No, seriously, can
        the Christian God get an erection? This is an important
        question. Why? Well, it will point us towards something
        of the true nature of the Christian God, if it exists,
        and maybe point us towards the way that Christians
        comprehend their non-existent Supreme Being.
        So, let's suspend
        our disbelief for a moment and have a quick ponder. 
        $
        SET DISBELIEF/STATE=OFF [RET]
        I have a penis, my
        next door neighbour and his son both have a penis (one
        each), and there's an almost 50/50 chance that you have a
        penis. And I'm sure that the strange looking woman I saw
        in the Little Chef on the A47 last week has some sort of
        a penis as well. We know from reading the Christian Bible
        that man is made in the image of God or Gods (Genesis 1:26),
        so it is quite evident that God does indeed have His own
        one-holed pink piccolo. If God is truly omnipresent (everywhere)
        then his Old Man - even in it's very limpest, most
        flaccid state - must be absolutely HUGE. It cannot be
        anything less than the most magnificent schlong in the
        whole universe. It is a third leg above all other third
        legs, probably the size of several dozen super-clusters
        of galaxies. Forget about all the other God's that are
        depicted with willeys (erect or otherwise), the Christian
        God's one-eyed trouser-snake really does make every one
        else's look depressingly microscopic. Goodness knows, his
        testicles alone must measure tens of thousands of light-years
        in diameter. Heck, one of His wrinkly, scrotal prune-skin
        crevices alone could quite easily swallow up several
        hundred solar systems! But for all the men out there who
        may be reading this, try not to get too depressed - God's
        post-elephantine todger is not made of any real substance,
        it can only be made of 'spirit' or some other such non-existent
        paranormal material. The same immeasurable stuff that God
        Himself is made of.
        
        I think that we
        can safely assume that God does not have a foreskin,
        because that would be a tad hypocritical of him wouldn't
        it? But who or what performed the surgery for His
        circumcision? Perhaps God just told His mammoth foreskin
        to disappear, and poof! off it went. We don't know, but
        we can say that if a knife was used it must have been
        terribly sharp. And big. Sharp enough to incise the
        unwanted dangly bit of the ultimate perfect being, and
        big enough to span the vast astronomical distances of the
        Godly prepuce.
        
        But getting back
        to the original question, can God get an erection? Can He
        pump up His volume? Can the Master of the Universe drag
        weed? Well, I don't think that He can, and I have several
        reasons as to why. Firstly, a penile erection is
        indicative of sexual excitement, and unless there is a
        Mrs. God in Heaven, Mr. God would not get aroused for the
        reason of opposite gender, marital rumpy-pumpy. Nowhere
        in the Bible does it say there is a companion Goddess.
        And next, as every man knows, John Thomas sometimes has a
        mind of his own, he stands to parade ground attention for
        no apparent reason at the most inconvenient of times,
        usually on an over-crowded tube train whilst wedged tight
        between a geriatric nun from Cardiff and a small group of
        Japanese tourist businessmen. But if God is the perfect
        being we are told of by the Christian clergy, this
        situation would not, could not happen to Him. 
        
        Young men
        understand the value of a secluded solo stiffy, but I
        think that we can easily dispose of the theory that God
        enjoys a "swift one off the wrist", for one
        thing He's far too old to still be indulging in a quick
        hand shandy. I doubt if there is one Christian on the
        planet who would assert that God indulges in the
        occasional bout of solo sexual action. Self-gratification
        in the company of Mrs. Palm and her five lovely daughters
        could not possibly enter God's pure mind. Anyway, where
        would He go to be alone? What would He use for visual
        stimulation? And as for the results of such a colossal
        Godly five-finger-shuffle, well it hardly bears thinking
        about, as would the cost of an almost infinite number of
        galaxy-sized sheets of bathroom tissue - over an almost
        infinite period of time.
        
        Ask several men if
        they have ever had a wet dream, some will say yes, and
        some will say no. The ones that say no are lying.
        Nocturnal emissions are a normal (and thankfully
        infrequent) part of the human male's unconscious bedtime
        life. But God, if he is aware of everyone and everything
        all the time does not go to sleep, so we can safely
        discount the overnight Divine astronomical tent pole. And
        the enormous wet patch that would seep outside the edge
        of the known universe, extinguishing several important
        proto-stars on it's inexorable glutinous journey.
        Is there any
        Viagra in Heaven? We will never know. But since God would
        not need any in the first place, the point is moot.
        A dysfunctional,
        permanently erect flesh-flute would not be possible for a
        perfect God. That is a rare, debilitating human condition.
        There is no reason
        to believe that God would use his monster sausage to
        expel fluid waste. He could not avail Himself of a wee-wee.
        How could God be perfect if He was capable of ejecting
        unwanted bodily fluids? He could not be capable of
        harbouring something that was not needed. Again, it would
        be an imperfection.
        $
        SET DISBELIEF/STATE=ON [RET]
        I have thought of
        some other reasons why the pretend Christian God would be
        unable to engender a massive portion of erectile tissue,
        but these are minor arguments. And I have already
        forgotten them anyway.
        So there we have
        it, the imaginary Christian God can not get an erection.
        His pork sword would have to be permanently limp. It is a
        humongous, useless appendage. But why should this be
        important? Well, the next time you are arguing against
        the existence of God with a Christian, just ask him or
        her if there is anything that their perfect god can not
        do. They always say no, because they cannot say otherwise
        if they believe in a perfect God. This time, instead of
        hitting them with the 'squaring the circle', 'creating a
        rock too heavy to lift' and 'iron chariot' arguments, go
        to it with the "Supreme Stiffy Is Not Possible
        Argument", courtesy of Martin J Burn - The English
        Atheist.
         
        
        This site has
        been awarded Sister Naincy's "Jesus Seal of Approval".
        
        sign the
        new Guestbook 
View the
        new Guestbook
         
        
        This
        page can also be read in Italian on this website.