The Adam Yauch Interview
by David Peisner

The Beastie Boys are a cultural force. Ever since the release of Licensed to Ill back in 1986, they have been changing the landscape of hip-hop, rock and pop culture in general with nearly every move they make. Though they began as three Jewish kids from Long Island, Adam "MCA" Yauch's embrace of Tibetan Buddhism led to their spearheading of the Tibetan Freedom Festivals, which began in 1996, and have run each summer since then. It's also spawned Free Tibet, a feature-length movie which documents the first concert and the cause. Their latest album, Hello Nasty, finds Yauch and his partners-in-rhyme Adam "Ad-Rock" Horovitz and Mike "D" Diamond, incorporating their newfound spiritual beliefs into their pollywog stew of hip-hop, funk, rock, and pop. Yauch took a few minutes before going on stage recently to talk about the Tibetan cause, their new album, and how the two are effecting each other.

How'd you first get involved with the Tibetan cause?

I met some Tibetan refugees that had just escaped from Tibet and they told me a bit about what was going on there and I was pretty moved by it and it stayed with me. And I took the time to continue learning about it and after that just learned more and more about it.

How'd the idea for the first Tibetan Freedom Concert germinate?

The idea of doing a concert for Tibet is one that's been floating around for a long time. And it was just something that we were close enough to the music business and to other bands to actually pull together.

How difficult was it to make the first show happen?

We mainly asked a lot of bands that we already knew from touring. Basically all the bands that are on there are bands that we know from around or that we've toured with. Then more and more, as it started getting more of a positive reputation as a good event, other bands were interested in being a part of it that we didn't know as well.

From the outside looking in, it seems like the music community, starting with the other Beastie Boys and extending outward, really embraced the Tibetan cause pretty quickly. But when you first got interested and started telling people the idea for the Concert, was there a certain amount of resistance to it?

Well, I mean I've had a lot of resistance, myself, to causes and to people touting causes, so I've tried to handle putting it forward in as subtle a way as possible. I think that I've found good documentaries about it and shown people documentaries if they were interested and tried to kind of pass it on like that.

You said that you've been resistant to causes and touting causes in the past, what broke down your resistance in this case?

It's probably meeting those people first hand. Actually being in Nepal and meeting these refugees that had just escaped. A lot of them were like young people, teenagers and young kids who were in their twenties or thirties. Some were old people. There were about 30 people travelling together who had just come over the Himalayas wearing sneakers and wearing like four pairs of pants on top of each other and a bunch of shirts and windbreakers, and kind of keeping their hands inside their jackets and climbing these snow covered passes. I think I was just really moved by meeting them.

They were talking about not going back home until Tibet was free and I think the idea of just leaving home struck me really strongly. Then the more I learned about it, the more I learned about the nonviolence, that's what probably kept me interested and working on it, because I think that the lesson of nonviolence is something the rest of the world needs so badly. We're all in desperate need of that. By working on this and getting more people to work on it we're really working on things that are going to help our own society and the rest of the world.

At one point did you guys decide that you were going to make a feature film about that first concert and about the cause in general?

I guess as the concert started coming together it just seemed really exciting and it seemed like something that should be documented. Also [it was] a way that we could spread the work we were trying to do a bit further. We could document it and then it could be used for educational purposes, either theatrically or in schools or whatever. It just seemed like a good idea.

The film, in addition to showing the activism it inspired, also showed examples of the apathy and cynicism that was undoubtedly present as well. Was this a conscious decision?

Yeah, definitely.

What was the motivation behind it?

We were kind of trying to be honest about it. Just to kind of give a feel of what the day was like. And that was definitely a part of it so we wanted to show that.

Does the apathy and the cynicism discourage you?

