here? My city is in chaos
because of you." One lone Everyman
standing up to machinery, to force, to all
the massed weight of the People's
Republic--the largest nation in the world,
comprising more than 1 billion people--while
its all powerful leaders remain, as ever, in
hiding somewhere within the bowels of the
Great Hall of the People.
Occasionally, unexpectedly, history consents to
disguise itself as allegory, and China, which
traffics in grand impersonals, has often led the
world in mass-producing symbols in block
capitals. The man who defied the tank was
standing, as it happens, on the Avenue of Eternal
Peace, just a minute away from the Gate of
Heavenly Peace, which leads into the Forbidden
City. Nearby Tiananmen Square--the very heart of
the Middle Kingdom, where students had
demonstrated in 1919; where Mao had
proclaimed a "People's Republic" in 1949 on
behalf of the Chinese people who had "stood up";
and where leaders customarily inspect their
People's Liberation Army troops--is a virtual
monument to People Power in the abstract. Its
western edge is taken up by the Great Hall of the
People. Its eastern side is dominated by the
Museum of Chinese Revolution. The Mao Zedong
mausoleum swallows up its southern face.
For seven weeks, though, in the late spring of
1989--the modern year of revolutions--the
Chinese people took back the square, first a few
workers and students and teachers and soldiers,
then more and more, until more than 1 million
had assembled there. They set up, in the heart of
the ancient nation, their own world within the
world, complete with a daily newspaper, a
broadcasting tent, even a 30-ft. plaster-covered
statue they called the "Goddess of Democracy."
Their "conference hall" was a Kentucky Fried
Chicken parlor on the southwest corner of the
square, and their spokesmen were 3,000 hunger
strikers who spilled all over the central
Monument to the People's Heroes. The
unofficials even took over, and reversed, the
formal symbolism of the government's ritual
pageantry: when Mikhail Gorbachev came to the
Great Hall of the People for a grand state
banquet during the demonstrations--the first visit
by a Soviet leader in 30 years--he had to steal in
by the back door.
Then, in the dark early hours of June 4, the
government struck back, sending tanks from all
directions toward Tiananmen Square and killing
hundreds of workers and students and doctors
and children, many later found shot in the back.
In the unnatural quiet after the massacre, with
the six-lane streets eerily empty and a
burned-out bus along the road, it fell to the tank
man to serve as the last great defender of the
peace, an Unknown Soldier in the struggle for
human rights.
As soon as the man had descended from the
tank, anxious onlookers pulled him to safety, and
the waters of anonymity closed around him once
more. Some people said he was called Wang
Weilin, was 19 years old and a student; others
said not even that much could be confirmed.
Some said he was a factory worker's son, others
that he looked like a provincial just arrived in the
capital by train. When American newsmen asked
Chinese leader Jiang Zemin a year later what had
happened to the symbol of Chinese
freedom--caught by foreign cameramen and
broadcast around the world--he replied, not very
ringingly, "I think never killed."
In fact, the image of the man before the tank
simplified--even distorted--as many complex
truths as any image does. The students leading
the demonstrations were not always peace loving
and notoriously bickered among themselves;
many were moved by needs less lofty than pure
freedom. At least seven retired generals had
written to the People's Daily opposing the
imposition of martial law, and many of the
soldiers sent to put down the demonstrators
were surely as young, as confused and as
uncommitted to aggression as many of the
students were. As one of the pro-democracy
movement's leaders said, the heroes of the tank
picture are two: the unknown figure who risked
his life by standing in front of the juggernaut and
the driver who rose to the moral challenge by
refusing to mow down his compatriot.
Nine years after the June 4 incident, moreover,
it's unclear how much the agitators for
democracy actually achieved. Li Peng, who
oversaw the crackdown on them, is still near the
top of China's hierarchy. Jiang, who proved his
colors by coming down hard on demonstrators in
Shanghai, is now the country's President. And
on a bright winter morning, Tiananmen Square is
still filled, as it was then, with bird-faced kites
and peasants from the countryside lining up to
have their photos taken amid the monuments to
Mao.
