....talking points....

"Education makes people easy to lead, but difficult to drive; easy to govern, but impossible to enslave."
....Henry Brougham

1---->Why didn't the Association attend the School Board bargaining forum?
The Association believes that the bargaining should take place as outlined in the Bargaining law - in private at the call of the mediator.
The Association is anxious to settle this dispute and will attend any and all meetings called by the mediator.
We believe attendance would have been counterproductive because of devisive posturing.
2---->Has this type of public forum been utilized elsewhere?
Yes, in fact, in Philadelphia appoximately twenty-five years ago the PFT and the school board bargained on television. It was a fiasco marked by posturing and grandstanding. Nothing productive occurred.
The Association finds it ironic that our School Board wants openness but excluded their own members from past bargaining sessions.
3---->What has the Association done to control health costs?
For three years the Association has presented and supported information concerning Health Care Consortiums to the District. These consortiums have saved up to $1800 per year per teacher in other districts. The Health Care savings could have been $1,296,000 over the three-year period. The Board rejected our offer. Currently this same plan is being explored in Luzerne County.
4---->What else has the Association done relative to health care costs?
The Association offered the District a Benefit Cost Reduction of $79,000 five years ago. The savings to taxpayers would have been $395,000. The Board rejected our offer.
The Association saved the District $12,826.92 annually by converting to a new Vision Program. These savings were also rejected five years ago at a loss of $64,134.60 to the District.
The Association has proposed a committee to study the issue of Health Care. There has been no response from the District.
5---->What has been the economic impact on the District due to attrition, state funding increases, the reduction in state retirement system payments, and other factors?
The District had apporximately $922.230 in attritional savings since 1992. Attritional savings occur when teachers at the top of the scale retire and are replaced by teachers at a lower salary. These attritional savings continue to accrue.
The District received state funding increases of $128,581 for the 1998-1999 school year.
The District has saved $254,322.08 in state retirement contributions over the past two school years, with another large savings to be realized for the 1998-1999 school year.
6---->How does the current Abington Heights benefit package compare to other districts in NEIU#19?
There are twenty districts in NEIU#19. Of those twenty, two districts have $250 deductible because they are community rated (less than seventy-five members.) They are Old Forge and Forest City. Two other locals have $250 deductibles. They are Lakeland and Valley View. One district, Susquehanna, has a $50 deductible.
7---->What effect does labor unrest have on a school district's hiring practices?
Demographic information tells us newly graduated teaching candidates look for districts without a history of labor unrest, excellent contracts and one which provides for their involvement in the decision making process.
Good contracts attract and maintain the best teachers and sustain those already in service.
Abington Heights has lost at least ten teahcers who had taught in our district and left because of labor unrest.

This is not about money. Money is the excuse.




[Home]
[nea/psea]
[info index]
[publications]
[psea affiliates]
[kids' stuff]
[college info]
[media]
[resources]
[gov't e-mail]
[chapter 4]
[preserve public ed]
[community relations]
[humor]
[stress management]
[ADD/ADHD]
[safe schools]
[new teacher info]
© 2001,2002,2003
All rights reserved

Send Your Comments




This page hosted by 
Get your own Free Home Page