When we were on the Lollapalooza tour in `93, we helped to bring the [Tibetan] monks out there. [We'd] bring nine monks out on the tour who would go up and do opening prayers for Lollapalooza and then kind of walk around and give out pamphlets. And one day, people were being pretty disrespectful to the monks, throwing stuff on stage at them, and somebody asked one of the monks, "Is this worth it? Wouldn't you rather be at home in Dharamsala [the town in Northern India that is the seat of the Tibetan government-in-exile]? What do you think about being out here on tour?" And the monk said, "If one person gains something from us being on this entire tour than it's all totally worth it." And that's kind of always stayed in my head. Not everybody's gonna gain something out of it but certainly some people are.

That kind of leads into my next question. What do you think the Tibetan Freedom Concerts have accomplished thus far?

Umm, I don't know exactly. I don't know how to....(Silence)

Do you feel they have accomplished something tangible?

Yeah. I think they've definitely helped to start to connect these two worlds for young people--to start to learn about Tibet and for a lot of young people to get involved in helping them. I think that through helping we're learning a lot of lessons that we're in desperate need of. I think that if we continue the path that we're on -- if we continue to fire missiles at people and to produce things that don't biodegrade and on and on -- if we continue on the path of selfishness that we're on then we're bound to really to do some serious destruction to ourselves. If we keep stockpiling weapons and keep thinking of violence as a means to resolve conflict than I think we're headed for some real problems.

So I think a lot of people are starting to learn about nonviolence and are starting to see that violence isn't really a feasible alternative to change. This example is perfect of what's going on right now. We think that we are retaliating, that we're teaching the Middle East a lesson by firing missiles at them and there's no way that that's going to lead to anything but more violence. It's clear to me that if we think that we're resolving something by retaliating, that chances are, there are people in the Middle East that are going to think that they're resolving something by retaliating. And it's just going to continue to escalate for years. I mean what do we do if somebody decides to blow up a nuclear weapon in the middle of New York City? How do we retaliate to that? There's no solution. In this modern age that we live in, with the weapons that exist now, there's no useful progress through retaliation. I mean, perhaps through economic sanctions or some sort of retaliatory action like that, but it has to be nonviolent because hatred just breeds more hatred and compassion is the only thing that resolves hatred. So hopefully some of those messages are coming across through the film.

One of the more interesting things that I've thought about the most recent missile strikes is that no one, not government officials, not the media, no one, has suggested that these missile strikes will be the end of it. They know that it is only going to spur on more attacks.

It's completely insane. The only thing that it can possibly do is make people more angry and lead to more violence. It definitely makes the film even more relevant.

I was reading the New York Times today and they had a review of your show in New York over the weekend and it mentioned that the audience had booed when you had made an apology to Muslims in light of the attacks. Was that accurate and if so, was it discouraging?

Yeah, it's accurate. I don't know how many of the people in the audience booed because most of my friends all came up to me afterwards and said they were really moved by what I had to say, and I think a lot of the people were, but there were a handful of people -- at least a good ten percent -- in there were booing because you could hear it. (Laughs) But I think maybe people misunderstood what I was saying, and maybe it was my choice of words but what I was trying to put across was that there's a lot of racism that comes from Americans towards Muslim people and Middle Eastern people.

We've kind of painted them, at this point, into the enemy, in a very generalized way, just as we used to do with the Russians a few years ago. And there's just this kind of general racism coming from America and I was trying to bring up that point and apologize for that to people of that ethnicity and people from that part of the world. And maybe it was a poor choice of words on my part but that was the sentiment. The reason that I'm saying it might have been a poor choice of words is because I did say almost the same thing the night before at another concert and almost the same thing the night after, and neither time did people boo. It was just at the Garden. I might have just kind of timed what I said a little bit weird and I think it came across like I was somehow pro-terrorism or something. (Laughs)

Do you think your spiritual beliefs and your political activism has changed your relationship with Adam and Mike?

Well, that's a little bit of an oversimplification in the premise of the question because I think the way that I would look at it is that everybody is evolving all the time as people, constantly. So I think that anything that anyone comes in contact with, probably effects all of their relations, and all their relationships with everyone they know. But yeah, I definitely think so. But I don't think negatively at all.

