Removing Your Integrated
Heat Spreader
By:
Haut^Karl |
Tuesday,
October 8, 2002 |
So your a mad overclocker and
you want to remove that Integrated Heat Spreader(IHS)
because it may drop your temperatures that few
degrees you need to gain perfect stability?
Not a bad idea if you have the skills to remove
the IHS and you have the correct type of heatsink.

"What? I'm gonna rip that
stupid thing off and slap my favorite heatsink
on there and I'm gonna be fine," says Bob
McHasty. Some people have tried this and have
put the IHS *back on* since they obtained strange
results and they chipped the corner off the
core. Let's take a look at why the above scenario
is a bad idea.
First, the IHS
is installed to "spread" the heat
generated by the core across a larger surface
area as fast as possible. McHasty's first problem
was that he did not take into account the IHS
is made of copper. Copper conducts heat about
2.5x better than aluminum. "But my Pentium3
doesn't have a heat spreader." That's because
the Pentium3 core has almost 28% more surface
area but only produces 12% more heat. The internal
design of these cpus has stayed roughly the
same but the process to "etch" them
into silicon has shrunk from 180nm to 130nm.
Unfortunately, the current consumed does not
shrink by the same ratio.
Processor |
Speed(GHz) |
Heat(in watts) |
Surface Area(mm2) |
Pentium3
EB 256k cache |
1.1 |
33.0 |
106 |
Pentium3 Tualatin 256k
cache |
1.13 |
29.1 |
~76 |
Pentium3 Tualatin 512k
cache |
1.13 |
28.7 |
79 |
Celeron Tualatin 256k
cache |
1.1 |
28.9 |
~76 |
Now, we have to dissipate marginally
less heat thru a significantly smaller junction.
Aluminum can no longer support a suitable junction
temperature for the cpu to operate normally.
The heat the cpu pumps into the aluminum heatsink
cannot dissipate fast enough. We have to resort
to copper to obtain the junction characteristics
we require.
So what does this mean? This
means that copper has to be the first material
the cpu pumps heat into. Intel chose to glue
the copper directly to the cpu in the form of
an IHS while AMD did the reverse. AMD provides
with its shrunk down Athlon XP an aluminum heatsink
with a copper base plate integrated into the
bottom of the heatsink.

So which method is better? We
believe the better performing method is to have
a copper base plate welded to the base of an
aluminum heatsink(Of course an all copper heatsink
would be ideal). For instance, the Thermalright
AX-7. This will reduce the number of weak
junctions to one. The thermal pad Intel uses
underneath the heatspreader is long-lasting,
easy to apply but performs worse than thermal
grease. The thermal pad plus the grease you
apply to your Tualeron makes 2 weak junctions
that hinder the dissipation of heat. This
email from Van's Hardware to Nevin House,
Artic Silver Inc illustrates what effect junction
size and thermal grease have on temperatures(Pay
attention to the blue text).
So that's the heatsink problem
out of the way. Second, the
IHS has thickness which when removed will reduce
the spring tension provided by the retaining
clip. Somewhere on Intel's site you can find
an article about thickness of thermal paste
& retention clip strength and their relationship
to conducting heat. If I recall correctly, 10
lbs of force was the recommended strength of
the clip. If you have a heatsink with a copper
base plate designed for a Pentium3 or AMD Athlon
then use it. Pentium3s, Athlons and Tualerons
without an IHS are similar thicknesses.
For some reason you have a heatsink
that doesn't provide enough pressure on the
cpu but you would like to use it. The quick
and easy way to overcome this is to pull apart
the heatsink and glue a shim underneath the
point where the clip pivots on the heatsink.
According to Intel's pdf, the IHS has a thickness
of 1.6mm. You can add a thicker shim for more
force or vice versa.
Lastly,
the Tualeron core is more fragile than
that of a Pentium3 so be careful not to
smash the corners off the core. Add some
foam/neoprene "dots" to the
4 corners of the cpu substrate to stabilize
the heatsink during installation and removal.
This funky foam shim can be purchased
from this
site.
An alternative would be
double sided foam tape. You can purchase
it at drug stores and art supply places.
Leave the non-adhesive paper on one side
of the tape and cut out 4 small squares.
Stick them on the corners of the cpu substrate
but *don't* remove the non-stick paper.
Otherwise your heatsink will be stuck
to the cpu with double stick tape! |
|
To remove the IHS from the cpu
substrate, you can pry it off or try some acetone(nail
polish). To pry it off, place a credit card
along the edge of the IHS in order to protect
the cpu substrate. Do not damage the substrate
as it conatins the microfine traces that connect
to the 370 pins underneath. Poke a corner of
a small screwdriver under the edge of the IHS
while resting on the credit card. Gently pry
the IHS upward a little. Rotate the cpu 90 degrees
and do the same thing. Keep prying then rotating
till the IHS falls off. Take your time and be
careful.
Use some decent thermal grease
as the poor quality silicone greases will seperate
leaving dry mud underneath your cpu and silicone
all over the top of your cpu. I have used Arctic
Silver III but I cannot say I noticed enough
of a difference to warrant paying $6 for 3 grams.
Stack 3 pennies on top of each other and that's
about the same volume of AS3 you will get.
We will provide some temperature
results when we are ready to permanently install
our Tualeron. No need risking a cracked corner
and dead cpu while we hack at some more slotkets.
If you put together some data before and after
you remove yours, send
it to us and we would be happy to add it to
this article.
DISCLAIMER:
These
mods will void your warranty. Do not attempt
any of these if you fear you will not
be successful.
We
accept no responsibility for your errors,
loss of hardware, software, data, or anything
else for that matter. |
|