Yet for all the qualifications, the man who stood
before the tanks reminded us that the conviction
of the young can generate a courage that their
elders sometimes lack. And, like student rebels
everywhere, he stood up against the very Great
Man of History theory. In China in particular, a
Celestial Empire that has often seemed to be
ruled by committee, a "mandate of Heaven"
consecrated to the might of the collective, the
individual has sometimes been seen as hardly
more than a work unit in some impersonal
equation. A "small number" were killed, Mao
once said of the death of 70,000, and in his
Great Leap Forward, at least 20 million more
were sacrificed to a leader's theories. In that
context, the man before the tank seems almost
a counter-Mao, daring to act as the
common-man hero tirelessly promoted by
propaganda and serving as a rebuke--or asterisk,
at least--to the leaders and revolutionaries who
share these pages.
More than a third of a century ago, before anyone
had ever heard of videotapes or the World Wide
Web or 24-hour TV news stations, Daniel
Boorstin, in his uncannily prescient book The
Image, described how, as we move deeper into
what he called the Graphic Revolution,
technology would threaten to diminish us. Ideas,
even ideals, would be reduced to the level of
images, he argued, and faith itself might be
simplified into credulity. "Two centuries ago,
when a great man appeared," the historian wrote,
"people looked for God's purpose in him; today
we look for his press agent."
The hero--so ran Boorstin's prophecy--was being
replaced by the celebrity, and where once our
leaders seemed grander versions of ourselves,
now they just looked like us on a giant screen.
Nowadays, as we read about the purported
telephone messages of a sitting President and
listen to the future King of England whisper to his
mistress, the power of technology not just to
dehumanize but to demystify seems 30 times
stronger than even Boorstin predicted.
But the man with the tank showed us another
face, so to speak, of the camera and gave us an
instance in which the image did not cut humanity
down to size but elevated and affirmed it, serving
as an instrument for democracy and justice.
Instead of making the lofty trivial, as it so often
seems to do, the image made the passing
eternal and assisted in the resistance of an
airbrushed history written by the winners.
Technology, which can so often implement
violence or oppression, can also give a nobody a
voice and play havoc with power's vertical
divisions by making a gesture speak a thousand
words. The entire Tiananmen uprising, in fact,
was a subversion underwritten by machines,
which obey no government and observe no
borders: the protesters got around official
restrictions by communicating with friends
abroad via fax; they followed their own
progress--unrecorded on Chinese TV--by
watching themselves on foreigners' satellite sets
in the Beijing Hotel; and in subsequent years
they have used the Internet--and their Western
training--to claim and disseminate an economic
freedom they could not get politically.
The second half of the century now ending has
been shadowed by one overwhelming,
ungovernable thought: that the moods, even the
whims, of a single individual, post-Oppenheimer,
could destroy much of the globe in a moment.
Yet the image of the man before the tank stands
for the other side of that dark truth: that in a
world ever more connected, the actions of a
regular individual can light up the whole globe in
an instant. And for centuries the walls of the
grand palaces and castles of the Old World have
been filled with ceremonial and often highly
flattering pictures of noblemen and bewigged
women looking out toward the posterity they
hope to shape.
But nowadays, in the video archives of the
memory, playing in eternal rerun, are many new
faces, unknown, that remind us how much
history is made at the service entrance by people
lopped out of the official photographs or working
in obscurity to fashion our latest instruments and
cures. In a century in which so many tried to
impress their monogram on history, often in
blood red, the man with the tank--Wang Weilin,
or whoever--stands for the forces of the unnamed:
the Unknown Soldier of a new Republic of the
Image.
Links to other sites on the Web
Return to Front Page
If anyone has Tienanmen Square links, please contact me.
© 1997 wendyt@ucla.edu
This page hosted by
Get your own Free Home Page