I guess what I'm getting at is it seemed in the days of Licensed to Ill, that you were all always on the same page. There seemed to be a lot of similar sentiments coming from all of you. Undoubtedly now, you've all carved out more individual identities and personalities. Do you think the way that you guys have evolved has affected the band and the music that you make now?

Well, I think the individuality thing, that's something that the media has been focusing on more, which has actually been a little bit strange to me because the three of us are really close friends and have been for a long time. And it's kind of like we've been out of the light of the media for the last few years and have spent a lot of time just hanging out together working on music and then all of a sudden to be thrown back into the middle of it and to have all these people writing all these things is definitely a little bit bizarre. Because I don't think we're as different or as one-sided as those three different caricatures are kind of portrayed. But I think we've all learned a tremendous amount since Licensed to Ill and are all kind of more aware of what we're saying and what we're doing. You might take note of the song on this last record, "Song For The Man," in which Adam [Horovitz] is going out of his way to talk about men being disrespectful of women.

Well, that's another thing worth bringing up. The three of you have made such a radical change in your world views from the Licensed to Ill days of writing songs like "Girls." Do you guys look back on those Licensed to Ill days and sort of cringe a little bit?

Kind of. I would say yes to cringe but not so much wishing that it hadn't have happened because I think that we all learned from that. So you can't wish that you didn't go through it because then you wouldn't have learned whatever you learned. So yeah, cringe, but so be it.

Well, do you guys have a hard time performing a lot of that stuff? I mean, obviously a lot of those cringe-worthy songs are still fan favorites.

There's only a couple of songs from that first album that we still even perform.

But do you find it tough to perform the old stuff you do play? I mean even some of the stuff on Paul's Boutique like, "Shake Your Rump," might fall into that same category?

Yeah, well, most of the songs that we do from Paul's Boutique and Licensed to Ill are ones that we feel comfortable with the lyrics or ones where we've changed the lyrics that we didn't feel that comfortable with. It's not perfect, but we try to adjust the stuff to where we feel comfortable with it. And there's actually only a couple of songs from Paul's Boutique that we've been doing and only a couple from Licensed to Ill.

Do you feel like the tenets of Buddhism, in any way, contradict your role in the Beastie Boys or your role as a pop music figure, in general?

No, because I think it's been evolving. The band has evolved into whatever it is the three of us are interested in, so it's kind of a natural thing.

I guess I'm asking because it sounds on the new album, particularly on a couple of the tracks, like "I Don't Know," and "Flowin' Prose," that you're having a hard time reconciling your spirituality and your political beliefs with your position as a pop culture icon, and just with sort of playing hip-hop in general. Do you think that that's a fair assessment?

No, not at all. I would think that it's the other way around. The way that I feel about it is that if I'm on the air, if I'm getting that kind of attention, it's something that can be used towards a positive end. So I haven't felt strange about that at all. I'm surprised to hear you say that it comes across in the songs.

Part of it is that it seems....

Actually I have to go. We're on stage in a few minutes.

Oh. Do you have time for one more question?

Maybe if it's quick. Is there anything you want to know about the film?

Uhh. Not, well, uhh, ok. How was putting together a film different from putting together an album?

Umm. I mean it's actually pretty similar in a lot of ways because you just go in day after day and work on stuff. and just keep chipping away at it until forms into what you want it to be.

Were there things that came up that you couldn't have anticipated because it was you first time doing a film?

Well, I worked a bit on films in college and on videos. It's interesting when you combine music and dialogue and imagery you create a whole new kind of realm that's definitely kind of different from all of the elements individually. But I do think documentary film is one of the best ways to put things across in this time. It's just a really powerful way to put forward ideas.

David Peisner

BACK

Go to MCA's biography
See some MCA pics
Interested in learining about Tibet?


start/tibet/mca's sardine tin/news/photo shoot/melange/quotable mca/links/me/